Last data update: Dec 02, 2024. (Total: 48272 publications since 2009)
Records 1-3 (of 3 Records) |
Query Trace: Shahi S[original query] |
---|
Blood pressure cuff sizes for pregnant women in the United States: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Shahi S , Streeter TE , Wall HK , Zhou W , Kuklina EV , Jackson SL . Am J Hypertens 2024 BACKGROUND: The use of correctly-sized blood pressure (BP) cuffs is important to ensure accurate measurement and effective management of hypertension. The goals of this study were to determine the proportions of pregnant women that would require small, adult, large, and extra-large (XL) cuff sizes, and to examine the demographic characteristics associated with need for a large or XL cuff. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 1,176 pregnant women (≥18 years) included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006 cycles. Recommended BP cuff sizes, based on American Heart Association recommendations, were categorized by mid-arm circumference: small adult (≤26 cm), adult (>26 to ≤34 cm), large (>34 to ≤44 cm), and extra-large (XL) (>44 cm). RESULTS: Among US pregnant women, recommended cuff sizes were: 17.9% small adult, 57.0% adult, and 25.1% for large or XL. About 38.5% of non-Hispanic Black, 21.6% of Mexican American and 21.0% of non-Hispanic White pregnant women required a large or XL cuff. About 81.8% of women in the highest quartile for BMI required large or XL cuffs, which was significantly higher than women in other quartiles. CONCLUSION: Roughly one out of every four pregnant women required large or XL BP cuffs. The requirement for large or XL cuffs was highest among non-Hispanic Black women and women with the highest BMI. For pregnant women, measuring the arm circumference and selecting an appropriately-sized cuff is important to facilitate accurate blood pressure monitoring and hypertension management. |
Cuff size variation across manufacturers of home blood pressure devices: A current patient dilemma
Shahi S , Jackson SL , Streeter T , He S , Wall HK . Am J Hypertens 2023 36 (10) 532-535 BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends cuff sizes of blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices based on patient arm circumference, which is critical for accurate BP measurement. This study aimed to assess cuff size variation across validated BP devices and to examine the degree of alignment with the AHA recommendations. METHODS: Data on home-based BP devices were obtained from the US BP Validated Device Listing website and listed cuff sizes were compared against AHA recommendations: small adult (22-26cm), adult (27-34cm), large (35-44cm), and extra-large (XL) (45-52cm). RESULTS: There were 42 home-based validated BP devices from 13 manufacturers, and none offered cuffs that were aligned with the AHA recommendations. Over half of devices (22, 52.4%) were compatible with only a broad-range cuff, generally excluding arm sizes larger than 44cm. Only 5 devices from 4 manufacturers offered a cuff labeled "XL," and of these, only 3 devices had sizes that covered the AHA XL range. Terminology lacked consistency with manufacturers using: different labels to describe the same-sized cuffs (e.g., 22-42cm was labeled "integrated," "standard," "adult," "large," and "wide range"); the same labels to describe differently sized cuffs (e.g., cuffs labeled "large" were sized 22-42cm, 32-38cm, 32-42cm, 36-45cm). CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturers of US home BP devices employ inconsistent terminologies and thresholds for cuff sizes, and sizes were not aligned with AHA recommendations. This lack of standardization could pose challenges for clinicians and patients attempting to select a properly sized cuff to support hypertension diagnosis and management. |
Tick extracellular vesicles enable arthropod feeding and promote distinct outcomes of bacterial infection
Oliva Chávez AS , Wang X , Marnin L , Archer NK , Hammond HL , Carroll EEM , Shaw DK , Tully BG , Buskirk AD , Ford SL , Butler LR , Shahi P , Morozova K , Clement CC , Lawres L , Neal AJO , Mamoun CB , Mason KL , Hobbs BE , Scoles GA , Barry EM , Sonenshine DE , Pal U , Valenzuela JG , Sztein MB , Pasetti MF , Levin ML , Kotsyfakis M , Jay SM , Huntley JF , Miller LS , Santambrogio L , Pedra JHF . Nat Commun 2021 12 (1) 3696 Extracellular vesicles are thought to facilitate pathogen transmission from arthropods to humans and other animals. Here, we reveal that pathogen spreading from arthropods to the mammalian host is multifaceted. Extracellular vesicles from Ixodes scapularis enable tick feeding and promote infection of the mildly virulent rickettsial agent Anaplasma phagocytophilum through the SNARE proteins Vamp33 and Synaptobrevin 2 and dendritic epidermal T cells. However, extracellular vesicles from the tick Dermacentor andersoni mitigate microbial spreading caused by the lethal pathogen Francisella tularensis. Collectively, we establish that tick extracellular vesicles foster distinct outcomes of bacterial infection and assist in vector feeding by acting on skin immunity. Thus, the biology of arthropods should be taken into consideration when developing strategies to control vector-borne diseases. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Dec 02, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure