Last data update: Apr 04, 2025. (Total: 49030 publications since 2009)
Filtered By: |
Order By: | Records 1-3 (of 3 Records) |
Query Trace: Ferretti M [original query] |
---|
Antimicrobial-Resistant Infections in Hospitalized Patients
Wolford H , McCarthy NL , Baggs J , Hatfield KM , Maillis A , Olubajo B , Bishop J , Ferretti M , Craig MR , Magill SS , McDonald LC , Sievert DM , Spalding Walters M , Jernigan JA , Lutgring JD , Reddy SC . JAMA Netw Open 2025 8 (3) e2462059 ![]() ![]() IMPORTANCE: Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health problem in the US. Estimating national rates of antimicrobial-resistant infections commonly associated with health care can aid in targeted public health efforts. OBJECTIVE: To determine the national incidence rates of 6 pathogens over time: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp (VRE), extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp (excluding Klebsiella aerogenes) (ESCR-EK), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp (CRAsp), and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used data from 2012 to 2022 on inpatient hospitalizations, clinical cultures, and facility-level characteristics. Hospital-months were included in the dynamic cohort if the hospital reported at least 1 culture with microbial growth accompanied by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results in the month. Data from the PINC-AI and Becton Dickinson Insights databases were used, and cases were defined as incident nonsurveillance cultures yielding an organism of interest with sufficient AST results for a phenotype of interest. Data were collected from January 2012 to December 2022 and analyzed from April 2023 to June 2024. EXPOSURE: Inpatient hospitalizations with a discharge date in an included hospital month. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: National annual antimicrobial-resistant cases per 10 000 hospitalizations were obtained using weights based on facility-level characteristics. Cases were defined as community-onset if collected on or before day 3 of hospitalization and hospital-onset if obtained on day 4 or later. RESULTS: This study cohort included 332 to 606 hospitals per year between 2012 to 2022 and 7 158 139 cultures. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens accounted for an estimated 569 749 (95% CI, 475 949-663 548) cases and 179.6 (95% CI, 163.1-196.1) cases per 10 000 hospitalizations in 2022. Of these cases, 77% (437 657; 95% CI, 364 529-510 785) were community-onset and 23% (132 092; 95% CI, 108 241-155 943) were hospital-onset. MRSA (44% [251 854; 95% CI, 209 558-294 150]) and ESCR-EK (35% [200 884; 95% CI, 163 692-238 077]) made up the largest proportions of total infections in 2022, respectively. Rates of hospital-onset MRSA, VRE, CRE, CRAsp, and MDR P aeruginosa had periods of decline from 2012 to 2019; however, all pathogens experienced an increase in hospital-onset rates in 2020 and 2021. Community-onset ESCR-EK rates increased from 2012 to 2022, while community-onset rates of MRSA, VRE, and MDR P aeruginosa declined. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While antimicrobial resistance rates have experienced uneven declines in the US from 2012 to 2022, the burden of resistance remains substantial. These findings suggest that more effective strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance are needed. |
Shared vision for improving outcomes for serious fungal diseases: Report of a patient, caregiver, and clinician summit
Purdie R , Tushla LA , Ferretti J , Castro GK , Watson R , Davis T , Raborg B , Mazi PB , Stroman A , Thomas Jones C , Walsh TJ , Chiller TM , Pappas PG , Meyer J , Spec A . Open Forum Infect Dis 2024 11 (6) ofae226 BACKGROUND: Recently, increasing focus on patient input into research and healthcare improvements has fostered expanded patient-centered advocacy efforts. This first pan-fungal disease summit, part of the MYCology Advocacy, Research, & Education effort, brought together patients, caregivers, and mycology experts to better document patient experiences with invasive fungal disease (IFD) and establish priorities for mycology education, advocacy, and research. METHODS: Patients who had suffered from IFD, their caregivers, clinicians, industry representatives, government officials, and patient advocacy professionals were invited. Patients and caregivers shared their stories and struggles with IFD. Breakout sessions separated mycology experts from patients and caregivers for further discussions to identify commonalities and perceived gaps and to formulate recommendations. The 2 groups then reconvened to develop consensus recommendations. RESULTS: IFD patients and their caregivers shared experiences reflecting the typically lengthy prediagnosis, acute treatment, long-term treatment, and posttreatment recovery stages of IFD. They reported substantial physical, psychological, and financial burdens associated with the IFD experience, particularly related to delayed diagnoses. They reaffirmed a need for coordinated patient-centered education, peer support, and advocacy to document the burden of serious fungal infections. Mycology experts discussed strategies to address gaps in the mycology field, such as insufficient training, inadequate workforce support, and a need to partner more with patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: A summit involving patients with IFD, family caregivers, and mycology experts identified a substantial nonclinical burden of disease associated with IFD. Patients and mycology experts prioritized several goals for education, advocacy, and research to raise awareness of IFD and improve outcomes. |
The Study to Explore Early Development (SEED): a multisite epidemiologic study of autism by the Centers for Autism and Developmental Disabilities Research and Epidemiology (CADDRE) network
Schendel DE , Diguiseppi C , Croen LA , Fallin MD , Reed PL , Schieve LA , Wiggins LD , Daniels J , Grether J , Levy SE , Miller L , Newschaffer C , Pinto-Martin J , Robinson C , Windham GC , Alexander A , Aylsworth AS , Bernal P , Bonner JD , Blaskey L , Bradley C , Collins J , Ferretti CJ , Farzadegan H , Giarelli E , Harvey M , Hepburn S , Herr M , Kaparich K , Landa R , Lee LC , Levenseller B , Meyerer S , Rahbar MH , Ratchford A , Reynolds A , Rosenberg S , Rusyniak J , Shapira SK , Smith K , Souders M , Thompson PA , Young L , Yeargin-Allsopp M . J Autism Dev Disord 2012 42 (10) 2121-40 ![]() The Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a multisite investigation addressing knowledge gaps in autism phenotype and etiology, aims to: (1) characterize the autism behavioral phenotype and associated developmental, medical, and behavioral conditions and (2) investigate genetic and environmental risks with emphasis on immunologic, hormonal, gastrointestinal, and sociodemographic characteristics. SEED uses a case-control design with population-based ascertainment of children aged 2-5 years with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and children in two control groups-one from the general population and one with non-ASD developmental problems. Data from parent-completed questionnaires, interviews, clinical evaluations, biospecimen sampling, and medical record abstraction focus on the prenatal and early postnatal periods. SEED is a valuable resource for testing hypotheses regarding ASD characteristics and causes. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 04, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure