Last data update: Sep 16, 2024. (Total: 47680 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 70 Records) |
Query Trace: Janet L [original query] |
---|
Executive summary: A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 updates
Yokoe DS , Advani SD , Anderson DJ , Babcock HM , Bell M , Berenholtz SM , Bryant KA , Buetti N , Calderwood MS , Calfee DP , Dubberke ER , Ellingson KD , Fishman NO , Gerding DN , Glowicz J , Hayden MK , Kaye KS , Klompas M , Kociolek LK , Landon E , Larson EL , Malani AN , Marschall J , Meddings J , Mermel LA , Patel PK , Perl TM , Popovich KJ , Schaffzin JK , Septimus E , Trivedi KK , Weinstein RA , Maragakis LL . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023 44 (10) 1-15 Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) | Essential practices | Infrastructure and resources | 1 Perform a CAUTI risk assessment and implement an organization-wide program to identify and remove catheters that are no longer necessary using 1 or | more methods documented to be effective. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Provide appropriate infrastructure for preventing CAUTI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Provide and implement evidence-based protocols to address multiple steps of the urinary catheter life cycle: catheter appropriateness (step 0), insertion | technique (step 1), maintenance care (step 2), and prompt removal (step 3) when no longer appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Ensure that only trained healthcare personnel (HCP) insert urinary catheters and that competency is assessed regularly. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Ensure that supplies necessary for aseptic technique for catheter insertion are available and conveniently located. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Implement a system for documenting the following in the patient record: physician order for catheter placement, indications for catheter insertion, date | and time of catheter insertion, name of individual who inserted catheter, nursing documentation of placement, daily presence of a catheter and | maintenance care tasks, and date and time of catheter removal. Record criteria for removal and justification for continued use. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 7 Ensure that sufficiently trained HCP and technology resources are available to support surveillance for catheter use and outcomes. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 8 Perform surveillance for CAUTI if indicated based on facility risk assessment or regulatory requirements. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 9 Standardize urine culturing by adapting an institutional protocol for appropriate indications for urine cultures in patients with and without indwelling | catheters. Consider incorporating these indications into the electronic medical record, and review indications for ordering urine cultures in the CAUTI | risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Education and training | 1 Educate HCP involved in the insertion, care, and maintenance of urinary catheters about CAUTI prevention, including alternatives to indwelling | catheters, and procedures for catheter insertion, management, and removal. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Assess healthcare professional competency in catheter use, catheter care, and maintenance. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Educate HCP about the importance of urine-culture stewardship and provide indications for urine cultures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Provide training on appropriate collection of urine. Specimens should be collected and should arrive at the microbiology laboratory as soon as possible, | preferably within an hour. If delay in transport to the laboratory is expected, samples should be refrigerated (no more than 24 hours) or collected in | preservative urine transport tubes. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Train clinicians to consider other methods for bladder management, such as intermittent catheterization or external male or female collection devices, | when appropriate, before placing an indwelling urethral catheter. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Share data in a timely fashion and report to appropriate stakeholders. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Insertion of indwelling catheters | 1 Insert urinary catheters only when necessary for patient care and leave in place only as long as indications remain. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Consider other methods for bladder management such as intermittent catheterization, or external male or female collection devices, when appropriate. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Use appropriate technique for catheter insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE). | 4 Consider working in pairs to help perform patient positioning and monitor for potential contamination during placement. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Practice hand hygiene (based on CDC or WHO guidelines) immediately before insertion of the catheter and before and after any manipulation of the | catheter site or apparatus. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Insert catheters following aseptic technique and using sterile equipment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Use sterile gloves, drape, and sponges, a sterile antiseptic solution for cleaning the urethral meatus, and a sterile single-use packet of lubricant jelly for | insertion. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Use a catheter with the smallest feasible diameter consistent with proper drainage to minimize urethral trauma but consider other catheter types and | sizes when warranted for patients with anticipated difficult catheterization to reduce the likelihood that a patient will experience multiple, sometimes | traumatic, catheterization attempts. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Management of indwelling catheters | 1 Properly secure indwelling catheters after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Maintain a sterile, continuously closed drainage system. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Replace the catheter and the collecting system using aseptic technique when breaks in aseptic technique, disconnection, or leakage occur. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | 4 For examination of fresh urine, collect a small sample by aspirating urine from the needleless sampling port with a sterile syringe/cannula adaptor after | cleansing the port with disinfectant. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | 2 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) | (Continued ) | 5 Facilitate timely transport of urine samples to laboratory. If timely transport is not feasible, consider refrigerating urine samples or using samplecollection cups with preservatives. Obtain larger volumes of urine for special analyses (eg, 24-hour urine) aseptically from the drainage bag. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | 6 Maintain unobstructed urine flow. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Employ routine hygiene. Cleaning the meatal area with antiseptic solutions is an unresolved issue, though emerging literature supports chlorhexidine | use prior to catheter insertion. Alcohol-based products should be avoided given concerns about the alcohol causing drying of the mucosal tissues. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Develop a protocol for standardizing diagnosis and management of postoperative urinary retention, including nurse-directed use of intermittent | catheterization and use of bladder scanners when appropriate as alternatives to indwelling urethral catheterization. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Establish a system for analyzing and reporting data on catheter use and adverse events from catheter use. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Establish a system for defining, analyzing, and reporting data on non–catheter-associated UTIs, particularly UTIs associated with the use of devices | being used as alternatives to indwelling urethral catheters. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Essential practices | Before insertion | 1 Provide easy access to an evidence-based list of indications for CVC use to minimize unnecessary CVC placement. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Require education and competency assessment of healthcare personnel (HCP) involved in insertion, care and maintenance of CVCs about CLABSI | prevention. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Bathe ICU patients aged >2 months with a chlorhexidine preparation on a daily basis. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | At insertion | 1 In ICU and non-ICU settings, a facility should have a process in place, such as a checklist, to ensure adherence to infection prevention practices at the | time of CVC insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Perform hand hygiene prior to catheter insertion or manipulation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 The subclavian site is preferred to reduce infectious complications when the catheter is placed in the ICU setting. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Use an all-inclusive catheter cart or kit. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Use ultrasound guidance for catheter insertion. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Use maximum sterile barrier precautions during CVC insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | After insertion | 1 Ensure appropriate nurse-to-patient ratio and limit use of float nurses in ICUs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Use chlorhexidine-containing dressings for CVCs in patients aged >2 months. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 For nontunneled CVCs in adults and children, change transparent dressings and perform site care with a chlorhexidine-based antiseptic at least every 7 | days or immediately if the dressing is soiled, loose, or damp. Change gauze dressings every 2 days or earlier if the dressing is soiled, loose, or damp. | (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Disinfect catheter hubs, needleless connectors, and injection ports before accessing the catheter. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Remove nonessential catheters. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Routine replacement of administration sets not used for blood, blood products, or lipid formulations can be performed at intervals up to 7 days. | (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 Perform surveillance for CLABSI in ICU and non-ICU settings. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Additional approaches | 1 Use antiseptic or antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH in adult patients; MODERATE in pediatric patients) | 2 Use antimicrobial lock therapy for long-term CVCs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Use recombinant tissue plasminogen activating factor (rt-PA) once weekly after hemodialysis in patients undergoing hemodialysis through a CVC. | (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Utilize infusion or vascular access teams for reducing CLABSI rates. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Use antimicrobial ointments for hemodialysis catheter-insertion sites. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Use an antiseptic-containing hub, connector cap, or port protector to cover connectors. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 3 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) | Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and infection | Essential practices | 1 Encourage appropriate use of antimicrobials through implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Implement diagnostic stewardship practices for ensuring appropriate use and interpretation of C. difficile testing. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Use contact precautions for infected patients, single-patient room preferred. (Quality of evidence: LOW for hand hygiene; MODERATE for gloves; LOW | for gowns; LOW for single-patient room) | 4 Adequately clean and disinfect equipment and the environment of patients with CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW for equipment; LOW for environment) | 5 Assess the adequacy of room cleaning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Implement a laboratory-based alert system to provide immediate notification to infection preventionists and clinical personnel about newly diagnosed | patients with CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Conduct CDI surveillance and analyze and report CDI data. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Educate healthcare personnel (HCP), environmental service personnel, and hospital administration about CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 9 Educate patients and their families about CDI as appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 10 Measure compliance with CDC or WHO hand hygiene and contact precaution recommendations. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Intensify the assessment of compliance with process measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Perform hand hygiene with soap and water as the preferred method following care of or interacting with the healthcare environment of a patient with | CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Place patients with diarrhea on contact precautions while C. difficile testing is pending. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Prolong the duration of contact precautions after the patient becomes asymptomatic until hospital discharge. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Use an EPA-approved sporicidal disinfectant, such as diluted (1:10) sodium hypochlorite, for environmental cleaning and disinfection. Implement a | system to coordinate with environmental services if it is determined that sodium hypochlorite is needed for environmental disinfection. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | Essential practices | 1 Implement an MRSA monitoring program. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Conduct an MRSA risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Promote compliance with CDC or World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene recommendations. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Use contact precautions for MRSA-colonized and MRSA-infected patients. A facility that chooses or has already chosen to modify the use of contact | precautions for some or all of these patients should conduct an MRSA-specific risk assessment to evaluate the facility for transmission risks and to | assess the effectiveness of other MRSA risk mitigation strategies (eg, hand hygiene, cleaning and disinfection of the environment, single occupancy | patient rooms) and should establish a process for ongoing monitoring, oversight, and risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Ensure cleaning and disinfection of equipment and the environment. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Implement a laboratory-based alert system that notifies healthcare personnel (HCP) of new MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients in a timely | manner. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Implement an alert system that identifies readmitted or transferred MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Provide MRSA data and outcome measures to key stakeholders, including senior leadership, physicians, nursing staff, and others. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 9 Educate healthcare personnel about MRSA. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 10 Educate patients and families about MRSA. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 11 Implement an antimicrobial stewardship program. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Active surveillance testing (AST) | 1 Implement an MRSA AST program for select patient populations as part of a multifaceted strategy to control and prevent MRSA. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) Note: specific populations may have different evidence ratings. | 2 Active surveillance for MRSA in conjunction with decolonization can be performed in targeted populations prior to surgery to prevent postsurgical | MRSA infection. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | (Continued) | 4 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent surgical-site infections (SSIs) | (Continued ) | 3 Active surveillance with contact precautions is inferior to universal decolonization for reduction of MRSA clinical isolates in adult ICUs. (Quality of | evidence: HIGH) | 4 Hospital-wide active surveillance for MRSA can be used in conjunction with contact precautions to reduce the incidence of MRSA infection. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Active surveillance can be performed in the setting of an MRSA outbreak or evidence of ongoing transmission of MRSA within a unit as part of a | multifaceted strategy to halt transmission. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Screen healthcare personnel for MRSA infection or colonization | 1 Screen HCP for MRSA infection or colonization if they are epidemiologically linked to a cluster of MRSA infections. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | MRSA decolonization therapy | 1 Use universal decolonization (ie, daily CHG bathing plus 5 days of nasal decolonization) for all patients in adult ICUs to reduce endemic MRSA clinical | cultures. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Perform preoperative nares screening with targeted use of CHG and nasal decolonization in MRSA carriers to reduce MRSA SSI from surgical | procedures involving implantation of hardware. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Screen for MRSA and provide targeted decolonization with CHG bathing and nasal decolonization to MRSA carriers in surgical units to reduce | postoperative MRSA inpatient infections. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Provide CHG bathing plus nasal decolonization to known MRSA carriers outside the ICU with medical devices, specifically central lines, midline | catheters, and lumbar drains to reduce MRSA clinical cultures. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Consider postdischarge decolonization of MRSA carriers to reduce postdischarge MRSA infections and readmissions. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Neonatal ICUs should consider targeted or universal decolonization during times of above-average MRSA infection rates or targeted decolonization for | patients at high risk of MRSA infection (eg, low birth weight, indwelling devices, or prior to high-risk surgeries). (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 7 Burn units should consider targeted or universal decolonization during times of above-average MRSA infection rates. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 8 Consider targeted or universal decolonization of hemodialysis patients. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 9 Decolonization should be strongly considered as part of a multimodal approach to control MRSA outbreaks. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Universal use of gowns and gloves | 1 Use gowns and gloves when providing care to or entering the room of any adult ICU patient, regardless of MRSA colonization status. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | 1 Administer antimicrobial prophylaxis according to evidence-based standards and guidelines. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Use a combination of parenteral and oral antimicrobial prophylaxis prior to elective colorectal surgery to reduce the risk of SSI. (Quality of evidence: | HIGH) | 3 Decolonize surgical patients with an anti-staphylococcal agent in the preoperative setting for orthopedic and cardiothoracic procedures. (Quality of | evidence: HIGH) | Decolonize surgical patients in other procedures at high risk of staphylococcal SSI, such as those involving prosthetic material. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 4 Use antiseptic-containing preoperative vaginal preparation agents for patients undergoing cesarean delivery or hysterectomy. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) | 5 Do not remove hair at the operative site unless the presence of hair will interfere with the surgical procedure. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Use alcohol-containing preoperative skin preparatory agents in combination with an antiseptic. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 For procedures not requiring hypothermia, maintain normothermia (temperature >35.5 °C) during the perioperative period. (Quality of evidence: HIGH). | 8 Use impervious plastic wound protectors for gastrointestinal and biliary tract surgery. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 9 Perform intraoperative antiseptic wound lavage. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 10 Control blood glucose level during the immediate postoperative period for all patients. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 11 Use a checklist and/or bundle to ensure compliance with best practices to improve surgical patient safety. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 12 Perform surveillance for SSI. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 13 Increase the efficiency of surveillance by utilizing automated data. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 14 Provide ongoing SSI rate feedback to surgical and perioperative personnel and leadership. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 15 Measure and provide feedback to healthcare personnel (HCP) regarding rates of compliance with process measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 5 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and ventilator-associated events (VAEs) | Adult patients | (Continued ) | 16 Educate surgeons and perioperative personnel about SSI prevention measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 17 Educate patients and their families about SSI prevention as appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 18 Implement policies and practices to reduce the risk of SSI for patients that align with applicable evidence-based standards, rules and regulations, and | medical device manufacturer instructions for use. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 19 Observe and review operating room personnel and the environment of care in the operating room and in central sterile reprocessing. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Perform an SSI risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Consider use of negative-pressure dressings in patients who may benefit. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Observe and review practices in the preoperative clinic, post-anesthesia care unit, surgical intensive care unit, and/or surgical ward. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Use antiseptic-impregnated sutures as a strategy to prevent SSI. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | Interventions with little risk of harm and that are associated with decreases in duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, mortality, antibiotic utilization, | and/or costs | Avoid intubation and prevent reintubation if possible. | 1 Use high flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as appropriate, whenever safe and feasible. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Minimize sedation. | 1 Minimize sedation of ventilated patients whenever possible. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Preferentially use multimodal strategies and medications other than benzodiazepines to manage agitation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Utilize a protocol to minimize sedation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Implement a ventilator liberation protocol. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Maintain and improve physical conditioning. | 1 Provide early exercise and mobilization. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Elevate the head of the bed to 30°–45°. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Provide oral care with toothbrushing but without chlorhexidine. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Provide early enteral rather than parenteral nutrition. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Maintain ventilator circuits. | 1 Change the ventilator circuit only if visibly soiled or malfunctioning (or per manufacturers’ instructions) (Quality of evidence: HIGH). | Additional approaches | May decrease duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and/or mortality in some populations but not in others, and they may confer some risk of harm | in some populations. | 1 Consider using selective decontamination of the oropharynx and digestive tract to decrease microbial burden in ICUs with low prevalence of antibiotic | resistant organisms. Antimicrobial decontamination is not recommended in countries, regions, or ICUs with high prevalence of antibiotic-resistant | organisms. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Additional approaches | May lower VAP rates, but current data are insufficient to determine their impact on duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and mortality. | 1 Consider using endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage ports to minimize pooling of secretions above the endotracheal cuff in patients | likely to require >48–72 hours of intubation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Consider early tracheostomy. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Consider postpyloric feeding tube placement in patients with gastric feeding intolerance at high risk for aspiration. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Preterm neonatal patients | Pediatric patients | Essential practices | Confer minimal risk of harm and may lower VAP and/or PedVAE rates. | Avoid intubation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Minimize duration of mechanical ventilation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Manage patients without sedation whenever possible. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Use caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity within 72 hours after birth to facilitate extubation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Assess readiness to extubate daily. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Take steps to minimize unplanned extubation and reintubation. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Provide regular oral care with sterile water (extrapolated from practice in infants and children, no data in preterm neonates). (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 6 Change the ventilator circuit only if visibly soiled or malfunctioning or according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use (extrapolated from studies in | adults and children, no data in preterm neonates). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Minimal risks of harm, but impact on VAP and VAE rates is unknown. | 1 Lateral recumbent positioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Reverse Trendelenberg positioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Closed or in-line suctioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Oral care with maternal colostrum. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | Confer minimal risk of harm and some data suggest that they may lower VAP rates, PedVAE rates, and/or duration of mechanical ventilation. | Avoid intubation. | 1 Use noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula whenever safe and feasible. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) | Minimize duration of mechanical ventilation. | 1 Assess readiness to extubate daily using spontaneous breathing trials in patients without contraindications. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Take steps to minimize unplanned extubations and reintubations. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Avoid fluid overload. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Provide regular oral care (ie, toothbrushing or gauze if no teeth). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Elevate the head of the bed unless medically contraindicated. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Maintain ventilator circuits. | 1 Change ventilator circuits only when visibly soiled or malfunctioning (or per manufacturer’s instructions). (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Remove condensate from the ventilator circuit frequently and avoid draining the condensate toward the patient. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Endotracheal tube selection and management | 1 Use cuffed endotracheal tubes. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Maintain cuff pressure and volume at the minimal occlusive settings to prevent clinically significant air leaks around the endotracheal tube, typically | 20-25cm H2O. This “minimal leak” approach is associated with lower rates of post-extubation stridor. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Suction oral secretions before each position change. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Minimal risks of harm and some evidence of benefit in adult patients but data in pediatric populations are limited. | 1 Minimize sedation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Use endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage ports for patients ≥10 years of age. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Consider early tracheostomy. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 7 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) | Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene | Essential practices | Promote the maintenance of healthy hand skin and nails. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Promote the preferential use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS) in most clinical situations. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Perform hand hygiene as indicated by CDC or the WHO Five Moments. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Include fingernail care in facility-specific policies related to hand hygiene. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | a) Healthcare personnel (HCP) should maintain short, natural fingernails. | b) Nails should not extend past the fingertip. | c) HCP who provide direct or indirect care in high-risk areas | (eg, ICU or perioperative) should not wear artificial fingernail extenders. | d) Prohibitions against fingernail polish (standard or gel shellac) are at the discretion of the infection prevention program, except among scrubbed | individuals who interact with the sterile field during surgical procedures; these individuals should not wear fingernail polish or gel shellac. | 4 Engage all HCP in primary prevention of occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Provide cotton glove liners for HCP with hand irritation and educate these HCP on their use. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Select appropriate products. | 1 For routine hand hygiene, choose liquid, gel, or foam ABHS with at least 60% alcohol. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Involve HCP in selection of products. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Obtain and consider manufacturers’ product-specific data if seeking ABHS with ingredients that may enhance efficacy against organisms anticipated to | be less susceptible to biocides. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Confirm that the volume of ABHS dispensed is consistent with the volume shown to be efficacious. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Educate HCP about an appropriate volume of ABHS and the time required to obtain effectiveness. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Provide facility-approved hand moisturizer that is compatible with antiseptics and gloves. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 For surgical antisepsis, use an FDA-approved surgical hand scrub or waterless surgical hand rub. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Ensure the accessibility of hand hygiene supplies. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Ensure ABHS dispensers are unambiguous, visible, and accessible within the workflow of HCP. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 In private rooms, consider 2 ABHS dispensers the minimum threshold for adequate numbers of dispensers: 1 dispenser in the hallway, and 1 in the | patient room. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 In semiprivate rooms, suites, bays, and other multipatient bed configurations, consider 1 dispenser per 2 beds the minimum threshold for adequate | numbers of dispensers. Place ABHS dispensers in the workflow of HCP. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Ensure that the placement of hand hygiene supplies (eg, individual pocket-sized dispensers, bed mounted ABHS dispenser, single use pump bottles) is | easily accessible for HCP in all areas where patients receive care. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Evaluate for the risk of intentional consumption. Utilize dispensers that mitigate this risk, such as wall-mounted dispensers that allow limited numbers | of activations within short periods (eg, 5 seconds). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Have surgical hand rub and scrub available in perioperative areas. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 Consider providing ABHS hand rubs or handwash with FDA-approved antiseptics for use in procedural areas and prior to high-risk bedside procedures | (eg, central-line insertion). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | Practices supported by interventional studies suggesting lower | NV-HAP rates | 1 Provide regular oral care. | 2 Diagnose and manage dysphagia. | 3 Provide early mobilization. | 4 Implement multimodal interventions to prevent viral infections. | 5 Use prevention bundles. | 8 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Implementing strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections | Standard approach to implementation | Examples of implementation frameworks | (Continued ) | Ensure appropriate glove use to reduce hand and environmental contamination. (Quality of Evidence: HIGH) | 1 Use gloves for all contact with the patient and environment as indicated by standard and contact precautions during the care of individuals with | organisms confirmed to be less susceptible to biocides (e.g., C. difficile or norovirus) | 2 Educate HCP about the potential for self-contamination and environmental contamination when gloves are worn. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Educate and confirm the ability of HCP to doff gloves in a manner that avoids contamination. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Take steps to reduce environmental contamination associated with sinks and sink drains. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Monitor adherence to hand hygiene. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Provide timely and meaningful feedback to enhance a culture of safety. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Additional approaches during outbreaks | 1 Consider educating HCP using a structured approach (eg, WHO Steps) for handwashing or hand sanitizing. Evaluate HCP adherence to technique. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 For waterborne pathogens of premise plumbing, consider disinfection of sink drains using an EPA-registered disinfectant with claims against biofilms. | Consult with state or local public health for assistance in determining appropriate protocols for use and other actions needed to ensure safe supply. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 For C. difficile and norovirus, in addition to contact precautions, encourage hand washing with soap and water after the care of patients with known or | suspected infections. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 1 Assess determinants of change and | classify as follows: | • Facilitators: promote practice or | change, or | • Barriers: hinder practice or change | Individual level: healthcare personnel, leaders, patients, and visitors’ preferences, needs, attitudes, and | knowledge. | Facility level: team composition, communication, culture, capacity, policies, resources. | Partners: degree of support and buy-in. | 2 Choose measures Measurement methods must be appropriate for the question(s) they seek to answer and adhere to the | methods’ data collection and analysis rules: | • Outcome measure: ultimate goal (eg, HAI reduction). | • Process measure: action reliability (eg, bundle adherence). | • Balancing measure: undesired outcome of change (eg, staff absences due to required vaccine side effects). | 3 Select framework(s) See below and “Implementing Strategies to Prevent Infections in Acute Care Settings” (Table 3) | 32 | Framework Published Experience Resources | 4Es Settings | • Healthcare facilities | • Large-scale projects including multiple | sites | Infection prevention and control | • HAI prevention (including mortality | reduction and cost savings) | • 4Es Framework11 | • HAI reduction12–14 | • Mortality reduction15 | • Cost savings16 | Behavior Change Wheel Settings | • Community-based practice | • Healthcare facilities | Healthy behaviors | • Smoking cessation | • Obesity prevention | • Increased physical activity | Infection prevention and control | • Hand hygiene adherence | • Antibiotic prescribing17 | • Behavior Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions18 | • Stand More at Work (SMArT Work)19 | (Continued) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 9 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Acknowledgments. The Compendium Partners thank the authors for their | dedication to this work, including maintaining adherence to the rigorous | process for the development of the Compendium: 2022 Updates, involving but | not limited to screening of thousands of articles; achieving multilevel consensus; | and consideration of, response to, and incorporation of many organizations’ | feedback and comments. We acknowledge these efforts especially because they | occurred as the authors handled the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. The | authors thank Valerie Deloney, MBA, for her organizational expertise in the | development of this manuscript and Janet Waters, MLS, BSN, RN, for her | expertise in developing the strategies used for the literature searches that | informed this manuscript. The authors thank the many individuals and | organizations who gave their time and expertise to review and provide | (Continued ) | Comprehensive Unit-based | Safety Program (CUSP) | Settings | • Intensive care units | • Ambulatory centers | Improvements | • Antibiotic prescribing | • CLABSI prevention | • CAUTI prevention | • CUSP Implementation Toolkit20 | • AHA/HRET: Eliminating CAUTI (Stop CAUTI)21 | • AHRQ Toolkit to Improve Safety in Ambulatory Surgery Centers22 | European Mixed Methods Settings | • European institutions of varied | healthcare systems and cultures | Improvements: | • CLABSI prevention | • Hand hygiene | • PROHIBIT: Description and Materials23 | Getting to Outcomes (GTO)® Settings | • Community programs and services | Improvements | • Sexual health promotion | • Dual-disorder treatment program in | veterans | • Community emergency preparedness | • RAND Guide for Emergency Preparedness24 (illustrated overview of GTO® methodology) | Model for Improvement Settings | • Healthcare (inpatient, perioperative, | ambulatory) | • Public health | Interventions | • PPE use | • HAI prevention | • Public health process evaluation | • Institute for Healthcare Improvement25 | • The Improvement Guide26 | • Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge27 | Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, | Implementation, Maintenance | (RE-AIM) | Settings | • Healthcare | • Public health | • Community programs | • Sexual health | Evaluations | • Antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU | • Clinical practice guidelines for STIs | • Promotion of vaccination | • Implementation of contact tracing | • RE-AIM.org28 | • Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and | resources29 | Replicating Effective Practices | (REP) | Settings | • Healthcare | • Public health | • HIV prevention | Interventions that have produced | positive results are reframed for local | relevance | CDC Compendium of HIV Prevention Interventions with Evidence of | Effectiveness30 (see Section C, Intervention Checklist) | Theoretical Domains Settings | • Healthcare (inpatient, perioperative, | ambulatory) | • Community (individual and communitybased behaviors) | Health maintenance | • Diabetes management in primary care | • Pregnancy weight management | HCP practice | • ICU blood transfusion | • Selective GI tract decontamination | • Preoperative testing | • Spine imaging | • Hand hygiene |
The Seattle Flu Study: a multi-arm community-based prospective study protocol for assessing influenza prevalence, transmission, and genomic epidemiology (preprint)
Chu HY , Boeckh M , Englund JA , Famulare M , Lutz B , Nickerson DA , Rieder M , Starita LM , Shendure J , Bedford T , Adler A , Brandstetter E , Frazer CD , Han PD , Gulati RK , Hadfield J , Jackson M , Kiavand A , Kimball LE , Lacombe K , Logue JK , Lyon VR , Newman KL , Sibley TR , Zigman Suchsland M , Wolf C . medRxiv 2020 2020.03.02.20029595 Introduction Influenza epidemics and pandemics cause significant morbidity and mortality. An effective response to a potential pandemic requires the infrastructure to rapidly detect, characterize, and potentially contain new and emerging influenza strains at a population level. The objective of this study is to use data gathered simultaneously from community and hospital sites to develop a model of how influenza enters and spreads in a population.Methods and Analysis Starting in the 2018-19 season, we have been enrolling individuals with acute respiratory illness from community sites throughout the Seattle metropolitan area, including clinics, childcare facilities, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, workplaces, college campuses, and homeless shelters. At these sites, we collect clinical data and mid-nasal swabs from individuals with at least two acute respiratory symptoms. Additionally, we collect residual nasal swabs and data from individuals who seek care for respiratory symptoms at four regional hospitals. Samples are tested using a multiplex molecular assay, and influenza whole genome sequencing is performed for samples with influenza detected. Geospatial mapping and computational modeling platforms are in development to characterize the regional spread of influenza and other respiratory pathogens.Ethics and Dissemination The study was approved by the University of Washington’s Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through talks at conferences, peer-reviewed publications, and on the study website (www.seattleflu.org).Strengths and limitations of this study- Large-scale multiple-arm study of respiratory illness characterization with collection of samples from individuals in the community as well as in ambulatory care and hospital settings- Integration of sociodemographic, clinical, and geospatial data on a regional level- Multiplex molecular testing for multiple viral and bacterial pathogens and whole genome sequencing of influenza for detailed molecular epidemiologic characterization and transmission mapping- Geographically and socioeconomically diverse sampling of community-based acute respiratory illnessesCompeting Interest StatementAmanda Adler, Elisabeth Brandstetter, Michael Famulare, Chris D. Frazar, Peter D. Han, Reena K. Gulati, James Hadfield, Michael L. Jackson, Anahita Kiavand, Louise E. Kimball, Kirsten Lacombe, Jennifer Logue, Victoria Lyon, Kira L. Newman, Thomas R. Sibley, Jay Shendure, Lea Starita, Monica L. Zigman Suchsland, and Caitlin Wolf declare no competing interests. Helen Y Chu receives research support from Sanofi, Cepheid, and Genentech/Roche and is a consultant for Merck. Janet Englund receives research support to her institution from Astrazeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Novavax and is a consultant for Sanofi Pasteur and Meissa Vaccines.Funding StatementThe Seattle Flu Study is funded through the Brotman Baty Institute. The funder was not involved in the design of the study, does not have any ownership over the management and conduct of the study, the data, or the rights to publishAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable YesThe data will be accessed only by authorized individuals on the study team. Access to deidentified, aggregated data and analysis code will be publicly available on the study web page (www.seattleflu.org). http://www.seattleflu.org |
Cryptic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Washington State.
