BACKGROUND: Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance transporter 1 (Pfmdr1) gene mutations are associated with altered response to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), particularly the combinations containing the partner drugs lumefantrine and amodiaquine (i.e., artemether-lumefantrine [AL] and artesunate-amodiaquine [ASAQ]). Past studies of Pfmdr1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at codons 86, 184, and 1246 have shown different responses to AL and ASAQ. METHODS: To determine whether infection with parasites carrying specific Pfmdr1 SNPs leads to increased risk of recurrent parasitaemia (recrudescent or new infection), data from 3,915 samples from 16 therapeutic efficacy studies from 13 African countries between 2013 and 2019 were analysed. RESULTS: Patients treated with AL and infected with parasites carrying Pfmdr1 N86 were at greater risk of recurrent infection than those whose parasites carried 86Y. After treatment with ASAQ, individuals infected with parasites that carried Pfmdr1 86Y were more likely to experience a recurrent infection. CONCLUSIONS: These results support prior studies that suggested: (1) patients given AL and infected with parasites carrying N86 were more likely to experience a recurrent infection; (2) patients given ASAQ and infected with parasites carrying 86Y were more likely to experience a recurrent infection. These findings suggest that ACT and Pfmdr1 genotype may influence outcome after Plasmodium falciparum infection.

BACKGROUND: In Uganda, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) is first-line therapy and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) second-line therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AL and DP in the management of uncomplicated falciparum malaria and measured the prevalence of molecular markers of resistance in three sentinel sites in Uganda from 2018 to 2019. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase IV clinical trial. Children aged 6 months to 10 years with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to treatment with AL or DP and followed for 28 and 42 days, respectively. Genotyping was used to distinguish recrudescence from new infection, and a Bayesian algorithm was used to assign each treatment failure a posterior probability of recrudescence. For monitoring resistance, Pfk13 and Pfmdr1 genes were Sanger sequenced and plasmepsin-2 copy number was assessed by qPCR. RESULTS: There were no early treatment failures. The uncorrected 28-day cumulative efficacy of AL ranged from 41.2 to 71.2% and the PCR-corrected cumulative 28-day efficacy of AL ranged from 87.2 to 94.4%. The uncorrected 28-day cumulative efficacy of DP ranged from 95.8 to 97.9% and the PCR-corrected cumulative 28-day efficacy of DP ranged from 98.9 to 100%. The uncorrected 42-day efficacy of DP ranged from 73.5 to 87.4% and the PCR-corrected 42-day efficacy of DP ranged from 92.1 to 97.5%. There were no reported serious adverse events associated with any of the regimens. No resistance-associated mutations in the Pfk13 gene were found in the successfully sequenced samples. In the AL arm, the NFD haplotype (N86Y, Y184F, D1246Y) was the predominant Pfmdr1 haplotype, present in 78 of 127 (61%) and 76 of 110 (69%) of the day 0 and day of failure samples, respectively. All the day 0 samples in the DP arm had one copy of the plasmepsin-2 gene. CONCLUSIONS: DP remains highly effective and safe for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. Recurrent infections with AL were common. In Busia and Arua, the 95% confidence interval for PCR-corrected AL efficacy fell below 90%. Further efficacy monitoring for AL, including pharmacokinetic studies, is recommended. Trial registration The trail was also registered with the ISRCTN registry with study Trial No. PACTR201811640750761.