Last data update: Dec 09, 2024. (Total: 48320 publications since 2009)
Records 1-20 (of 20 Records) |
Query Trace: Yousaf AR[original query] |
---|
Notes from the field: Surveillance for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children - United States, 2023
Yousaf AR , Lindsey KN , Wu MJ , Shah AB , Free RJ , Simeone RM , Zambrano LD , Campbell AP . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024 73 (10) 225-228 |
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children among persons who completed a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine primary series compared with those reporting no COVID-19 vaccination, US national MIS-C surveillance
Yousaf AR , Miller AD , Lindsey K , Shah AB , Wu MJ , Melgar M , Zambrano LD , Campbell AP . Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023 42 (12) e476-e478 We analyzed multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children cases by reported COVID-19 vaccination status (2-dose primary series vs. no vaccination). A total of 46% vaccinated versus 58% unvaccinated persons received intensive care unit-level care (P = 0.02); the risk of intensive care unit admission was 23% higher (adjusted relative risk: 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.48) among unvaccinated patients; 21 unvaccinated persons died. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children occurs after SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated persons, but may be less severe. |
Reported Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Aged 12-20 Years in the United States Who Received COVID-19 Vaccine, December 2020 through August 2021 (preprint)
Yousaf AR , Cortese MM , Taylor AW , Broder KR , Oster ME , Wong JM , Guh AY , McCormick DW , Kamidani S , Schlaudecker EP , Edwards K , Creech CB , Staat MA , Belay ED , Marquez P , Su JR , Salzman MB , Thompson D , Campbell AP , Museru O , Howard LM , Parise M , Finn LE , Kim M , Raman KV , Komatsu KK , Spiker BL , Burkholder CP , Lang SM , Soslow JH . medRxiv 2022 05 Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a hyperinflammatory condition associated with antecedent SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the United States, reporting of MIS-C after vaccination is required under COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorizations. This case series describes persons aged 12-20 years with MIS-C following COVID-19 vaccination reported to passive surveillance systems or through clinician outreach to CDC. Method(s): We investigated potential cases of MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination reported to CDC's health department-based national MIS-C surveillance, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS, co-administered by CDC and the U.S. FDA), and CDC's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project (CISA) from December 14, 2020, to August 31, 2021. We describe cases meeting the CDC MIS-C case definition. Any positive SARS-CoV-2 serology test satisfied the case criteria although anti-nucleocapsid antibody indicates SARS-CoV-2 infection, while anti-spike protein antibody indicates either infection or COVID-19 vaccination. Finding(s): We identified 21 persons with MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination. Of these 21 persons, median age was 16 years (range, 12-20 years); 13 (62%) were male. All were hospitalized; 12 (57%) had intensive care unit admission, and all were discharged home. Fifteen (71%) of the 21 had laboratory evidence of past or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and six (29%) did not. Through August 2021, 21,335,331 persons aged 12-20 years had received >=1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine, making the overall reporting rate for MIS-C following vaccination 1.0 case per million persons receiving >=1 vaccine dose in this age group. The reporting rate for those without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.3 cases per million vaccinated persons. Interpretation(s): In our case series, we describe a small number of persons with MIS-C who had received >=1 COVID-19 vaccine dose before illness onset. Continued reporting of potential cases and surveillance for MIS-C illnesses after COVID-19 vaccination is warranted. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. |
COVID-19 vaccine reactogenicity and vaccine attitudes among children and parents/guardians after multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children or COVID-19 hospitalization: September 2021-May 2022
Yousaf AR , Kunkel A , Abrams JY , Shah AB , Hammett TA , Arnold KE , Beltran YL , Laham FR , Kao CM , Hunstad DA , Hussaini L , Baida N , Salazar L , Perez MA , Rostad CA , Godfred-Cato S , Campbell AP , Belay ED . Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023 42 (3) 252-259 BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a multiorgan hyperinflammatory condition following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data on COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and vaccine attitudes in children with prior MIS-C are limited. We described characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine adverse events and vaccine attitudes in children with a history of MIS-C or COVID-19 and their parents/guardians. METHODS: We enrolled children previously hospitalized for MIS-C or COVID-19 from 3 academic institutions. We abstracted charts and interviewed children and parents/guardians regarding vaccine adverse events and acceptability. RESULTS: Of 163 vaccine-eligible children enrolled with a history of MIS-C and 70 with history of COVID-19, 51 (31%) and 34 (49%), respectively, received mRNA COVID-19 vaccine a median of 10 (Interquartile Range 6-13) months after hospital discharge. Among 20 children with MIS-C and parents/guardians who provided interviews, local injection site reaction of brief duration (mean 1.8 days) was most commonly reported; no children required medical care within 2 weeks postvaccination. Vaccine survey results of interviewed, vaccinated children and their parents/guardians: of 20 children with MIS-C and 15 children with COVID-19, 17 (85%) and 13 (87%), respectively, listed doctors in the top 3 most trusted sources for vaccine information; 13 (65%) and 9 (60%) discussed vaccination with their doctor. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination was well tolerated in children with prior MIS-C or COVID-19 participating in our investigation. Parents/guardians regarded their children's doctors as a trusted source of information for COVID-19 vaccines, and most vaccinated children's parents/guardians had discussed COVID-19 vaccination for their child with their doctor. |
Surveillance for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. children aged 5-11 years who received Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, November 2021-March 2022
Cortese MM , Taylor AW , Akinbami LJ , Thames-Allen A , Yousaf AR , Campbell AP , Maloney SA , Harrington T , Anyalechi EG , Munshi D , Kamidani S , Curtis CR , McCormick DW , Staat MA , Edwards KM , Creech CB , Museru O , Marquez P , Thompson D , Su JR , Schlaudecker EP , Broder KR . J Infect Dis 2023 228 (2) 143-148 Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection; in the U.S., reporting of MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination is required for vaccine safety monitoring. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was authorized for children aged 5-11 years on October 29, 2021. Covering a period when ∼7 million children received vaccine, surveillance for MIS-C ≤90 days post-vaccination using passive systems identified 58 children with MIS-C and laboratory evidence of past/recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 4 without evidence. During a period with extensive SARS-CoV-2 circulation, MIS-C illness in children after COVID-19 vaccination who lacked evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was rare (<1 per million vaccinated children). |
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in American Indian/Alaska Native children, March 2020-May 2022
Bornstein ER , Miller AD , Zambrano LD , Yousaf AR , Apostolou A , Weiser T , Campbell AP . Pediatr Infect Dis J 2022 42 (4) e105-e108 We describe characteristics, clinical features and outcomes of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons compared with non-Hispanic white persons. AI/AN patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children were younger, more often obese, and from areas of higher social vulnerability. A greater proportion of AI/AN patients had severe respiratory involvement and shock. |
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists/CDC Surveillance Case Definition for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection - United States.
Melgar M , Lee EH , Miller AD , Lim S , Brown CM , Yousaf AR , Zambrano LD , Belay ED , Godfred-Cato S , Abrams JY , Oster ME , Campbell AP . MMWR Recomm Rep 2022 71 (4) 1-14 THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES THE EVIDENCE AND RATIONALE SUPPORTING THE COMPONENTS OF THE CSTE/CDC MIS-C SURVEILLANCE CASE DEFINITION AND DESCRIBES THE METHODS USED TO DEVELOP THE DEFINITION. THESE METHODS INCLUDED CONVENING MIS-C CLINICAL EXPERTS (I.E., CONSULTANTS): regarding identification of MIS-C and its distinction from other pediatric conditions, a review of available literature comparing MIS-C phenotype with that of pediatric COVID-19 and other hyperinflammatory syndromes, and retrospective application of different criteria to data from MIS-C cases previously reported to CDC. |
Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Variant Circulation- United States, July 2021 - January 2022.
Miller AD , Yousaf AR , Bornstein E , Wu MJ , Lindsey K , Melgar M , Oster ME , Zambrano LD , Campbell AP . Clin Infect Dis 2022 75 S303-S307 We describe 2,116 multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) cases reported to CDC during Delta and Omicron circulation from July 2021-January 2022. Half of MIS-C patients were aged 5-11 years, 52% received ICU-level care, and 1.1% died. Only 3.0% of eligible patients were fully vaccinated prior to MIS-C onset. |
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in US Children Ages 5-11 Years.
Hause AM , Shay DK , Klein NP , Abara WE , Baggs J , Cortese MM , Fireman B , Gee J , Glanz JM , Goddard K , Hanson KE , Hugueley B , Kenigsberg T , Kharbanda EO , Lewin B , Lewis N , Marquez P , Myers T , Naleway A , Nelson JC , Su JR , Thompson D , Olubajo B , Oster ME , Weintraub ES , Williams JTB , Yousaf AR , Zerbo O , Zhang B , Shimabukuro TT . Pediatrics 2022 150 (2) BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited post-authorization safety data for BNT-162b2 COVID-19 vaccination among children ages 5-11 years are available, particularly for the adverse event myocarditis, which has been detected in adolescents and young adults. We describe adverse events observed during the first 4 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination program in this age group. METHODS: We analyzed data from 3 US safety monitoring systems: v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based system that monitors reactions and health effects; the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the national spontaneous reporting system co-managed by CDC and FDA; and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), an active surveillance system that monitors electronic health records for prespecified events, including myocarditis. RESULTS: Among 48,795 children ages 5-11 years enrolled in v-safe, most reported reactions were mild-to-moderate, most frequently reported the day after vaccination, and were more common after dose 2. VAERS received 7,578 adverse event reports; 97% were non-serious. On review of 194 serious VAERS reports, 15 myocarditis cases were verified; 8 occurred in males after dose 2 (reporting rate 2.2 per million doses). In VSD, no safety signals were detected in weekly sequential monitoring after administration of 726,820 doses. CONCLUSIONS: Safety findings for BNT-162b2 vaccine from 3 US monitoring systems in children ages 5-11 years show that most reported adverse events were mild and no safety signals were observed in active surveillance. VAERS reporting rates of myocarditis after dose 2 in this age group were substantially lower than those observed among adolescents ages 12-15 years. |
Comparison of Home Antigen Testing With RT-PCR and Viral Culture During the Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Chu VT , Schwartz NG , Donnelly MAP , Chuey MR , Soto R , Yousaf AR , Schmitt-Matzen EN , Sleweon S , Ruffin J , Thornburg N , Harcourt JL , Tamin A , Kim G , Folster JM , Hughes LJ , Tong S , Stringer G , Albanese BA , Totten SE , Hudziec MM , Matzinger SR , Dietrich EA , Sheldon SW , Stous S , McDonald EC , Austin B , Beatty ME , Staples JE , Killerby ME , Hsu CH , Tate JE , Kirking HL , Matanock A . JAMA Intern Med 2022 182 (7) 701-709 IMPORTANCE: As self-collected home antigen tests become widely available, a better understanding of their performance during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of home antigen tests compared with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culture by days from illness onset, as well as user acceptability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted from January to May 2021 in San Diego County, California, and metropolitan Denver, Colorado. The convenience sample included adults and children with RT-PCR-confirmed infection who used self-collected home antigen tests for 15 days and underwent at least 1 nasopharyngeal swab for RT-PCR, viral culture, and sequencing. EXPOSURES: SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the daily sensitivity of home antigen tests to detect RT-PCR-confirmed cases. Secondary outcomes included the daily percentage of antigen test, RT-PCR, and viral culture results that were positive, and antigen test sensitivity compared with same-day RT-PCR and cultures. Antigen test use errors and acceptability were assessed for a subset of participants. RESULTS: This study enrolled 225 persons with RT-PCR-confirmed infection (median [range] age, 29 [1-83] years; 117 female participants [52%]; 10 [4%] Asian, 6 [3%] Black or African American, 50 [22%] Hispanic or Latino, 3 [1%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 145 [64%] White, and 11 [5%] multiracial individuals) who completed 3044 antigen tests and 642 nasopharyngeal swabs. Antigen test sensitivity was 50% (95% CI, 45%-55%) during the infectious period, 64% (95% CI, 56%-70%) compared with same-day RT-PCR, and 84% (95% CI, 75%-90%) compared with same-day cultures. Antigen test sensitivity peaked 4 days after illness onset at 77% (95% CI, 69%-83%). Antigen test sensitivity improved with a second antigen test 1 to 2 days later, particularly early in the infection. Six days after illness onset, antigen test result positivity was 61% (95% CI, 53%-68%). Almost all (216 [96%]) surveyed individuals reported that they would be more likely to get tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection if home antigen tests were available over the counter. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this cohort study of home antigen tests suggest that sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 was moderate compared with RT-PCR and high compared with viral culture. The results also suggest that symptomatic individuals with an initial negative home antigen test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection should test again 1 to 2 days later because test sensitivity peaked several days after illness onset and improved with repeated testing. |
Reported cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children aged 12-20 years in the USA who received a COVID-19 vaccine, December, 2020, through August, 2021: a surveillance investigation.
Yousaf AR , Cortese MM , Taylor AW , Broder KR , Oster ME , Wong JM , Guh AY , McCormick DW , Kamidani S , Schlaudecker EP , Edwards KM , Creech CB , Staat MA , Belay ED , Marquez P , Su JR , Salzman MB , Thompson D , Campbell AP , Museru O , Howard LM , Parise M , Finn LE , Kim M , Raman KV , Komatsu KK , Spiker BL , Burkholder CP , Lang SM , Soslow JH . Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022 6 (5) 303-312 BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a hyperinflammatory condition associated with antecedent SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the USA, reporting of MIS-C after vaccination is required under COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorisations. We aimed to investigate reports of individuals aged 12-20 years with MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination reported to passive surveillance systems or through clinician outreach to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). METHODS: In this surveillance activity, we investigated potential cases of MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination reported to CDC's MIS-C national surveillance system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (co-administered by CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration), and CDC's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project. A multidisciplinary team adjudicated cases by use of the CDC MIS-C definition. Any positive SARS-CoV-2 serology test satisfied case criteria; although anti-nucleocapsid antibodies indicate previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-spike protein antibodies indicate either past or recent infection or COVID-19 vaccination. We describe the demographic and clinical features of cases, stratified by laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To calculate the reporting rate of MIS-C, we divided the count of all individuals meeting the MIS-C case definition, and of those without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, by the number of individuals aged 12-20 years in the USA who received one or more COVID-19 vaccine doses up to Aug 31, 2021, obtained from CDC national vaccine surveillance data. FINDINGS: Using surveillance results from Dec 14, 2020, to Aug 31, 2021, we identified 21 individuals with MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination. Of these 21 individuals, median age was 16 years (range 12-20); 13 (62%) were male and eight (38%) were female. All 21 were hospitalised: 12 (57%) were admitted to an intensive care unit and all were discharged home. 15 (71%) of 21 individuals had laboratory evidence of past or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and six (29%) did not. As of Aug 31, 2021, 21 335 331 individuals aged 12-20 years had received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, making the overall reporting rate for MIS-C after vaccination 1·0 case per million individuals receiving one or more doses in this age group. The reporting rate in only those without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0·3 cases per million vaccinated individuals. INTERPRETATION: Here, we describe a small number of individuals with MIS-C who had received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine before illness onset; the contribution of vaccination to these illnesses is unknown. Our findings suggest that MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination is rare. Continued reporting of potential cases and surveillance for MIS-C illnesses after COVID-19 vaccination is warranted. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. |
Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children-United States, February 2020-July 2021.
Miller AD , Zambrano LD , Yousaf AR , Abrams JY , Meng L , Wu MJ , Melgar M , Oster ME , Godfred Cato SE , Belay ED , Campbell AP . Clin Infect Dis 2021 75 (1) e1165-e1175 BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a severe hyperinflammatory condition in persons aged <21 years associated with antecedent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our objective was to describe MIS-C cases reported to CDC's national surveillance since the COVID-19 pandemic began. METHODS: We included patients meeting the MIS-C case definition with onset date from February 19, 2020 through July 31, 2021, using CDC's MIS-C case report form, which collects information on demographics, clinical presentation, and laboratory results. Trends over time across 3 MIS-C pandemic waves were assessed using Cochran-Armitage test for categorical and Jonckheere-Terpstra test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Of 4,901 reported cases, 4,470 met inclusion criteria. Median patient age increased over time (P<0.001), with a median of 9 years (interquartile range, 5-13 years) during the most recent (third) wave. Male predominance also increased (62% in third wave, P<0.001). A significant (P<0.001) increase in severe hematologic and gastrointestinal involvement was observed across the study period. Frequency of several cardiovascular complications (i.e., cardiac dysfunction, myocarditis, and shock/ vasopressor receipt) and renal failure declined (P<0.001). Provision of critical care including mechanical ventilation (P<0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO; P=0.046) decreased, as did duration of hospitalization and mortality (each P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over the first 3 pandemic waves of MIS-C in the United States, cardiovascular complications and clinical outcomes including length of hospitalization, receipt of ECMO, and death decreased over time. These data serve as a baseline for monitoring future trends associated with SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) or other variants and increased COVID-19 vaccination among children. |
Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ELISA and the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG nucleocapsid protein assays for detection of antibodies.
Wadhwa A , Yin S , Freeman B , Hershow RB , Killerby M , Yousaf AR , Lester S , Mills L , Buono SA , Pomeroy M , Owusu D , Chu VT , Tate JE , Bhattacharyya S , Hall P , Thornburg NJ , Kirking HL . PLoS One 2021 16 (7) e0255208 Serologic assays developed for SARS-CoV-2 detect different antibody subtypes and are based on different target antigens. Comparison of the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Protein ELISA and the nucleocapsid-based Abbott ArchitectTM SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay indicated that the assays had high concordance, with rare paired discordant tests results. |
Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Children and Adolescents.
Chu VT , Yousaf AR , Chang K , Schwartz NG , McDaniel CJ , Lee SH , Szablewski CM , Brown M , Drenzek CL , Dirlikov E , Rose DA , Villanueva J , Fry AM , Hall AJ , Kirking HL , Tate JE , Lanzieri TM , Stewart RJ . N Engl J Med 2021 385 (10) 954-956 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children is often asymptomatic or results in only mild disease.1 Data on the extent of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from children and adolescents in the household setting, including transmission to older persons who are at increased risk for severe disease, are limited.2 After an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) at an overnight camp,3 we conducted a retrospective cohort study involving camp attendees and their household contacts to assess secondary transmission and factors associated with household transmission (additional details are provided in the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). |
Persistent SARS-CoV-2 RNA Shedding without Evidence of Infectiousness: A Cohort Study of Individuals with COVID-19.
Owusu D , Pomeroy MA , Lewis NM , Wadhwa A , Yousaf AR , Whitaker B , Dietrich E , Hall AJ , Chu V , Thornburg N , Christensen K , Kiphibane T , Willardson S , Westergaard R , Dasu T , Pray IW , Bhattacharyya S , Dunn A , Tate JE , Kirking HL , Matanock A . J Infect Dis 2021 224 (8) 1362-1371 BACKGROUND: To better understand SARS-CoV-2 shedding duration and infectivity, we estimated SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding duration, described characteristics associated with viral RNA shedding resolution1, and determined if replication-competent viruses could be recovered ≥10 days after symptom onset among individuals with mild to moderate COVID-19. METHODS: We collected serial nasopharyngeal specimens at various time points from 109 individuals with rRT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 in Utah and Wisconsin. We calculated probability of viral RNA shedding resolution using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and evaluated characteristics associated with shedding resolution using Cox proportional hazards regression. We attempted viral culture for 35 rRT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal specimens collected ≥10 days after symptom onset. RESULTS: The likelihood of viral RNA shedding resolution at 10 days after symptom onset was approximately 3%. Time to shedding resolution was shorter among participants aged <18 years (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR]: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.6-5.6) and longer among those aged ≥50 years (aHR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9) compared to participants aged 18-49 years. No replication-competent viruses were recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 for ≥10 days after symptom onset, our findings suggest that individuals with mild to moderate COVID-19 are unlikely to be infectious ≥10 days after symptom onset. |
SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Dynamics in a Sleep-Away Camp.
Szablewski CM , Chang KT , McDaniel CJ , Chu VT , Yousaf AR , Schwartz NG , Brown M , Winglee K , Paul P , Cui Z , Slayton RB , Tong S , Li Y , Uehara A , Zhang J , Sharkey SM , Kirking HL , Tate JE , Dirlikov E , Fry AM , Hall AJ , Rose DA , Villanueva J , Drenzek C , Stewart RJ , Lanzieri TM . Pediatrics 2021 147 (4) OBJECTIVES: In late June 2020, a large outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred at a sleep-away youth camp in Georgia, affecting primarily persons </=21 years. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among campers and staff (attendees) to determine the extent of the outbreak and assess factors contributing to transmission. METHODS: Attendees were interviewed to ascertain demographic characteristics, known exposures to COVID-19 and community exposures, and mitigation measures before, during, and after attending camp. COVID-19 case status was determined for all camp attendees on the basis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test results and reported symptoms. We calculated attack rates and instantaneous reproduction numbers and sequenced SARS-CoV-2 viral genomes from the outbreak. RESULTS: Among 627 attendees, the median age was 15 years (interquartile range: 12-16 years); 56% (351 of 627) of attendees were female. The attack rate was 56% (351 of 627) among all attendees. On the basis of date of illness onset or first positive test result on a specimen collected, 12 case patients were infected before arriving at camp and 339 case patients were camp associated. Among 288 case patients with available symptom information, 45 (16%) were asymptomatic. Despite cohorting, 50% of attendees reported direct contact with people outside their cabin cohort. On the first day of camp session, the instantaneous reproduction number was 10. Viral genomic diversity was low. CONCLUSIONS: Few introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into a youth congregate setting resulted in a large outbreak. Testing strategies should be combined with prearrival quarantine, routine symptom monitoring with appropriate isolation and quarantine, cohorting, social distancing, mask wearing, and enhanced disinfection and hand hygiene. Promotion of mitigation measures among younger populations is needed. |
Symptoms and Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Among Children - Utah and Wisconsin, March-May 2020.
Laws RL , Chancey RJ , Rabold EM , Chu VT , Lewis NM , Fajans M , Reses HE , Duca LM , Dawson P , Conners EE , Gharpure R , Yin S , Buono S , Pomeroy M , Yousaf AR , Owusu D , Wadhwa A , Pevzner E , Battey KA , Njuguna H , Fields VL , Salvatore P , O'Hegarty M , Vuong J , Gregory CJ , Banks M , Rispens J , Dietrich E , Marcenac P , Matanock A , Pray I , Westergaard R , Dasu T , Bhattacharyya S , Christiansen A , Page L , Dunn A , Atkinson-Dunn R , Christensen K , Kiphibane T , Willardson S , Fox G , Ye D , Nabity SA , Binder A , Freeman BD , Lester S , Mills L , Thornburg N , Hall AJ , Fry AM , Tate JE , Tran CH , Kirking HL . Pediatrics 2020 147 (1) BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in children. We described infection rates and symptom profiles among pediatric household contacts of individuals with coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS: We enrolled individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 and their household contacts, assessed daily symptoms prospectively for 14 days, and obtained specimens for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and serology testing. Among pediatric contacts (<18 years), we described transmission, assessed the risk factors for infection, and calculated symptom positive and negative predictive values. We compared secondary infection rates and symptoms between pediatric and adult contacts using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Among 58 households, 188 contacts were enrolled (120 adults; 68 children). Secondary infection rates for adults (30%) and children (28%) were similar. Among households with potential for transmission from children, child-to-adult transmission may have occurred in 2 of 10 (20%), and child-to-child transmission may have occurred in 1 of 6 (17%). Pediatric case patients most commonly reported headache (79%), sore throat (68%), and rhinorrhea (68%); symptoms had low positive predictive values, except measured fever (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44% to 100%). Compared with symptomatic adults, children were less likely to report cough (odds ratio [OR]: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.57), loss of taste (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.74), and loss of smell (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.96) and more likely to report sore throat (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.04 to 11.18). CONCLUSIONS: Children and adults had similar secondary infection rates, but children generally had less frequent and severe symptoms. In two states early in the pandemic, we observed possible transmission from children in approximately one-fifth of households with potential to observe such transmission patterns. |
Adolescent with COVID-19 as the Source of an Outbreak at a 3-Week Family Gathering - Four States, June-July 2020.
Schwartz NG , Moorman AC , Makaretz A , Chang KT , Chu VT , Szablewski CM , Yousaf AR , Brown MM , Clyne A , DellaGrotta A , Drobeniuc J , Korpics J , Muir A , Drenzek C , Bandy U , Kirking HL , Tate JE , Hall AJ , Lanzieri TM , Stewart RJ . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 69 (40) 1457-1459 There is increasing evidence that children and adolescents can efficiently transmit SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1-3). During July-August 2020, four state health departments and CDC investigated a COVID-19 outbreak that occurred during a 3-week family gathering of five households in which an adolescent aged 13 years was the index and suspected primary patient; 11 subsequent cases occurred. |
SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Infection Among Attendees of an Overnight Camp - Georgia, June 2020.
Szablewski CM , Chang KT , Brown MM , Chu VT , Yousaf AR , Anyalechi N , Aryee PA , Kirking HL , Lumsden M , Mayweather E , McDaniel CJ , Montierth R , Mohammed A , Schwartz NG , Shah JA , Tate JE , Dirlikov E , Drenzek C , Lanzieri TM , Stewart RJ . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 69 (31) 1023-1025 Limited data are available about transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), among youths. During June 17-20, an overnight camp in Georgia (camp A) held orientation for 138 trainees and 120 staff members; staff members remained for the first camp session, scheduled during June 21-27, and were joined by 363 campers and three senior staff members on June 21. Camp A adhered to the measures in Georgia's Executive Order* that allowed overnight camps to operate beginning on May 31, including requiring all trainees, staff members, and campers to provide documentation of a negative viral SARS-CoV-2 test ≤12 days before arriving. Camp A adopted most(†) components of CDC's Suggestions for Youth and Summer Camps(§) to minimize the risk for SARS-CoV-2 introduction and transmission. Measures not implemented were cloth masks for campers and opening windows and doors for increased ventilation in buildings. Cloth masks were required for staff members. Camp attendees were cohorted by cabin and engaged in a variety of indoor and outdoor activities, including daily vigorous singing and cheering. On June 23, a teenage staff member left camp A after developing chills the previous evening. The staff member was tested and reported a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 the following day (June 24). Camp A officials began sending campers home on June 24 and closed the camp on June 27. On June 25, the Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH) was notified and initiated an investigation. DPH recommended that all attendees be tested and self-quarantine, and isolate if they had a positive test result. |
A prospective cohort study in non-hospitalized household contacts with SARS-CoV-2 infection: symptom profiles and symptom change over time.
Yousaf AR , Duca LM , Chu V , Reses HE , Fajans M , Rabold EM , Laws RL , Gharpure R , Matanock A , Wadhwa A , Pomeroy M , Njuguna H , Fox G , Binder AM , Christiansen A , Freeman B , Gregory C , Tran CH , Owusu D , Ye D , Dietrich E , Pevzner E , Conners EE , Pray I , Rispens J , Vuong J , Christensen K , Banks M , O'Hegarty M , Mills L , Lester S , Thornburg NJ , Lewis N , Dawson P , Marcenac P , Salvatore P , Chancey RJ , Fields V , Buono S , Yin S , Gerber S , Kiphibane T , Dasu T , Bhattacharyya S , Westergaard R , Dunn A , Hall AJ , Fry AM , Tate JE , Kirking HL , Nabity S . Clin Infect Dis 2020 73 (7) e1841-e1849 BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of SARS-CoV-2 spectrum of disease is essential for clinical and public health interventions. There are limited data on mild or asymptomatic infections, but recognition of these individuals is key as they contribute to viral transmission. We describe the symptom profiles from individuals with mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: From March 22 to April 22, 2020 in Wisconsin and Utah, we enrolled and prospectively observed 198 household contacts exposed to SARS-CoV-2. We collected and tested nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens by RT-PCR two or more times during a 14-day period. Contacts completed daily symptom diaries. We characterized symptom profiles on the date of first positive RT-PCR test and described progression of symptoms over time. RESULTS: We identified 47 contacts, median age 24 (3-75) years, with detectable SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. The most commonly reported symptoms on the day of first positive RT-PCR test were upper respiratory (n=32, 68%) and neurologic (n=30, 64%); fever was not commonly reported (n=9, 19%). Eight (17%) individuals were asymptomatic at the date of first positive RT-PCR collection; two (4%) had preceding symptoms that resolved and six (13%) subsequently developed symptoms. Children less frequently reported lower respiratory symptoms (age <18: 21%, age 18-49: 60%, age 50+ years: 69%; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Household contacts with lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection reported mild symptoms. When assessed at a single time-point, several contacts appeared to have asymptomatic infection; however, over time all developed symptoms. These findings are important to inform infection control, contact tracing, and community mitigation strategies. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Dec 09, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure