A case of locally acquired (autochthonous) mosquito-transmitted Plasmodium vivax malaria was diagnosed in Arkansas in September 2023. This represents the 10th autochthonous case identified nationally in 2023, after 20 years without recorded local mosquitoborne malaria transmission in the United States. The public health response included case investigation, active case surveillance, mosquito surveillance and control, assessment of medical countermeasures, and clinical and public outreach. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment of malaria can improve clinical outcomes and, in addition to vector control, minimize risk for local transmission. Clinicians should consider malaria among patients who have traveled to countries where malaria is endemic, or with unexplained fever regardless of travel history. Although the risk for autochthonous malaria in the United States remains very low, its reemergence highlights the importance of vectorborne disease preparedness and response. Examples of such efforts include improving awareness among clinicians, access to diagnostics and antimalarial medications, and capacity for mosquito surveillance and control. Collaboration and communication among CDC, health departments, local jurisdictions, clinicians, hospitals, laboratories, and the public can support rapid malaria diagnosis, prevention, and control. Before traveling internationally to areas where malaria is endemic, travelers should consult with their health care provider regarding recommended malaria prevention measures, including chemoprophylaxis and precautions to avoid mosquito bites, to reduce both personal and community risk.

The coccidian parasite Cyclospora cayetanensis is the causative agent for foodborne outbreaks of cyclosporiasis disease and multiple annual fresh produce recalls. The aim of this study was to identify potential cross-reacting species for the C. cayetanensis 18S rRNA and MIT1C gene target real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays. The environmental samples evaluated were irrigation pond water, produce wash water, and wastewater treatment sludge from a previous study with qPCR detections of C. cayetanensis by the 18S rRNA gene target qPCR. From these samples, longer regions of the 18S rRNA gene and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit III gene (cox3) were sequenced. Of 65 irrigation pond water samples with positive test results using the C. cayetanensis 18S rRNA gene qPCR assay, none had MIT1C qPCR assay detections or sequences that clustered with C. cayetanensis based on sequencing of the cox3 and 18S rRNA gene. Sequences from these samples clustered around coccidia sequences found in bird, fish, reptile, and amphibian hosts. Of 26 sludge samples showing detections by either qPCR assay, 14 (54%) could be confirmed as containing C. cayetanensis by sequencing of cox3 and 18S rRNA gene regions. In three of the remaining sludge samples, sequenced reads clustered with coccidia from rodents. This study demonstrated that caution should be taken when interpreting qPCR C. cayetanensis detection data in environmental samples and sequencing steps will likely be needed for confirmation. IMPORTANCE: Fresh produce is a leading transmission source in cyclosporiasis outbreaks. It is therefore essential to understand the role that produce-growing environments play in the spread of this disease. To accomplish this, sensitive and specific tests for environmental and irrigation waters must be developed. Potential cross-reactions of Cyclospora cayetanensis real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays have been identified, hindering the ability to accurately identify this parasite in the environment. Amplicon sequencing of the cox3 and 18S rRNA genes revealed that all irrigation pond water and two sludge samples that initially detected C. cayetanensis by qPCR were most likely cross-reactions with related coccidian organisms shed from birds, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and rodents. These results support that a single testing method for environmental samples is likely not adequate for sensitive and specific detection of C. cayetanensis.

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is a sexually transmitted infection that can lead to adverse reproductive health outcomes. CT prevalence estimates are primarily derived from screening using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). However, screening guidelines in the United States only include particular subpopulations, and NAATs only detect current infections. In contrast, seroassays identify past CT infections which are important for understanding the public health impacts of CT, including pelvic inflammatory disease and tubal factor infertility. Older seroassays have been plagued by low sensitivity and specificity and have not been validated using a consistent reference measure, making it challenging to compare studies, define the epidemiology of CT and determine the effectiveness of control programs. Newer seroassays have better performance characteristics. This narrative review summarizes the "state of the science" for CT seroassays that have been applied in epidemiologic studies and provides practical considerations for interpreting the literature and employing seroassays in future research.

Human infections caused by viral pathogens trigger a complex gamut of host responses that limit disease, resolve infection, generate immunity, and contribute to severe disease or death. Here, we present experimental methods and multi-omics data capture approaches representing the global host response to infection generated from 45 individual experiments involving human viruses from the Orthomyxoviridae, Filoviridae, Flaviviridae, and Coronaviridae families. Analogous experimental designs were implemented across human or mouse host model systems, longitudinal samples were collected over defined time courses, and global multi-omics data (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics) were acquired by microarray, RNA sequencing, or mass spectrometry analyses. For comparison, we have included transcriptomics datasets from cells treated with type I and type II human interferon. Raw multi-omics data and metadata were deposited in public repositories, and we provide a central location linking the raw data with experimental metadata and ready-to-use, quality-controlled, statistically processed multi-omics datasets not previously available in any public repository. This compendium of infection-induced host response data for reuse will be useful for those endeavouring to understand viral disease pathophysiology and network biology.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed and implemented the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry (C19VPR) to monitor vaccine safety. Potential participants who received a COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy or up to 30 days prior to their pregnancy-associated last menstrual period were eligible to participate in the registry, which monitored health outcomes of participants and their infants through phone interviews and review of available medical records. Data for select outcomes, including birth defects, were reviewed by clinicians. In certain cases, medical records were used to confirm and add detail to participant-reported health conditions. This paper serves as a description of CDC C19VPR protocol. We describe the development and implementation for each data collection aspect of the registry (i.e., participant phone interviews, clinical review, and medical record abstraction), data management, and strengths and limitations. We also describe the demographics and vaccinations received among eligible and enrolled participants. There were 123,609 potential participants 18-54 years of age identified from January 2021 through mid-June 2021; 23,339 were eligible and enrolled into the registry. Among these, 85.3 % consented to medical record review for themselves and/or their infants. Participants were majority non-Hispanic White (79.1 %), residents of urban areas (93.3 %), and 48.3 % were between 30 and 34 years of age. Most participants completed the primary series of vaccination by the end of pregnancy (89.7 %). Many participants were healthcare personnel (44.8 %), possibly due to the phased roll-out of the vaccination program. The registry continues to provide important information about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people, a population with higher risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19 who were not included in pre-authorization clinical trials. Lessons learned from the registry may guide development and implementation of future vaccine safety monitoring efforts for pregnant people and their infants.

Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) | Essential practices | Infrastructure and resources | 1 Perform a CAUTI risk assessment and implement an organization-wide program to identify and remove catheters that are no longer necessary using 1 or | more methods documented to be effective. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Provide appropriate infrastructure for preventing CAUTI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Provide and implement evidence-based protocols to address multiple steps of the urinary catheter life cycle: catheter appropriateness (step 0), insertion | technique (step 1), maintenance care (step 2), and prompt removal (step 3) when no longer appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Ensure that only trained healthcare personnel (HCP) insert urinary catheters and that competency is assessed regularly. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Ensure that supplies necessary for aseptic technique for catheter insertion are available and conveniently located. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Implement a system for documenting the following in the patient record: physician order for catheter placement, indications for catheter insertion, date | and time of catheter insertion, name of individual who inserted catheter, nursing documentation of placement, daily presence of a catheter and | maintenance care tasks, and date and time of catheter removal. Record criteria for removal and justification for continued use. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 7 Ensure that sufficiently trained HCP and technology resources are available to support surveillance for catheter use and outcomes. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 8 Perform surveillance for CAUTI if indicated based on facility risk assessment or regulatory requirements. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 9 Standardize urine culturing by adapting an institutional protocol for appropriate indications for urine cultures in patients with and without indwelling | catheters. Consider incorporating these indications into the electronic medical record, and review indications for ordering urine cultures in the CAUTI | risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Education and training | 1 Educate HCP involved in the insertion, care, and maintenance of urinary catheters about CAUTI prevention, including alternatives to indwelling | catheters, and procedures for catheter insertion, management, and removal. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Assess healthcare professional competency in catheter use, catheter care, and maintenance. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Educate HCP about the importance of urine-culture stewardship and provide indications for urine cultures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Provide training on appropriate collection of urine. Specimens should be collected and should arrive at the microbiology laboratory as soon as possible, | preferably within an hour. If delay in transport to the laboratory is expected, samples should be refrigerated (no more than 24 hours) or collected in | preservative urine transport tubes. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Train clinicians to consider other methods for bladder management, such as intermittent catheterization or external male or female collection devices, | when appropriate, before placing an indwelling urethral catheter. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Share data in a timely fashion and report to appropriate stakeholders. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Insertion of indwelling catheters | 1 Insert urinary catheters only when necessary for patient care and leave in place only as long as indications remain. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Consider other methods for bladder management such as intermittent catheterization, or external male or female collection devices, when appropriate. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Use appropriate technique for catheter insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE). | 4 Consider working in pairs to help perform patient positioning and monitor for potential contamination during placement. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Practice hand hygiene (based on CDC or WHO guidelines) immediately before insertion of the catheter and before and after any manipulation of the | catheter site or apparatus. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Insert catheters following aseptic technique and using sterile equipment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Use sterile gloves, drape, and sponges, a sterile antiseptic solution for cleaning the urethral meatus, and a sterile single-use packet of lubricant jelly for | insertion. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Use a catheter with the smallest feasible diameter consistent with proper drainage to minimize urethral trauma but consider other catheter types and | sizes when warranted for patients with anticipated difficult catheterization to reduce the likelihood that a patient will experience multiple, sometimes | traumatic, catheterization attempts. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Management of indwelling catheters | 1 Properly secure indwelling catheters after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Maintain a sterile, continuously closed drainage system. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Replace the catheter and the collecting system using aseptic technique when breaks in aseptic technique, disconnection, or leakage occur. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | 4 For examination of fresh urine, collect a small sample by aspirating urine from the needleless sampling port with a sterile syringe/cannula adaptor after | cleansing the port with disinfectant. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | 2 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) | (Continued ) | 5 Facilitate timely transport of urine samples to laboratory. If timely transport is not feasible, consider refrigerating urine samples or using samplecollection cups with preservatives. Obtain larger volumes of urine for special analyses (eg, 24-hour urine) aseptically from the drainage bag. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | 6 Maintain unobstructed urine flow. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Employ routine hygiene. Cleaning the meatal area with antiseptic solutions is an unresolved issue, though emerging literature supports chlorhexidine | use prior to catheter insertion. Alcohol-based products should be avoided given concerns about the alcohol causing drying of the mucosal tissues. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Develop a protocol for standardizing diagnosis and management of postoperative urinary retention, including nurse-directed use of intermittent | catheterization and use of bladder scanners when appropriate as alternatives to indwelling urethral catheterization. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Establish a system for analyzing and reporting data on catheter use and adverse events from catheter use. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Establish a system for defining, analyzing, and reporting data on non–catheter-associated UTIs, particularly UTIs associated with the use of devices | being used as alternatives to indwelling urethral catheters. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Essential practices | Before insertion | 1 Provide easy access to an evidence-based list of indications for CVC use to minimize unnecessary CVC placement. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Require education and competency assessment of healthcare personnel (HCP) involved in insertion, care and maintenance of CVCs about CLABSI | prevention. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Bathe ICU patients aged >2 months with a chlorhexidine preparation on a daily basis. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | At insertion | 1 In ICU and non-ICU settings, a facility should have a process in place, such as a checklist, to ensure adherence to infection prevention practices at the | time of CVC insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Perform hand hygiene prior to catheter insertion or manipulation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 The subclavian site is preferred to reduce infectious complications when the catheter is placed in the ICU setting. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Use an all-inclusive catheter cart or kit. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Use ultrasound guidance for catheter insertion. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Use maximum sterile barrier precautions during CVC insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | After insertion | 1 Ensure appropriate nurse-to-patient ratio and limit use of float nurses in ICUs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Use chlorhexidine-containing dressings for CVCs in patients aged >2 months. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 For nontunneled CVCs in adults and children, change transparent dressings and perform site care with a chlorhexidine-based antiseptic at least every 7 | days or immediately if the dressing is soiled, loose, or damp. Change gauze dressings every 2 days or earlier if the dressing is soiled, loose, or damp. | (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Disinfect catheter hubs, needleless connectors, and injection ports before accessing the catheter. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Remove nonessential catheters. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Routine replacement of administration sets not used for blood, blood products, or lipid formulations can be performed at intervals up to 7 days. | (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 Perform surveillance for CLABSI in ICU and non-ICU settings. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Additional approaches | 1 Use antiseptic or antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH in adult patients; MODERATE in pediatric patients) | 2 Use antimicrobial lock therapy for long-term CVCs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Use recombinant tissue plasminogen activating factor (rt-PA) once weekly after hemodialysis in patients undergoing hemodialysis through a CVC. | (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Utilize infusion or vascular access teams for reducing CLABSI rates. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Use antimicrobial ointments for hemodialysis catheter-insertion sites. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Use an antiseptic-containing hub, connector cap, or port protector to cover connectors. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 3 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) | Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and infection | Essential practices | 1 Encourage appropriate use of antimicrobials through implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Implement diagnostic stewardship practices for ensuring appropriate use and interpretation of C. difficile testing. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Use contact precautions for infected patients, single-patient room preferred. (Quality of evidence: LOW for hand hygiene; MODERATE for gloves; LOW | for gowns; LOW for single-patient room) | 4 Adequately clean and disinfect equipment and the environment of patients with CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW for equipment; LOW for environment) | 5 Assess the adequacy of room cleaning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Implement a laboratory-based alert system to provide immediate notification to infection preventionists and clinical personnel about newly diagnosed | patients with CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Conduct CDI surveillance and analyze and report CDI data. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Educate healthcare personnel (HCP), environmental service personnel, and hospital administration about CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 9 Educate patients and their families about CDI as appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 10 Measure compliance with CDC or WHO hand hygiene and contact precaution recommendations. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Intensify the assessment of compliance with process measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Perform hand hygiene with soap and water as the preferred method following care of or interacting with the healthcare environment of a patient with | CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Place patients with diarrhea on contact precautions while C. difficile testing is pending. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Prolong the duration of contact precautions after the patient becomes asymptomatic until hospital discharge. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Use an EPA-approved sporicidal disinfectant, such as diluted (1:10) sodium hypochlorite, for environmental cleaning and disinfection. Implement a | system to coordinate with environmental services if it is determined that sodium hypochlorite is needed for environmental disinfection. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | Essential practices | 1 Implement an MRSA monitoring program. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Conduct an MRSA risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Promote compliance with CDC or World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene recommendations. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Use contact precautions for MRSA-colonized and MRSA-infected patients. A facility that chooses or has already chosen to modify the use of contact | precautions for some or all of these patients should conduct an MRSA-specific risk assessment to evaluate the facility for transmission risks and to | assess the effectiveness of other MRSA risk mitigation strategies (eg, hand hygiene, cleaning and disinfection of the environment, single occupancy | patient rooms) and should establish a process for ongoing monitoring, oversight, and risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Ensure cleaning and disinfection of equipment and the environment. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Implement a laboratory-based alert system that notifies healthcare personnel (HCP) of new MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients in a timely | manner. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Implement an alert system that identifies readmitted or transferred MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Provide MRSA data and outcome measures to key stakeholders, including senior leadership, physicians, nursing staff, and others. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 9 Educate healthcare personnel about MRSA. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 10 Educate patients and families about MRSA. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 11 Implement an antimicrobial stewardship program. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Active surveillance testing (AST) | 1 Implement an MRSA AST program for select patient populations as part of a multifaceted strategy to control and prevent MRSA. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) Note: specific populations may have different evidence ratings. | 2 Active surveillance for MRSA in conjunction with decolonization can be performed in targeted populations prior to surgery to prevent postsurgical | MRSA infection. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | (Continued) | 4 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent surgical-site infections (SSIs) | (Continued ) | 3 Active surveillance with contact precautions is inferior to universal decolonization for reduction of MRSA clinical isolates in adult ICUs. (Quality of | evidence: HIGH) | 4 Hospital-wide active surveillance for MRSA can be used in conjunction with contact precautions to reduce the incidence of MRSA infection. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Active surveillance can be performed in the setting of an MRSA outbreak or evidence of ongoing transmission of MRSA within a unit as part of a | multifaceted strategy to halt transmission. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Screen healthcare personnel for MRSA infection or colonization | 1 Screen HCP for MRSA infection or colonization if they are epidemiologically linked to a cluster of MRSA infections. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | MRSA decolonization therapy | 1 Use universal decolonization (ie, daily CHG bathing plus 5 days of nasal decolonization) for all patients in adult ICUs to reduce endemic MRSA clinical | cultures. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Perform preoperative nares screening with targeted use of CHG and nasal decolonization in MRSA carriers to reduce MRSA SSI from surgical | procedures involving implantation of hardware. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Screen for MRSA and provide targeted decolonization with CHG bathing and nasal decolonization to MRSA carriers in surgical units to reduce | postoperative MRSA inpatient infections. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Provide CHG bathing plus nasal decolonization to known MRSA carriers outside the ICU with medical devices, specifically central lines, midline | catheters, and lumbar drains to reduce MRSA clinical cultures. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Consider postdischarge decolonization of MRSA carriers to reduce postdischarge MRSA infections and readmissions. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Neonatal ICUs should consider targeted or universal decolonization during times of above-average MRSA infection rates or targeted decolonization for | patients at high risk of MRSA infection (eg, low birth weight, indwelling devices, or prior to high-risk surgeries). (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 7 Burn units should consider targeted or universal decolonization during times of above-average MRSA infection rates. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 8 Consider targeted or universal decolonization of hemodialysis patients. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 9 Decolonization should be strongly considered as part of a multimodal approach to control MRSA outbreaks. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Universal use of gowns and gloves | 1 Use gowns and gloves when providing care to or entering the room of any adult ICU patient, regardless of MRSA colonization status. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | 1 Administer antimicrobial prophylaxis according to evidence-based standards and guidelines. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Use a combination of parenteral and oral antimicrobial prophylaxis prior to elective colorectal surgery to reduce the risk of SSI. (Quality of evidence: | HIGH) | 3 Decolonize surgical patients with an anti-staphylococcal agent in the preoperative setting for orthopedic and cardiothoracic procedures. (Quality of | evidence: HIGH) | Decolonize surgical patients in other procedures at high risk of staphylococcal SSI, such as those involving prosthetic material. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 4 Use antiseptic-containing preoperative vaginal preparation agents for patients undergoing cesarean delivery or hysterectomy. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) | 5 Do not remove hair at the operative site unless the presence of hair will interfere with the surgical procedure. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Use alcohol-containing preoperative skin preparatory agents in combination with an antiseptic. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 For procedures not requiring hypothermia, maintain normothermia (temperature >35.5 °C) during the perioperative period. (Quality of evidence: HIGH). | 8 Use impervious plastic wound protectors for gastrointestinal and biliary tract surgery. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 9 Perform intraoperative antiseptic wound lavage. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 10 Control blood glucose level during the immediate postoperative period for all patients. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 11 Use a checklist and/or bundle to ensure compliance with best practices to improve surgical patient safety. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 12 Perform surveillance for SSI. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 13 Increase the efficiency of surveillance by utilizing automated data. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 14 Provide ongoing SSI rate feedback to surgical and perioperative personnel and leadership. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 15 Measure and provide feedback to healthcare personnel (HCP) regarding rates of compliance with process measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 5 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and ventilator-associated events (VAEs) | Adult patients | (Continued ) | 16 Educate surgeons and perioperative personnel about SSI prevention measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 17 Educate patients and their families about SSI prevention as appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 18 Implement policies and practices to reduce the risk of SSI for patients that align with applicable evidence-based standards, rules and regulations, and | medical device manufacturer instructions for use. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 19 Observe and review operating room personnel and the environment of care in the operating room and in central sterile reprocessing. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Perform an SSI risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Consider use of negative-pressure dressings in patients who may benefit. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Observe and review practices in the preoperative clinic, post-anesthesia care unit, surgical intensive care unit, and/or surgical ward. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Use antiseptic-impregnated sutures as a strategy to prevent SSI. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | Interventions with little risk of harm and that are associated with decreases in duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, mortality, antibiotic utilization, | and/or costs | Avoid intubation and prevent reintubation if possible. | 1 Use high flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as appropriate, whenever safe and feasible. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Minimize sedation. | 1 Minimize sedation of ventilated patients whenever possible. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Preferentially use multimodal strategies and medications other than benzodiazepines to manage agitation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Utilize a protocol to minimize sedation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Implement a ventilator liberation protocol. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Maintain and improve physical conditioning. | 1 Provide early exercise and mobilization. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Elevate the head of the bed to 30°–45°. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Provide oral care with toothbrushing but without chlorhexidine. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Provide early enteral rather than parenteral nutrition. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Maintain ventilator circuits. | 1 Change the ventilator circuit only if visibly soiled or malfunctioning (or per manufacturers’ instructions) (Quality of evidence: HIGH). | Additional approaches | May decrease duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and/or mortality in some populations but not in others, and they may confer some risk of harm | in some populations. | 1 Consider using selective decontamination of the oropharynx and digestive tract to decrease microbial burden in ICUs with low prevalence of antibiotic | resistant organisms. Antimicrobial decontamination is not recommended in countries, regions, or ICUs with high prevalence of antibiotic-resistant | organisms. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Additional approaches | May lower VAP rates, but current data are insufficient to determine their impact on duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and mortality. | 1 Consider using endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage ports to minimize pooling of secretions above the endotracheal cuff in patients | likely to require >48–72 hours of intubation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Consider early tracheostomy. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Consider postpyloric feeding tube placement in patients with gastric feeding intolerance at high risk for aspiration. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Preterm neonatal patients | Pediatric patients | Essential practices | Confer minimal risk of harm and may lower VAP and/or PedVAE rates. | Avoid intubation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Minimize duration of mechanical ventilation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Manage patients without sedation whenever possible. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Use caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity within 72 hours after birth to facilitate extubation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Assess readiness to extubate daily. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Take steps to minimize unplanned extubation and reintubation. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Provide regular oral care with sterile water (extrapolated from practice in infants and children, no data in preterm neonates). (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 6 Change the ventilator circuit only if visibly soiled or malfunctioning or according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use (extrapolated from studies in | adults and children, no data in preterm neonates). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Minimal risks of harm, but impact on VAP and VAE rates is unknown. | 1 Lateral recumbent positioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Reverse Trendelenberg positioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Closed or in-line suctioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Oral care with maternal colostrum. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | Confer minimal risk of harm and some data suggest that they may lower VAP rates, PedVAE rates, and/or duration of mechanical ventilation. | Avoid intubation. | 1 Use noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula whenever safe and feasible. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) | Minimize duration of mechanical ventilation. | 1 Assess readiness to extubate daily using spontaneous breathing trials in patients without contraindications. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Take steps to minimize unplanned extubations and reintubations. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Avoid fluid overload. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Provide regular oral care (ie, toothbrushing or gauze if no teeth). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Elevate the head of the bed unless medically contraindicated. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Maintain ventilator circuits. | 1 Change ventilator circuits only when visibly soiled or malfunctioning (or per manufacturer’s instructions). (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Remove condensate from the ventilator circuit frequently and avoid draining the condensate toward the patient. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Endotracheal tube selection and management | 1 Use cuffed endotracheal tubes. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Maintain cuff pressure and volume at the minimal occlusive settings to prevent clinically significant air leaks around the endotracheal tube, typically | 20-25cm H2O. This “minimal leak” approach is associated with lower rates of post-extubation stridor. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Suction oral secretions before each position change. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Minimal risks of harm and some evidence of benefit in adult patients but data in pediatric populations are limited. | 1 Minimize sedation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Use endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage ports for patients ≥10 years of age. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Consider early tracheostomy. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 7 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) | Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene | Essential practices | Promote the maintenance of healthy hand skin and nails. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Promote the preferential use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS) in most clinical situations. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Perform hand hygiene as indicated by CDC or the WHO Five Moments. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Include fingernail care in facility-specific policies related to hand hygiene. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | a) Healthcare personnel (HCP) should maintain short, natural fingernails. | b) Nails should not extend past the fingertip. | c) HCP who provide direct or indirect care in high-risk areas | (eg, ICU or perioperative) should not wear artificial fingernail extenders. | d) Prohibitions against fingernail polish (standard or gel shellac) are at the discretion of the infection prevention program, except among scrubbed | individuals who interact with the sterile field during surgical procedures; these individuals should not wear fingernail polish or gel shellac. | 4 Engage all HCP in primary prevention of occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Provide cotton glove liners for HCP with hand irritation and educate these HCP on their use. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Select appropriate products. | 1 For routine hand hygiene, choose liquid, gel, or foam ABHS with at least 60% alcohol. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Involve HCP in selection of products. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Obtain and consider manufacturers’ product-specific data if seeking ABHS with ingredients that may enhance efficacy against organisms anticipated to | be less susceptible to biocides. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Confirm that the volume of ABHS dispensed is consistent with the volume shown to be efficacious. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Educate HCP about an appropriate volume of ABHS and the time required to obtain effectiveness. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Provide facility-approved hand moisturizer that is compatible with antiseptics and gloves. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 For surgical antisepsis, use an FDA-approved surgical hand scrub or waterless surgical hand rub. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Ensure the accessibility of hand hygiene supplies. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Ensure ABHS dispensers are unambiguous, visible, and accessible within the workflow of HCP. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 In private rooms, consider 2 ABHS dispensers the minimum threshold for adequate numbers of dispensers: 1 dispenser in the hallway, and 1 in the | patient room. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 In semiprivate rooms, suites, bays, and other multipatient bed configurations, consider 1 dispenser per 2 beds the minimum threshold for adequate | numbers of dispensers. Place ABHS dispensers in the workflow of HCP. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Ensure that the placement of hand hygiene supplies (eg, individual pocket-sized dispensers, bed mounted ABHS dispenser, single use pump bottles) is | easily accessible for HCP in all areas where patients receive care. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Evaluate for the risk of intentional consumption. Utilize dispensers that mitigate this risk, such as wall-mounted dispensers that allow limited numbers | of activations within short periods (eg, 5 seconds). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Have surgical hand rub and scrub available in perioperative areas. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 Consider providing ABHS hand rubs or handwash with FDA-approved antiseptics for use in procedural areas and prior to high-risk bedside procedures | (eg, central-line insertion). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | Practices supported by interventional studies suggesting lower | NV-HAP rates | 1 Provide regular oral care. | 2 Diagnose and manage dysphagia. | 3 Provide early mobilization. | 4 Implement multimodal interventions to prevent viral infections. | 5 Use prevention bundles. | 8 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Implementing strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections | Standard approach to implementation | Examples of implementation frameworks | (Continued ) | Ensure appropriate glove use to reduce hand and environmental contamination. (Quality of Evidence: HIGH) | 1 Use gloves for all contact with the patient and environment as indicated by standard and contact precautions during the care of individuals with | organisms confirmed to be less susceptible to biocides (e.g., C. difficile or norovirus) | 2 Educate HCP about the potential for self-contamination and environmental contamination when gloves are worn. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Educate and confirm the ability of HCP to doff gloves in a manner that avoids contamination. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Take steps to reduce environmental contamination associated with sinks and sink drains. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Monitor adherence to hand hygiene. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Provide timely and meaningful feedback to enhance a culture of safety. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Additional approaches during outbreaks | 1 Consider educating HCP using a structured approach (eg, WHO Steps) for handwashing or hand sanitizing. Evaluate HCP adherence to technique. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 For waterborne pathogens of premise plumbing, consider disinfection of sink drains using an EPA-registered disinfectant with claims against biofilms. | Consult with state or local public health for assistance in determining appropriate protocols for use and other actions needed to ensure safe supply. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 For C. difficile and norovirus, in addition to contact precautions, encourage hand washing with soap and water after the care of patients with known or | suspected infections. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 1 Assess determinants of change and | classify as follows: | • Facilitators: promote practice or | change, or | • Barriers: hinder practice or change | Individual level: healthcare personnel, leaders, patients, and visitors’ preferences, needs, attitudes, and | knowledge. | Facility level: team composition, communication, culture, capacity, policies, resources. | Partners: degree of support and buy-in. | 2 Choose measures Measurement methods must be appropriate for the question(s) they seek to answer and adhere to the | methods’ data collection and analysis rules: | • Outcome measure: ultimate goal (eg, HAI reduction). | • Process measure: action reliability (eg, bundle adherence). | • Balancing measure: undesired outcome of change (eg, staff absences due to required vaccine side effects). | 3 Select framework(s) See below and “Implementing Strategies to Prevent Infections in Acute Care Settings” (Table 3) | 32 | Framework Published Experience Resources | 4Es Settings | • Healthcare facilities | • Large-scale projects including multiple | sites | Infection prevention and control | • HAI prevention (including mortality | reduction and cost savings) | • 4Es Framework11 | • HAI reduction12–14 | • Mortality reduction15 | • Cost savings16 | Behavior Change Wheel Settings | • Community-based practice | • Healthcare facilities | Healthy behaviors | • Smoking cessation | • Obesity prevention | • Increased physical activity | Infection prevention and control | • Hand hygiene adherence | • Antibiotic prescribing17 | • Behavior Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions18 | • Stand More at Work (SMArT Work)19 | (Continued) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 9 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Acknowledgments. The Compendium Partners thank the authors for their | dedication to this work, including maintaining adherence to the rigorous | process for the development of the Compendium: 2022 Updates, involving but | not limited to screening of thousands of articles; achieving multilevel consensus; | and consideration of, response to, and incorporation of many organizations’ | feedback and comments. We acknowledge these efforts especially because they | occurred as the authors handled the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. The | authors thank Valerie Deloney, MBA, for her organizational expertise in the | development of this manuscript and Janet Waters, MLS, BSN, RN, for her | expertise in developing the strategies used for the literature searches that | informed this manuscript. The authors thank the many individuals and | organizations who gave their time and expertise to review and provide | (Continued ) | Comprehensive Unit-based | Safety Program (CUSP) | Settings | • Intensive care units | • Ambulatory centers | Improvements | • Antibiotic prescribing | • CLABSI prevention | • CAUTI prevention | • CUSP Implementation Toolkit20 | • AHA/HRET: Eliminating CAUTI (Stop CAUTI)21 | • AHRQ Toolkit to Improve Safety in Ambulatory Surgery Centers22 | European Mixed Methods Settings | • European institutions of varied | healthcare systems and cultures | Improvements: | • CLABSI prevention | • Hand hygiene | • PROHIBIT: Description and Materials23 | Getting to Outcomes (GTO)® Settings | • Community programs and services | Improvements | • Sexual health promotion | • Dual-disorder treatment program in | veterans | • Community emergency preparedness | • RAND Guide for Emergency Preparedness24 (illustrated overview of GTO® methodology) | Model for Improvement Settings | • Healthcare (inpatient, perioperative, | ambulatory) | • Public health | Interventions | • PPE use | • HAI prevention | • Public health process evaluation | • Institute for Healthcare Improvement25 | • The Improvement Guide26 | • Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge27 | Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, | Implementation, Maintenance | (RE-AIM) | Settings | • Healthcare | • Public health | • Community programs | • Sexual health | Evaluations | • Antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU | • Clinical practice guidelines for STIs | • Promotion of vaccination | • Implementation of contact tracing | • RE-AIM.org28 | • Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and | resources29 | Replicating Effective Practices | (REP) | Settings | • Healthcare | • Public health | • HIV prevention | Interventions that have produced | positive results are reframed for local | relevance | CDC Compendium of HIV Prevention Interventions with Evidence of | Effectiveness30 (see Section C, Intervention Checklist) | Theoretical Domains Settings | • Healthcare (inpatient, perioperative, | ambulatory) | • Community (individual and communitybased behaviors) | Health maintenance | • Diabetes management in primary care | • Pregnancy weight management | HCP practice | • ICU blood transfusion | • Selective GI tract decontamination | • Preoperative testing | • Spine imaging | • Hand hygiene

Objectives: The largest mumps outbreak in the United States since 2006 occurred in Arkansas during the 2016-17 school year. An additional dose (third dose) of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR3) was offered to school children. We evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of MMR3 compared with two doses of MMR for preventing mumps among school-aged children during the outbreak. Study design: A generalized linear mixed effects model was used to estimate the incremental vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a third dose of MMR compared with two doses of MMR for preventing mumps. Methods: We obtained school enrollment, immunization status and mumps case status from school registries, Arkansas's immunization registry, and Arkansas's mumps surveillance system, respectively. We included students who previously received 2 doses of MMR in schools with ≥1 mumps case after the MMR3 clinic. We used a generalized linear mixed model to estimate VE of MMR3 compared with two doses of MMR. Results: Sixteen schools with 9272 students were included in the analysis. Incremental VE of MMR3 versus a two-dose MMR regimen was 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.6%‒78.4%) overall and in 8 schools with high mumps transmission it was 64.0% (95% CI: 1.2%‒86.9%). MMR3 VE was higher among middle compared with elementary school students (68.5% [95% CI: -30.2%‒92.4%] vs 37.6% [95% CI: -62.5%‒76.1%]); these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our findings suggest MMR3 provided additional protection from mumps compared with two MMR doses in elementary and middle school settings during a mumps outbreak. © 2023

Salmonella enterica serovar (Salmonella Typhi) is the causative bacterial agent of typhoid fever. Environmental surveillance of wastewater and wastewater-impacted surface waters has proven effective in monitoring various pathogens and has recently been applied to Salmonella Typhi. This study evaluated eight sample collection and concentration methods with 12 variations currently being developed and used for Salmonella Typhi surveillance globally to better understand the performance of each method based on its ability to detect Salmonella Typhi and its feasibility. Salmonella Typhi strains Ty21a and Ty2 were seeded to influent wastewater at known concentrations to evaluate the following methods: grab sampling using electropositive filters, centrifugation, direct enrichment, or membrane filtration and trap sampling using Moore swabs. Concentrated samples underwent nucleic acid extraction and were detected and/or quantified via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Results suggest that all methods tested can be successful at concentrating Salmonella Typhi for subsequent detection by qPCR, although each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, including the Salmonella Typhi concentration it is best suited for, with a range of positive detections observed as low as 0.1-0.001 colony-forming units (CFU) Ty21a/mL and 0.01 CFU Ty2/mL. These factors should be considered when identifying a method for environmental surveillance and will greatly depend on the use case planned.

Salmonella enterica serovar (Salmonella Typhi) is the causative bacterial agent of Typhoid fever. Environmental surveillance of wastewater and wastewater-impacted surface waters has proven effective in monitoring various pathogens, and has recently been applied to Salmonella Typhi. This study evaluated eight sample collection and concentration methods with twelve variations currently being developed and used for Salmonella Typhi surveillance globally to better understand the performance of each method based on their ability to detect Salmonella Typhi and feasibility. Salmonella Typhi strains, Ty21a and Ty2, were seeded to influent wastewater at known concentrations to evaluate the following methods: grab sampling using electropositive filters, centrifugation, direct enrichment, or membrane filtration and trap sampling using Moore swabs. Concentrated samples underwent nucleic acid extraction and were detected and/or quantified via qPCR. Results suggest that all methods tested can be successful at concentrating Salmonella Typhi for subsequent detection by qPCR, although each method has its own strengths and weaknesses including the Salmonella Typhi concentrations they are best suited for with a range of positive detections observed as low as 0.1-0.001 CFU Ty21a/mL and 0.01 CFU Ty2/mL. These factors should be considered when identifying a method for environmental surveillance and will greatly depend on the use case planned. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Inadvertent ingestion of recreational waters contaminated with feces containing Cryptosporidium spp., an extremely chlorine-tolerant parasite, can result in gastrointestinal illness. In early 2023, a Massachusetts college notified the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) that 19 of 50 (38%) members of the men’s and women’s swim teams had experienced diarrhea beginning 3 days after their return from a weeklong training trip to Puerto Rico. One ill swimmer reported receiving a positive ova and parasite test result for Cryptosporidium. On days 5 and 6 after return from Puerto Rico, symptomatic Massachusetts swimmers competed in two meets against New York and Rhode Island collegiate teams (meet 1 and meet 2, respectively), raising concern about the potential for secondary transmission.

Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 is the etiologic agent of the disease cholera, and strains of this serogroup are responsible for pandemics. A few other serogroups have been found to carry cholera toxin genes-most notably, O139, O75, and O141-and public health surveillance in the United States is focused on these four serogroups. A toxigenic isolate was recovered from a case of vibriosis from Texas in 2008. This isolate did not agglutinate with any of the four different serogroups' antisera (O1, O139, O75, or O141) routinely used in phenotypic testing and did not display a rough phenotype. We investigated several hypotheses that might explain the recovery of this potential nonagglutinating (NAG) strain using whole-genome sequencing analysis and phylogenetic methods. The NAG strain formed a monophyletic cluster with O141 strains in a whole-genome phylogeny. Furthermore, a phylogeny of ctxAB and tcpA sequences revealed that the sequences from the NAG strain also formed a monophyletic cluster with toxigenic U.S. Gulf Coast (USGC) strains (O1, O75, and O141) that were recovered from vibriosis cases associated with exposures to Gulf Coast waters. A comparison of the NAG whole-genome sequence showed that the O-antigen-determining region of the NAG strain was closely related to those of O141 strains, and specific mutations were likely responsible for the inability to agglutinate. This work shows the utility of whole-genome sequence analysis tools for characterization of an atypical clinical isolate of V. cholerae originating from a USGC state. IMPORTANCE Clinical cases of vibriosis are on the rise due to climate events and ocean warming (1, 2), and increased surveillance of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae strains is now more crucial than ever. While traditional phenotyping using antisera against O1 and O139 is useful for monitoring currently circulating strains with pandemic or epidemic potential, reagents are limited for non-O1/non-O139 strains. With the increased use of next-generation sequencing technologies, analysis of less well-characterized strains and O-antigen regions is possible. The framework for advanced molecular analysis of O-antigen-determining regions presented herein will be useful in the absence of reagents for serotyping. Furthermore, molecular analyses based on whole-genome sequence data and using phylogenetic methods will help characterize both historical and novel strains of clinical importance. Closely monitoring emerging mutations and trends will improve our understanding of the epidemic potential of Vibrio cholerae to anticipate and rapidly respond to future public health emergencies.

Human norovirus (HuNoV) is an important cause of acute gastroenteritis and can be transmitted by water exposures, but its persistence in water is not well understood. Loss of HuNoV infectivity in surface water was compared with persistence of intact HuNoV capsids and genome segments. Surface water from a freshwater creek was filter-sterilized, inoculated with HuNoV (GII.4) purified from stool, and incubated at 15 or 20 °C. We measured HuNoV infectivity via the human intestinal enteroid system and HuNoV persistence via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays without (genome segment persistence) or with (intact viral capsid persistence) enzymatic pretreatment to digest naked RNA. For infectious HuNoV, results ranged from no significant decay to a decay rate constant ("k") of 2.2 day(-1). In one creek water sample, genome damage was likely a dominant inactivation mechanism. In other samples from the same creek, loss of HuNoV infectivity could not be attributed to genome damage or capsid cleavage. The range in k and the difference in the inactivation mechanism observed in water from the same site could not be explained, but variable constituents in the environmental matrix could have contributed. Thus, a single k may be insufficient for modeling virus inactivation in surface waters.

The National Poison Data System (NPDS) comprises self-reported information from people who call US poison center hotlines. NPDS data have proven to be important in identifying emerging public health threats. We used NPDS to examine records of people who had self-reported exposure to harmful algal blooms (HABs). Participating poison centers then contacted people who had called their centers from May through October 2019 about their HAB exposure to ask about exposure route, symptoms, health care follow-up, and awareness of possible risks of exposure. Of 55 callers who agreed to participate, 47 (85%) reported exposure to HABs while swimming or bathing in HAB-contaminated water. Nine callers reported health symptoms from being near waters contaminated with HABs, suggesting potential exposure via aerosolized toxins. Symptoms varied by the reported routes of exposure; the most commonly reported symptoms were gastrointestinal and respiratory. More public and health care provider education and outreach are needed to improve the understanding of HAB-related risks, to address ways to prevent HAB-related illnesses, and to describe appropriate support when exposures occur.

District of Columbia (DC) has high rates of HIV infection and human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers. People living with HIV (PLWH) are at risk for developing HPV-associated cancers. Previous studies identified factors that may further increase the risk of HPV-associated cancer among PLWH such as age, race/ethnicity, sex, risk factor for HIV transmission, stage of HIV infection, and age at HIV diagnosis. The extent to which PLWH in DC are affected by HPV-associated cancers has not previously been well described, and to our knowledge, the relationship between bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and subsequent development of HPV-associated cancer among PLWH in DC has not been explored. This was a retrospective case-control analysis of surveillance data on cancer, STIs, and HIV in Washington, DC from 1996 to 2015. There were 20,744 PLWH included in this study, of whom 335 (1.6%) had been diagnosed with an HPV-associated cancer. Among males living with HIV (MLWH), for every additional STI per 10 person-years, risk of developing an HPV-associated cancer increased by 11%. Exposure to STIs was not a significant risk factor for HPV-associated cancer among females. Ever being diagnosed with stage three HIV infection increased risk of HPV-associated cancers among males by 109% and females living with HIV by 111%. STI exposures were associated with HPV-associated cancers among MLWH in DC and ever being diagnosed with advanced HIV infection was associated with HPV-associated cancers among all PLWH. Clinicians treating MLWH should ensure their patients receive primary HPV infection prevention and HPV-associated cancer screenings.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation (RNLE) to predict risk of low back pain (LBP). BACKGROUND: In 1993, NIOSH published the RNLE as a risk assessment method for LBP associated with manual lifting. To date, there has been little research evaluating the RNLE as a predictor of the risk of LBP using a prospective design. METHODS: A total of 78 healthy industrial workers' baseline LBP risk exposures and self-reported LBP at one-year follow-up were investigated. The composite lifting index (CLI), the outcome measure of the RNLE for analyzing multiple lifting tasks, was used as the main risk predictor. The risk was estimated using the mean and maximum CLI variables at baseline and self-reported LBP during the follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for covariates that included personal factors, physical activities outside of work, job factors, and work-related psychosocial characteristics. RESULTS: The one-year self-reported LBP incidence was 32.1%. After controlling for history of prior LBP, supervisory support, and job strain, the categorical mean and maximum CLI above 2 had a significant relationship (OR = 5.1-6.5) with self-reported LBP, as compared with the CLI below or equal to 1. The correlation between the continuous CLI variables and LBP was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: The CLI > 2 threshold may be useful for predicting self-reported LBP. Research with a larger sample size is needed to clarify the exposure-response relationship between the CLI and LBP.

Candida auris, an emerging multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO), is an urgent public health threat. We report on a C. auris outbreak investigation at a Virginia ventilator skilled nursing facility (vSNF). During October 2020-June 2021, we identified 28 cases among residents in the ventilator unit. Genomic evidence suggested ≥2 distinct C. auris introductions to the facility. We identified multiple infection and prevention control challenges, highlighting the importance of strengthening MDRO prevention efforts at vSNFs.

Herpes zoster is a localized skin infection caused by reactivation of latent varicella-zoster virus. Tissue-resident T cells likely control skin infections. Zoster provides a unique opportunity to determine if focal reinfection of human skin boosts local or disseminated antigen-specific tissue-resident T cells. Here, we show virus-specific T cells are retained over one year in serial samples of rash site and contralateral unaffected skin of individuals recovered from zoster. Consistent with zoster resolution, viral DNA is largely undetectable on skin from day 90 and virus-specific B and T cells decline in blood. In skin, there is selective infiltration and long-term persistence of varicella-zoster virus-specific T cells in the rash site relative to the contralateral site. The skin T cell infiltrates express the canonical tissue-resident T cell markers CD69 and CD103. These findings show that zoster promotes spatially-restricted long-term retention of antigen-specific tissue-resident T cells in previously infected skin.

Background and ObjectivesThere have been numerous reports of neurologic manifestations identified in hospitalized patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Here, we identify the spectrum of associated neurologic symptoms and diagnoses, define the time course of their development, and examine readmission rates and mortality risk posthospitalization in a multiethnic urban cohort.MethodsWe identify the occurrence of new neurologic diagnoses among patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in New York City. A retrospective cohort study was performed on 532 cases (hospitalized patients with new neurologic diagnoses within 6 weeks of positive SARS-CoV-2 laboratory results between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2020). We compare demographic and clinical features of the 532 cases with 532 controls (hospitalized COVID-19 patients without neurologic diagnoses) in a case-control study with one-to-one matching and examine hospital-related data and outcomes of death and readmission up to 6 months after acute hospitalization in a secondary case-only analysis.ResultsAmong the 532 cases, the most common new neurologic diagnoses included encephalopathy (478, 89.8%), stroke (66, 12.4%), and seizures (38, 7.1%). In the case-control study, cases were more likely than controls to be male (58.6% vs 52.8%, p = 0.05), had baseline neurologic comorbidities (36.3% vs 13.0%, p < 0.0001), and were to be treated in an intensive care unit (62.0% vs 9.6%, p < 0.0001). Of the 394 (74.1%) cases who survived acute hospitalization, more than half (220 of 394, 55.8%) were readmitted within 6 months, with a mortality rate of 23.2% during readmission.DiscussionHospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 and new neurologic diagnoses have significant morbidity and mortality postdischarge. Further research is needed to define the effect of neurologic diagnoses during acute hospitalization on longitudinal post-COVID-19-related symptoms including neurocognitive impairment. © American Academy of Neurology.

Acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance has been used to identify polio cases and target vaccination campaigns since the inception of the Global Poliovirus Eradication Initiative (GPEI) in 1988. To date, only Afghanistan and Pakistan have failed to interrupt wild poliovirus transmission. Circulation of vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPV) continues to be a problem in high-risk areas of the Eastern Mediterranean, African, and Southeast Asian regions. Environmental surveillance (ES) is an important adjunct to AFP surveillance, helping to identify circulating polioviruses in problematic areas. Stools from AFP cases and contacts (>200,000 specimens/year) and ES samples (>642 sites) are referred to 146 laboratories in the Global Polio Laboratory Network (GPLN) for testing. Although most World Health Organization supported laboratories use the two-phase separation method due to its simplicity and effectiveness, alternative simple, widely available, and cost-effective methods are needed. The CAF (Concentration and Filtration Elution) method was developed from existing filtration methods to handle any type of sewage or residual waters. At $1020 US per sample for consumable materials, CAF is cost effective, and all equipment and reagents are readily available from markets and suppliers globally. The report describes the results from a parallel study of CAF method with the standard two-phase separation method. The study was performed with samples collected from five countries (Guatemala, Hati, Thailand, Papua New Guinea, and the Philippines), run in three laboratories(United States, Thailand and in the Philippines) to account for regional and sample-to-sample variability. Samples from each site were divided into two 500ml aliquots and processed by both methods, with no other additional concentration or manipulation. The results of 338 parallel-tested samples show that the CAF method is more sensitive than the two-phase separation method for detection of non-polio enteroviruses (p-value < 0.0001) and performed as well as the two-phase separation method for polioviruses detection with no significant difference (p-value > 0.05). The CAF method is a robust, sensitive, and cost-effective method for isolating enteroviruses from residual waters. Copyright 2022 Belgasmi, Miles, Sayyad, Wong, Harrington, Gerloff, Coulliette-Salmond, Guntapong, Tacharoenmuang, Ayutthaya, Apostol, Valencia, Burns, Benito and Vega.

In April 2021, we assessed mRNA vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the context of a COVID-19 outbreak in a skilled nursing facility. Among 28 cases, genomic sequencing was performed on four specimens on four different patients, and all were classified by sequence analysis as the Beta (B.1.351) variant. Adjusted VE among residents was 65% (95% Confidence Interval: 25-84%). These findings underscore the importance of vaccination for prevention of COVID-19 in skilled nursing facilities.

During events like the COVID-19 pandemic or a disaster, researchers may need to switch from collecting biological samples to personal exposure samplers that are easy and safe to transport and wear, such as silicone wristbands. Previous studies have demonstrated significant correlations between urine biomarker concentrations and chemical levels in wristbands. We build upon those studies and use a novel combination of descriptive statistics and supervised statistical learning to evaluate the relationship between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) concentrations in silicone wristbands and hydroxy-PAH (OH-PAH) concentrations in urine. In New York City, 109 participants in a longitudinal birth cohort wore one wristband for 48 h and provided a spot urine sample at the end of the 48-hour period during their third trimester of pregnancy. We compared four PAHs with the corresponding seven OH-PAHs using descriptive statistics, a linear regression model, and a linear discriminant analysis model. Five of the seven PAH and OH-PAH pairs had significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.35-0.64, p ≤ 0.003) and significant chi-square tests of independence for exposure categories (p ≤ 0.009). For these five comparisons, the observed PAH or OH-PAH concentration could predict the other concentration within a factor of 1.47 for 50-80% of the measurements (depending on the pair). Prediction accuracies for high exposure categories were at least 1.5 times higher compared to accuracies based on random chance. These results demonstrate that wristbands and urine provide similar PAH exposure assessment information, which is critical for environmental health researchers looking for the flexibility to switch between biological sample and wristband collection.

Between 2010 and 2015, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) conducted a biomonitoring program to gather exposure data on Great Lakes contaminants among licensed anglers and Burmese refugees living in western New York who ate locally caught fish. Four hundred and nine adult licensed anglers and 206 adult Burmese refugees participated in this program. Participants provided blood and urine samples and completed a detailed questionnaire. Herein, we present blood metal levels (cadmium, lead, and total mercury) and serum persistent organic pollutant concentrations [polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), and trans-nonachlor]. Multiple linear regression was applied to investigate the associations between analyte concentrations and indicators of fish consumption (locally caught fish meals, store-bought fish meals, and consuming fish/shellfish in the past week). Licensed anglers consumed a median of 16 locally caught fish meals and 22 store-bought fish meals while Burmese refugees consumed a median of 106 locally caught fish meals and 104 store-bought fish/shellfish meals in the past year. Compared to the general U.S. adult population, licensed anglers had higher blood lead and mercury levels; and Burmese refuges had higher blood cadmium, lead, and mercury, and higher serum DDE levels. Eating more locally caught fish was associated with higher blood lead, blood mercury, and serum PCBs concentrations among licensed anglers. Licensed anglers and Burmese refugees who reported fish/shellfish consumption in the past week had elevated blood mercury levels compared with those who reported no consumption. Among licensed anglers, eating more store-bought fish meals was also associated with higher blood mercury levels. As part of the program, NYSDOH staff provided fish advisory outreach and education to all participants on ways to reduce their exposures, make healthier choices of fish to eat, and waters to fish from. Overall, our findings on exposure levels and fish consumption provide information to support the development and implementation of exposure reduction public health actions.

Legionella pneumophila is the cause of Legionnaires' disease, a life-threatening pneumonia that occurs after inhalation of aerosolized water containing the bacteria. Legionella growth occurs in stagnant, warm-to-hot water (77°F-113°F) that is inadequately disinfected. Piped hot spring water in Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, USA, has naturally high temperatures (>135°F) that prevent Legionella growth, and Legionnaires' disease has not previously been associated with the park or other hot springs in the United States. During 2018-2019, Legionnaires' disease occurred in 5 persons after they visited the park; 3 of these persons were potentially exposed in spa facilities that used untreated hot spring water. Environmental testing revealed Legionella bacteria in piped spring water, including 134°F stagnant pipe water. These fi ndings underscore the importance of water management programs to reduce Legionella growth in plumbing through control activities such as maintaining hot water temperatures, reducing stored water age, and ensuring adequate water flow. © 2022 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: Fish and other seafood are an important dietary source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in many areas of the world, and PFAS were found to be pervasive in fish from the Great Lakes area. Few studies, however, have examined the associations between Great Lakes Basin fish consumption and PFAS exposure. Many licensed anglers and Burmese refugees and immigrants residing in western New York State consume fish caught from the Great Lakes and surrounding waters, raising their risk of exposure to environmental contaminants including PFAS. The aims of this study were to: 1) present the PFAS exposure profile of the licensed anglers and Burmese refugees and 2) examine the associations between serum PFAS levels and local fish consumption. METHODS: Licensed anglers (n = 397) and Burmese participants (n = 199) provided blood samples and completed a detailed questionnaire in 2013. We measured 12 PFAS in serum. Multiple linear regression was used to assess associations between serum PFAS concentrations and self-reported consumption of fish from Great Lakes waters. RESULTS: Licensed anglers and Burmese participants reported consuming a median of 16 (IQR: 6-36) and 88 (IQR: 44-132) meals of locally caught fish in the year before sample collection, respectively (data for Burmese group restricted to 10 months of the year). Five PFAS were detected in almost all study participants (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, PFNA and PFDA; 97.5-100%). PFOS had the highest median serum concentration in licensed anglers (11.6 ng/mL) and the Burmese (35.6 ng/mL), approximately two and six times that of the U.S. general population, respectively. Serum levels of other PFAS in both groups were generally low and comparable to those in the general U.S. POPULATION: Among licensed anglers, Great Lakes Basin fish meals over the past year were positively associated with serum PFOS (P < 0.0001), PFDA (P < 0.0001), PFHxS (P = 0.01), and PFNA (P = 0.02) and the number of years consuming locally caught fish was positively associated with serum PFOS (P = 0.01) and PFDA (P = 0.01) levels. In the Burmese group, consuming Great Lakes Basin fish more than three times a week in the past summer was positively associated with serum PFOS (P = 0.004) and PFDA (P = 0.02) among the Burmese of non-Karen ethnicity, but not among those of Karen ethnicity, suggesting potential ethnic differences in PFAS exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Great Lakes Basin fish consumption was associated with an increase in blood concentrations of some PFAS, and especially of PFOS, among licensed anglers and Burmese refugees and immigrants in western New York State. In the Burmese population, there may be other important PFAS exposure routes related to residential history and ethnicity. Continued outreach efforts to increase fish advisory awareness and reduce exposure to contaminants are needed among these populations.

BACKGROUND: Dried plasma spot specimens may be a viable alternative to traditional liquid plasma in field settings, but the diagnostic accuracy is not well understood. METHODS: Standard databases (PubMed and Medline), conferences, and grey literature were searched until January 2019. The quality of evidence was evaluated using STARD and QUADAS-2 criteria. We used univariate and bivariate random effects models to determine misclassification, sensitivity, and specificity across multiple thresholds, overall and for each viral load technology and to account for between-study variation. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies for inclusion in the systematic review that compared the diagnostic accuracy of dried plasma spots to plasma. Primary data from 16 of the 23 studies were shared and included in the meta-analysis, representing 18 countries, totaling 1,847 paired dried plasma spot:plasma data points. The mean bias of dried plasma spot specimens compared to plasma was 0.28 log10 copies/ml, while the difference in median viral load was 2.25 log10 copies/ml. More dried plasma spot values were undetectable compared to plasma values (43.6% vs. 29.8%). Analyzing all technologies together, the sensitivity and specificity of dried plasma spot specimens was >92% across all treatment failure thresholds compared and total misclassification <5.4% across all treatment failure thresholds compared. Some technologies had lower sensitivity or specificity; however, the results were typically consistent across treatment failure thresholds. DISCUSSION: Overall, dried plasma spot specimens performed relatively well compared to plasma with sensitivity and specificity values greater than 90% and misclassification rates less than 10% across all treatment failure thresholds reviewed.

BACKGROUND: Cruise travel contributed to SARS-CoV-2 transmission when there were relatively few cases in the United States. By March 14, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a No Sail Order suspending U.S. cruise operations; the last U.S. passenger ship docked on April 16. METHODS: We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on cruises in U.S. waters or carrying U.S. citizens and used regression models to compare voyage characteristics. We used compartmental models to simulate the potential impact of four interventions (screening for COVID-19 symptoms; viral testing on two days and isolation of positive persons; reduction of passengers by 40%, crew by 20%, and port visits to one) for 7-day and 14-day voyages. RESULTS: During January 19-April 16, 2020, 89 voyages on 70 ships had known SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks; 16 ships had recurrent outbreaks. There were 1,669 RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 29 confirmed deaths. Longer voyages were associated with more cases (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17, p < 0.0001). Mathematical models showed that 7-day voyages had about 70% fewer cases than 14-day voyages. On 7-day voyages, the most effective interventions were reducing the number of individuals onboard (43-49% reduction in total infections) and testing passengers and crew (42-43% reduction in total infections). All four interventions reduced transmission by 80%, but no single intervention or combination eliminated transmission. Results were similar for 14-day voyages. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on cruises were common during January-April 2020. Despite all interventions modeled, cruise travel still poses a significant SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk.

BACKGROUND: Humans are exposed to tens of thousands of chemical substances that need to be assessed for their potential toxicity. Acute systemic toxicity testing serves as the basis for regulatory hazard classification, labeling, and risk management. However, it is cost- and time-prohibitive to evaluate all new and existing chemicals using traditional rodent acute toxicity tests. In silico models built using existing data facilitate rapid acute toxicity predictions without using animals. OBJECTIVES: The U.S. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) Acute Toxicity Workgroup organized an international collaboration to develop in silico models for predicting acute oral toxicity based on five different end points: Lethal Dose 50 (LD50 value, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hazard (four) categories, Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labeling hazard (five) categories, very toxic chemicals [LD50 (LD50 ≤ 50 mg/kg)], and nontoxic chemicals (LD50 > 2,000 mg/kg). METHODS: An acute oral toxicity data inventory for 11,992 chemicals was compiled, split into training and evaluation sets, and made available to 35 participating international research groups that submitted a total of 139 predictive models. Predictions that fell within the applicability domains of the submitted models were evaluated using external validation sets. These were then combined into consensus models to leverage strengths of individual approaches. RESULTS: The resulting consensus predictions, which leverage the collective strengths of each individual model, form the Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite (CATMoS). CATMoS demonstrated high performance in terms of accuracy and robustness when compared with in vivo results. DISCUSSION: CATMoS is being evaluated by regulatory agencies for its utility and applicability as a potential replacement for in vivo rat acute oral toxicity studies. CATMoS predictions for more than 800,000 chemicals have been made available via the National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment tools and data sets (ice.ntp.niehs.nih.gov). The models are also implemented in a free, standalone, open-source tool, OPERA, which allows predictions of new and untested chemicals to be made. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8495.

INTRODUCTION: When it is not possible to capture direct measures of occupational exposure or conduct biomonitoring, retrospective exposure assessment methods are often used. Among the common retrospective assessment methods, assigning exposure estimates by multiple expert rater review of detailed job descriptions is typically the most valid, but also the most time-consuming and expensive. Development of screening protocols to prioritize a subset of jobs for expert rater review can reduce the exposure assessment cost and time requirement, but there is often little data with which to evaluate different screening approaches. We used existing job-by-job exposure assessment data (assigned by consensus between multiple expert raters) from a large, population-based study of women to create and test screening algorithms for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that would be suitable for use in other population-based studies. METHODS: We evaluated three approaches to creating a screening algorithm: a machine-learning algorithm, a set of a priori decision rules created by experts based on features (such as keywords) found in the job description, and a hybrid algorithm incorporating both sets of criteria. All coded jobs held by mothers of infants participating in National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) (n = 35,424) were used in developing or testing the screening algorithms. The job narrative fields considered for all approaches included job title, type of product made by the company, main activities or duties, and chemicals or substances handled. Each screening approach was evaluated against the consensus rating of two or more expert raters. RESULTS: The machine-learning algorithm considered over 30,000 keywords and industry/occupation codes (separate and in combination). Overall, the hybrid method had a similar sensitivity (87.1%) as the expert decision rules (85.5%) but was higher than the machine-learning algorithm (67.7%). Specificity was best in the machine-learning algorithm (98.1%), compared to the expert decision rules (89.2%) and hybrid approach (89.1%). Using different probability cutoffs in the hybrid approach resulted in improvements in sensitivity (24-30%), without the loss of much specificity (7-18%). CONCLUSION: Both expert decision rules and the machine-learning algorithm performed reasonably well in identifying the majority of jobs with potential exposure to PAHs. The hybrid screening approach demonstrated that by reviewing approximately 20% of the total jobs, it could identify 87% of all jobs exposed to PAHs; sensitivity could be further increased, albeit with a decrease in specificity, by adjusting the algorithm. The resulting screening algorithm could be applied to other population-based studies of women. The process of developing the algorithm also provides a useful illustration of the strengths and potential pitfalls of these approaches to developing exposure assessment algorithms.

School closures affected more than 55 million students across the United States when implemented as a strategy to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1). Reopening schools requires balancing the risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection to students and staff members against the benefits of in-person learning (2). During December 3, 2020-January 31, 2021, CDC investigated SARS-CoV-2 transmission in 20 elementary schools (kindergarten through grade 6) that had reopened in Salt Lake County, Utah. The 7-day cumulative number of new COVID-19 cases in Salt Lake County during this time ranged from 290 to 670 cases per 100,000 persons.(†) Susceptible(§) school contacts(¶) (students and staff members exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in school) of 51 index patients** (40 students and 11 staff members) were offered SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Among 1,041 susceptible school contacts, 735 (70.6%) were tested, and five of 12 cases identified were classified as school-associated; the secondary attack rate among tested susceptible school contacts was 0.7%. Mask use among students was high (86%), and the median distance between students' seats in classrooms was 3 ft. Despite high community incidence and an inability to maintain ≥6 ft of distance between students at all times, SARS-CoV-2 transmission was low in these elementary schools. The results from this investigation add to the increasing evidence that in-person learning can be achieved with minimal SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk when multiple measures to prevent transmission are implemented (3,4).

The recent increase of reported cyclosporiasis outbreaks associated with fresh produce has highlighted the need for understanding environmental transmission of Cyclospora cayetanensis in agricultural settings and facilities. Conducting such environmental investigations necessitates robust sample collection and analytical methods to detect C. cayetanensis in water samples. This study evaluated three sample collection methods for recovery of C. cayetanensis oocysts from water samples during seeded recovery experiments. Two filtration-based methods, dead-end ultrafiltration (DEUF) and USEPA Method 1623.1, were evaluated for oocyst recovery from irrigation water. A non-filter-based method, continuous flow centrifugation (CFC), was evaluated separately for recovery from creek water and spent produce wash water. Median C. cayetanensis recovery efficiencies were 17% for DEUF and 16–22% for Method 1623.1. The DEUF method proved to be more robust than Method 1623.1, as the recovery efficiencies were less variable and the DEUF ultrafilters were capable of filtering larger volumes of high-turbidity water without clogging. Median C. cayetanensis recovery efficiencies for CFC were 28% for wash water and 63% for creek water, making it a viable option for processing water with high turbidity or organic matter. The data from this study demonstrate the capability of DEUF and CFC as filter-based and non-filter-based options, respectively, for the recovery of C. cayetanensis oocysts from environmental and agricultural waters.