Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content
RCH PHGKB

Specific PHGKB|Reproductive and Child Health PHGKB|Public Health Genomics and Precision Health Knowledge Base (PHGKB)
Effective August 1, 2024, this database was discontinued. All content will remain searchable and be preserved online for historical purposes only until 2029.

spot light Spotlight

Expanded Newborn Screening Using Genome Sequencing for Early Actionable Conditions

From the abstract: "What is the parental acceptance, feasibility, and screen-positive rate of targeted genome screening in newborns of different racial and ethnic groups? In this study of 4000 newborns, 72.0% of approached families consented to participate. Genome sequencing was successfully completed for 99.6% of participants. The screen-positive rate in a predefined gene panel was 3.7%. Targeted analysis of a predefined set of genes from genome sequencing for screening in a diverse newborn population is feasible and could expand the scope of newborn screening. "

The Path to Genomic Screening—Far From Simple, but the Journey Has Begun

From the article: "Today’s genomic technology introduces a multitude of assays that could be deployed in health care: diagnostic testing of patients with suspected monogenic conditions, polygenic risk prediction for common diseases, pharmacogenomic analysis for drug-gene interactions, analysis of tumors for targetable somatic sequence variations, and noninvasive screening for prenatal chromosomal disorders or occult cancer. Alongside these approaches we must also grapple with screening of the ostensibly healthy population for monogenic diseases of newborns, children, and adults with either targeted or genome-scale sequencing. "

Wilson and Jungner Revisited: Are Screening Criteria Fit for the 21st Century?

From the abstract: "This systematic review revealed a set of general limitations of the WJ criteria, such as imprecise terminology, lack of measurability and objectivity, missing pediatric focus, and absent guidance on program management. Furthermore, it unraveled specific aspects of criticism on clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and economical aspects. A major obstacle was found to be the incompletely understood natural history and phenotypic diversity of rare diseases prior to NBS implementation, resulting in uncertainty about case definition, risk stratification, and indications for treatment. This gap could be closed through the systematic collection and evaluation of real-world evidence on the quality, safety, and (cost-)effectiveness of NBS, as well as the long-term benefits experienced by screened individuals. "

Every baby deserves access to genetic screening

From the article: "Nation-wide genetic screening, available to all newborns, could in principle also be a tool to narrow the disparities that exist in today’s healthcare systems, providing to every family information about their baby’s health, regardless of socioeconomic and geographical factors. Designing genomics-based newborn screening programs that bring benefit equitably to the population is, however, an extremely complex task, also given the costs, and there is an urgent need to generate robust evidence on the potential benefits and harms of the approach, at the population level, before it can be implemented more widely. "


news Latest News and Publications
Challenges and opportunities of vaccination during pregnancy: perspectives of 20 healthcare professionals. External Web Site Icon
Razai Mohammad S, et al. Journal of public health policy 2025 0 0.
Social Internet Use by People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. External Web Site Icon
van Alem Johanna L L, et al. Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2025 0 0.
Rapid luminescence-based screening method for SARS- CoV-2 inhibitors discovery. External Web Site Icon
Madani Abdeldjalil, et al. SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D 2025 0 0. 100211
The Human Microglia Atlas (HuMicA) unravels changes in disease-associated microglia subsets across neurodegenerative conditions. External Web Site Icon
Martins-Ferreira Ricardo, et al. Nature communications 2025 0 0. (1) 739
COVID-19 in patients with Down syndrome: Characteristics of hospitalisation and disease progression compared to patients without Down syndrome. External Web Site Icon
Hofmann Verena, et al. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability 2025 0 0. (3) 353-361
Unveiling autism spectrum disorder in South East Asia through a public health Lens. External Web Site Icon
Kumar Alok, et al. Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry 2025 0 0. 1489269
Primary care research on hypertension: A bibliometric analysis using machine-learning. External Web Site Icon
Yasli Gökben, et al. Medicine 2025 0 0. (47) e40482
A β-Thalassemia Cell Biobank: Updates, Further Validation in Genetic and Therapeutic Research and Opportunities During (and After) the COVID-19 Pandemic. External Web Site Icon
Gambari Roberto, et al. Journal of clinical medicine 2025 0 0. (1)
Inpatient Hospitalizations for COVID-19 Among Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis. External Web Site Icon
Luccarelli James, et al. American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2025 0 0. e63980
Proficiency, Clarity, and Objectivity of Large Language Models Versus Specialists' Knowledge on COVID-19 Impacts in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. External Web Site Icon
Bragazzi Nicola, et al. JMIR formative research 2025 0 0.

More


Disclaimer: Articles listed in the Public Health Knowledge Base are selected by Public Health Genomics Branch to provide current awareness of the literature and news. Inclusion in the update does not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor does it imply endorsement of the article's methods or findings. CDC and DHHS assume no responsibility for the factual accuracy of the items presented. The selection, omission, or content of items does not imply any endorsement or other position taken by CDC or DHHS. Opinion, findings and conclusions expressed by the original authors of items included in the update, or persons quoted therein, are strictly their own and are in no way meant to represent the opinion or views of CDC or DHHS. References to publications, news sources, and non-CDC Websites are provided solely for informational purposes and do not imply endorsement by CDC or DHHS.

TOP