In 2021, the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM) (formerly the American Association for Clinical Chemistry [AACC]) developed a scientific study that aimed to contribute to the understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunity during the evolving course of the pandemic. This study was led by a group of expert member volunteers and resulted in survey data from 975 individuals and blood collection from 698 of those participants. This paper describes the formulation and execution of this large-scale scientific study, encompassing best practices and insights gained throughout the endeavor.

Clinical laboratory measurements that are accurate and comparable across measurement systems and over time are critical for patient care and public health systems. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend specific decision points to guide clinical decisions. Electronic health records include patient laboratory data, transferrable across healthcare systems, that inform physicians about a patient’s health history. Laboratory data generated within and across healthcare systems are used to characterize patient populations, identify public health concerns, and track outcomes. Patients access their laboratory results, compare them with publicly available information, and discuss them with healthcare providers. These recent developments have advanced the roles of the clinical laboratory and introduced opportunities for laboratories to provide valuable new information to the patient and the healthcare team. However, these advancements and opportunities require accurate and reliable laboratory measurements. Reliability, in this context, comprises characteristics such as analytical sensitivity, specificity, precision, and consistency over time. Harmonization of laboratory measurement results and standardization, a more specific way of harmonizing results, can help to achieve this. Harmonization creates laboratory measurements that are applicable to practice guidelines, comparable, and interoperable across health systems and over time.

IMPORTANCE: Appropriately established pediatric reference intervals are critical to the clinical decision-making process and should reflect the physiologic changes that occur during healthy child development. Reference intervals used in pediatric care today remain highly inconsistent across a broad range of common clinical biomarkers. OBSERVATIONS: This narrative review assesses biomarker-specific pediatric reference intervals and their clinical utility with respect to the underlying biological changes occurring during development. Pediatric reference intervals from PubMed-indexed articles published from January 2015 to April 2021, commercial laboratory websites, study cohorts, and pediatric reference interval books were all examined. Although large numbers of pediatric reference intervals are published for some biomarkers, very few are used by clinical and commercial laboratories. The patterns, extent, and timing of biomarker changes are highly variable, particularly during developmental stages with rapid physiologic changes. However, many pediatric reference intervals do not capture these changes and thus do not accurately reflect the underlying biochemistry of development, resulting in significant inconsistencies between reference intervals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is a need to correctly describe the biochemistry of child development as well as to identify strategies to develop accurate and consistent pediatric reference intervals for improved pediatric care.