Last data update: Apr 29, 2024. (Total: 46658 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 106 Records) |
Query Trace: Moro P [original query] |
---|
Assessment for antibodies to rifapentine and isoniazid in persons developing flu-like reactions during treatment of latent tuberculosis infection
Moro RN , Mehaffy C , De P , Phillips E , Borisov AS , Sterling TR , Dobos KM . J Infect Dis 2024 BACKGROUND: Flu-like reactions can occur after exposure to rifampin, rifapentine, or isoniazid. Prior studies have reported the presence of antibodies to rifampin, but associations with underlying pathogenesis are unclear. METHODS: We evaluated PREVENT TB study participants who received weekly isoniazid + rifapentine for 3 months (3HP) or daily isoniazid for 9 months (9H) as treatment for M. tuberculosis infection. Flu-like reaction was defined as a grade ≥2 of any of flu-like symptoms. Controls (3HP or 9H) did not report flu-like reactions. We developed a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to detect antibodies against rifapentine, isoniazid, rifampin, and rifapentine metabolite. RESULTS: Among 128 participants, 69 received 3HP (22 with flu-like reactions; 47 controls) and 59 received 9H (12 with flu-like reactions; 47 controls). In participants receiving 3HP, anti-rifapentine IgG was identified in 2/22 (9%) participants with flu-like reactions and 6/47 (13%) controls (P = 0.7), anti-isoniazid IgG in 2/22 (9%) participants with flu-like reactions and 4/47 (9%) controls (P = 0.9), and anti-rifapentine metabolite IgG in 2/47 (4%) controls (P = 0.9). Among participants receiving 9H, IgG and IgM anti-isoniazid antibodies were each present in 4/47 (9%) controls, respectively, but none among participants with flu-like reactions; anti-rifapentine IgG antibodies were not present in any participants with flu-like reactions or controls. CONCLUSIONS: We detected anti-rifapentine, anti-isoniazid, and anti-rifapentine metabolite antibodies, but the proportions of participants with antibodies were low, and did not differ between participants with flu-like reactions and those without such reactions. This suggests that flu-like reactions associated with 3HP and 9H were not antibody-mediated. |
JYNNEOS vaccine safety surveillance during the 2022 mpox outbreak using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and v-safe, United States, 2022-2023
Duffy J , Myers TR , Marquez P , Rouse D , Brown H , Zhang B , Shay DK , Moro PL . Sex Transm Dis 2024 BACKGROUND: In response to the 2022 mpox outbreak in the United States, people with higher potential for exposure to mpox were recommended to receive two doses of the JYNNEOS vaccine. Vaccine safety was monitored using two complementary systems. METHODS: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a passive surveillance system that accepts reports of adverse events following vaccination. VAERS is capable of rapidly identifying rare adverse events and unusual reporting patterns. Medical records were requested and reviewed for adverse events of special interest, including myocarditis. Adverse event reporting rates were calculated as the number of verified adverse event cases divided by the number of JYNNEOS doses administered. V-safe for mpox was a voluntary smartphone-based vaccine safety surveillance system that sent enrolled persons text messages linked to health surveys asking about reactions and health impact events occurring after vaccination. RESULTS: There were 1,207,056 JYNNEOS doses administered in the United States. VAERS received 1,927 reports for JYNNEOS. The myocarditis reporting rate per million doses was 2.69 after dose 1 and 8.64 after dose 2. V-safe had 213 participants complete at least one health survey. Rates of injection site and systemic reactions were similar in the first week following dose 1 and dose 2. CONCLUSIONS: JYNNEOS vaccine safety surveillance findings from VAERS and v-safe did not identify any unexpected safety concerns. The VAERS reporting rate for myocarditis was similar to previously published population background rates. |
Overview of U.S. COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance systems
Gee J , Shimabukuro TT , Su JR , Shay D , Ryan M , Basavaraju SV , Broder KR , Clark M , Buddy Creech C , Cunningham F , Goddard K , Guy H , Edwards KM , Forshee R , Hamburger T , Hause AM , Klein NP , Kracalik I , Lamer C , Loran DA , McNeil MM , Montgomery J , Moro P , Myers TR , Olson C , Oster ME , Sharma AJ , Schupbach R , Weintraub E , Whitehead B , Anderson S . Vaccine 2024 The U.S. COVID-19 vaccination program, which commenced in December 2020, has been instrumental in preventing morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 disease. Safety monitoring has been an essential component of the program. The federal government undertook a comprehensive and coordinated approach to implement complementary safety monitoring systems and to communicate findings in a timely and transparent way to healthcare providers, policymakers, and the public. Monitoring involved both well-established and newly developed systems that relied on both spontaneous (passive) and active surveillance methods. Clinical consultation for individual cases of adverse events following vaccination was performed, and monitoring of special populations, such as pregnant persons, was conducted. This report describes the U.S. government's COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring systems and programs used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Indian Health Service. Using the adverse event of myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination as a model, we demonstrate how the multiple, complementary monitoring systems worked to rapidly detect, assess, and verify a vaccine safety signal. In addition, longer-term follow-up was conducted to evaluate the recovery status of myocarditis cases following vaccination. Finally, the process for timely and transparent communication and dissemination of COVID-19 vaccine safety data is described, highlighting the responsiveness and robustness of the U.S. vaccine safety monitoring infrastructure during the national COVID-19 vaccination program. |
Safety monitoring of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant persons in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System - United States, September 1, 2022 - March 31, 2023
Moro PL , Carlock G , Fifadara N , Habenicht T , Zhang B , Strid P , Marquez P . Vaccine 2024 BACKGROUND: Pregnant persons are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 illness. Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone, including pregnant persons. However, data are limited on the safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and summarize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national spontaneous reporting system, among pregnant persons who received bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: VAERS U.S. reports of adverse events (AEs) in pregnant persons who received the bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine from 9/1/2022-03/31/2023 were identified. Clinicians reviewed all reports and available medical records. AEs of these reports were compared with AEs reported to VAERS following monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination in pregnancy. RESULTS: VAERS received 136 reports for pregnant persons who received bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine; 87 (64 %) after BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 48 (35 %) after mRNA-1273 (Moderna); 28 (20.6 %) reports were classified as serious. The most common pregnancy-specific outcomes reported included 12 (8.8 %) spontaneous abortions (<20 weeks gestation), 6 (4.4 %) episodes of preterm delivery, and 5 (3.7 %) reports of preeclampsia. One stillbirth (≥20 weeks gestation) was reported. No maternal or infant deaths were reported. There were 6 reports of AEs in infants, which included 3 reports of admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit: two infants with low birth weight, and one infant with a patent ductus arteriosus and patent foramen ovale. Non-pregnancy-specific adverse events were mostly COVID-19 infection and systemic reactions (e.g., headache, fatigue). Pregnancy-specific conditions were reported less frequently after bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination compared to monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination (3rd and 4th dose). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review of reports to VAERS, the safety profile of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant persons was comparable to that observed for monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination (3rd and 4th dose) in pregnant persons. |
Safety of simultaneous administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
Moro PL . Drug Saf 2024 INTRODUCTION: Bivalent mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may be simultaneously administered with other recommended vaccines, including seasonal influenza vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the safety of co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. METHODS: We searched the VAERS database for reports of adverse events (AEs) following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines during the period of September 1, 2022-March 31, 2023. We assessed the characteristics of these reports and described the most frequently reported AEs. Clinicians reviewed available medical records for reports of serious AEs and adverse events of special interest (AESI). RESULTS: During the period of 1 September 2022 through 31 March 2023, VAERS received 3689 reports of AEs following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. The median age of vaccinees was 59 years (interquartile range 39, 70 years); 342 reports (9.3%) were classified as serious. The most common AEs among non-serious reports were severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection (785, 23.5%), cough (592, 17.7%), and fatigue (568, 17.0%). The most common AEs among serious reports were Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (88, 25.7%), dyspnea (81, 23.7%), and condition aggravated (55, 16.1%). DISCUSSION: Reports of AEs following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines did not reveal any unusual or unexpected patterns of AEs. Increased reporting of certain events (e.g., COVID-19) was expected due to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reporting requirements. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor the safety of co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. |
Administration of the GSK respiratory syncytial virus vaccine to pregnant persons in error
Moro PL . Obstet Gynecol 2024 The GSK and Pfizer respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines are both indicated for adults aged 60 years and older, but only the Pfizer product is approved for use in pregnancy to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in infants aged younger than 6 months. To assess for vaccine administration errors (ie, administration of the GSK RSV vaccine to pregnant persons) VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), a U.S. passive reporting system, was searched for the time period from August 2023 to January 2024. A total of 113 reports of these administration errors were identified. Most reports (103, 91.2%) did not describe an adverse event. These administration errors are preventable with proper education and training and other preventive measures. |
Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013.
Moro PL , Harrington T , Shimabukuro T , Cano M , Museru OI , Menschik D , Broder K . Vaccine 2013 31 (43) 4984-7 BACKGROUND: In May 2011, the first trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine exclusively for intradermal administration (TIV-ID) was licensed in the US for adults aged 18-64 years. OBJECTIVE: To characterize adverse events (AEs) after TIV-ID reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system. METHODS: We searched VAERS for US reports after TIV-ID among persons vaccinated from July 1, 2011-February 28, 2013. Medical records were requested for reports coded as serious (death, hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization, disability, life-threatening-illness), and those suggesting anaphylaxis. Clinicians reviewed available information and assigned a primary clinical category to each report. Empirical Bayesian data mining was used to identify disproportional AE reporting following TIV-ID. Causality was not assessed. RESULTS: VAERS received 466 reports after TIV-ID; 9 (1.9%) were serious, including one reported fatality in an 88-year-old vaccinee. Median age was 43 years (range 4-88 years). The most common AE categories were: 218 (46.8%) injection site reactions; 89 (19.1%) other non-infectious (comprised mainly of constitutional signs and symptoms); and 74 (15.9%) allergy. Eight reports (1.7%) of anaphylaxis were verified by the Brighton criteria or a documented physician diagnosis. Disproportional reporting was identified for three AEs: 'injection site nodule', 'injection site pruritus', and 'drug administered to patient of inappropriate age'. The findings for the first two AEs were expected. Twenty-four reports of vaccinees <18 years or ≥ 65 years were reported, and 14 of 24 were coded with the AE 'drug administered to patient of inappropriate age'. CONCLUSIONS: Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns after TIV-ID. Injection site reactions were the most commonly reported AEs, similar to the pre-licensure clinical trials. Use of TIV-ID in younger and older individuals outside the approved age range highlights the need for education of healthcare providers regarding approved TIV-ID use. |
Pneumococcal vaccine for adults aged 19 years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2023
Kobayashi M , Pilishvili T , Farrar JL , Leidner AJ , Gierke R , Prasad N , Moro P , Campos-Outcalt D , Morgan RL , Long SS , Poehling KA , Cohen AL . MMWR Recomm Rep 2023 72 (3) 1-39 This report compiles and summarizes all published recommendations from CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of pneumococcal vaccines in adults aged ≥19 years in the United States. This report also includes updated and new clinical guidance for implementation from CDC. | | Before 2021, ACIP recommended 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) alone (up to 2 doses), or both a single dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in combination with 1–3 doses of PPSV23 in series (PCV13 followed by PPSV23), for use in U.S. adults depending on age and underlying risk for pneumococcal disease. In 2021, two new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), a 15-valent and a 20-valent PCV (PCV15 and PCV20), were licensed for use in U.S. adults aged ≥18 years by the Food and Drug Administration. | | ACIP recommendations specify the use of either PCV20 alone or PCV15 in series with PPSV23 for all adults aged ≥65 years and for adults aged 19–64 years with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who have not received a PCV or whose vaccination history is unknown. In addition, ACIP recommends use of either a single dose of PCV20 or ≥1 dose of PPSV23 for adults who have started their pneumococcal vaccine series with PCV13 but have not received all recommended PPSV23 doses. Shared clinical decision-making is recommended regarding use of a supplemental PCV20 dose for adults aged ≥65 years who have completed their recommended vaccine series with both PCV13 and PPSV23. | | Updated and new clinical guidance for implementation from CDC includes the recommendation for use of PCV15 or PCV20 for adults who have received PPSV23 but have not received any PCV dose. The report also includes clinical guidance for adults who have received 7-valent PCV (PCV7) only and adults who are hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. |
Notes from the field: Safety monitoring of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine among persons aged 12 years - United States, July 13, 2022-March 13, 2023
Romanson B , Moro PL , Su JR , Marquez P , Nair N , Day B , DeSantis A , Shimabukuro TT . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (31) 850-851 The NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax) COVID-19 vaccine is a recombinant spike protein nanoparticle vaccine with Matrix-M adjuvant. Novavax is authorized and recommended as a primary 2-dose monovalent vaccination series in persons aged ≥12 years to prevent COVID-19 and as a monovalent booster dose in persons aged ≥18 years who are unable to or unwilling to receive an mRNA COVID-19 bivalent vaccine (1). | | Top | | Investigation and Outcomes | During July 13, 2022–March 13, 2023, a total of 69,227 Novavax doses were administered to persons aged ≥12 years in the United States, and 230 reports of adverse events (AEs) after Novavax vaccination were received by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (2). The median age of patients in the reports was 45 years (IQR = 31–61 years); 152 (66.1%) reports concerned females, and 104 (45.2%) concerned non-Hispanic White persons (Table). Within the study period, VAERS received no reports concerning pregnant women. Most VAERS reports (211; 91.7%) were classified as nonserious.* The most commonly reported AEs included dizziness (33; 14.3%), fatigue (26; 11.3%), and headache (25; 10.9%). |
Post-marketing safety surveillance of a hexavalent vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Moro PL , Zhang B , Marquez P , Reich J . J Pediatr 2023 262 113643 We assessed the safety of hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HepB) in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Five hundred-one reports of adverse events (AEs) were identified; 21 (4.2%) were serious. Most frequently reported AEs were fever (10.2%) and injection site erythema (5.4%). AEs reported were consistent with findings from pre-licensure studies. |
Human-aided dispersal facilitates parasitism escape in the most invasive mosquito species (preprint)
Girard M , Martin E , Vallon L , Van VT , Da Silva Carvalho C , Sacks J , Bontemps Z , Balteneck J , Colin F , Duval P , Malassigne S , Swanson J , Hennessee I , Jiang S , Vizcaino L , Romer Y , Dada N , Huynh Kim KL , Thi Thuy TH , Bellet C , Lambert G , Raharimalala FN , Jupatanakul N , Goubert C , Boulesteix M , Mavingui P , Desouhant E , Luis P , Cazabet R , Hay AE , Moro CV , Minard G . bioRxiv 2023 20 Human-aided invasion of alien species across the world sometimes leads to economic, health or environmental burdens. During invasion process, species encounter new environments and partially escape some ecological constrains they faced in their native range, while they face new ones. The Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus is one of the most iconic invasive species that was introduced in every inhabited continent over a short period of time due to international trade. It has also been shown to be infected by a prevalent and yet disregarded gregarine entomoparasite Ascogregarina taiwanensis. In this study, we aimed at deciphering the global dynamics of As. taiwanensis infection in natural Ae. albopictus populations and we further explored factors shaping its distribution. We showed that Ae. albopictus populations are highly colonized by several As. taiwanesis genotypes but recently introduced ones are escaping the parasite. We further performed experiments to explain such pattern. First, we hypothesized that founder effects (i.e. population establishment by a small number of individuals) may influence the parasite dynamics. This was confirmed since experimental increase in mosquitoes' density improves the parasite horizontal transmission to larvae. Furthermore, Ae. albopictus larvae do not exhibit density dependent prophylaxis to control the parasite meaning that infection is not mitigated when larval density increases. Secondly, we hypothesized that unparasitized mosquitoes were more prompt to found new populations through active flight dispersal. This was, however, unlikely since parasitized mosquitoes tend to be more active than their unparasitized relatives. Finally, we hypothesized that mosquito passive dispersal (i.e. often mediated by human-aided transportation of dried eggs) affects the parasite infectiveness. Our results support this hypothesis since parasite infection decreases over time when dry eggs are stored. This study highlights the importance of global trade on parasitism escape in one of the most invasive vector species on earth. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. |
Reporting Rates for VAERS Death Reports Following COVID-19 Vaccination, December 14, 2020-November 17, 2021 (preprint)
Day B , Menschik D , Thompson D , Jankosky C , Su J , Moro P , Zinderman C , Welsh K , Nair N . medRxiv 2022 07 Background: Despite widely available safety information for the COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine hesitancy remains a challenge. In some cases, vaccine hesitancy may be related to concerns about the number of reports of death to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Objective(s): To provide information and context about reports of death to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccination. Design(s): Descriptive study; reporting rates for VAERS death reports. Setting(s): United States; December 14, 2020, to November 17, 2021. Participant(s): COVID-19 vaccine recipients. Measurements: Reporting rates for death events per million persons vaccinated; adverse event counts; data mining signals of disproportionate reporting. Result(s): 9,201 death events were reported for COVID-19 vaccine recipients aged five years and older (or age unknown). Reporting rates for death events increased with increasing age, and males generally had higher reporting rates than females. For death events within seven days and 42 days of vaccination, respectively, observed reporting rates were lower than the expected all-cause death rates. Reporting rates for Ad26.COV2.S vaccine were generally higher than for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, but still lower than the expected all-cause death rates. Reported adverse events were nonspecific or reflected the known leading causes of death. Limitation(s): VAERS data are subject to several limitations such as reporting bias (underreporting and stimulated reporting), missing or inaccurate information, and lack of a control group. Reported diagnoses, including deaths, are not causally verified diagnoses. Conclusion(s): Reporting rates for death events were lower than the expected all-cause mortality rates. Trends in reporting rates reflected known trends in background mortality rates. These findings do not suggest an association between vaccination and overall increased mortality. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
Safety monitoring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine third doses among children aged 6 months-5 years - United States, June 17, 2022-May 7, 2023
Hause AM , Marquez P , Zhang B , Moro PL , Myers TR , Bradley C , Bazel S , Panchanathan SS , Shimabukuro TT , Shay DK . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (23) 621-626 As of May 7, 2023, CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all children aged 6 months-5 years receive at least 1 age-appropriate bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose. Depending on their COVID-19 vaccination history and history of immunocompromise, these children might also need additional doses* (1-3). Initial vaccine safety findings after primary series vaccination among children aged 6 months-5 years showed that transient local and systemic reactions were common whereas serious adverse events were rare (4). To characterize the safety of a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose among children aged 6 months-5 years, CDC reviewed adverse events and health surveys reported to v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by CDC to monitor health after COVID-19 vaccination (https://vsafe.cdc.gov/en/) and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. passive vaccine safety surveillance system co-managed by CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (https://vaers.hhs.gov/) (5). During June 17, 2022-May 7, 2023, approximately 495,576 children aged 6 months-4 years received a third dose (monovalent or bivalent) of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and 63,919 children aged 6 months-5 years received a third dose of Moderna vaccine.(†) A third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was recorded for 2,969 children in v-safe; approximately 37.7% had no reported reactions, and among those for whom reactions were reported, most reactions were mild and transient. VAERS received 536 reports after a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for children in these age groups; 98.5% of reports were nonserious and most (78.4%) were classified as a vaccination error.(§) No new safety concerns were identified. Preliminary safety findings after a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 6 months-5 years are similar to those after other doses. Health care providers can counsel parents and guardians of young children that most reactions reported after vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine were mild and transient and that serious adverse events are rare. |
COVID-19 vaccine safety inquiries to the Centers For Disease Control And Prevention Immunization Safety Office
Miller ER , Moro PL , Shimabukuro TT , Carlock G , Davis SN , Freeborn EM , Roberts AL , Gee J , Taylor AW , Gallego R , Suragh T , Su JR . Vaccine 2023 BACKGROUND: Following the authorization and recommendations for use of the U.S. COVID-19 vaccines, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Immunization Safety Office (ISO) responded to inquiries and questions from public health officials, healthcare providers, and the general public on COVID-19 vaccine safety. METHODS: We describe COVID-19 vaccine safety inquiries, by topic, received and addressed by ISO from December 1, 2020-August 31, 2022. RESULTS: Of the 1978 COVID-19 vaccine-related inquiries received, 1655 specifically involved vaccine safety topics. The most frequently asked-about topics included deaths following vaccination, myocarditis, pregnancy, and reproductive health outcomes, understanding or interpreting data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Inquiries about vaccine safety generally reflect issues that receive media attention. ISO will continue to monitor vaccine safety inquiries and provide accurate and timely information to healthcare providers, public health officials, and the general public. |
Using a medication event monitoring system to evaluate self-report and pill count for determining treatment completion with self-administered, once-weekly isoniazid and rifapentine
Scott AA , Sadowski C , Vernon A , Arevalo B , Beer K , Borisov A , Cayla JA , Chen M , Feng PJ , Moro RN , Holland DP , Martinson N , Millet JP , Miro JM , Belknap R . Contemp Clin Trials 2023 129 107173 BACKGROUND: Treatment completion is essential for the effectiveness of any latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) regimen. The Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (TBTC) Study 33 (iAdhere) combined self-report and pill counts - standard of care (SOC) with a medication event monitoring system (MEMS) to determine treatment completion for 12-dose once-weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP). Understanding the performance of SOC relative to MEMS can inform providers and suggest when interventions may be applied to optimize LTBI treatment completion. METHOD: iAdhere randomized participants to directly observed therapy (DOT), SAT, or SAT with text reminders in Hong Kong, South Africa, Spain and the United States (U.S.). This post-hoc secondary analysis evaluated treatment completion in both SAT arms, and compared completion based on SOC with MEMS to completion based on SOC only. Treatment completion proportions were compared. Characteristics associated with discordance between SOC and SOC with MEMS were identified. RESULTS: Overall 80.8% of 665 participants completed treatment per SOC, compared to 74.7% per SOC with MEMS, a difference of 6.1% (95%CI: 4.2%, 7.8%). Among U.S. participants only, this difference was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.8%, 4.9%). Differences in completion was 3.1% (95% CI: -1.1%, 7.3%) in Spain, and 36.8% (95% CI: 24.3%, 49.4%) in South Africa. There was no difference in Hong Kong. CONCLUSION: When used for monitoring 3HP, SOC significantly overestimated treatment completion in U.S. and South Africa. However, SOC still provides a reasonable estimate of treatment completion of the 3HP regimen, in U.S., Spain, and Hong Kong. |
Symptoms and systemic drug reactions in persons receiving weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid (3HP) treatment for latent tuberculosis infection
Sadowski C , Belknap R , Holland DP , Moro RN , Chen MP , Wright A , Millet JP , Cayla JA , Scott NA , Borisov A , Gandhi NR . Clin Infect Dis 2023 76 (12) 2090-2097 BACKGROUND: Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid (3HP) therapy for latent tuberculosis infections (LTBI) is recommended worldwide. The development of symptoms and systemic drug reactions (SDR) on 3HP have not been fully characterized. We aimed to determine the patterns of symptom development and identify SDR and associated factors in patients on 3HP. METHODS: We analyzed symptoms data in participants undergoing 3HP in Tuberculosis Trials Consortium's (TBTC) iAdhere study (Study 33). We examined the patterns of symptom reporting across participants from baseline and four monthly visits. Bivariate analyses and multivariable regression models were used to identify factors associated with SDR. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 1,002 participants receiving 3HP, 768 (77%) reported at least one symptom; 97% of these symptoms were grade 1 (79%) or grade 2 (18%). Most symptoms developed in the first month and resolved. 111 (11%) participants had symptoms that met criteria for SDR; however, 53 (48%) of these participants completed therapy. Factors associated with SDR and discontinuation included female sex (RR 2.05, CI: 1.19-3.54), age ≥45 years (RR 1.99, CI: 1.19-3.31), and use of concomitant medications (RR 2.26, CI: 1.15-4.42). CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients receiving 3HP reported symptoms, most were mild, occurred early, and resolved without stopping treatment. Among patients experiencing SDR, nearly half were able to complete therapy. Patient and provider education should focus on differentiating severe reactions where 3HP should be stopped from minor symptoms that will resolve. |
Reporting rates for VAERS death reports following COVID-19 vaccination, December 14, 2020-November 17, 2021
Day B , Menschik D , Thompson D , Jankosky C , Su J , Moro P , Zinderman C , Welsh K , Dimova RB , Nair N . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023 32 (7) 763-772 PURPOSE: Despite widely available safety information for the COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine hesitancy remains a challenge. In some cases, vaccine hesitancy may be related to concerns about the number of reports of death to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). We aimed to provide information and context about reports of death to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: This is a descriptive study evaluating reporting rates for VAERS death reports for COVID-19 vaccine recipients in the United States between December 14, 2020, and November 17, 2021. Reporting rates were calculated as death events per million persons vaccinated and compared to expected all-cause (background) death rates. RESULTS: 9,201 death events were reported for COVID-19 vaccine recipients aged five years and older (or age unknown). Reporting rates for death events increased with increasing age, and males generally had higher reporting rates than females. For death events within seven days and 42 days of vaccination, respectively, observed reporting rates were lower than the expected all-cause death rates. Reporting rates for Ad26.COV2.S vaccine were generally higher than for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, but still lower than the expected all-cause death rates. Limitations of VAERS data include potential reporting bias, missing or inaccurate information, lack of a control group, and reported diagnoses, including deaths, are not causally verified diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting rates for death events were lower than the all-cause death rates expected in the general population. Trends in reporting rates reflected known trends in background death rates. These findings do not suggest an association between vaccination and overall increased mortality. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Spontaneous reports of primary ovarian insufficiency after vaccination: A review of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
Patricia Wodi A , Marquez P , Mba-Jonas A , Barash F , Nguon K , Moro PL . Vaccine 2023 41 (9) 1616-1622 BACKGROUND: Since 2012, reports of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) temporally associated with receipt of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine have been published leading to questions about a potential causal association. A Vaccine Safety Datalink study did not find an increased risk for POI after vaccination. We reviewed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to describe POI reports. METHODS: We searched VAERS, a U.S. passive surveillance system, for domestic POI reports received from 01/01/1990 to 12/31/2017 after any vaccination. The search used both Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activity Preferred Terms and a text-based search for POI and its symptoms. All reports were reviewed, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines for POI diagnosis were applied. Data mining for disproportionate reporting was conducted. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-two reports met the search criteria and clinical review identified 19 POI reports. Most reports (n = 16) were received between 2013 and 2017. The median age at vaccination was 14.5 years (range 10-25 years) and the median interval between first dose of vaccination and reporting the event to VAERS was 43 months (range 4-132 months; mean 59.6 months). Four reports met ACOG diagnostic criteria; one with an underlying cause (47XXX chromosomal abnormality) reported. Eleven reports documented menstrual irregularity ≥ 3 months; 5 had ≥ 1 laboratory test result used to diagnose POI. Eighteen of 19 reports described receipt of HPV vaccine with or without other vaccines. Other vaccines reported were meningococcal conjugate vaccine, hepatitis A, varicella and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis. Disproportionate reporting was found for three relevant coding terms after HPV vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: POI is rarely reported to VAERS. Most reports contained limited diagnostic information and were submitted after published cases of POI following HPV vaccination. Results of our review do not suggest a safety concern. |
Safety of co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal inactivated influenza vaccines in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) during July 1, 2021-June 30, 2022
Moro PL , Zhang B , Ennulat C , Harris M , McVey R , Woody G , Marquez P , McNeil MM , Su JR . Vaccine 2023 41 (11) 1859-1863 BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccines may be co-administered with other recommended vaccines, including seasonal influenza vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the safety of co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. OBJECTIVE: To describe reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. METHODS: We searched the VAERS database for reports of adverse events (AEs) following co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines and following a first booster dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine alone, during July 1, 2021-June 30, 2022. We assessed the characteristics of these reports and described the most frequently reported MedDRA preferred terms (PTs). Clinicians reviewed available medical records for serious reports and reports of adverse events of special interest (AESI) and categorized the main diagnosis by system organ class. RESULTS: From July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, VAERS received 2,449 reports of adverse events following co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. Median age of vaccinees was 48 years (IQR: 31, 66); 387 (15.8%) were classified as serious. Most reports (1,713; 69.3%) described co-administration of a first booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine with seasonal influenza vaccine. The most common AEs among non-serious reports were injection site reactions (193; 14.5%), headache (181; 13.6%), and pain (171; 12.8%). The most common AEs among reports classified as serious were dyspnea (38; 14.9%), COVID-19 infection (32; 12.6%), and chest pain (27; 10.6%). DISCUSSION: This review of reports to VAERS following co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines did not reveal any unusual or unexpected patterns of AEs. Increased reporting of certain events (e.g., COVID-19 disease) was expected. CDC will continue to monitor the safety of co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines, including co-administration involving bivalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccines that have been recommended for people ages ≥ 6 months in the United States. |
Safety monitoring of JYNNEOS Vaccine during the 2022 Mpox outbreak - United States, May 22-October 21, 2022
Duffy J , Marquez P , Moro P , Weintraub E , Yu Y , Boersma P , Donahue JG , Glanz JM , Goddard K , Hambidge SJ , Lewin B , Lewis N , Rouse D , Shimabukuro T . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 71 (49) 1555-1559 JYNNEOS (Modified Vaccinia Ankara vaccine, Bavarian Nordic) is recommended in the United States for persons exposed to or at high risk for exposure to Monkeypox virus during the 2022 monkeypox (mpox) outbreak (1). JYNNEOS is a live, nonreplicating viral vaccine licensed for the prevention of smallpox and mpox in adults aged ≥18 years, administered as a 0.5-mL 2-dose series given 28 days apart by subcutaneous injection (2). On August 9, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for administration of 0.1 mL doses by intradermal injection for adults aged ≥18 years as a strategy to increase vaccine supply, and administration of 0.5 mL doses subcutaneously for persons aged <18 years (3). During May 22-October 21, 2022, a total of 987,294 JYNNEOS vaccine doses were administered in the United States. CDC has monitored JYNNEOS vaccine safety using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) for vaccine recipients of all ages, and through single-patient emergency Investigational New Drug (EIND) procedures for persons aged <18 years vaccinated before August 9, 2022. The most common adverse health events reported to VAERS for adults were nonserious and included injection site reactions, which was consistent with the prelicensure studies. Adverse health events were reported at similar rates for doses received by intradermal and subcutaneous administration. Serious adverse events were rare in adults, and no serious adverse events have been identified among persons aged <18 years. Overall, postlicensure and postauthorization surveillance to date support JYNNEOS vaccine safety. |
Safety Surveillance of Varicella Vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, United States, 2006-2020.
Moro PL , Leung J , Marquez P , Kim Y , Wei S , Su JR , Marin M . J Infect Dis 2022 226 S431-s440 BACKGROUND: . The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is the United States national passive vaccine safety surveillance system. We updated the data on the safety of single-antigen varicella vaccine (VAR) and assessed the safety of combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV) licensed in the United States using VAERS data. METHODS: US VAERS reports received after administration of VAR and MMRV during 2006-2020 were identified. Reports were analyzed by vaccine type, age, seriousness, most common adverse events (AEs), and concomitant vaccines. We reviewed medical records of selected reports of AEs of special interest and conducted empirical Bayesian data mining to identify disproportionally reported AEs. RESULTS: During 2006-2020, approximately 132.8 million VAR doses were distributed; 40 684 reports were received in VAERS (30.6/100 000 doses distributed), with 4.1% classified as serious (1.3/100 000 doses distributed). Approximately 35.5 million MMRV doses were distributed; 13 325 reports were received (37.6/100 000 doses distributed) with 3.3% classified as serious (1.3/100 000 doses distributed). The most common adverse health events after both VAR and MMRV were injection site reactions (31% and 27%), rash (28% and 20%), and fever (12% and 14%), respectively. Vaccination errors accounted for 23% of reports after VAR administration and 41% after MMRV administration, but ≥95% of them did not describe an adverse health event. AEs associated with evidence of vaccine strain varicella-zoster virus (vVZV) infection included meningitis, encephalitis, herpes zoster, and 6 deaths (all in immunocompromised persons with contraindications for vaccination). No new or unexpected AE was disproportionally reported. CONCLUSIONS: No new or unexpected safety findings were detected for VAR and MMRV given as recommended, reinforcing the favorable safety profiles of these vaccines. Providers should obtain specimens for viral testing and strain-typing for serious AEs if they consider vVZV as the possible causative agent. |
Safety of Booster Doses of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine in Pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
Moro PL , Olson CK , Zhang B , Marquez P , Strid P . Obstet Gynecol 2022 140 (3) 421-427 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and summarize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national spontaneous reporting system, in pregnant people who received a booster dose of mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. METHODS: We searched VAERS for U.S. reports of adverse events in pregnant people who received a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine from September 22, 2021, to March 24, 2022. Clinicians reviewed reports and available medical records. RESULTS: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received 323 reports of adverse events in pregnant people who received a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine; 178 (55.1%) after BNT162b2 from Pfizer-BioNTech and 145 (44.9%) after mRNA-1273 from Moderna. Seventy-two (22.3%) reports were coded as serious. One neonatal death was reported, but no maternal deaths occurred. Pregnancy-specific outcomes included 56 (17.3%) spontaneous abortions (before 20 weeks of gestation), eight (2.5%) episodes of vaginal bleeding, five (1.5%) stillbirths (at or after 20 weeks of gestation), four (1.2%) episodes of preeclampsia, and two (0.6%) preterm deliveries. Reporting rates for stillbirth and preterm delivery were below background rates. Ten instances of adverse events in neonates were reported, which included two reports of birth defects. Non-pregnancy-specific adverse events (n=207; 64.1%) were mostly systemic (eg, headache, fatigue) and local reactions and occurred in proportions comparable with those seen in pregnant people who received the primary COVID-19 vaccination series and reported to VAERS during the same period. CONCLUSION: Review of reports after a booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant people in VAERS found their safety profile was comparable with that of published reports after primary COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant people. |
Post-authorization surveillance of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), December 2020 - October 2021.
Moro PL , Olson CK , Clark E , Marquez P , Strid P , Ellington S , Zhang B , Mba-Jonas A , Alimchandani M , Cragan J , Moore C . Vaccine 2022 40 (24) 3389-3394 BACKGROUND: Pregnant persons are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 infection, including intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and death compared with non-pregnant persons of reproductive age. Limited data are available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines administered during and around the time of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and summarize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national spontaneous reporting system, in pregnant persons who received a COVID-19 vaccine to assess for potential vaccine safety problems. METHODS: We searched VAERS for US reports of adverse events (AEs) in pregnant persons who received a COVID-19 vaccine from 12/14/2020-10/31/2021. Clinicians reviewed reports and available medical records. Crude reporting rates for selected AEs were calculated, and disproportional reporting was assessed using data mining methods. RESULTS: VAERS received 3,462 reports of AEs in pregnant persons who received a COVID-19 vaccine; 1,831 (52.9%) after BNT162b2, 1,350 (38.9%) after mRNA-1273, and 275 (7.9%) after Ad26.COV2.S. Eight maternal deaths and 12 neonatal deaths were reported. Six-hundred twenty-one (17.9%) reports were serious. Pregnancy-specific outcomes included: 878 spontaneous abortions (<20 weeks), 101 episodes of vaginal bleeding, 76 preterm deliveries (<37 weeks), 62 stillbirths (≥20 weeks), and 33 outcomes with birth defects. Crude reporting rates for preterm deliveries and stillbirths, as well as maternal and neonatal mortality rates were below background rates from published sources. No disproportional reporting for any AE was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Review of reports to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons did not identify any concerning patterns of maternal or infant-fetal outcomes. |
Postmarketing safety surveillance of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Woo EJ , Moro PL . Vaccine 2022 40 (7) 1026-1030 On November 4, 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent; QIV-HD) for active immunization for the prevention of influenza disease in individuals 65 years of age and older. A prelicensure randomized, active-controlled, modified double-blind trial did not reveal any major differences in adverse events following QIV-HD versus Fluzone High-Dose (trivalent). To improve our understanding of the safety profile of QIV-HD, we reviewed and summarized reports of adverse events after QIV-HD to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). From July 30, 2020 through June 30, 2021, VAERS received 2,122 reports after QIV-HD. The vast majority (2,018; 95.1%) were non-serious and included events that had been observed in the prelicensure clinical trial, such as injection site reactions, fever, headache, and nausea. The most common serious events included Guillain-Barré syndrome, cellulitis or other local reactions, constitutional signs/symptoms (e.g., fever), and cardiovascular events. Our review did not reveal any new safety concerns. This information may enable policy makers, health officials, clinicians, and patients to make a more informed decision regarding vaccination strategies. |
Successes of the CDC monitoring systems in evaluating post-authorization safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
Moro PL , McNeil MM . Expert Rev Vaccines 2021 21 (3) 281-284 The first two COVID-19 vaccines, both of which contain messenger RNA (mRNA), BNT162b2 from Pfizer Inc/BioNTech and mRNA-1273 from Moderna and a third containing a recombinant replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vector, Ad26.COV2.S from Janssen Pharmaceuticals Companies of Johnson & Johnson, were authorized for emergency use in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in mid-December 2020 and at the end of February 2021, respectively [Citation1–3]. In the pre-emergency use authorization clinical trials for these vaccines, local and systemic reactions were the main types of adverse events (AE) observed. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses three systems to monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines: 1) the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is the front-line, national, spontaneous surveillance system [Citation4]; 2) v-safe, a new smartphone and Internet survey-based, after-vaccination health checker for people who receive COVID-19 vaccines [Citation5]; there is also the associated v-safe pregnancy registry which collects detailed pregnancy and medical history information from v-safe participants who report being pregnant around the time of vaccination [Citation6]; and 3) the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) which is a large linked database system used for active surveillance and traditional epidemiologic research [Citation7]. These complementary systems are being used to actively monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States [Citation8]. The results of this unprecedented and comprehensive effort are communicated through frequent presentations at the meetings of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and in several fast-tracked published reports. |
Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy in the US.
Moro PL , Panagiotakopoulos L , Oduyebo T , Olson CK , Myers T . Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021 17 (12) 1-9 Pregnant persons are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19. The first COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. were authorized for emergency use in December 2020 and pregnant persons were eligible and could get vaccinated despite scarce safety data in this population. To monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, four surveillance systems are used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is a national, passive system that captures reports of potential adverse events. V-safe is a novel, active system that uses text messaging and web-based surveys to provide health check-ins after vaccination; and enrolls eligible v-safe participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry. The Vaccine Safety Datalink is a collaboration between the CDC and nine integrated health care organizations which performs near-real time surveillance and traditional epidemiologic studies on pregnant vaccine recipients. The CDC is committed to timely and comprehensive monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy. |
US Emergency Department Visits for Acute Harms from Over-the-Counter Cough and Cold Medications, 2017-2019
Mital R , Lovegrove MC , Moro RN , Geller AI , Weidle NJ , Lind JN , Budnitz DS . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2021 31 (2) 225-234 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Characterization of emergency department (ED) visits for acute harms related to use of over-the-counter cough and cold medications (CCMs) by patient demographics, intent of CCM use, concurrent substance use, and clinical manifestations can help guide prevention of medication harms. METHODS: Public health surveillance data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance project were used to estimate numbers and population rates of ED visits from 2017-2019. RESULTS: Based on 1,396 surveillance cases, there were an estimated 26,735 (95% CI, 21,679-31,791) US ED visits for CCM-related harms annually, accounting for 1.3% (95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%) of all ED visits for medication adverse events. Three fifths (61.4%, 95% CI, 55.6%-67.2%) of these visits were attributed to non-therapeutic CCM use (nonmedical use, self-harm, unsupervised pediatric exposures). Most visits by children aged <4 years (74.0%, 95% CI, 59.7%-88.3%) were for unsupervised CCM exposures. Proportion hospitalized was higher for visits for self-harm (76.5%, 95% CI, 68.9%-84.2%) than for visits for nonmedical use (30.3%, 95% CI, 21.1%-39.6%) and therapeutic use (8.8%, 95% CI, 5.9%-11.8%). Overall, estimated population rates of ED visits for CCM-related harms were higher for patients aged 12-34 years (16.5 per 100,000, 95% CI, 13.0-20.0) compared with patients aged <12 years (5.1 per 100,000, 95% CI, 3.6-6.5) and ≥35 years (4.3 per 100,000, 95% CI, 3.4-5.1). Concurrent use of other medications, illicit drugs, or alcohol was frequent in ED visits for nonmedical use (61.3%) and self-harm (75.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Continued national surveillance of CCM-related harms can assess progress toward safer use. |
U.S. Population-Based background incidence rates of medical conditions for use in safety assessment of COVID-19 vaccines.
Gubernot D , Jazwa A , Niu M , Baumblatt J , Gee J , Moro P , Duffy J , Harrington T , McNeil MM , Broder K , Su J , Kamidani S , Olson CK , Panagiotakopoulos L , Shimabukuro T , Forshee R , Anderson S , Bennett S . Vaccine 2021 39 (28) 3666-3677 The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a devastating impact on global health, and has resulted in an unprecedented, international collaborative effort to develop vaccines to control the outbreak, protect human lives, and avoid further social and economic disruption. Mass vaccination campaigns are underway in multiple countries and are expected worldwide once more vaccine becomes available. Some early candidate vaccines use novel platforms, such as mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, and relatively new platforms, such as replication-deficient viral vectors. While these new vaccine platforms hold promise, limited safety data in humans are available. Serious health outcomes linked to vaccinations are rare, and some outcomes may occur incidentally in the vaccinated population. Knowledge of background incidence rates of these medical conditions is a critical component of vaccine safety monitoring to aid in the assessment of adverse events temporally associated with vaccination and to put these events into context with what would be expected due to chance alone. A list of 22 potential adverse events of special interest (AESI), including neurologic, autoimmune, and cardiovascular disorders, was compiled by subject matter experts at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The most recently available U.S. background rates for these medical conditions, overall and by age, sex, and race/ethnicity (when available), were sourced from reported statistics (data published by medical panels/ associations or federal government reports), and literature reviews in PubMed. This review provides estimates of background incidence rates for medical conditions that may be monitored or studied as AESI during safety surveillance and research for COVID-19 vaccines and other new vaccines. |
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.
Shimabukuro TT , Kim SY , Myers TR , Moro PL , Oduyebo T , Panagiotakopoulos L , Marquez PL , Olson CK , Liu R , Chang KT , Ellington SR , Burkel VK , Smoots AN , Green CJ , Licata C , Zhang BC , Alimchandani M , Mba-Jonas A , Martin SW , Gee JM , Meaney-Delman DM . N Engl J Med 2021 384 (24) 2273-2282 BACKGROUND: Many pregnant persons in the United States are receiving messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines, but data are limited on their safety in pregnancy. METHODS: From December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, we used data from the "v-safe after vaccination health checker" surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to characterize the initial safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. RESULTS: A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes. |
Postmarketing safety surveillance of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Woo EJ , Moro PL . Vaccine 2021 39 (13) 1812-1817 On October 7, 2016, the Food and Drug Administration approved recombinant hemagglutinin quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) (Spodoptera frugiperda cell line; Flublok Quadrivalent) for active immunization for the prevention of influenza disease in individuals 18 years of age and older. Clinical trials did not reveal any major differences in adverse events or serious adverse events following Flublok Quadrivalent versus standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. To improve our understanding of the safety profile of this vaccine, we reviewed and summarized adverse event reports after Flublok Quadrivalent administration to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Through June 30, 2020, VAERS received 849 reports after RIV4 vaccination. The vast majority (810; 95%) were non-serious. Among serious events, there were 10 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, including 5 people who required mechanical ventilation and 2 people who died. Many allergic reactions were reported as non-serious, but required interventions to treat a life-threatening event, e.g., epinephrine, nebulizers, albuterol, glucocorticoids, and supplemental oxygen. Two people experienced a positive rechallenge (i.e., allergic reactions after repeated vaccination with RIV4), including a person who-despite premedication with antihistamines-developed respiratory difficulties, required epinephrine, and was transported to the emergency department. The occurrence of anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions in some individuals may reflect an underlying predisposition to atopy that may manifest itself after an exposure to any drug or vaccine, and does not necessarily suggest that Flublok Quadrivalent is particularly allergenic. Postmarketing safety surveillance will continue to be vital for understanding the benefits and risks of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 29, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure