BACKGROUND: While electronic cigarettes (ECIG) may have lower toxicant delivery than cigarettes, ECIG-liquids and aerosols still contain toxicants that can potentially disrupt lung lipid homeostasis. METHODS: Participants from two studies underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Ninety-eight participants (21-44 years old) were included in a cross-sectional study, with 17 ECIG users, 52 non-smokers, and 29 smokers. In the four-week clinical trial, 30 non-smokers were randomly assigned to use nicotine-free, flavorless ECIG or no use. A panel of 75 quantifiable lipid species and 7 lipid classes were assessed in the BAL using two tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) platforms. Ten cytokines and lipid-laden macrophages (LLM) were analyzed using the V-PLEX Plus Proinflam Combo 10 panel and Oil Red O staining, respectively. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional study, 43 lipids were associated with smoking status at FDR<0.1, including two between ECIG and non-smokers (PC(14:0/18:1) and PC(18:0/14:0)) in pairwise follow-up analyses (Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.017). Associations between lipid species and cotinine, inflammatory markers, including IL-1β and IL-8, and LLM were also identified, as well as differences in lipid classes between smokers and the other groups. Smokers had higher saturated lipids, including ceramide (CER), sphingomyelin (SM), and diacylglycerol (DAG) than that of non-smokers and ECIG users. No significant associations were identified in the 4-week clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking was associated with altered lipid levels, as compared to both non-smokers and ECIG users; the majority were downregulated and ECIG effects tend to be smaller in magnitude than smoking effects, although some were different than those in the smokers group. This is a novel study of healthy individuals examining lipidomic differences between smokers, ECIG users, and non-smokers, indicating potential roles of smoking and ECIG-related lipid alterations in pulmonary disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by The OSU Institutional Review Board (OSU-2015C0088) in accordance with its ethical standards, the Helsinki declaration, and the Belmont Report, and is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02596685; 2015-11-04).

BACKGROUND: The causative agents for the current national outbreak of electronic-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) have not been established. Detection of toxicants in bronchoalveolar-lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with EVALI can provide direct information on exposure within the lung. METHODS: BAL fluids were collected from 51 patients with EVALI in 16 states and from 99 healthy participants who were part of an ongoing study of smoking involving nonsmokers, exclusive users of e-cigarettes or vaping products, and exclusive cigarette smokers that was initiated in 2015. Using the BAL fluid, we performed isotope dilution mass spectrometry to measure several priority toxicants: vitamin E acetate, plant oils, medium-chain triglyceride oil, coconut oil, petroleum distillates, and diluent terpenes. RESULTS: State and local health departments assigned EVALI case status as confirmed for 25 patients and as probable for 26 patients. Vitamin E acetate was identified in BAL fluid obtained from 48 of 51 case patients (94%) in 16 states but not in such fluid obtained from the healthy comparator group. No other priority toxicants were found in BAL fluid from the case patients or the comparator group, except for coconut oil and limonene, which were found in 1 patient each. Among the case patients for whom laboratory or epidemiologic data were available, 47 of 50 (94%) had detectable tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or its metabolites in BAL fluid or had reported vaping THC products in the 90 days before the onset of illness. Nicotine or its metabolites were detected in 30 of 47 of the case patients (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin E acetate was associated with EVALI in a convenience sample of 51 patients in 16 states across the United States. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.).

Cancer prevention postdoctoral fellowships have existed since the 1970s. The National Cancer Institute facilitated a meeting by a panel of experts in April 2013 to consider four important topics for future directions for cancer prevention postdoctoral training programs: (i) future research needs; (ii) underrepresented disciplines; (iii) curriculum; and (iv) career preparation. Panelists proffered several areas needing more research or emphasis, ranging from computational science to culture. Health care providers, along with persons from nontraditional disciplines in scientific training programs such as engineers and lawyers, were among those recognized as being underrepresented in training programs. Curriculum suggestions were that fellows receive training in topics such as leadership and human relations, in addition to learning the principles of epidemiology, cancer biologic mechanisms, and behavioral science. For career preparation, there was a clear recognition of the diversity of employment options available besides academic positions, and that program leaders should do more to help fellows identify and prepare for different career paths. The major topics and strategies covered at this meeting can help form the basis for cancer prevention training program leaders to consider modifications or new directions, and keep them updated with the changing scientific and employment climate for doctoral degree recipients and postdoctoral fellows.