Evaluating antibody maturation provides valuable data to characterize immune responses to HIV infection and can provide insight into biomedical intervention efficacy. It is important to develop assays that evaluate antibody maturation in both plasma and mucosal compartments. The nonhuman primate model provides a controlled system to collect temporal data that are integral to assessing intervention strategies. We report the development of a novel multiplex assay, based on the Bio-Plex platform, to evaluate plasma and mucosal IgG and IgA avidity and maturation against simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) in this controlled system. Vaginal mucosa and plasma samples were collected from a prior study evaluating the efficacy of a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) intravaginal ring (IVR) against SHIVSF162P3 challenge in female pigtailed macaques. For validation of the multiplex assay, specimens from six SHIV-infected placebo animals and one TDF breakthrough animal were evaluated. For SHIV and HIV envelope analytes, antibody levels and avidity in both compartments continued to mature post-infection. Maturation of IgG and IgA levels was similar in each compartment, however, mucosal antibody levels tended to be more variable. This SHIV assay elucidates IgG/IgA antibody kinetics in the plasma and vaginal mucosa and will be a valuable tool in vaccine and other biomedical intervention studies in the nonhuman primate model.

The availability of reliable laboratory methods for determining recent HIV infection is vital for accurate estimation of population-based incidence. The mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) and false recent rate (FRR) are critical parameters for HIV incidence assays, as they impact HIV incidence estimates and provide a measure of assay performance. The HIV-1 Multiplex assay is an in-house developed, magnetic bead-based assay that measures virus-specific antibody levels and avidity to multiple analytes. To ensure quality control and to facilitate transfer of the assay to external laboratories or testing facilities, the in-house assay has been adapted and produced in kit form. Here, we describe the performance characteristics of the multiplex kit and demonstrate the stability of the kit components over a one-year period. Two statistical methods were employed to estimate the MDRI of the individual analytes and five different algorithms, combining multiple analyte values. The MDRI estimates for the individual analytes and five algorithms were all between 200 and 300 days post-seroconversion, with no notable difference between the two statistical approaches. All five algorithms exhibited a 0% FRR with specimens from long-term, subtype B HIV-1-infected individuals. The assay parameters described in this study provide the necessary tools to implement the HIV-1 multiplex assay and improves the utility of the assay for field use.

BACKGROUND: The availability of more accurate point-of-care technology could increase the number of persons aware of their HIV status. The DPP((R)) HIV-1/2 assay is the first dual path platform rapid test (RT) approved in the U.S. that also received the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) waiver for use with oral fluid and fingerstick and venous whole blood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the DPP((R)) HIV-1/2 assay with plasma specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were calculated from 696 HIV-1 groups M (B and non-B subtypes) and O and HIV-2 (groups A and B) specimens and 505 HIV-negative specimens, respectively. Analysis of the assay performance in HIV-1 early infections was assessed by estimating the relative sensitivity of the RT before the Western blot (WB) becomes positive using a 50% cumulative frequency analysis and by comparing the reactivity with other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved RTs. RESULTS: The sensitivity for established infection was 100% for HIV-1 and 100% for HIV-2. The specificity was 100%. The DPP((R)) HIV-1/2 assay performs similarly to most antibody-based RT approved by FDA in early HIV-1 infections. CONCLUSIONS: The DPP((R)) technology showed no significant improvement for detecting early infections over other lateral-flow RTs used in the U.S. Without more data on the DPP((R)) HIV-1/2 assay, especially from whole blood and oral fluid specimens collected during the early phase of infection, its performance as point-of-care technology remains to be assessed.