Last data update: Dec 02, 2024. (Total: 48272 publications since 2009)
Records 1-2 (of 2 Records) |
Query Trace: Stewart-Juba J[original query] |
---|
Acute febrile illness among outpatients seeking health care in Bangladeshi hospitals prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Das P , Rahman MZ , Banu S , Rahman M , Chisti MJ , Chowdhury F , Akhtar Z , Palit A , Martin DW , Anwar MU , Namwase AS , Angra P , Kato CY , Ramos CJ , Singleton J , Stewart-Juba J , Patel N , Condit M , Chung IH , Galloway R , Friedman M , Cohen AL . PLoS One 2022 17 (9) e0273902 Understanding the distribution of pathogens causing acute febrile illness (AFI) is important for clinical management of patients in resource-poor settings. We evaluated the proportion of AFI caused by specific pathogens among outpatients in Bangladesh. During May 2019-March 2020, physicians screened patients aged 2 years in outpatient departments of four tertiary level public hospitals. We randomly enrolled patients having measured fever (100.4F) during assessment with onset within the past 14 days. Blood and urine samples were tested at icddr,b through rapid diagnostic tests, bacterial culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Acute and convalescent samples were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) for Rickettsia and Orientia (R/O) and Leptospira tests. Among 690 patients, 69 (10%) had enteric fever (Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi orSalmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi), 51 (7.4%) Escherichia coli, and 28 (4.1%) dengue detected. Of the 441 patients tested for R/O, 39 (8.8%) had rickettsioses. We found 7 (2%) Leptospira cases among the 403 AFI patients tested. Nine patients (1%) were hospitalized, and none died. The highest proportion of enteric fever (15%, 36/231) and rickettsioses (14%, 25/182) was in Rajshahi. Dhaka had the most dengue cases (68%, 19/28). R/O affected older children and young adults (IQR 8-23 years) and was detected more frequently in the 21-25 years age-group (17%, 12/70). R/O was more likely to be found in patients in Rajshahi region than in Sylhet (aOR 2.49, 95% CI 0.85-7.32) between July and December (aOR 2.01, 1.01-5.23), and who had a history of recent animal entry inside their house than not (aOR 2.0, 0.93-4.3). Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae were the most common bacterial infections, and dengue was the most common viral infection among AFI patients in Bangladeshi hospitals, though there was geographic variability. These results can help guide empiric outpatient AFI management. |
Analytically sensitive Rickettsia species detection for laboratory diagnosis
Chung IH , Robinson LK , Stewart-Juba JJ , Dasch GA , Kato CY . Am J Trop Med Hyg 2022 106 (5) 1352-7 Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of rickettsial diseases is challenging because of the undifferentiated symptoms (commonly fever, headache, and malaise) and low bacteremia (< 100 genomic copies [gc]/mL) during the early acute stage of illness. Early treatment with doxycycline is critical for a positive outcome, especially in Rickettsia rickettsii (Rocky Mountain spotted fever) infections where cases may be fatal within 5 to 10 days from symptom onset, emphasizing the need for more sensitive diagnostics. A real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, RCKr, was developed and validated for Rickettsia spp. nucleic acid detection in human clinical samples. The limit of detection for RCKr was determined to be 20 gc/mL, compared with our 2013 (Kato etal.) laboratory developed test, PanR8 at 1,800 to 2,000 gc/mL. Inclusivity, exclusivity, accuracy, and precision results correlated as expected. From an evaluation of 49 banked clinical samples, RCKr detected 35 previously positive samples, as well as two specimens that were PanR8 real-time PCR negative yet clinically diagnosed as possible rickettsiosis. Ct values from RCKr clinical sample testing show a 100-fold increase relative to PanR8. Additional testing is needed to understand the clinical sensitivity of RCKr; however, this study demonstrates RCKr to have high analytical specificity and sensitivity for Rickettsia detection. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Dec 02, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure