Last data update: Mar 17, 2025. (Total: 48910 publications since 2009)
Records 1-2 (of 2 Records) |
Query Trace: Okoye MIJ[original query] |
---|
SARS-CoV-2 serologic surveillance among people living with HIV in Nigeria, April 2022-January 2023
Chun HM , Osawe S , Adams-Dabban S , Favaloro J , Iriemenam NC , Dirlikov E , Martin D , Milligan K , Abutu A , Okunoye O , Okoli M , Akanbi O , Akinmulero O , Okonkwo R , Oyedele O , Greby S , Abimiku A , Okoye MIJ , Shiraishi RW . Int J Infect Dis 2024 151 107309 OBJECTIVES: Evidence indicates that people living with HIV (PLHIV) are more impacted by COVID-19. The burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection among PLHIV is unknown in Nigeria. METHODS: We conducted repeated cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 serosurveys in 14 states and the Federal Capital Territory in Nigeria among PLHIV who had an HIV viral load (VL) test during April 2022 to January 2023. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was assessed using a multiplex bead assay to measure IgG to spike (S), receptor binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins to identify potential infection and/or vaccination status. RESULTS: Between April 2022 and January 2023, 47,614 remnant VL samples were included and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as IgG antibodies to spike and RBD591 [S+] and nucleocapsid [N+], (S+N+), ranged between 21.1% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 11.4-31.8) in Ekiti State in January 2023 to 71.4% (95% CI 71.9-81.9) in Gombe State in November 2022, with overall steady trends within and between states over time, across age and sex. CONCLUSION: High rates of SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence among PLHIV in Nigeria were observed. This underscores the need to understand the association between HIV and SARS-CoV-2 to inform strategies to reduce the threat posed by COVID-19. |
Lessons learnt from assessing and improving accuracy and positive predictive value of the national HIV testing algorithm in Nigeria
Mpamugo AO , Iriemenam NC , Bashorun A , Okunoye OO , Bassey OO , Onokevbagbe E , Jelpe T , Alagi MA , Meribe C , Aguolu RE , Nzelu CE , Bello S , Ezra B , Obioha CA , Ibrahim BS , Adedokun O , Ikpeazu A , Ihekweazu C , Croxton T , Adebajo SB , Okoye MIJ , Abimiku A . Afr J Lab Med 2024 13 (1) 2339 BACKGROUND: HIV testing remains an entry point into HIV care and treatment services. In 2007, Nigeria adopted and implemented a two-test rapid HIV testing algorithm of three HIV rapid test kits, following the sequence: Alere Determine (first test), Unigold(TM) (second test), and STAT-PAK(®) as the tie-breaker. Sub-analysis of the 2018 Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey data showed significant discordance between the first and second tests, necessitating an evaluation of the algorithm. This manuscript highlights lessons learnt from that evaluation. INTERVENTION: A two-phased evaluation method was employed, including abstraction and analysis of retrospective HIV testing data from January 2017 to December 2019 from 24 selected sites supported by the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief programme. A prospective evaluation of HIV testing was done among 2895 consecutively enrolled and consented adults, aged 15-64 years, accessing HIV testing services from three selected sites per state across the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria between July 2020 and September 2020. The prospective evaluation was performed both in the field and at the National Reference Laboratory under controlled laboratory conditions. Stakeholder engagements, strategic selection and training of study personnel, and integrated supportive supervision were employed to assure the quality of evaluation procedures and outcomes. LESSONS LEARNT: The algorithm showed higher sensitivity and specificity in the National Reference Laboratory compared with the field. The approaches to quality assurance were integral to the high-quality study outcomes. RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend comparison of testing algorithms under evaluation against a gold standard. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study provides context-specific considerations in using World Health Organization recommendations to evaluate the Nigerian national HIV rapid testing algorithm. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Mar 17, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure