BACKGROUND: Almost half of individuals born with Down syndrome (DS) have congenital heart defects (CHDs). Yet, little is known about the health and healthcare needs of adults with CHDs and DS. Therefore, we examined comorbidities and healthcare utilization of this population. METHODS: Data were from the 2016-2019 Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG), a survey of 19-38-year-olds with CHDs identified through birth defects registries in Arkansas, Arizona, and Atlanta. Outcome estimates were standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population. Multivariable Poisson regression generated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between DS and each outcome, adjusting for covariates, including CHD severity. RESULTS: Among 1500 respondents, 9.1% had DS. Compared to those without DS, respondents with DS were more commonly male (55.5% vs. 45.0%), < 25 years old (51.8% vs. 42.7%), non-Hispanic White (72.3% vs. 69.3%), and publicly insured (77.4% vs. 22.8%; all p < 0.05). Of adults with CHDs and DS, 5.5% had cardiac comorbidities, 19.3% had emergency room (ER) visits, 6.2% had hospital admissions, and 1.2% had cost-related delays in care in the last year; 0.1 to 0.6 times lower than adults with CHDs without DS. Additionally, 26.7% had non-cardiac comorbidities (aPR = 1.25 [0.92-1.72]), most commonly sleep apnea (13.7% vs. 3.2%, aPR = 3.67 [2.02-6.67]). Receipt of cardiology care in the last 2 years was similarly low (52.7% vs. 44.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CHDs and DS comprise a substantial percentage of adults with CHDs and have unique health and healthcare needs. Half of adults with CHDs and DS are not receiving recommended routine cardiac care.

BACKGROUND: Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are an effective method to treat persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Longer treatment times are associated with better health outcomes, yet treatment retention rates remain low. This study aimed to assess patient characteristics and experiences associated with retention in treatment. METHODS: Data were from an observational cohort study of OUD treatments. Among persons receiving buprenorphine or methadone, log-binomial regression models assessed the relationship between patient characteristics and experiences and three retention outcomes: retention in any OUD treatment, retention in the index treatment (OUD treatment being administered at the time when patients were screened for study eligibility), and 6-month retention in the index treatment. RESULTS: Individuals being treated with methadone at the start of the study compared to those treated with buprenorphine were more likely to remain in their same index treatment at the 18-month follow-up (aPR = 1.35; 95 % CI = 1.11-1.65), and to have remained on their index treatment for 6-months or longer (aPR = 1.22; 95 % CI = 1.14-1.32), but were not significantly more likely to remain in any OUD treatment overall. Individuals residing five miles or less from treatment were more likely to have been retained in any OUD treatment (aPR = 1.06; 95 % CI = 1.00-1.12), to remain in their index treatment at the 18-month follow-up (aPR = 1.21; 95 % CI = 1.08-1.36), and to have remained in their index treatment for 6 months or more (aPR = 1.08; 95 % CI = 1.02-1.13). Individuals without health insurance were less likely to be retained in any OUD treatment (aPR = 0.86; 95 % CI = 0.78-0.95). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of retention in any OUD treatment was higher for individuals residing five miles or less from treatment. These findings expand on previous studies that have shown distance to and location of treatment sites can impact treatment access and retention. Lack of health insurance was also associated with lower retention in any OUD treatment in this study. Given the high burden associated with overdose deaths, it is important to understand and address barriers to retention in treatment.