Bedford T , Greninger AL , Roychoudhury P , Starita LM , Famulare M , Huang ML , Nalla A , Pepper G , Reinhardt A , Xie H , Shrestha L , Nguyen TN , Adler A , Brandstetter E , Cho S , Giroux D , Han PD , Fay K , Frazar CD , Ilcisin M , Lacombe K , Lee J , Kiavand A , Richardson M , Sibley TR , Truong M , Wolf CR , Nickerson DA , Rieder MJ , Englund JA , Hadfield J , Hodcroft EB , Huddleston J , Moncla LH , Müller NF , Neher RA , Deng X , Gu W , Federman S , Chiu C , Duchin J , Gautom R , Melly G , Hiatt B , Dykema P , Lindquist S , Queen K , Tao Y , Uehara A , Tong S , MacCannell D , Armstrong GL , Baird GS , Chu HY , Shendure J , Jerome KR . medRxiv 2020 Following its emergence in Wuhan, China, in late November or early December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has rapidly spread throughout the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. Genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 strains allows for the reconstruction of transmission history connecting these infections. Here, we analyze 346 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from samples collected between 20 February and 15 March 2020 from infected patients in Washington State, USA. We found that the large majority of SARS-CoV-2 infections sampled during this time frame appeared to have derived from a single introduction event into the state in late January or early February 2020 and subsequent local spread, strongly suggesting cryptic spread of COVID-19 during the months of January and February 2020, before active community surveillance was implemented. We estimate a common ancestor of this outbreak clade as occurring between 18 January and 9 February 2020. From genomic data, we estimate an exponential doubling between 2.4 and 5.1 days. These results highlight the need for large-scale community surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 introductions and spread and the power of pathogen genomics to inform epidemiological understanding. |
Examining the use of wearable activity monitors and goal setting toward a step goal
Soto Graycie , Omura John D , Fulton Janet E , Whitfield Geoffrey P . Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022 54 170-170 PURPOSE: Wearable activity monitors (wearables) are increasingly used in the US and can help encourage physical activity participation through step counts. Understanding whether wearable users track daily step counts and how they set step goals can help ensure wearables are designed and used to maximize their public health impact. This study examined the proportion of US adults who use wearables, and among users whether wearables are used to track daily step counts and how they determine their daily step count goals. | | METHODS: Data from a nationwide sample of US adults (SummerStyles, 2020) were analyzed (N = 3661). Participants were asked if they have ever used a wearable and were categorized as a current, past, or never user. Current users were asked if they use their wearable to track their daily step count. Those who responded yes were asked if they determine their daily step goal by using the default goal, a personal goal, no goal, or that they gradually increase their step goal. Prevalence of wearable users, use of wearable to track daily step counts, and how users determine daily step count goals were calculated overall and by demographic characteristics. Pairwise t tests were used to identify significant differences between subgroups (p < .05). | | RESULTS: Overall, 31.4% of US adults currently use a wearable activity monitor. Among current users (n = 1219), 88.3% reported using their device to track their daily step count with a greater prevalence among females (91.2%) compared to males (84.6%) and among Hispanics (95.2%) compared to Whites (87.1%). Current wearable users reported determining their step count goal by using the default goal (41.7%), their own personal goal (32.9%), not having a daily goal (17.4%), and gradually increasing their daily goal (8.0%). | | CONCLUSION: Nearly 9 in 10 wearable users track their daily step count on their devices. Most users set step goals based on default settings or personal goals, so establishing evidence-based steps per day guidelines may help wearable users achieve levels of health enhancing physical activity. |
Comparison of Symptoms and RNA Levels in Children and Adults With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Community Setting.
Chung E , Chow EJ , Wilcox NC , Burstein R , Brandstetter E , Han PD , Fay K , Pfau B , Adler A , Lacombe K , Lockwood CM , Uyeki TM , Shendure J , Duchin JS , Rieder MJ , Nickerson DA , Boeckh M , Famulare M , Hughes JP , Starita LM , Bedford T , Englund JA , Chu HY . JAMA Pediatr 2021 175 (10) e212025 IMPORTANCE: The association between COVID-19 symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 viral levels in children living in the community is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To characterize symptoms of pediatric COVID-19 in the community and analyze the association between symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels, as approximated by cycle threshold (Ct) values, in children and adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used a respiratory virus surveillance platform in persons of all ages to detect community COVID-19 cases from March 23 to November 9, 2020. A population-based convenience sample of children younger than 18 years and adults in King County, Washington, who enrolled online for home self-collection of upper respiratory samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing were included. EXPOSURES: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from participant-collected samples. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, with Ct values stratified by age and symptoms. RESULTS: Among 555 SARS-CoV-2-positive participants (mean [SD] age, 33.7 [20.1] years; 320 were female [57.7%]), 47 of 123 children (38.2%) were asymptomatic compared with 31 of 432 adults (7.2%). When symptomatic, fewer symptoms were reported in children compared with adults (mean [SD], 1.6 [2.0] vs 4.5 [3.1]). Symptomatic individuals had lower Ct values (which corresponded to higher viral RNA levels) than asymptomatic individuals (adjusted estimate for children, -3.0; 95% CI, -5.5 to -0.6; P = .02; adjusted estimate for adults, -2.9; 95% CI, -5.2 to -0.6; P = .01). The difference in mean Ct values was neither statistically significant between symptomatic children and symptomatic adults (adjusted estimate, -0.7; 95% CI, -2.2 to 0.9; P = .41) nor between asymptomatic children and asymptomatic adults (adjusted estimate, -0.6; 95% CI, -4.0 to 2.8; P = .74). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this community-based cross-sectional study, SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels, as determined by Ct values, were significantly higher in symptomatic individuals than in asymptomatic individuals and no significant age-related differences were found. Further research is needed to understand the role of SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and viral transmission. |
COVID-19 and Chronic Disease: The Impact Now and in the Future.
Hacker KA , Briss PA , Richardson L , Wright J , Petersen R . Prev Chronic Dis 2021 18 E62 Chronic diseases represent 7 of the top 10 causes of death in the United States (1). Six in 10 Americans live with at least 1 chronic condition, such as heart disease, stroke, cancer, or diabetes (2). Chronic diseases are also the leading causes of disability in the US and the leading drivers of the nation’s $3.8 trillion annual health care costs (2,3). | | The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in enormous personal and societal losses, with more than half a million lives lost (4). COVID-19 is a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that can result in respiratory distress. In addition to the physical toll, the emotional impact has yet to be fully understood. For those with chronic disease, the impact has been particularly profound (5,6). Heart disease, diabetes, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and obesity are all conditions that increase the risk for severe illness from COVID-19 (7). Other factors, including smoking and pregnancy, also increase the risk (7). Finally, in addition to COVID-19–related deaths since February 1, 2020, an increase in deaths has been observed among people with dementia, circulatory diseases, and diabetes among other causes (8). This increase could reflect undercounting COVID-19 deaths or indirect effects of the virus, such as underutilization of, or stresses on, the health care system (8). |
Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children - Initial Therapy and Outcomes.
Son MBF , Murray N , Friedman K , Young CC , Newhams MM , Feldstein LR , Loftis LL , Tarquinio KM , Singh AR , Heidemann SM , Soma VL , Riggs BJ , Fitzgerald JC , Kong M , Doymaz S , Giuliano JS Jr , Keenaghan MA , Hume JR , Hobbs CV , Schuster JE , Clouser KN , Hall MW , Smith LS , Horwitz SM , Schwartz SP , Irby K , Bradford TT , Maddux AB , Babbitt CJ , Rowan CM , McLaughlin GE , Yager PH , Maamari M , Mack EH , Carroll CL , Montgomery VL , Halasa NB , Cvijanovich NZ , Coates BM , Rose CE , Newburger JW , Patel MM , Randolph AG . N Engl J Med 2021 385 (1) 23-34 BACKGROUND: The assessment of real-world effectiveness of immunomodulatory medications for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) may guide therapy. METHODS: We analyzed surveillance data on inpatients younger than 21 years of age who had MIS-C and were admitted to 1 of 58 U.S. hospitals between March 15 and October 31, 2020. The effectiveness of initial immunomodulatory therapy (day 0, indicating the first day any such therapy for MIS-C was given) with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) plus glucocorticoids, as compared with IVIG alone, was evaluated with propensity-score matching and inverse probability weighting, with adjustment for baseline MIS-C severity and demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was cardiovascular dysfunction (a composite of left ventricular dysfunction or shock resulting in the use of vasopressors) on or after day 2. Secondary outcomes included the components of the primary outcome, the receipt of adjunctive treatment (glucocorticoids in patients not already receiving glucocorticoids on day 0, a biologic, or a second dose of IVIG) on or after day 1, and persistent or recurrent fever on or after day 2. RESULTS: A total of 518 patients with MIS-C (median age, 8.7 years) received at least one immunomodulatory therapy; 75% had been previously healthy, and 9 died. In the propensity-score-matched analysis, initial treatment with IVIG plus glucocorticoids (103 patients) was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular dysfunction on or after day 2 than IVIG alone (103 patients) (17% vs. 31%; risk ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.94). The risks of the components of the composite outcome were also lower among those who received IVIG plus glucocorticoids: left ventricular dysfunction occurred in 8% and 17% of the patients, respectively (risk ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.15), and shock resulting in vasopressor use in 13% and 24% (risk ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.00). The use of adjunctive therapy was lower among patients who received IVIG plus glucocorticoids than among those who received IVIG alone (34% vs. 70%; risk ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.65), but the risk of fever was unaffected (31% and 40%, respectively; risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.13). The inverse-probability-weighted analysis confirmed the results of the propensity-score-matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Among children and adolescents with MIS-C, initial treatment with IVIG plus glucocorticoids was associated with a lower risk of new or persistent cardiovascular dysfunction than IVIG alone. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.). |
Global Trends in Norovirus Genotype Distribution among Children with Acute Gastroenteritis.
Cannon JL , Bonifacio J , Bucardo F , Buesa J , Bruggink L , Chan MC , Fumian TM , Giri S , Gonzalez MD , Hewitt J , Lin JH , Mans J , Muñoz C , Pan CY , Pang XL , Pietsch C , Rahman M , Sakon N , Selvarangan R , Browne H , Barclay L , Vinjé J . Emerg Infect Dis 2021 27 (5) 1438-1445 Noroviruses are a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) among adults and children worldwide. NoroSurv is a global network for norovirus strain surveillance among children <5 years of age with AGE. Participants in 16 countries across 6 continents used standardized protocols for dual typing (genotype and polymerase type) and uploaded 1,325 dual-typed sequences to the NoroSurv web portal during 2016-2020. More than 50% of submitted sequences were GII.4 Sydney[P16] or GII.4 Sydney[P31] strains. Other common strains included GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.6[P7], and GI.3[P3] viruses. In total, 22 genotypes and 36 dual types, including GII.3 and GII.20 viruses with rarely reported polymerase types, were detected, reflecting high strain diversity. Surveillance data captured in NoroSurv enables the monitoring of trends in norovirus strains associated childhood AGE throughout the world on a near real-time basis. |
Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Children in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Prospective Multicenter Study.
Haddadin Z , Schuster JE , Spieker AJ , Rahman H , Blozinski A , Stewart L , Campbell AP , Lively JY , Michaels MG , Williams JV , Boom JA , Sahni LC , Staat M , McNeal M , Selvarangan R , Harrison CJ , Weinberg GA , Szilagyi PG , Englund JA , Klein EJ , Curns AT , Rha B , Langley GE , Hall AJ , Patel MM , Halasa NB . Pediatrics 2021 148 (2) OBJECTIVES: Nonpharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 likely have a role in decreasing viral acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs). We aimed to assess the frequency of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza ARIs before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: This study was a prospective, multicenter, population-based ARI surveillance, including children seen in the emergency departments and inpatient settings in 7 US cities for ARI. Respiratory samples were collected and evaluated by molecular testing. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the association between community mitigation and number of eligible and proportion of RSV and influenza cases. RESULTS: Overall, 45 759 children were eligible; 25 415 were enrolled and tested; 25% and 14% were RSV-positive and influenza-positive, respectively. In 2020, we noted a decrease in eligible and enrolled ARI subjects after community mitigation measures were introduced, with no RSV or influenza detection from April 5, 2020, to April 30, 2020. Compared with 2016-2019, there was an average of 10.6 fewer eligible ARI cases per week per site and 63.9% and 45.8% lower odds of patients testing positive for RSV and influenza, respectively, during the 2020 community mitigation period. In all sites except Seattle, the proportions of positive tests for RSV and influenza in the 2020 community mitigation period were lower than predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Between March and April 2020, rapid declines in ARI cases and the proportions of RSV and influenza in children were consistently noted across 7 US cities, which could be attributable to community mitigation measures against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. |
A remote household-based approach to influenza self-testing and antiviral treatment.
Heimonen J , McCulloch DJ , O'Hanlon J , Kim AE , Emanuels A , Wilcox N , Brandstetter E , Stewart M , McCune D , Fry S , Parsons S , Hughes JP , Jackson ML , Uyeki TM , Boeckh M , Starita LM , Bedford T , Englund JA , Chu HY . Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021 15 (4) 469-477 BACKGROUND: Households represent important settings for transmission of influenza and other respiratory viruses. Current influenza diagnosis and treatment relies upon patient visits to healthcare facilities, which may lead to under-diagnosis and treatment delays. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of an at-home approach to influenza diagnosis and treatment via home testing, telehealth care, and rapid antiviral home delivery. METHODS: We conducted a pilot interventional study of remote influenza diagnosis and treatment in Seattle-area households with children during the 2019-2020 influenza season using pre-positioned nasal swabs and home influenza tests. Home monitoring for respiratory symptoms occurred weekly; if symptoms were reported within 48 hours of onset, participants collected mid-nasal swabs and used a rapid home-based influenza immunoassay. An additional home-collected swab was returned to a laboratory for confirmatory influenza RT-PCR testing. Baloxavir antiviral treatment was prescribed and delivered to symptomatic and age-eligible participants, following a telehealth encounter. RESULTS: 124 households comprising 481 individuals self-monitored for respiratory symptoms, with 58 home tests administered. 12 home tests were positive for influenza, of which eight were true positives confirmed by RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the home influenza test were 72.7% and 96.2%, respectively. There were eight home deliveries of baloxavir, with 7 (87.5%) occurring within 3 hours of prescription and all within 48 hours of symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of self-testing combined with rapid home delivery of influenza antiviral treatment. This approach may be an important control strategy for influenza epidemics and pandemics. |
Finding, treating and retaining persons with HIV in a high HIV prevalence and high treatment coverage country: Results from the Botswana Combination Prevention Project.
Bachanas P , Alwano MG , Lebelonyane R , Block L , Behel S , Raizes E , Ussery G , Wang H , Ussery F , Pretorius Holme M , Sexton C , Pals S , Lasry A , Del Castillo L , Hader S , Lockman S , Bock N , Moore J . PLoS One 2021 16 (4) e0250211 INTRODUCTION: The scale-up of Universal Test and Treat has resulted in reductions in HIV morbidity, mortality and incidence. However, healthcare system and personal challenges have impacted the levels of treatment coverage achieved. We implemented interventions to improve linkage to care, retention, viral load (VL) coverage and service delivery, and describe the HIV care cascade over the course of the Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP) study. METHODS: BCPP was designed to evaluate the impact of prevention interventions on HIV incidence in 30 communities in Botswana. We followed a longitudinal cohort of newly identified and known HIV-positive persons not on antiretroviral therapy (ART) identified through community-based testing activities through BCPP and referred with appointments to local HIV clinics in 15 intervention communities. Those who did not keep the first or follow-up appointments were tracked and traced through phone and home contacts. Improvements to service delivery models in the intervention clinics were also implemented. RESULTS: A total of 3,657 newly identified or HIV-positive persons not on ART were identified and referred to their local HIV clinic; 90% (3,282/3,657) linked to care and of those, 93% (3,066/3,282) initiated treatment. Near the end of the study, 221 persons remained >90 days late for appointments or missing. Tracing efforts identified 54/3,066 (2%) persons who initiated treatment but died, and 106/3,066 (3%) persons were located and returned to treatment. At study end, 61/3,066 (2%) persons remained missing and were never reached. Overall, 2,951 (98%) persons living with HIV (PLHIV) who initiated treatment were still alive, retained in care and still receiving ART out of the 3,001 persons alive at the end of the study. Of those on ART, 2,854 (97%) had current VL results and 2,784 (98%) of those were virally suppressed at study end. CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved high rates of linkage, treatment initiation, retention and VL coverage and suppression in a cohort of newly identified and known PLHIV not on ART. Tracking and tracing interventions effectively identified those persons who needed more resource intensive follow-up. The interventions implemented to improve service delivery and data quality may have also contributed to high linkage and retention rates. Clinical trial number: NCT01965470. |
SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a Georgia school district - United States, December 2020-January 2021.
Gettings JR , Gold JAW , Kimball A , Forsberg K , Scott C , Uehara A , Tong S , Hast M , Swanson MR , Morris E , Oraka E , Almendares O , Thomas ES , Mehari L , McCloud J , Roberts G , Crosby D , Balajee A , Burnett E , Chancey RJ , Cook P , Donadel M , Espinosa C , Evans ME , Fleming-Dutra KE , Forero C , Kukielka EA , Li Y , Marcet PL , Mitruka K , Nakayama JY , Nakazawa Y , O'Hegarty M , Pratt C , Rice ME , Rodriguez Stewart RM , Sabogal R , Sanchez E , Velasco-Villa A , Weng MK , Zhang J , Rivera G , Parrott T , Franklin R , Memark J , Drenzek C , Hall AJ , Kirking HL , Tate JE , Vallabhaneni S . Clin Infect Dis 2021 74 (2) 319-326 BACKGROUND: To inform prevention strategies, we assessed the extent of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and settings in which transmission occurred in a Georgia public school district. METHODS: During December 1, 2020-January 22, 2021, SARS-CoV-2-infected index cases and their close contacts in schools were identified by school and public health officials. For in-school contacts, we assessed symptoms and offered SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing; performed epidemiologic investigations and whole-genome sequencing to identify in-school transmission; and calculated secondary attack rate (SAR) by school setting (e.g., sports, elementary school classroom), index case role (i.e., staff, student), and index case symptomatic status. RESULTS: We identified 86 index cases and 1,119 contacts, 688 (63.1%) of whom received testing. Fifty-nine (8.7%) of 679 contacts tested positive; 15 (17.4%) of 86 index cases resulted in ≥2 positive contacts. Among 55 persons testing positive with available symptom data, 31 (56.4%) were asymptomatic. Highest SAR were in indoor, high-contact sports settings (23.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7, 33.3), staff meetings/lunches (18.2%, CI 4.5-31.8), and elementary school classrooms (9.5%, CI 6.5-12.5). SAR was higher for staff (13.1%, CI 9.0-17.2) versus student index cases (5.8%, CI 3.6-8.0) and for symptomatic (10.9%, CI 8.1-13.9) versus asymptomatic index cases (3.0%, CI 1.0-5.5). CONCLUSIONS: Indoor sports may pose a risk to the safe operation of in-person learning. Preventing infection in staff members, through measures that include COVID-19 vaccination, is critical to reducing in-school transmission. Because many positive contacts were asymptomatic, contact tracing should be paired with testing, regardless of symptoms. |
A Comprehensive Approach to Ending an Outbreak of Rare bla OXA-72 gene-positive Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii at a Community Hospital, Kansas City, MO, 2018
McKinsey DS , Gasser C , McKinsey JP , Ditto G , Agard A , Zellmer B , Poteete C , Vagnone PS , Dale JL , Bos J , Hahn R , Turabelidze G , Poiry M , Franklin P , Vlachos N , McAllister GA , Halpin AL , Glowicz J , Ham DC , Epstein L . Am J Infect Control 2021 49 (9) 1183-1185 We identified a cluster of extensively drug-resistant, carbapenemase gene-positive, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CP-CRAB) at a teaching hospital in Kansas City. Extensively drug-resistant CRAB was identified from eight patients and 3% of environmental cultures. We used patient cohorting and targeted environmental disinfection to stop transmission. After implementation of these measures, no additional cases were identified. |
Notes from the Field: COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Program - Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota, September-November 2020.
Matthias J , Charboneau T , Schaffer C , Rusten J , Whitmer S , de la Paz J , Dykstra J , Pathmanathan I , Stowell D . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (14) 533-534 In late September 2020, the incidence of confirmed COVID-19* in North Dakota began increasing rapidly, from approximately 300 new cases per day to approximately 2,260 cases on November 13, 2020 (1). On October 20, the North Dakota Department of Health reported that contact tracing notification efforts were delayed. Because of the delay, COVID-19 patients were asked to notify their own contacts about potential exposure and encourage them to seek testing for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (2). The Spirit Lake sovereign nation in east central North Dakota is home to approximately 7,500 members of the Spirit Lake Tribe. In response to increasing incidence of COVID-19 on the Spirit Lake Reservation, CDC assisted the Spirit Lake Tribe in building a tribally managed program for comprehensive COVID-19 case investigations, case notification, contact tracing, contact testing, and contact management to ensure timely implementation of these critical epidemic control measures. |
Rotavirus Genotype Trends and Gastrointestinal Pathogen Detection in the United States, 2014-16: Results from the New Vaccine Surveillance Network.
Esona MD , Ward ML , Wikswo ME , Rustempasic SM , Gautam R , Perkins C , Selvarangan R , Harrison CJ , Boom JA , Englund JA , Klein EJ , Staat MA , McNeal MM , Halasa N , Chappell J , Weinberg GA , Payne DC , Parashar UD , Bowen MD . J Infect Dis 2021 224 (9) 1539-1549 BACKGROUND: Following the implementation of rotavirus vaccination in 2006, severe acute gastroenteritis (AGE) due to group A rotavirus (RVA) has substantially declined in USA (US) children. We report the RVA genotype prevalence as well as co-infection data from seven US New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) sites during three consecutive RVA seasons, 2014-2016. METHODS: A total of 1041 stool samples that tested positive for RVA by Rotaclone enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for RVA genotyping and multipathogen testing. RESULTS: A total of 795 (76%) contained detectable RVA at CDC. Rotavirus disease was highest in children < 3 years of age. Four G types (G1, G2, G9, and G12) accounted for 94.6% of strains while two P types (P[4] and P[8]) accounted 94.7% of the strains. Overall, G12P[8] was the most common genotype detected in all three seasons. Stepwise conditional logistic analysis found year and study site were significant predictors of genotype. Twenty four percent (24%) of RVA-positive specimens contained other AGE pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: G12P[8] predominated over three seasons, but strain predominance varied by year and study site. Ongoing surveillance provides continuous tracking and monitoring of US genotypes during the post vaccine era. |
Neurologic Involvement in Children and Adolescents Hospitalized in the United States for COVID-19 or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome.
LaRovere KL , Riggs BJ , Poussaint TY , Young CC , Newhams MM , Maamari M , Walker TC , Singh AR , Dapul H , Hobbs CV , McLaughlin GE , Son MBF , Maddux AB , Clouser KN , Rowan CM , McGuire JK , Fitzgerald JC , Gertz SJ , Shein SL , Munoz AC , Thomas NJ , Irby K , Levy ER , Staat MA , Tenforde MW , Feldstein LR , Halasa NB , Giuliano JS Jr , Hall MW , Kong M , Carroll CL , Schuster JE , Doymaz S , Loftis LL , Tarquinio KM , Babbitt CJ , Nofziger RA , Kleinman LC , Keenaghan MA , Cvijanovich NZ , Spinella PC , Hume JR , Wellnitz K , Mack EH , Michelson KN , Flori HR , Patel MM , Randolph AG . JAMA Neurol 2021 78 (5) 536-547 IMPORTANCE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the nervous system in adult patients. The spectrum of neurologic involvement in children and adolescents is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To understand the range and severity of neurologic involvement among children and adolescents associated with COVID-19. SETTING, DESIGN, AND PARTICIPANTS: Case series of patients (age <21 years) hospitalized between March 15, 2020, and December 15, 2020, with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test result (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and/or antibody) at 61 US hospitals in the Overcoming COVID-19 public health registry, including 616 (36%) meeting criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Patients with neurologic involvement had acute neurologic signs, symptoms, or diseases on presentation or during hospitalization. Life-threatening involvement was adjudicated by experts based on clinical and/or neuroradiologic features. EXPOSURES: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Type and severity of neurologic involvement, laboratory and imaging data, and outcomes (death or survival with new neurologic deficits) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 1695 patients (909 [54%] male; median [interquartile range] age, 9.1 [2.4-15.3] years), 365 (22%) from 52 sites had documented neurologic involvement. Patients with neurologic involvement were more likely to have underlying neurologic disorders (81 of 365 [22%]) compared with those without (113 of 1330 [8%]), but a similar number were previously healthy (195 [53%] vs 723 [54%]) and met criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (126 [35%] vs 490 [37%]). Among those with neurologic involvement, 322 (88%) had transient symptoms and survived, and 43 (12%) developed life-threatening conditions clinically adjudicated to be associated with COVID-19, including severe encephalopathy (n = 15; 5 with splenial lesions), stroke (n = 12), central nervous system infection/demyelination (n = 8), Guillain-Barré syndrome/variants (n = 4), and acute fulminant cerebral edema (n = 4). Compared with those without life-threatening conditions (n = 322), those with life-threatening neurologic conditions had higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (median, 12.2 vs 4.4) and higher reported frequency of D-dimer greater than 3 μg/mL fibrinogen equivalent units (21 [49%] vs 72 [22%]). Of 43 patients who developed COVID-19-related life-threatening neurologic involvement, 17 survivors (40%) had new neurologic deficits at hospital discharge, and 11 patients (26%) died. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, many children and adolescents hospitalized for COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children had neurologic involvement, mostly transient symptoms. A range of life-threatening and fatal neurologic conditions associated with COVID-19 infrequently occurred. Effects on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes are unknown. |
Characteristics and Outcomes of US Children and Adolescents With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Compared With Severe Acute COVID-19.
Feldstein LR , Tenforde MW , Friedman KG , Newhams M , Rose EB , Dapul H , Soma VL , Maddux AB , Mourani PM , Bowens C , Maamari M , Hall MW , Riggs BJ , Giuliano JSJr , Singh AR , Li S , Kong M , Schuster JE , McLaughlin GE , Schwartz SP , Walker TC , Loftis LL , Hobbs CV , Halasa NB , Doymaz S , Babbitt CJ , Hume JR , Gertz SJ , Irby K , Clouser KN , Cvijanovich NZ , Bradford TT , Smith LS , Heidemann SM , Zackai SP , Wellnitz K , Nofziger RA , Horwitz SM , Carroll RW , Rowan CM , Tarquinio KM , Mack EH , Fitzgerald JC , Coates BM , Jackson AM , Young CC , Son MBF , Patel MM , Newburger JW , Randolph AG . JAMA 2021 325 (11) 1074-1087 IMPORTANCE: Refinement of criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) may inform efforts to improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of children and adolescents with MIS-C vs those with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SETTING, DESIGN, AND PARTICIPANTS: Case series of 1116 patients aged younger than 21 years hospitalized between March 15 and October 31, 2020, at 66 US hospitals in 31 states. Final date of follow-up was January 5, 2021. Patients with MIS-C had fever, inflammation, multisystem involvement, and positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antibody test results or recent exposure with no alternate diagnosis. Patients with COVID-19 had positive RT-PCR test results and severe organ system involvement. EXPOSURE: SARS-CoV-2. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presenting symptoms, organ system complications, laboratory biomarkers, interventions, and clinical outcomes. Multivariable regression was used to compute adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of factors associated with MIS-C vs COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 1116 patients (median age, 9.7 years; 45% female), 539 (48%) were diagnosed with MIS-C and 577 (52%) with COVID-19. Compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with MIS-C were more likely to be 6 to 12 years old (40.8% vs 19.4%; absolute risk difference [RD], 21.4% [95% CI, 16.1%-26.7%]; aRR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.33-1.72] vs 0-5 years) and non-Hispanic Black (32.3% vs 21.5%; RD, 10.8% [95% CI, 5.6%-16.0%]; aRR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.17-1.76] vs White). Compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with MIS-C were more likely to have cardiorespiratory involvement (56.0% vs 8.8%; RD, 47.2% [95% CI, 42.4%-52.0%]; aRR, 2.99 [95% CI, 2.55-3.50] vs respiratory involvement), cardiovascular without respiratory involvement (10.6% vs 2.9%; RD, 7.7% [95% CI, 4.7%-10.6%]; aRR, 2.49 [95% CI, 2.05-3.02] vs respiratory involvement), and mucocutaneous without cardiorespiratory involvement (7.1% vs 2.3%; RD, 4.8% [95% CI, 2.3%-7.3%]; aRR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.84-2.85] vs respiratory involvement). Patients with MIS-C had higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (median, 6.4 vs 2.7, P < .001), higher C-reactive protein level (median, 152 mg/L vs 33 mg/L; P < .001), and lower platelet count (<150 ×103 cells/μL [212/523 {41%} vs 84/486 {17%}, P < .001]). A total of 398 patients (73.8%) with MIS-C and 253 (43.8%) with COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 10 (1.9%) with MIS-C and 8 (1.4%) with COVID-19 died during hospitalization. Among patients with MIS-C with reduced left ventricular systolic function (172/503, 34.2%) and coronary artery aneurysm (57/424, 13.4%), an estimated 91.0% (95% CI, 86.0%-94.7%) and 79.1% (95% CI, 67.1%-89.1%), respectively, normalized within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This case series of patients with MIS-C and with COVID-19 identified patterns of clinical presentation and organ system involvement. These patterns may help differentiate between MIS-C and COVID-19. |
Clusters of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Elementary School Educators and Students in One School District - Georgia, December 2020-January 2021.
Gold JAW , Gettings JR , Kimball A , Franklin R , Rivera G , Morris E , Scott C , Marcet PL , Hast M , Swanson M , McCloud J , Mehari L , Thomas ES , Kirking HL , Tate JE , Memark J , Drenzek C , Vallabhaneni S . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (8) 289-292 In-person learning benefits children and communities (1). Understanding the context in which transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), occurs in schools is critical to improving the safety of in-person learning. During December 1, 2020-January 22, 2021, Cobb and Douglas Public Health (CDPH), the Georgia Department of Public Health (GDPH), and CDC investigated SARS-CoV-2 transmission in eight public elementary schools in a single school district. COVID-19 cases* among educators and students were either self-reported or identified by local public health officials. Close contacts (contacts)(†) of persons with a COVID-19 case received testing. Among contacts who received positive test results, public health investigators assessed epidemiologic links, probable transmission directionality, and the likelihood of in-school transmission.(§) Nine clusters of three or more epidemiologically linked COVID-19 cases were identified involving 13 educators and 32 students at six of the eight elementary schools. Two clusters involved probable educator-to-educator transmission that was followed by educator-to-student transmission and resulted in approximately one half (15 of 31) of school-associated cases. Sixty-nine household members of persons with school-associated cases were tested, and 18 (26%) received positive results. All nine transmission clusters involved less than ideal physical distancing, and five involved inadequate mask use by students. Educators were central to in-school transmission networks. Multifaceted mitigation measures in schools, including promotion of COVID-19 precautions outside of school, minimizing in-person adult interactions at school, and ensuring universal and correct mask use and physical distancing among educators and students when in-person interaction is unavoidable, are important in preventing in-school transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Although not required for reopening schools, COVID-19 vaccination should be considered as an additional mitigation measure to be added when available. |
Characterization of Pyrethroid Resistance Mechanisms in Aedes aegypti from the Florida Keys.
Scott ML , Hribar LJ , Leal AL , McAllister JC . Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021 104 (3) 1111-1122 The status of insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti is of concern in areas where Aedes-borne arboviruses like chikungunya, dengue, and Zika occur. In recent years, outbreaks involving these arboviruses have occurred, for which vaccines do not exist; therefore, disease prevention is only through vector control and personal protection. Aedes aegypti are present on every inhabited island within the Florida Keys. The resistance status of Ae. aegypti in the Florida Keys was assessed to guide knowledge of the best choice of chemical for use during an outbreak. Mosquito eggs were collected using ovitraps placed on Key West, Stock Island, Vaca Key, Upper Matecumbe Key, Plantation Key, and Key Largo. Bottle bioassays were conducted at the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District using Bifenthrin(®) 30+30. Further bottle testing using malathion and permethrin occurred at the CDC, Fort Collins, CO, in addition to molecular and biochemical assays. Levels of resistance varied between islands with different underlying mechanisms present. Resistance was seen to bifenthrin 30+30 but not to permethrin, indicating that piperonyl butoxide (PBO) or the inert ingredients may be involved in resistance. No study has been conducted to date examining the role of PBO in resistance. Key Largo was treated the most with adulticides and expressed the highest levels of alpha and beta esterases, oxidases, glutathione-S-transferases, and frequency of the V1016I knockdown mutation from all sites tested. Knowledge of localized resistance and underlying mechanisms helps in making rational decisions in selection of appropriate and effective insecticides. |
Multidisciplinary Community-Based Investigation of a COVID-19 Outbreak Among Marshallese and Hispanic/Latino Communities - Benton and Washington Counties, Arkansas, March-June 2020.
Center KE , Da Silva J , Hernandez AL , Vang K , Martin DW , Mazurek J , Lilo EA , Zimmerman NK , Krow-Lucal E , Campbell EM , Cowins JV , Walker C , Dominguez KL , Gallo B , Gunn JKL , McCormick D , Cochran C , Smith MR , Dillaha JA , James AE . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 69 (48) 1807-1811 By June 2020, Marshallese and Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) persons in Benton and Washington counties of Arkansas had received a disproportionately high number of diagnoses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite representing approximately 19% of these counties' populations (1), Marshallese and Hispanic persons accounted for 64% of COVID-19 cases and 57% of COVID-19-associated deaths. Analyses of surveillance data, focus group discussions, and key-informant interviews were conducted to identify challenges and propose strategies for interrupting transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Challenges included limited native-language health messaging, high household occupancy, high employment rate in the poultry processing industry, mistrust of the medical system, and changing COVID-19 guidance. Reducing the COVID-19 incidence among communities that suffer disproportionately from COVID-19 requires strengthening the coordination of public health, health care, and community stakeholders to provide culturally and linguistically tailored public health education, community-based prevention activities, case management, care navigation, and service linkage. |
Point-of-care molecular testing and antiviral treatment of influenza in residents of homeless shelters in Seattle, WA: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Newman KL , Rogers JH , McCulloch D , Wilcox N , Englund JA , Boeckh M , Uyeki TM , Jackson ML , Starita L , Hughes JP , Chu HY . Trials 2020 21 (1) 956 INTRODUCTION: Influenza is an important public health problem, but data on the impact of influenza among homeless shelter residents are limited. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether on-site testing and antiviral treatment of influenza in residents of homeless shelters reduces influenza spread in these settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial of on-site testing and antiviral treatment for influenza in nine homeless shelter sites within the Seattle metropolitan area. Participants with acute respiratory illness (ARI), defined as two or more respiratory symptoms or new or worsening cough with onset in the prior 7 days, are eligible to enroll. Approximately 3200 individuals are estimated to participate from October to May across two influenza seasons. All sites will start enrollment in the control arm at the beginning of each season, with routine surveillance for ARI. Sites will be randomized at different timepoints to enter the intervention arm, with implementation of a test-and-treat strategy for individuals with two or fewer days of symptoms. Eligible individuals will be tested on-site with a point-of-care influenza test. If the influenza test is positive and symptom onset is within 48 h, participants will be administered antiviral treatment with baloxavir or oseltamivir depending upon age and comorbidities. Participants will complete a questionnaire on demographics and symptom duration and severity. The primary endpoint is the incidence of influenza in the intervention period compared to the control period, after adjusting for time trends. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04141917 . Registered 28 October 2019. Trial sponsor: University of Washington. |
Remote Household Observation for Non-influenza Respiratory Viral Illness.
Emanuels A , Heimonen J , O'Hanlon J , Kim AE , Wilcox N , McCulloch DJ , Brandstetter E , Wolf CR , Logue JK , Han PD , Pfau B , Newman KL , Hughes JP , Jackson ML , Uyeki TM , Boeckh M , Starita LM , Nickerson DA , Bedford T , Englund JA , Chu HY . Clin Infect Dis 2020 73 (11) e4411-e4418 BACKGROUND: Non-influenza respiratory viruses are responsible for a substantial burden of disease in the United States. Household transmission is thought to contribute significantly to subsequent transmission through the broader community. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, contactless surveillance methods are of particular importance. METHODS: From November 2019 to April 2020, 303 households in the Seattle area were remotely monitored in a prospective longitudinal study for symptoms of respiratory viral illness. Enrolled participants reported weekly symptoms and submitted respiratory samples by mail in the event of an acute respiratory illness (ARI). Specimens were tested for fourteen viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, using RT-PCR. Participants completed all study procedures at home without physical contact with research staff. RESULTS: In total, 1171 unique participants in 303 households were monitored for ARI. Of participating households, 128 (42%) included a child aged <5 years and 202 (67%) included a child aged 5-12 years. Of the 678 swabs collected during the surveillance period, 237 (35%) tested positive for one or more non-influenza respiratory viruses. Rhinovirus, common human coronaviruses, and respiratory syncytial virus were the most common. Four cases of SARS-CoV-2 were detected in three households. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the circulation of respiratory viruses within households during the winter months during the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Contactless methods of recruitment, enrollment and sample collection were utilized throughout this study, and demonstrate the feasibility of home-based, remote monitoring for respiratory infections. |
The Seattle Flu Study: a multiarm community-based prospective study protocol for assessing influenza prevalence, transmission and genomic epidemiology.
Chu HY , Boeckh M , Englund JA , Famulare M , Lutz B , Nickerson DA , Rieder M , Starita LM , Adler A , Brandstetter E , Frazer CD , Han PD , Gulati RK , Hadfield J , Jackson M , Kiavand A , Kimball LE , Lacombe K , Newman K , Sibley TR , Logue JK , Lyon VR , Wolf CR , Zigman Suchsland M , Shendure J , Bedford T . BMJ Open 2020 10 (10) e037295 INTRODUCTION: Influenza epidemics and pandemics cause significant morbidity and mortality. An effective response to a potential pandemic requires the infrastructure to rapidly detect, characterise, and potentially contain new and emerging influenza strains at both an individual and population level. The objective of this study is to use data gathered simultaneously from community and hospital sites to develop a model of how influenza enters and spreads in a population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Starting in the 2018-2019 season, we have been enrolling individuals with acute respiratory illness from community sites throughout the Seattle metropolitan area, including clinics, childcare facilities, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, workplaces, college campuses and homeless shelters. At these sites, we collect clinical data and mid-nasal swabs from individuals with at least two acute respiratory symptoms. Additionally, we collect residual nasal swabs and data from individuals who seek care for respiratory symptoms at four regional hospitals. Samples are tested using a multiplex molecular assay, and influenza whole genome sequencing is performed for samples with influenza detected. Geospatial mapping and computational modelling platforms are in development to characterise the regional spread of influenza and other respiratory pathogens. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the University of Washington's Institutional Review Board (STUDY00006181). Results will be disseminated through talks at conferences, peer-reviewed publications and on the study website (www.seattleflu.org). |
Cryptic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Washington state.
Bedford T , Greninger AL , Roychoudhury P , Starita LM , Famulare M , Huang ML , Nalla A , Pepper G , Reinhardt A , Xie H , Shrestha L , Nguyen TN , Adler A , Brandstetter E , Cho S , Giroux D , Han PD , Fay K , Frazar CD , Ilcisin M , Lacombe K , Lee J , Kiavand A , Richardson M , Sibley TR , Truong M , Wolf CR , Nickerson DA , Rieder MJ , Englund JA , Hadfield J , Hodcroft EB , Huddleston J , Moncla LH , Müller NF , Neher RA , Deng X , Gu W , Federman S , Chiu C , Duchin JS , Gautom R , Melly G , Hiatt B , Dykema P , Lindquist S , Queen K , Tao Y , Uehara A , Tong S , MacCannell D , Armstrong GL , Baird GS , Chu HY , Shendure J , Jerome KR . Science 2020 370 (6516) 571-575 Following its emergence in Wuhan, China, in late November or early December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has rapidly spread globally. Genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 allows reconstruction of its transmission history, although this is contingent on sampling. We have analyzed 453 SARS-CoV-2 genomes collected between 20 February and 15 March 2020 from infected patients in Washington State, USA. We find that most SARS-CoV-2 infections sampled during this time derive from a single introduction in late January or early February 2020 which subsequently spread locally before active community surveillance was implemented. |
Comparison of Molecular Subtyping and Antimicrobial Resistance Detection Methods Used in a Large Multi-State Outbreak of Extensively Drug-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni Infections Linked to Pet Store Puppies.
Joseph LA , Francois Watkins LK , Chen J , Tagg KA , Bennett C , Caidi H , Folster JP , Laughlin ME , Koski L , Silver R , Stevenson L , Robertson S , Pruckler J , Nichols M , Pouseele H , Carleton HA , Basler C , Friedman CR , Geissler A , Hise KB , Aubert RD . J Clin Microbiol 2020 58 (10) Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of enteric bacterial illness in the United States. Traditional molecular subtyping methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and 7-gene multilocus sequencing typing (MLST), provided limited resolution to adequately identify C. jejuni outbreaks and separate out sporadic isolates during outbreak investigations. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a powerful tool for C. jejuni outbreak detection. In this investigation, 45 human and 11 puppy isolates obtained during a 2016-2018 outbreak linked to pet store puppies were sequenced. Core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) and high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (hqSNP) analysis of the sequence data separated the isolates into the same two clades containing minor within clade differences; however, cgMLST analysis does not require selection of an appropriate reference genome making this method preferable to hqSNP analysis for Campylobacter surveillance and cluster detection. The isolates were classified as ST2109-a rarely seen MLST sequence type. PFGE was performed on 38 human and 10 puppy isolates; PFGE patterns did not reliably predict clustering by cgMLST analysis. Genetic detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants predicted that all outbreak-associated isolates would be resistant to six drug classes. Traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) confirmed a high correlation between genotypic and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance determinations. WGS analysis linked C. jejuni isolates in humans and pet store puppies even when canine exposure information was unknown, aiding the epidemiological investigation during this outbreak. WGS data were also used to quickly identify the highly drug-resistant profile of these outbreak-associated C. jejuni isolates. |
Copyright and digital collections: A data-driven roadmap for rights statement success
Benson SR , Stitzlein H . Coll Res Libr 2020 81 (5) 753-767 An earlier version of this manuscript was presented by the authors at the biennial conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, April 13, 2019. The authors wish to acknowledge the Research and Publication Committee of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library, which provided support for the completion of this research. We would also like to thank Janet Swatscheno, the Digital Publishing Librarian at the University of Illinois Chicago, for her helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. This article summarizes the results of interviews with Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) service hub participants to determine whether and how standardized rights metadata is included in their digital collections. Providing accurate standardized rights metadata is crucial to communicating with patrons regarding how they can use objects in digital collections. Results from the interviews reveal key findings on effective rights statement implementation techniques as well as common tools used by librarians when applying rights statements to digital collections. |
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infections in Children: Multicenter Surveillance, United States, January-March 2020.
Rha B , Lively JY , Englund JA , Staat MA , Weinberg GA , Selvarangan R , Halasa NB , Williams JV , Boom JA , Sahni LC , Michaels MG , Stewart LS , Harrison CJ , Szilagyi PG , McNeal MM , Klein EJ , Strelitz B , Lacombe K , Schlaudecker E , Moffatt ME , Schuster JE , Pahud BA , Weddle G , Hickey RW , Avadhanula V , Wikswo ME , Hall AJ , Curns AT , Gerber SI , Langley G . J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2020 9 (5) 609-612 Previous reports of COVID-19 among US children have been based on health jurisdiction reporting. We performed SARS-CoV-2 testing on children enrolled in active, prospective, multi-center surveillance during January-March, 2020. Among 3187 children, only 4 (0.1%) SARS-CoV-2-positive cases were identified March 20-31 despite evidence of rising community circulation. |
HIV-1 genetic diversity to estimate time of infection and infer adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Council OD , Ruone S , Mock PA , Khalil G , Martin A , Curlin ME , McNicholl JM , Heneine W , Leelawiwat W , Choopanya K , Vanichseni S , Cherdtrakulkiat T , Anekvorapong R , Martin M , Garcia-Lerma JG . AIDS 2019 33 (15) 2299-2307 OBJECTIVE: To estimate time of HIV infection in participants from the Bangkok Tenofovir Study (BTS) with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and relate infection with adherence patterns. DESIGN: We used the diversity structure of the virus population at the first RNA-positive sample to estimate the date of infection, and mapped these estimates to medication diaries obtained under daily directly observed therapy (DOT). METHODS: HIV genetic diversity was investigated in all 17 PrEP breakthrough infections and in 16 placebo recipients. We generated 10 to 25 HIV env sequences from each participant by single genome amplification, and calculated time since infection (and 95% confidence interval) using Poisson models of early virus evolution. Study medication diaries obtained under daily DOT were then used to compute the number of missed TDF doses at the approximate date of infection. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 17 PrEP breakthrough infections were successfully amplified. Of these, 13 were initiated by a single genetic variant and generated reliable estimates of time since infection (median=47 [IQR=35] days). Eleven of these 13 were under daily DOT at the estimated time of infection. Analysis of medication diaries in these 11 participants showed 100% adherence in five, 90-95% adherence in two, 55% adherence in one, and non-adherence in three. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated time of infection in participants from BTS and found several infections when high levels of adherence to TDF were reported. Our results suggest that the biological efficacy of daily TDF against parenteral HIV exposure is not 100%. |
HIV-1 genetic diversity to estimate time of infection and infer adherence to preexposure prophylaxis.
Council OD , Ruone S , Mock PA , Khalil G , Martin A , Curlin ME , McNicholl JM , Heneine W , Leelawiwat W , Choopanya K , Vanichseni S , Cherdtrakulkiat T , Anekvorapong R , Martin M , Garcia-Lerma JG . AIDS 2019 33 (15) 2299-2307 OBJECTIVE: To estimate time of HIV infection in participants from the Bangkok Tenofovir Study (BTS) with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and relate infection with adherence patterns. DESIGN: We used the diversity structure of the virus population at the first RNA-positive sample to estimate the date of infection, and mapped these estimates to medication diaries obtained under daily directly observed therapy (DOT). METHODS: HIV genetic diversity was investigated in all 17 PrEP breakthrough infections and in 16 placebo recipients. We generated 10 to 25 HIV env sequences from each participant by single genome amplification, and calculated time since infection (and 95% confidence interval) using Poisson models of early virus evolution. Study medication diaries obtained under daily DOT were then used to compute the number of missed TDF doses at the approximate date of infection. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 17 PrEP breakthrough infections were successfully amplified. Of these, 13 were initiated by a single genetic variant and generated reliable estimates of time since infection (median=47 [IQR=35] days). Eleven of these 13 were under daily DOT at the estimated time of infection. Analysis of medication diaries in these 11 participants showed 100% adherence in five, 90-95% adherence in two, 55% adherence in one, and non-adherence in three. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated time of infection in participants from BTS and found several infections when high levels of adherence to TDF were reported. Our results suggest that the biological efficacy of daily TDF against parenteral HIV exposure is not 100%. |
Unbiased Assessment of Abundance of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato Ticks, Canine Exposure to Spotted Fever Group Rickettsia , and Risk Factors in Mexicali, México.
Foley J , Tinoco-Gracia L , Rodriguez-Lomeli M , Estrada-Guzman J , Fierro M , Mattar-Lopez E , Peterson A , Pascoe E , Gonzalez Y , Hori-Oshima S , Armstrong PA , Lopez G , Jacome-Ibarra M , Paddock CD , Zazueta OE . Am J Trop Med Hyg 2019 101 (1) 22-32 An epidemic of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is ongoing in Mexicali, Mexico. We visited 100 neighborhoods with diagnosed human cases and 100 control neighborhoods to evaluate knowledge of the epidemic; obtain data on the spatial distribution of dogs, canine seroprevalence and active infection, tick infestations, and presence of rickettsial DNA in ticks; and evaluate risk factors for human cases, seropositivity, and tick infestation within an unbiased study design. The majority (80%) of residents had heard of RMSF, but only 48% used acaricides in the home or on dogs. Case neighborhoods and those with high canine seroprevalence tended to be on the city periphery or in the agricultural valley. No dogs were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive for Rickettsia rickettsii, and the overall seroprevalence was 65% (titers from 64 to 1,024). PCR prevalence in ticks was 0.70%, confirmed by DNA sequencing as R. rickettsii; neighborhood prevalence ranged from 0.7% to 6.1%. Twelve percent of dogs had high tick burdens, and all ticks were Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Epidemiologically significant risk factors were ground covering for a neighborhood having a human case; dogs having poor body condition and weighing < 10 kg for canine seropositivity; dogs living at the home for the number of ticks in the environment; and being near canals, having trash on the patio, and a dog being thin for tick burdens on dogs. A One Health approach is crucial to understanding RMSF and brown dog ticks. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Sep 16, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure