Last data update: Oct 28, 2024. (Total: 48004 publications since 2009)
Records 1-15 (of 15 Records) |
Query Trace: Ruberto I[original query] |
---|
Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 infection among companion animals in households with confirmed human COVID-19 Cases
Venkat H , Yaglom HD , Hecht G , Goedderz A , Ely JL , Sprenkle M , Martins T , Jasso-Selles D , Lemmer D , Gesimondo J , Ruberto I , Komatsu K , Engelthaler DM . Pathogens 2024 13 (6) We aimed to characterize SARS-CoV-2 infection in companion animals living in households with COVID-19-positive people and understand the dynamics surrounding how these animals become infected. Public health investigators contacted households with at least one confirmed, symptomatic person with COVID-19 for study recruitment. Blood, nasal, and rectal swab specimens were collected from pet dogs and cats and a questionnaire was completed. Specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, and for neutralizing antibodies; genomic sequencing was performed on viral-positive samples. A total of 36.4% of 110 pets enrolled had evidence of infection with SARS-CoV-2. Pets were more likely to test positive if the pet was immunocompromised, and if more than one person in the home was positive for COVID-19. Among 12 multi-pet households where at least one pet was positive, 10 had at least one other pet test positive. Whole-genome sequencing revealed the genomes of viral lineages circulating in the community during the time of sample collection. Our findings suggest a high likelihood of viral transmission in households with multiple pets and when pets had very close interactions with symptomatic humans. Further surveillance studies are needed to characterize how new variants impact animals and to understand opportunities for infection and spillover in susceptible species. |
Notes from the field: Increases in imported malaria cases - three southern U.S. Border jurisdictions, 2023
Mitchell CL , Kennar A , Vasquez Y , Noris K , Williamson T , Mannell A , Taylor A , Ruberto I , Cullen TA , Singletary M , Shah S , Ocaranza H , Rodriguez Lainz A , Mace KE . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024 73 (18) 417-419 Malaria is a severe and potentially fatal mosquitoborne disease caused by infection with Plasmodium spp. parasites. Although malaria is no longer endemic in the United States, imported infections are reported annually; the primary risk group has been U.S. residents traveling to areas where malaria is endemic (1). In 2023, sporadic locally acquired mosquito-transmitted malaria cases were reported in several U.S. states (2,3). This report describes increases in imported malaria cases in 2023 compared with 2022 in three public health jurisdictions along the U.S. southern border. |
Detection of Hantavirus during the COVID-19 Pandemic, Arizona, USA, 2020
Hecht G , Dale AP , Ruberto I , Adame G , Close R , Snyder SJ , Pink K , Lemmon N , Rudolfo J , Madsen M , Wiens AL , Cossaboom C , Shoemaker T , Choi MJ , Cannon D , Krapiunaya I , Whitmer S , Mobley M , Talundzic E , Klena JD , Venkat H . Emerg Infect Dis 2023 29 (8) 1663-1667 We identified 2 fatal cases of persons infected with hantavirus in Arizona, USA, 2020; 1 person was co-infected with SARS-CoV-2. Delayed identification of the cause of death led to a public health investigation that lasted ≈9 months after their deaths, which complicated the identification of a vector or exposure. |
Soft tick relapsing fever - United States, 2012-2021
Beeson AM , Kjemtrup A , Oltean H , Schnitzler H , Venkat H , Ruberto I , Marzec N , Cozart D , Tengelsen L , Ladd-Wilson S , Rettler H , Mayes B , Broussard K , Garcia A , Drake LL , Dietrich EA , Petersen J , Hinckley AF , Kugeler KJ , Marx GE . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (29) 777-781 Soft tick relapsing fever (STRF) (also known as tickborne relapsing fever) is a rare infection caused by certain Borrelia spirochetes and transmitted to humans by soft-bodied Ornithodoros ticks. In the United States, acquisition of STRF is commonly associated with exposure to rustic cabins, camping, and caves. Antibiotic treatment is highly effective for STRF, but without timely treatment, STRF can result in severe complications, including death. No nationally standardized case definition for STRF exists; however, the disease is reportable in 12 states. This report summarizes demographic and clinical information for STRF cases reported during 2012-2021 from states where STRF is reportable. During this period, 251 cases were identified in 11 states. The median annual case count was 24. Most patients with STRF (55%) were hospitalized; no fatalities were reported. The geographic distribution and seasonal pattern of STRF have remained relatively constant since the 1990s. Persons should avoid rodent-infested structures and rodent habitats, such as caves, in areas where STRF is endemic. STRF surveillance, prevention, and control efforts would benefit from a standardized case definition and increased awareness of the disease among the public and clinicians. |
Notes from the field: Exposures to mpox among cases in children aged 12 years - United States, September 25-December 31, 2022
Nemechek K , Stefanos R , Miller EL , Riser A , Kebede B , Galang RR , Hufstetler K , Descamps D , Balenger A , Hennessee I , Neelam V , Hutchins HJ , Labuda SM , Davis KM , McCormick DW , Marx GE , Kimball A , Ruberto I , Williamson T , Rzucidlo P , Willut C , Harold RE , Mangla AT , English A , Brikshavana D , Blanding J , Kim M , Finn LE , Marutani A , Lockwood M , Johnson S , Ditto N , Wilton S , Edmond T , Stokich D , Shinall A , Alravez B , Crawley A , Nambiar A , Gateley EL , Schuman J , White SL , Davis K , Milleron R , Mendez M , Kawakami V , Segaloff HE , Bower WA , Ellington SR , McCollum AM , Pao LZ . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (23) 633-635 During May 17–December 31, 2022, 125 probable or confirmed U.S. monkeypox (mpox)† cases were reported among patients aged <18 years, including 45 (36%) in children aged ≤12 years. Eighty-three cases in persons aged <18 years diagnosed during May 17–September 24, 2022 were previously described (1); 28 (34%) of these were in children aged ≤12 years, 29% of whom did not have reported information on exposure. Among 20 (71%) of 28 patients with documented information on exposure, most were exposed by a household contact. This report updates the previous report using data collected during September 25–December 31, 2022, proposes possible mpox exposure routes in children aged ≤12 years, and describes three U.S. mpox cases in neonates. Household members or caregivers with mpox, including pregnant women and their health care providers, should be informed of the risk of transmission to persons aged <18 years, and strategies to protect persons aged <18 years at risk for exposure, including isolating household contacts with mpox, should be implemented immediately. | | During September 25–December 31, 2022, 17 children aged ≤12 years with probable or confirmed mpox were identified through national surveillance. CDC provided a questionnaire to state and local health departments for collection of the child’s history of exposure to any person with mpox§ during the previous 3 weeks, exposure settings, types of contact (e.g., skin-to-skin, being held or cuddled, diaper change, or toilet use), and precautions taken by the person with mpox (e.g., practiced isolation or covered lesions). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.¶ |
"Sniffing" out SARS-CoV-2 in Arizona working dogs: an exploratory serosurvey
Hecht G , Sarbo N , Svoboda W , Mead HL , Ruberto I , Altin JA , Engelthaler DM , Venkat H , Yaglom HD . Front Vet Sci 2023 10 1166101 Susceptibility to and infection with SARS-CoV-2 in companion animals has been well-documented throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveillance for the virus in dogs has largely been focused on household pets; however, other canine populations may also be impacted. We partnered with a local veterinary hospital with a high working dog patient volume to conduct viral and neutralizing antibody testing in working dogs and identify potential risk factors in the dog's work and home environments. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in law enforcement and security working dogs in Arizona found 24.81% (32/129) of dogs to be seropositive. Thirteen dogs presenting with clinical signs or with reported exposure to COVID-19 in the 30 days prior to sample collection were also tested by PCR; all samples were negative. 90.7% (n = 117) of dogs were reported to be asymptomatic or have no change in performance at the time of sampling. Two dogs (1.6%) had suspected anosmia as reported by their handlers; one of which was seropositive. Known exposure to the dog's COVID-19 positive handler or household member was identified as a significant risk factor. Demographics factors including sex, altered status, and type of work were not associated with canine seropositivity. Further work is warranted to understand the impact of SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious diseases in working dogs. |
Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory exposure, Arizona, USA
Speiser LJ , Graf EH , Seville MT , Singbartl K , Dalton ML , Harrington D , Kretschmer M , Kuljanin M , Zabel K , Sunenshine R , Ruberto I , Venkat H , Grys TE . Emerg Infect Dis 2023 29 (5) 1061-1063 We describe an incidental Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory exposure in Arizona, USA. Because melioidosis cases are increasing in the United States and B. pseudomallei reservoirs have been discovered in the Gulf Coast Region, US laboratory staff could be at increased risk for B. pseudomallei exposure. |
Notes From the Field: First evidence of locally acquired dengue virus infection - Maricopa County, Arizona, November 2022
Kretschmer M , Collins J , Dale AP , Garrett B , Koski L , Zabel K , Staab RN , Turnbow K , Nativio J , Andrews K , Smith WE , Townsend J , Busser N , Will J , Burr K , Jones FK , Santiago GA , Fitzpatrick KA , Ruberto I , Fitzpatrick K , White JR , Adams L , Sunenshine RH . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (11) 290-291 On November 7, 2022, dengue virus (DENV), which is not endemic in the continental United States (1), was identified in a Maricopa County, Arizona resident by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing at Arizona State Public Health Laboratory (ASPHL). The patient (patient A) was admitted to a hospital on October 19 for a dengue-like illness, 7 days after traveling to and remaining in Mexicali, Mexico for <4 hours. Patient A was hospitalized for 3 days and subsequently recovered. Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) conducted retrospective testing for DENV in samples collected from 21 mosquito pools located within 5 miles (8 km) of patient A’s residence during October 1–November 3. A sample collected from one mosquito pool (pool A) on October 5 was positive for DENV. Whole genome sequencing by CDC’s Dengue Branch later revealed that closely related DENV-3 strains not known to be circulating in the patient’s travel region were identified in both patient A and pool A, suggesting local DENV transmission. |
Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of Monkeypox cases - United States, May 17-July 22, 2022
Philpott D , Hughes CM , Alroy KA , Kerins JL , Pavlick J , Asbel L , Crawley A , Newman AP , Spencer H , Feldpausch A , Cogswell K , Davis KR , Chen J , Henderson T , Murphy K , Barnes M , Hopkins B , Fill MA , Mangla AT , Perella D , Barnes A , Hughes S , Griffith J , Berns AL , Milroy L , Blake H , Sievers MM , Marzan-Rodriguez M , Tori M , Black SR , Kopping E , Ruberto I , Maxted A , Sharma A , Tarter K , Jones SA , White B , Chatelain R , Russo M , Gillani S , Bornstein E , White SL , Johnson SA , Ortega E , Saathoff-Huber L , Syed A , Wills A , Anderson BJ , Oster AM , Christie A , McQuiston J , McCollum AM , Rao AK , Negrón ME . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 71 (32) 1018-1022 Monkeypox, a zoonotic infection caused by an orthopoxvirus, is endemic in parts of Africa. On August 4, 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services declared the U.S. monkeypox outbreak, which began on May 17, to be a public health emergency (1,2). After detection of the first U.S. monkeypox case), CDC and health departments implemented enhanced monkeypox case detection and reporting. Among 2,891 cases reported in the United States through July 22 by 43 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (DC), CDC received case report forms for 1,195 (41%) cases by July 27. Among these, 99% of cases were among men; among men with available information, 94% reported male-to-male sexual or close intimate contact during the 3 weeks before symptom onset. Among the 88% of cases with available data, 41% were among non-Hispanic White (White) persons, 28% among Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) persons, and 26% among non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) persons. Forty-two percent of persons with monkeypox with available data did not report the typical prodrome as their first symptom, and 46% reported one or more genital lesions during their illness; 41% had HIV infection. Data suggest that widespread community transmission of monkeypox has disproportionately affected gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and racial and ethnic minority groups. Compared with historical reports of monkeypox in areas with endemic disease, currently reported outbreak-associated cases are less likely to have a prodrome and more likely to have genital involvement. CDC and other federal, state, and local agencies have implemented response efforts to expand testing, treatment, and vaccination. Public health efforts should prioritize gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, who are currently disproportionately affected, for prevention and testing, while addressing equity, minimizing stigma, and maintaining vigilance for transmission in other populations. Clinicians should test patients with rash consistent with monkeypox,(†) regardless of whether the rash is disseminated or was preceded by prodrome. Likewise, although most cases to date have occurred among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, any patient with rash consistent with monkeypox should be considered for testing. CDC is continually evaluating new evidence and tailoring response strategies as information on changing case demographics, clinical characteristics, transmission, and vaccine effectiveness become available.(§). |
Genomic investigation of a household SARS-CoV-2 disease cluster in Arizona involving a cat, dog, and pet owner.
Yaglom HD , Hecht G , Goedderz A , Jasso-Selles D , Ely JL , Ruberto I , Bowers JR , Engelthaler DM , Venkat H . One Health 2021 13 100333 Arizona's COVID-19 and Pets Program is a prospective surveillance study being conducted to characterize how SARS-CoV-2 impacts companion animals living in households with SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals. Among the enrolled pets, we identified a SARS-CoV-2-infected cat and dog from the same household; both animals were asymptomatic but had close contact with the symptomatic and SARS-CoV-2-positive owner. Whole genome sequencing of animal and owner specimens revealed identical viral genomes of the B.1.575 lineage, suggesting zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from human to at least one pet. This is the first report of the B.1.575 lineage in companion animals. Genetically linking SARS-CoV-2 between people and animals, and tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 genomes is essential to detect any cross-species SARS-CoV-2 transmission that may lead to more transmissible or severe variants that can affect humans. Surveillance studies, including genomic analyses of owner and pet specimens, are needed to further our understanding of how SARS-CoV-2 impacts companion animals. |
Notes from the field: Delays in identification and treatment of a case of septicemic plague - Navajo County, Arizona, 2020
Dale AP , Kretschmer M , Ruberto I , Wagner DM , Solomon C , Komatsu K , Venkat H . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (31) 1063-1064 On June 18, 2020, a White non-Hispanic man aged 67 years sought care at an emergency department (ED) in Navajo County, Arizona, complaining of dehydration, nausea, weakness, and a chronic cough of 1.5 years’ duration. He had arrived in Navajo County from Nebraska approximately 9 days earlier. On physical exam, he was tachycardic and tachypneic. His chest radiograph and computed tomographic angiography chest scan with contrast were normal, and he was discharged after receiving intravenous fluids. He returned to the ED the next day (June 19) for treatment of three red and painful suspected insect bites on his leg and was discharged the same day with a diagnosis of cellulitis and two antibiotic prescriptions (Figure). He returned to the ED the following day (June 20) complaining of fever, dizziness, productive worsening cough, “swollen glands” (location not noted), weakness, and chills. He was hospitalized and received treatment with four antibiotics for a presumptive diagnosis of sepsis. Test results of nasopharyngeal specimens collected on June 18 and June 21 were negative for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and other respiratory pathogens. On June 24, the hospital laboratory reported an atypical gram-negative isolate from a blood specimen, which was sent that day to a commercial reference laboratory for further identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). The organism was identified as Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, a gram-negative, rod-shaped organism, and reported to the hospital on June 30. The patient was discharged from the hospital on July 1 with a peripherally inserted central catheter line and 3 additional days of a 14-day course of intravenous vancomycin. |
Notes from the field: An outbreak of West Nile virus - Arizona, 2019
Ruberto I , Kretschmer M , Zabel K , Sunenshine R , Smith K , Townsend J , Richard D , Erhart LM , Staab N , Komatsu K , Venkat H . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (4) 123-124 West Nile virus (WNV), a mosquitoborne flavivirus,* was first identified in the United States in 1999 and first reported in Arizona in 2003 (with 12 human cases); 391 human cases were reported in 2004. Since that time, a median of 103 cases (range = 21–391) have been reported in Arizona annually.† During week 28 in 2019, the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) recorded the highest weekly WNV case count (23) ever reported in Arizona (an incidence of 0.32 cases per 100,000 population) (Figure). This prompted ADHS to investigate the outbreak’s severity to inform prevention, resource allocation, and public messaging. |
Culture of Clinical Specimens Reveals Extensive Diversity of Legionella pneumophila Strains in Arizona.
Raphael BH , Huynh T , Brown E , Smith JC , Ruberto I , Getsinger L , White S , Winchell JM . mSphere 2019 4 (1) Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 236 Legionella species isolates from Arizona were submitted to the CDC for reference testing. Most of these isolates were recovered from bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Although the incidence of legionellosis in Arizona is less than the overall U.S. incidence, Arizona submits the largest number of isolates to the CDC for testing compared to those from other states. In addition to a higher proportion of culture confirmation of legionellosis cases in Arizona than in other states, all Legionella pneumophila isolates are forwarded to the CDC for confirmatory testing. Compared to that from other states, a higher proportion of isolates from Arizona were identified as belonging to L. pneumophila serogroups 6 (28.2%) and 8 (8.9%). Genome sequencing was conducted on 113 L. pneumophila clinical isolates not known to be associated with outbreaks in order to understand the genomic diversity of strains causing legionellosis in Arizona. Whole-genome multilocus sequence typing (wgMLST) revealed 17 clusters of isolates sharing at least 99% identical allele content. Only two of these clusters contained isolates from more than one individual with exposure at the same facility. Additionally, wgMLST analysis revealed a group of 31 isolates predominantly belonging to serogroup 6 and containing isolates from three separate clusters. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and pangenome analysis were used to further resolve genome sequences belonging to a subset of isolates. This study demonstrates that culture of clinical specimens for Legionella spp. reveals a highly diverse population of strains causing legionellosis in Arizona which could be underappreciated using other diagnostic approaches.IMPORTANCE Culture of clinical specimens from patients with Legionnaires' disease is rarely performed, restricting our understanding of the diversity and ecology of Legionella Culture of Legionella from patient specimens in Arizona revealed a greater proportion of non-serogroup 1 Legionella pneumophila isolates than in other U.S. isolates examined. Disease caused by such isolates may go undetected using other diagnostic methods. Moreover, genome sequence analysis revealed that these isolates were genetically diverse, and understanding these populations may help in future environmental source attribution studies. |
Dengue knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Arizona health care providers, 2014-2015
Ruberto I , Yaglom H , Erhart LM , Plante L , Weiss J , Golenko C , Casal M , McCotter O , Adams L , Ernst K , Komatsu K . Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2019 19 (6) 434-440 BACKGROUND: Detection of local dengue transmission requires an aware and engaged medical community, as health care providers are the front line of public health surveillance. To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice about dengue, an online survey was distributed among Arizona health care providers during 2014 and 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey consisted of a total of 10 knowledge, attitude, and practice questions divided as follows: 5 knowledge questions, 2 attitude questions, and 3 practice questions. The link to the Qualtrics survey was distributed through the Arizona Health Alert Network to a total of 4582 e-mail addresses, of which 335 participants opened the survey, and 196 completed and submitted their responses. RESULTS: Less than half the respondents reported choosing the right dengue diagnostic test (40.4%) or understanding the epidemiology of dengue in Arizona (40.9%). Slightly more than half the respondents reported frequently asking for travel history (59%), and three-fourth of them would notify the local health department on suspicion of a dengue patient (76.1%). Survey score was associated with providers specialized in infectious diseases (1.88, 95% CI: 0.42-3.33, p = 0.01), medical doctors or doctors of osteopathic medicine (1.82, 95% CI: 0.98-2.65, p < 0.0001), and respondents who reported to have heard about the increase in dengue cases in Sonora (Mexico) in fall 2014 (1.51, 95% CI: 0.67-2.34, p = 0.0005), indicating better survey performance. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that education for health care providers on dengue should be improved particularly among general practice noninfectious disease providers who might be the first point of care for dengue patients. Findings suggest that additional training on clinical management, asking travel history, and notifying the local health department on suspicion of a dengue patient are needed. |
Possible Zika virus infection among pregnant women - United States and Territories, May 2016
Simeone RM , Shapiro-Mendoza CK , Meaney-Delman D , Petersen EE , Galang RR , Oduyebo T , Rivera-Garcia B , Valencia-Prado M , Newsome KB , Perez-Padilla J , Williams TR , Biggerstaff M , Jamieson DJ , Honein MA , Ahmed F , Anesi S , Arnold KE , Barradas D , Barter D , Bertolli J , Bingham AM , Bollock J , Bosse T , Bradley KK , Brady D , Brown CM , Bryan K , Buchanan V , Bullard PD , Carrigan A , Clouse M , Cook S , Cooper M , Davidson S , DeBarr A , Dobbs T , Dunams T , Eason J , Eckert A , Eggers P , Ellington SR , Feldpausch A , Fredette CR , Gabel J , Glover M , Gosciminski M , Gay M , Haddock R , Hand S , Hardy J , Hartel ME , Hennenfent AK , Hills SL , House J , Igbinosa I , Im L , Jeff H , Khan S , Kightlinger L , Ko JY , Koirala S , Korhonen L , Krishnasamy V , Kurkjian K , Lampe M , Larson S , Lee EH , Lind L , Lindquist S , Long J , Macdonald J , MacFarquhar J , Mackie DP , Mark-Carew M , Martin B , Martinez-Quinones A , Matthews-Greer J , McGee SA , McLaughlin J , Mock V , Muna E , Oltean H , O'Mallan J , Pagano HP , Park SY , Peterson D , Polen KN , Porse CC , Rao CY , Ropri A , Rinsky J , Robinson S , Rosinger AY , Ruberto I , Schiffman E , Scott-Waldron C , Semple S , Sharp T , Short K , Signs K , Slavinski SA , Stevens T , Sweatlock J , Talbot EA , Tonzel J , Traxler R , Tubach S , Van Houten C , VinHatton E , Viray M , Virginie D , Warren MD , Waters C , White P , Williams T , Winters AI , Wood S , Zaganjor I . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016 65 (20) 514-9 Zika virus is a cause of microcephaly and brain abnormalities (1), and it is the first known mosquito-borne infection to cause congenital anomalies in humans. The establishment of a comprehensive surveillance system to monitor pregnant women with Zika virus infection will provide data to further elucidate the full range of potential outcomes for fetuses and infants of mothers with asymptomatic and symptomatic Zika virus infection during pregnancy. In February 2016, Zika virus disease and congenital Zika virus infections became nationally notifiable conditions in the United States (2). Cases in pregnant women with laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection who have either 1) symptomatic infection or 2) asymptomatic infection with diagnosed complications of pregnancy can be reported as cases of Zika virus disease to ArboNET* (2), CDC's national arboviral diseases surveillance system. Under existing interim guidelines from the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), asymptomatic Zika virus infections in pregnant women who do not have known pregnancy complications are not reportable. ArboNET does not currently include pregnancy surveillance information (e.g., gestational age or pregnancy exposures) or pregnancy outcomes. To understand the full impact of infection on the fetus and neonate, other systems are needed for reporting and active monitoring of pregnant women with laboratory evidence of possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy. Thus, in collaboration with state, local, tribal, and territorial health departments, CDC established two surveillance systems to monitor pregnancies and congenital outcomes among women with laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection(dagger) in the United States and territories: 1) the U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry (USZPR),( section sign) which monitors pregnant women residing in U.S. states and all U.S. territories except Puerto Rico, and 2) the Zika Active Pregnancy Surveillance System (ZAPSS), which monitors pregnant women residing in Puerto Rico. As of May 12, 2016, the surveillance systems were monitoring 157 and 122 pregnant women with laboratory evidence of possible Zika virus infection from participating U.S. states and territories, respectively. Tracking and monitoring clinical presentation of Zika virus infection, all prenatal testing, and adverse consequences of Zika virus infection during pregnancy are critical to better characterize the risk for congenital infection, the performance of prenatal diagnostic testing, and the spectrum of adverse congenital outcomes. These data will improve clinical guidance, inform counseling messages for pregnant women, and facilitate planning for clinical and public health services for affected families. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Oct 28, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure