Seroprevalence studies play an important role in estimating the number of children infected with SARS-CoV-2. We report SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children seeking medical care for any reason at a free-standing pediatric hospital in Seattle, WA over a 2.5-year period and four distinct pandemic waves. We randomly selected residual serum samples from children and young adults seeking medical care as inpatients and outpatients at Seattle Children's Hospital between June 2020 and December 2022 to test for the presence of anti-nucleocapsid (N) antibodies. Samples were categorized into four distinct pandemic waves based on Washington State epidemiology: Wave 1 (June 2020-October 2020), Wave 2 (November 2020-June 2021), Wave 3 (July 2021-November 2021), and Wave 4 (December 2021-December 2022). Patient characteristics and COVID-19 vaccine status were obtained, and zip codes were used to ascertain the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust variance estimates were used to examine the relationship between patient characteristics and anti-N-positivity for each wave. Among 8,040 samples from 7,102 patients included in the analyses, seroprevalence rose from 2.4% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.1%) in Wave 1 to 25.5% (95% CI 23.3%-27.8%) in Wave 4 (following the Omicron surge). High SVI, Hispanic ethnicity, or use of government insurance was associated with increased anti-N positivity in most waves. We observed a steady increase in anti-N seroprevalence followed by a sharp increase after the Omicron surge in early 2022. Our data demonstrate the burden of COVID-19 on specific groups with health disparities within our region throughout the pandemic.IMPORTANCEOur results highlight the importance of seropositivity studies as essential tools to provide information on the incidence and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. Our results also reinforce other reports demonstrating the inequitable burden of COVID-19 on groups with health disparities and that this inequitable burden continued to persist throughout the pandemic, even in a region with high adherence to COVID-19 mitigation efforts. It also highlights SVI's value in identifying communities that must be part of pandemic research, and public health and vaccination strategies.

Background: Guidelines recommend tailored reproductive health counseling for women with congenital heart defects (CHDs) beginning in adolescence, yet provider adherence to recommendations remains understudied, particularly outside specialized cardiac care settings. Study Design: We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study among women aged 19 to 38 with CHDs, identified from active population-based birth defects registries in three states. Participants completed surveys from 2016 to 2019, including questions about contraception, pregnancy counseling, concerns, and experiences. Multivariable Poisson regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and health characteristics, assessed associations between CHD severity, counseling, and reproductive health outcomes. Results: Of 765 women, those with severe CHDs, compared with non-severe, were more likely to report receiving clinician counseling about safe contraceptive methods (44.0% and 13.7%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [2.2, 4.0]), pregnancy, (63.3% and 16.5%; aPR = 3.6; 95% CI [2.7, 4.6]), and pregnancy avoidance (32.0% and 6.4%; aPR = 4.3; 95% CI [2.9, 6.6]); be concerned about ability to have children (40.9% and 31.2%; aPR = 1.4; 95% CI [1.1, 1.8]), and delay/avoid pregnancy (26.6% and 10.7%; aPR = 2.2; 95% CI [1.5, 3.2]). No disparity was found in ever being pregnant (30.0% vs. 37.2%; aPR = 1.0; 95% CI [0.7, 1.2]). One-third of the respondents with any CHD reported concerns about their ability to have children (33.6%). Conclusion: We found that only a minority of women with CHDs reported receiving counseling on safe contraception and pregnancy, and about a third reported concerns about their ability to have children. These findings highlight a gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, underscoring the need for improved reproductive health discussions for women with CHDs. © 2025 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, George Washington University

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding the development and durability of immune responses following COVID-19 infection or vaccination in pediatric solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS: Renal, liver, or intestinal transplant recipients < 21 years of age followed at Seattle Children's Hospital were enrolled from August 2020 to May 2021. Blood samples were collected at ~6-month intervals for up to 3 years and tested for antinucleocapsid (N) antibodies. COVID-19 vaccination data were collected from the Washington State Immunization Information System and/or the medical record. Semi-quantitative anti-S IgG testing was performed on all postvaccine samples using the Abbott Architect platform. We further evaluated a subset of postvaccine samples using variant-specific quantitative binding (Meso Scale Discovery, MSD) immunoassays and pseudovirus-neutralization assays. Antibody levels were compared over time and by vaccine category. RESULTS: We followed 83 SOT recipients for a median of 12.5 months (IQR 7.0, 28.3). Overall, 16 (19.3%) participants had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on anti-N antibody detection. Forty-six (55%) participants had a blood sample collected > 14 days after receipt of a vaccination. Serum IgG to spike antigens (anti-S antibody) increased following vaccination and increased with the number of vaccine doses received as assessed by both the Abbott and MSD assays. Neutralizing activity was significantly lower against the Omicron subvariants compared to the ancestral strain. CONCLUSION: Pediatric SOT recipients demonstrated strong antibody responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with higher anti-S antibody responses following > 2 doses of vaccine. Our study offers unique longitudinal immune response data in this vulnerable patient population.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants in the United States (US). RSV immunization, in the form of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) for infants and vaccines for pregnant people, may reduce infant RSV risk. METHODS: In April and May 2023, we surveyed adults with children in Oregon and Washington about the likelihood to accept infant mAb and maternal RSV vaccine and RSV awareness. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of self-reported likelihood of accepting RSV immunization. RESULTS: Among 1082 respondents, 68% and 70% responded they would very likely accept infant mAb or maternal RSV vaccine, respectively. Respondents had lower odds of accepting infant mAb (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.07-0.15) and maternal RSV vaccine (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.12-0.23) if they were somewhat or very concerned about side effects. Respondents had higher odds of accepting infant mAb if they received an influenza vaccination (OR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.88-7.63). Respondents had higher odds of accepting maternal vaccine if they had an advanced degree (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.06-2.73), had received an influenza vaccination (OR: 3.62, 95% CI: 1.80-7.25), or were aware of RSV before our survey (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.03-4.01). CONCLUSION: Most respondents reported that they would likely accept RSV mAb for their infant or an RSV vaccine during pregnancy. Concerns about side effects lowered the odds of accepting immunization, however, nearly one-half of those concerned about side effects still expressed a high likelihood of accepting either immunization.

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to understand the experiences and preferences for social risk factor screening among racially, ethnically, and linguistically diverse cancer survivors in the Washington, DC, region. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with English, Spanish, and Amharic-speaking breast and prostate cancer survivors. Data were inductively coded to identify themes, and differences by race and preferred language were evaluated. FINDINGS: Twenty-two interviews in English (n = 14), Spanish (n = 7), and Amharic (n = 1) among participants who identified as Black (n = 8), White (n = 5), Asian (n = 1), Other (n = 6), and multiracial (n = 2) were completed. Participants reported unresolved needs during treatment including transportation, healthful food, mental health care, financial help, and employment assistance. COVID-19 exacerbated many needs. Most participants did not recall discussing needs with oncology teams, but all participants were open to having these conversations. CONCLUSION(S): This research reveals that cancer survivors might benefit from culturally appropriate strategies that address social needs.

COVID-19 vaccines mitigate severe disease, yet uptake remains low among people experiencing homelessness (PEH) despite the risk of transmission in congregate settings like homeless shelters. This study evaluated retrospective COVID-19 vaccination intent and decision-making between March 2020-October 2021 to identify modifiable factors to improve vaccine acceptance among PEH. We conducted 31 semi-structured interviews and eight focus group discussions across six homeless shelters in Seattle-King County, Washington. Residents and staff aged >= 18 years were recruited through purposive sampling for interviews and convenience sampling for focus groups. Thematic analysis was conducted. Participants reported that too much contradictory and changing information about COVID-19 vaccines led to confusion. Information deemed trustworthy contributed to individual's knowledge and in some cases changed their vaccination intent. While many intended to get vaccinated without external motivators, others were motivated by incentives and requirements. Despite intention to vaccinate, participants reported barriers to COVID-19 vaccine access including availability of vaccine doses, timely eligibility for vaccination, and availability of appointments. Participants presented recommendations to improve COVID-19 information content and dissemination, access, and use of incentives in shelter settings. Future research should test recommended vaccination strategies rooted in the voices and experiences of PEH to determine feasibility and effectiveness in shelter settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Objectives: In the United States, firearm injuries disproportionately occur in low-income communities and among racial and ethnic minority populations. Recognizing these patterns across social conditions is vital for effective public health interventions. Using timely and localized data, we examined the association between social vulnerability and firearm injuries in King County, Washington. Methods: For this ecological, cross-sectional study, we used health reporting areas (HRAs) (n = 61), a subcounty geography of King County. We obtained HRA-level counts of firearm injuries by using responses from King County emergency medical services (EMS) from 2019 through 2023. We measured HRA-level social vulnerability by using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, categorized into tertiles (low, moderate, and high SVI). We used bivariate choropleth mapping to illustrate spatial associations between SVI and rates of firearm injuries per 10 000 residents. We used Bayesian spatial negative binomial regression to quantify the strength of these associations. Results: Bivariate choropleth mapping showed a correlation between SVI and rates of firearm injuries. In spatial models, HRAs categorized as high SVI had a 3 times higher rate of firearm injuries than HRAs categorized as low SVI (incidence rate ratio = 3.01; 95% credible interval, 2.02-4.47). Rates of firearm injuries were also higher in HRAs categorized as moderate versus low SVI (incidence rate ratio = 1.72; 95% credible interval, 1.23-2.40). Conclusion: In King County, areas with high social vulnerability had high rates of EMS responses to firearm injuries. SVI can help identify geographic areas for intervention and provide a framework for identifying upstream factors that might contribute to spatial disparities in firearm injuries. © 2024, Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among U.S. adults with and without disabilities, overall and by subgroups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data on adults aged ≥18 years from the cross-sectional 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey to report the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes by functional disability status and for each disability type (hearing, seeing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and communication) separately. With use of the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning indicator, disability was defined according to the categories of milder (reporting some difficulty), moderate (reporting a lot of difficulty), and severe (cannot do at all) by disability type. Crude prevalence and age-standardized prevalence of diabetes were also calculated for adults with any difficulty with any disability by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, and poverty-to-income ratio. RESULTS: Diabetes prevalence increased with number of disability types, was lower among adults with no disability (5.8%) than among those with milder (9.5%) or moderate to more severe (18.3%) disability, and was 4.0-10.3 percentage points higher among those with moderate to more severe disability than among those with milder disability for vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive disabilities. Diabetes prevalence was similar for adults with milder and moderate to more severe self-care and communication disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of diabetes was higher among adults with any functional disability than without and increased with increasing number of disability types. Adults with multiple disability types, or those who have difficulty with self-care or communication or other moderate to more severe disabilities, may benefit from diabetes prevention programs.

BACKGROUND: Institutions of higher education (IHE) have been a focus of SARS-CoV-2 transmission studies but there is limited information on how viral diversity and transmission at IHE changed as the pandemic progressed. METHODS: Here we analyze 3606 viral genomes from unique COVID-19 episodes collected at a public university in Seattle, Washington from September 2020 to September 2022. RESULTS: Across the study period, we found evidence of frequent viral transmission among university affiliates with 60% (n = 2153) of viral genomes from campus specimens genetically identical to at least one other campus specimen. Moreover, viruses from students were observed in transmission clusters at a higher frequency than in the overall dataset while viruses from symptomatic infections were observed in transmission clusters at a lower frequency. Although only a small percentage of community viruses were identified as possible descendants of viruses isolated in university study specimens, phylodynamic modeling suggested a high rate of transmission events from campus into the local community, particularly during the 2021-2022 academic year. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that viral transmission was common within the university population throughout the study period but that not all university affiliates were equally likely to be involved. In addition, the transmission rate from campus into the surrounding community may have increased during the second year of the study, possibly due to return to in-person instruction.

Rotavirus is a leading cause of diarrhea among children but less known as a cause among adults. We describe clinical, epidemiologic, and genotype characteristics of a rotavirus outbreak among adults in King County, Washington occurring January-June 2023. Adult rotavirus incidence in 2023 was ten times higher than the same period in 2022 (5% versus 0.5% samples). Disease severity was mild. G9P[4], an uncommon, non-vaccine strain in USA, was the predominant genotype. Genotyping suggested spillover from children with subsequent spread among adults. Our study highlights benefits of routine testing and genotyping during outbreaks for surveillance, tracking, and understanding implications on vaccination.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To understand trends in nonfatal firearm injuries by examining rates of firearm injury emergency department (ED) visits stratified by individual- and county-level characteristics. METHODS: Data from participating EDs within 10 jurisdictions in the United States funded through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Firearm Injury Surveillance Through Emergency Rooms program, including the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia, were analyzed. We examined trends in firearm injury ED visits by sex, age group, jurisdiction, county-level urbanicity, and county-level social vulnerability from January 2019 to August 2023. Mean weekly rates of firearm injury ED visits and visit ratios (or the proportion of firearm injury-related ED visits of all visits during the surveillance periods with the same period in 2019) were calculated. RESULTS: Compared with 2019, the proportion of ED visits for firearm injury was elevated each year during 2020 to 2023 overall, with the largest observed increase in 2020 (visit ratio=1.59). All 10 Firearm Injury Surveillance Through Emergency Rooms jurisdictions experienced an increase in the proportion of firearm injury ED visits in 2020 (visit ratios ranging from 1.26 in West Virginia and 2.31 in Washington, DC) when compared with 2019. By county-level social vulnerability, the mean weekly rate of firearm injury ED visits was highest in counties with the highest social vulnerability over the entire study period. CONCLUSION: Results highlight the continued burden of firearm injuries in communities with higher social vulnerability. Timely ED data by community social vulnerability can inform public health interventions and resource allocation at local, state, and national levels.

INTRODUCTION: Occupational injuries have been associated with increased suicide mortality, but prior studies have not accounted for pre-injury depression. METHODS: We linked injuries that occurred from 1994 to 2000 in the Washington State workers' compensation system with Social Security Administration data on earnings and mortality through 2018. We estimated the subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) and 95% confidence interval using competing risks regression of suicide deaths with lost time compared with medical-only injuries separately for men and women, adjusting for age, pre-injury annual earnings, and industry. We further adjusted for pre-injury diagnosis of major depressive disorder by using a quantitative bias analysis (QBA), with the prevalence of this disorder in workers derived from an external health insurance claims data set. RESULTS: Elevated suicide mortality was observed following lost-time injuries compared with medical-only injuries for men (sHR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.14, 1.93]) and women (sHR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.00, 1.69]), adjusting for age, pre-injury earnings, and industry. Adjusted for pre-injury depression using a QBA, elevated suicide risk in men remained statistically significant (median sHR = 1.33, simulation interval [1.18, 1.47]) but not for women. DISCUSSION: Workplace injury requiring time off work appeared to remain influential in increasing suicide risk among men, even after controlling for pre-injury depression. The relationship between mental health before and after occupational injury is complex and studies should better integrate mental health pre-injury. CONCLUSIONS: Though many questions remain on the complex relationship between work, depression, injuries, and suicide, employers should work to prevent injuries and consider implementing mental health programs, which could be helpful in reducing suicide risk.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences exist in antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in pediatric urgent cares (PUCs) by patient race/ethnicity, insurance, and language. DESIGN: Multi-center cohort study. SETTING: Nine organizations (92 locations) from 22 states and Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ages 6 months-18 years evaluated April 2022-April 2023, with acute viral respiratory infections, otitis media with effusion (OME), acute otitis media (AOM), pharyngitis, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and sinusitis. METHODS: We compared the use of first-line (FL) therapy as defined by published guidelines. We used race/ethnicity, insurance, and language as exposures. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the odds of FL therapy by group. RESULTS: We evaluated 396,340 ARI encounters. Among all encounters, 351,930 (88.8%) received FL therapy (98% for viral respiratory infections, 85.4% for AOM, 96.0% for streptococcal pharyngitis, 83.6% for sinusitis). OME and CAP had the lowest rates of FL therapy (49.9% and 60.7%, respectively). Adjusted odds of receiving FL therapy were higher in Black Non-Hispanic (NH) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.53 [1.47, 1.59]), Asian NH (aOR 1.46 [1.40, 1.53], and Hispanic children (aOR 1.37 [1.33, 1.41]), compared to White NH. Additionally, odds of receiving FL therapy were higher in children with Medicaid/Medicare (aOR 1.21 [1.18-1.24]) and self-pay (aOR 1.18 [1.1-1.27]) compared to those with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter collaborative showed lower rates of FL therapy for children of the White NH race and those with commercial insurance compared to other groups. Exploring these differences through a health equity lens is important for developing mitigating strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate COVID-19 disparities between Hispanic/Latino persons (H/L) and non-H/L persons in an agricultural community by examining behavioral and demographic differences. METHODS: In September 2020, we conducted Community Assessments for Public Health Emergency Response in Wenatchee and East Wenatchee, Washington, to evaluate differences between H/L and non-H/L populations in COVID-19 risk beliefs, prevention practices, household needs, and vaccine acceptability. We produced weighted sample frequencies. RESULTS: More households from predominately H/L census blocks (H/L-CBHs) versus households from predominately non-H/L census blocks (non-H/L-CBHs) worked in essential services (79% versus 57%), could not telework (70% versus 46%), and reported more COVID-19 cases (19% versus 4%). More H/L-CBHs versus non-H/L-CBHs practiced prevention strategies: avoiding gatherings (81% versus 61%), avoiding visiting friends/family (73% versus 36%), and less restaurant dining (indoor 24% versus 39%). More H/L-CBHs versus non-H/L-CBHs needed housing (16% versus 4%) and food assistance (19% versus 6%). COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in H/L-CBHs and non-H/L-CBHs was 42% versus 46%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite practicing prevention measures with greater frequency, H/L-CBHs had more COVID-19 cases. H/L-CBHs worked in conditions with a higher likelihood of exposure. H/L-CBHs had increased housing and food assistance needs due to the pandemic. COVID-19 vaccine acceptability was similarly low (<50%) between groups.

Congregate homeless shelters are disproportionately affected by infectious disease outbreaks. We describe enterovirus epidemiology across 23 adult and family shelters in King County, Washington, USA, during October 2019-May 2021, by using repeated cross-sectional respiratory illness and environmental surveillance and viral genome sequencing. Among 3,281 participants >3 months of age, we identified coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21) in 39 adult residents (3.0% [95% CI 1.9%-4.8%] detection) across 7 shelters during October 2019-February 2020. We identified enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) in 5 adult residents in 2 shelters during October-November 2019. Of 812 environmental samples, 1 was EV-D68-positive and 5 were CVA21-positive. Other enteroviruses detected among residents, but not in environmental samples, included coxsackievirus A6/A4 in 3 children. No enteroviruses were detected during April 2020-May 2021. Phylogenetically clustered CVA21 and EV-D68 cases occurred in some shelters. Some shelters also hosted multiple CVA21 lineages.

BACKGROUND: Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus are important vectors of multiple pathogens in the United States. However, their role in transmission of Bartonella spp., which are commonly reported in rodents and fleas, has been debated. Our previous investigation on Bartonella spp. in host-seeking I. scapularis and I. pacificus showed Bartonella spp. were absent in the ticks, suggesting the two species are unlikely to contribute to Bartonella transmission. It is unclear whether the absence of Bartonella spp. in the host-seeking ticks was attributable to ticks not being exposed to Bartonella in nature or being exposed but unable to acquire or transstadially transmit the bacterium. To assess the likelihood of exposure and acquisition, we tested Ixodes spp. ticks collected from rodents for Bartonella infections. METHODS: Blood-fed I. scapularis ticks (n = 792; consisting of 645 larvae and 147 nymphs), I. pacificus ticks (n = 45, all larvae), and Ixodes angustus ticks (n = 16, consisting of 11 larvae and 5 nymphs) collected from rodents from Minnesota and Washington were tested for Bartonella spp. using a quadruplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplicon next-generation sequencing approach that targets Bartonella-specific fragments on gltA, ssrA, rpoB, and groEL. In parallel, rodents and fleas collected from the same field studies were investigated to compare the differences of Bartonella distribution among the ticks, fleas, and rodents. RESULTS: Bartonella spp. were commonly detected in rodents and fleas, with prevalence of 25.6% in rodents and 36.8% in fleas from Minnesota; 27.9% in rodents and 45.2% in fleas from Washington. Of all tested ticks, Bartonella DNA was detected by gltA in only one larval I. scapularis tick from Minnesota. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of Bartonella spp. in rodents and fleas coupled with extremely low prevalence of Bartonella spp. in blood-fed ticks suggests that although Ixodes ticks commonly encounter Bartonella in rodents, they rarely acquire the infection through blood feeding. Notably, ticks were at various stages of feeding on rodents when they were collected. Laboratory transmission studies are needed to assess acquisition rates in fully blood-fed ticks and to assess transstadial transmission efficiency if ticks acquire Bartonella infections from feeding to repletion.

The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) is a set of surveys that tracks a broad range of behaviors, experiences, and conditions that can lead to poor health among high school students. The system includes a nationally representative Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) and separate school-based YRBSs conducted by states, tribes, territories, and local school districts. For the 2023 national YRBS, CDC made changes to the sampling method, survey administration mode, and questionnaire. Specifically, the sampling design added an American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) supplemental sample so that separate, precise estimates could be made for AI/AN high school students, in addition to the usual sample designed to provide nationally representative data for the population of students in grades 9-12. To decrease the time needed to collect and process data, CDC changed the survey administration mode from paper-and-pencil scannable booklets to a tablet-based electronic survey. To provide national data on topics of emerging interest, CDC added new questions to the questionnaire. These new questions assessed social media use, experiences of racism at school, adverse childhood experiences, transgender identity, consent for sexual contact, and unfair discipline at school. Public health practitioners and researchers can use YRBSS data to examine the prevalence of youth health behaviors, experiences, and conditions; monitor trends; and guide interventions. This overview report describes 2023 YRBSS survey methodology, including sampling, data collection, data processing, weighting, and data analyses. The 2023 YRBS participation map, survey response rates, and a detailed examination of student demographic characteristics are included in this report. During 2023, in addition to the national YRBS, 68 site-level surveys were administered to high school students in 39 states, three tribal governments, five territories, and 21 local school districts. These site-level surveys use site-specific questionnaires that are similar to the national YRBS questionnaire but are modified to meet sites' needs. This overview and methods report is one of 11 featured in this MMWR supplement, which reports results from the 2023 national YRBS but does not include data from the 68 site-level surveys. Each report is based on data collected using methods presented in this overview report. A full description of YRBSS results and downloadable data are available (https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/index.html).

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the impact of occupational injury and illness on opioid-related mortality while accounting for confounding by preinjury opioid use. METHODS: We employed a retrospective cohort study design using Washington State workers' compensation data for 1994-2000 injuries linked to US Social Security Administration earnings and mortality data and National Death Index (NDI) cause of death data from 1994 to 2018. We categorised injuries as lost-time versus medical-only, where the former involved more than 3 days off work or permanent disability. We determined death status and cause of death from NDI records. We modelled separate Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% CIs for injured men and women for opioid-related and all drug-related mortality through 2018. We used quantitative bias analysis to account for unmeasured confounding by preinjury opioid use. RESULTS: The hazard of opioid-related mortality was elevated for workers with lost-time relative to medical-only injuries: sHR for men: 1.53, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.66; for women: 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.48. Accounting for preinjury opioid use, effect sizes were reduced but remained elevated: sHR for men was 1.43, 95% simulation interval (SI) 1.20 to 1.69; for women: 1.27, 95% SI 1.10 to 1.45. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational injuries and illnesses severe enough to require more than 3 days off work are associated with an increase in the hazard of opioid-related mortality. The estimated increase is reduced when we account for preinjury opioid use, but it remains substantial. Reducing work-related injuries and postinjury opioid prescribing and improving employment and income security may decrease opioid-related mortality.

BACKGROUND: Existing surveillance systems monitor nonfatal and fatal opioid overdoses but do not monitor severe nonfatal overdoses that require intensive medical interventions. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Drug Overdose Surveillance and Epidemiology system was used to query emergency department data from local syndromic systems and the National Syndromic Surveillance Program from January 2019 to August 2022. Opioid overdoses were classified as not severe or severe using a definition from the patient's chief complaint terms and discharge diagnosis codes. The percentage of opioid overdoses treated in emergency departments classified as severe was described by patient demographics, US Census region, and month. RESULTS: Among 503 156 opioid overdoses in 29 states and Washington, DC, from January 2019 to August 2022, 17.4% were classified as severe. Common key terms found among severe opioid overdoses were hypoxia (34.8%), unresponsive (32.9%), and naloxone/Narcan (20.9%). The largest severity percentage was in the South Census region (19.6%). The trends of severe opioid overdoses remained stable during the study period. DISCUSSION: Based on the severe opioid overdose definition, there was minimal change in the severity of opioid overdoses during the study period. This definition can help monitor trends of severe opioid overdoses, guiding public health action such as focusing on naloxone and fentanyl test strip distribution to areas of need.

Introduction: Longitudinal data on how acute respiratory illness (ARI) affects behavior, namely school or work participation, and nonpharmaceutical intervention (NPI) usage before and during the COVID-19 pandemic is limited. The authors assessed how ARIs and specific symptoms affected school, work, and health-related behaviors over time. Methods: From November 2019 to June 2021, participating households with children in King County, Washington, were remotely monitored for ARI symptoms weekly. Following ARIs, participants reported illness-related effects on school, work, and NPI use. Using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, the authors examined associations between symptoms and behaviors. Results: Of 1,861 participants, 581 (31%) from 293 households reported 884 ARIs and completed one-week follow-up surveys. Compared with the prepandemic period, during the period of the pandemic pre–COVID-19 vaccine, ARI-related school (56% vs 10%, p<0.001) absenteeism decreased and masking increased (3% vs 28%, p<0.001). After vaccine authorization in December 2020, more ARIs resulted in masking (3% vs 48%, p<0.001), avoiding contact with non-household members (26% vs 58%, p<0.001), and staying home (37% vs 69%, p<0.001) compared with the prepandemic period. Constitutional symptoms such as fever were associated with work disruptions (OR=1.91; 95% CI=1.06, 3.43), staying home (OR=1.55; 95% CI=1.06, 2.27), and decreased contact with non-household members (OR=1.58; 95% CI=1.05, 2.36). Conclusions: This remote household study permitted uninterrupted tracking of behavioral changes in families with children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying increased use of some NPIs when ill but no additional illness-associated work or school disruptions. © 2024 The Authors

IMPORTANCE: Hepatitis C can be cured with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), but Medicaid programs have implemented fibrosis, sobriety, and prescriber restrictions to control costs. Although restrictions are easing, understanding their association with hepatitis C treatment rates is crucial to inform policies that increase access to lifesaving treatment. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association of jurisdictional (50 states and Washington, DC) DAA restrictions and Medicaid expansion with the number of Medicaid recipients with filled prescriptions for DAAs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used publicly available Medicaid documents and claims data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, to compare the number of unique Medicaid recipients treated with DAAs in each jurisdiction year with Medicaid expansion status and categories of fibrosis, sobriety, and prescriber restrictions. Medicaid recipients from all 50 states and Washington, DC, during the study period were included. Multilevel Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between Medicaid expansion and DAA restrictive policies on jurisdictional Medicaid DAA prescription fills. Data were analyzed initially from August 15 to November 15, 2023, and subsequently from April 15 to May 9, 2024. EXPOSURES: Jurisdictional Medicaid expansion status and fibrosis, sobriety, and prescriber DAA restrictions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number of people treated with DAAs per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year. RESULTS: A total of 381 373 Medicaid recipients filled DAA prescriptions during the study period (57.3% aged 45-64 years; 58.7% men; 15.2% non-Hispanic Black and 52.2% non-Hispanic White). Medicaid nonexpansion jurisdictions had fewer filled DAA prescriptions per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year than expansion jurisdictions (38.6 vs 86.6; adjusted relative risk [ARR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.52-0.61]). Jurisdictions with F3 to F4 (34.0 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.37-0.66]) or F1 to F2 fibrosis restrictions (61.9 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.59-0.66]) had lower treatment rates than jurisdictions without fibrosis restrictions (94.8 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year). Compared with no sobriety restrictions (113.5 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year), 6 to 12 months of sobriety (38.3 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.61-0.71]) and screening and counseling requirements (84.7 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.83-0.92]) were associated with reduced treatment rates, while 1 to 5 months of sobriety was not statistically significantly different. Compared with no prescriber restrictions (97.8 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year), specialist consult restrictions was associated with increased treatment (66.2 per 100 000 Medicaid recipients per year; ARR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.10]), while specialist required restrictions were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, Medicaid nonexpansion status, fibrosis, and sobriety restrictions were associated with a reduction in the number of people with Medicaid who were treated for hepatitis C. Removing DAA restrictions might facilitate treatment of more people diagnosed with hepatitis C.

INTRODUCTION: After SARS-CoV-2 infection, some people will experience long-term sequelae known as post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). Although PCC is recognized as a public health problem, estimates of the prevalence of PCC are sparse. We described a framework for estimating the incidence and prevalence of PCC by population subgroups and geography over time in Washington State. METHODS: We collected data on reported COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations and estimated SARS-CoV-2 infections in Washington State from March 2020 through October 2023. The reported case data were incorporated with parameter estimates from published articles and prevalence estimates from the Household Pulse Survey into a mathematical compartmental model of PCC progression. The model used differential equations to describe how the population of people with PCC moved through the model's various stages. This framework allowed us to integrate data on age group, sex, race and ethnicity, vaccination status, and county to estimate incidence and prevalence of PCC for each subgroup. RESULTS: Our model indicated that 6.4% (95% CI, 5.9%-6.8%) of all adults in Washington State were experiencing PCC as of October 2023. In addition to temporal differences in PCC prevalence and incidence, we found substantial differences across age groups, race and ethnicity, and sex. Geographic heterogeneity was pronounced, with the highest rates of PCC in central and eastern Washington. CONCLUSION: Estimation of PCC prevalence is essential for addressing PCC as a public health problem. Responding to PCC will require continued surveillance, research, and dedicated financial and public health action. This analysis, accounting for heterogeneities, highlights disparities in the prevalence, incidence, and distribution of PCC in Washington State and can better guide awareness and response efforts.

IMPORTANCE: COVID-19 vaccination is recommended throughout pregnancy to prevent pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes associated with COVID-19 disease. To date, data on birth defects after first-trimester vaccination are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associated risks for selected major structural birth defects among live-born infants after first-trimester receipt of a messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with estimated last menstrual period (LMP) between September 13, 2020, and April 3, 2021, and ending in live birth from March 5, 2021, to January 25, 2022. Included were data from 8 health systems in California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Minnesota, and Wisconsin in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. EXPOSURES: Receipt of 1 or 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses in the first trimester, as part of the primary series. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Selected major structural birth defects among live-born infants, identified from electronic health data using validated algorithms, with neural tube defects confirmed via medical record review. RESULTS: Among 42 156 eligible pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.9 [5.0] years) 7632 (18.1%) received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester. Of 34 524 pregnancies without a first-trimester COVID-19 vaccination, 2045 (5.9%) were vaccinated before pregnancy, 13 494 (39.1%) during the second or third trimester, and 18 985 (55.0%) were unvaccinated before or during pregnancy. Compared with pregnant people unvaccinated in the first trimester, those vaccinated in the first trimester were older (mean [SD] age, 32.3 [4.5] years vs 30.6 [5.1] years) and differed by LMP date. After applying stabilized inverse probability weighting, differences in baseline characteristics between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant persons in the first trimester were negligible (standardized mean difference <0.20). Selected major structural birth defects occurred in 113 infants (1.48%) after first-trimester mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and in 488 infants (1.41%) without first-trimester vaccine exposure; the adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.78-1.33). In secondary analyses, with major structural birth defect outcomes grouped by organ system, no significant differences between infants vaccinated or unvaccinated in the first trimester were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this multisite cohort study, among live-born infants, first-trimester mRNA COVID-19 vaccine exposure was not associated with an increased risk for selected major structural birth defects.

As the Duwamish Valley community in Seattle, Washington, U.S.A. and other environmental justice communities nationally contend with growing risks from climate change, there have been calls for a more community-centered approach to understanding impacts and priorities to inform resilience planning. To engage community members and identify climate justice and resilience priorities, a partnership of community leaders, government-based practitioners, and academics co-produced a survey instrument and collected data from the community using the Seattle Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (SASPER), an approach adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER). In addition, we conducted a process and outcome project evaluation using quantitative survey data collected from volunteers and qualitative semi-structured interviews with project team members. In October and November 2022, teams of volunteers from partner organizations collected 162 surveys from households in the Duwamish Valley. Poor air quality, extreme heat, and wildfires were among the highest reported hazards of concern. Most Duwamish Valley households agreed or strongly agreed that their neighborhood has a strong sense of community (64%) and that they have people nearby to call when they need help (69%). Forty-seven percent of households indicated willingness to get involved with resilience planning, and 62% of households said that they would use a Resilience Hub during an emergency. Survey volunteers evaluated their participation positively, with over 85% agreeing or strongly agreeing that they learned new skills, were prepared for the survey, and would participate in future assessments. The evaluation interviews underscored that while the SASPER may have demonstrated feasibility in a pre-disaster phase, CASPER may not meet all community/partner needs in the immediate disaster response phase because of its lack of focus on equity and logistical requirements. Future research should focus on identifying less resource intensive data collection approaches that maintain the rigor and reputation of CASPER while enabling a focus on equity.

Objective: To summarize the prevalence of ALS in all 50 states and Washington, DC in the United States from 2011 to 2018 using data collected and analyzed by the National ALS Registry. In October 2010, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) launched the congressionally mandated Registry to determine the incidence and prevalence of ALS within the USA, characterize the demographics of persons with ALS, and identify the potential risk factors for the disease. This is the first analysis of state-level ALS prevalence estimates. Methods: ALS is not a notifiable disease in the USA, so the Registry uses a two-pronged approach to identify cases. The first approach uses existing national administrative databases (Medicare, Veterans Health Administration, and Veterans Benefits Administration). The second method uses a secure web portal to gather voluntary participant data and identify cases not included in the national administrative databases. Results: State-level age-adjusted average prevalence from 2011-2018 ranged from 2.6 per 100,000 persons (Hawaii) to 7.8 per 100,000 persons (Vermont), with an average of 4.4 per 100,000 persons in the US. New England and Midwest regions had higher prevalence rates than the national average. Conclusions: These findings summarize the prevalence of ALS for all 50 states from 2011 to 2018. This is a continuing effort to identify ALS cases on a national population basis. The establishment of the National ALS Registry has allowed for epidemiological trends of this disease and the assessment of potential risk factors that could cause ALS.

BACKGROUND: Detection and containment of hospital outbreaks currently depend on variable and personnel-intensive surveillance methods. Whether automated statistical surveillance for outbreaks of health care-associated pathogens allows earlier containment efforts that would reduce the size of outbreaks is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized trial in 82 community hospitals within a larger health care system. All hospitals followed an outbreak response protocol when outbreaks were detected by their infection prevention programs. Half of the hospitals additionally used statistical surveillance of microbiology data, which alerted infection prevention programs to outbreaks. Statistical surveillance was also applied to microbiology data from control hospitals without alerting their infection prevention programs. The primary outcome was the number of additional cases occurring after outbreak detection. Analyses assessed differences between the intervention period (July 2019 to January 2022) versus baseline period (February 2017 to January 2019) between randomized groups. A post hoc analysis separately assessed pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and Covid-19 pandemic intervention periods. RESULTS: Real-time alerts did not significantly reduce the number of additional outbreak cases (intervention period versus baseline: statistical surveillance relative rate [RR]=1.41, control RR=1.81; difference-in-differences, 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 1.52; P=0.46). Comparing only the prepandemic intervention with baseline periods, the statistical outbreak surveillance group was associated with a 64.1% reduction in additional cases (statistical surveillance RR=0.78, control RR=2.19; difference-in-differences, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.99). There was no similarly observed association between the pandemic versus baseline periods (statistical surveillance RR=1.56, control RR=1.66; difference-in-differences, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.92). CONCLUSIONS: Automated detection of hospital outbreaks using statistical surveillance did not reduce overall outbreak size in the context of an ongoing pandemic. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04053075. Support for HCA Healthcare's participation in the study was provided in kind by HCA.).

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective tool for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention. The purpose of this study is to identify correlates of PrEP retention using patient data from an urban, publicly funded safety-net clinic in Washington, DC. Cox proportional hazards regression, logistical regression, and survival curves were used to assess the association of age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, number of partners, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis at PrEP initiation with time on PrEP. From August 2016-December 2020, 1,126 people were prescribed PrEP - patients were mostly Black (44.8%) or Latinx (30.4%) and identified as cisgender men (84.6%). Half had no insurance (49.1%), with the remaining patients reporting private (28.9%) or public (21.5%) insurance. Age at PrEP prescription ranged from 15 to 66 with 80% being 20 to 39 years. For the 87.7% (n = 987) of patients who discontinued PrEP, mean PrEP time was 158 days and median was 28 days. The highest rates of discontinuation were observed within the first month with 44.3% discontinuing by day 30, 52.3% by 3 months, and 73.2% by 1 year. Cisgender women, transgender persons, and those younger than 30 years were more likely to discontinue PrEP. Latinx and patients with less than 3 male partners in the last 90 days were less likely to discontinue PrEP. We demonstrated a high level of PrEP uptake among populations disproportionally affected by HIV. Future analyses are needed to examine ways of reducing barriers to PrEP initiation and improving PrEP adherence.

INTRODUCTION: Early during the COVID-19 outbreak, various approaches were utilized to prevent COVID-19 introductions from incoming airport travellers. However, the costs and effectiveness of airport-specific interventions have not been evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated policy options for COVID-19-specific interventions at Entebbe International Airport for costs and impact on COVID-19 case counts, we took the government payer perspective. Policy options included; (1)no screening, testing, or mandatory quarantine for any incoming traveller; (2)mandatory symptom screening for all incoming travellers with RT-PCR testing only for the symptomatic and isolation of positives; and (3)mandatory 14-day quarantine and one-time testing for all, with 10-day isolation of persons testing positive. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US$ per additional case averted. RESULTS: Expected costs per incoming traveller were $0 (Option 1), $19 (Option 2), and $766 (Option 3). ICERs per case averted were $257 for Option 2 (which averted 4,948 cases), and $10,139 for Option 3 (which averted 5,097 cases) compared with Option I. Two-week costs were $0 for Option 1, $1,271,431 Option 2, and $51,684,999 Option 3. The per-case ICER decreased with increase in prevalence. The cost-effectiveness of our interventions was modestly sensitive to the prevalence of COVID-19, diagnostic test sensitivity, and testing costs. CONCLUSION: Screening all incoming travellers, testing symptomatic persons, and isolating positives (Option 2) was the most cost-effective option. A higher COVID-19 prevalence among incoming travellers increased cost-effectiveness of airport-specific interventions. This model could be used to evaluate prevention options at the airport for COVID-19 and other infectious diseases with similar requirements for control.