Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Main|Search|PHGKB
Search PHGKB:

Last Posted: Jul 31, 2024
spot light Highlights

Secondary ACMG and non-ACMG genetic findings in a multiethnic cohort of 16,713 pediatric participants

From the abstract: " We systematically identified pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants in established disease-causing genes, adhering to ACMG v3.2 secondary finding guidelines and beyond. For non-ACMG secondary findings, akin to incidental findings in clinical settings, we utilized a set of criteria focusing on pediatric onset, high penetrance, moderate to severe phenotypes, and the clinical actionability of the variants...Overall, variants of possible medical importance were found in 8.76% of participants in both ACMG (5.81%) and non-ACMG (2.95%) genes. "

A framework for the evaluation and reporting of incidental findings in clinical genomic testing
CM Brown et al, EJHG, April 2, 2024

From the abstract: "Herein we describe a framework developed to guide the evaluation and return of IFs encountered in probands undergoing clinical genome sequencing (cGS). The framework prioritizes clinical significance and actionability of IFs and follows a stepwise approach with stopping points at which IFs may be recommended for return or not. Over 18 months, implementation of the framework in a clinical laboratory facilitated the return of actionable IFs in 37 of 720 (5.1%) individuals referred for cGS. "


Disclaimer: Articles listed in the Public Health Genomics and Precision Health Knowledge Base are selected by the CDC Office of Public Health Genomics to provide current awareness of the literature and news. Inclusion in the update does not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor does it imply endorsement of the article's methods or findings. CDC and DHHS assume no responsibility for the factual accuracy of the items presented. The selection, omission, or content of items does not imply any endorsement or other position taken by CDC or DHHS. Opinion, findings and conclusions expressed by the original authors of items included in the update, or persons quoted therein, are strictly their own and are in no way meant to represent the opinion or views of CDC or DHHS. References to publications, news sources, and non-CDC Websites are provided solely for informational purposes and do not imply endorsement by CDC or DHHS.

TOP