Last data update: Mar 17, 2025. (Total: 48910 publications since 2009)
Records 1-2 (of 2 Records) |
Query Trace: Smallwood M[original query] |
---|
Update on progress in electronic reporting of laboratory results to public health agencies - United States, 2014
Lamb E , Satre J , Hurd-Kundeti G , Liscek B , Hall CJ , Pinner RW , Conn L , Zajac J , Smallwood M , Smith K . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015 64 (12) 328-30 Since 2010, CDC has provided resources from the Prevention and Public Health Fund of the Affordable Care Act to 57 state, local, and territorial health departments through the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases cooperative agreement to assist with implementation of electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) from clinical and public health laboratories to public health agencies. To update information from a previous report about the progress in implementing ELR in the United States, CDC examined regular communications between the agency and the 57 health departments during 2012-2014. The results indicated that, as of July 2014, 67% of the approximately 20 million laboratory reports received annually for notifiable conditions were received electronically, compared with 62% in July 2013. These electronic reports were received by 55 of the 57 jurisdictions and came from 3,269 (up from nearly 2,900 in July 2013) of approximately 10,600 reporting laboratories. The proportion of laboratory reports received electronically varied by jurisdiction. In 2014, compared with 2013, the number of jurisdictions receiving >75% of laboratory reports electronically was higher (21 versus 14), and the number of jurisdictions receiving <25% of reports electronically was lower (seven versus nine). National implementation of ELR continues to increase and appears it might reach 80% of total laboratory report volume by 2016. |
A safety information campaign to reduce sharps injuries: results from the Stop Sticks campaign
Cunningham TR , Sinclair RC , Harney AMG , Smallwood SW , Christianson AL . J Commun Healthc 2010 3 164-184 Injuries from medical sharps devices and blood-borne pathogen (BBP) exposure are a significant risk to many healthcare workers. Risk awareness communications and sharps safety strategies are key components of BBP exposure prevention efforts. The research reported here includes an evaluation of a large-scale communication intervention aimed at raising awareness among healthcare workers regarding the risks of sharps injuries and BBP exposure, as well as methods of prevention. The Stop Sticks campaign was a multi-media communication intervention targeted at multiple healthcare facilities in Columbia, South Carolina. Following a comprehensive needs assessment in each facility, tailored communications were delivered via several channels. Samples included individual hospital departments, an entire hospital, and a nursing home. Results indicate high levels of knowledge and communication channel recall, minimal attitude and behavior change, and a strong association between sharps-related safety behavior and safety climate. Overall, this research suggests the blitz approach is viable for raising awareness of occupational safety and health issues. Based on these findings, several recommendations are offered for conducting safety campaigns in healthcare facilities. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Mar 17, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure