In 2012, Uganda introduced the use of GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale CA), a sensitive, automated, real-time polymerase chain reaction-based platform for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, for programmatic use among children, adults with presumptive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated TB, and symptomatic persons at risk for rifampicin (RIF)-resistant TB. The effect of using the platform's Xpert MTB/RIF assay on TB care and control was assessed using routinely collected programmatic data; in addition, a retrospective review of district quarterly summaries using abstracted TB register data from purposively selected facilities in the capital city of Kampala was conducted. Case notification rates were calculated and nonparametric statistical methods were used for analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in case notification rates before and after the Xpert MTB/RIF assay became available, although four of 10 districts demonstrated a statistically significant difference in bacteriologically confirmed TB. Once the GeneXpert MTB/RIF platform is established and refined, a more comprehensive evaluation should be conducted.

SETTING: All 11 tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic and treatment units in Kyankwanzi and Kiboga Districts in Uganda. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of, factors associated with and barriers related to incomplete anti-tuberculosis treatment sputum monitoring. DESIGN: Data were abstracted from anti-tuberculosis treatment and laboratory registers of sputum smear-positive patients who started treatment between January 2009 and December 2011 in the study districts. Patients missing documentation for any smear results at 2 or 3, 5, and 6 or 8 months were classified as having incomplete monitoring. Health providers and patients were interviewed about barriers to sputum monitoring. RESULTS: Overall, 272 (55%) of 492 patients had incomplete monitoring: 16% (78/492) at 2 or 3 months, 39% (181/465) at 5 months and 28% (119/428) at 6 or 8 months of treatment. More sputum results were recorded in laboratory than in TB treatment registers. Incomplete monitoring was significantly associated with being male, living in Kyankwanzi District and not receiving directly observed treatment. Patients' inability to produce sputum, long laboratory waiting times, and insufficient patient and provider education were primary reasons for incomplete monitoring. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients missed at least one smear result during treatment, which has implications for treatment monitoring and treatment outcomes in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (TB) have become major threats to control of tuberculosis globally. The rates of anti-TB drug resistance in Uganda are not known. We conducted a national drug resistance survey to investigate the levels and patterns of resistance to first and second line anti-TB drugs among new and previously treated sputum smear-positive TB cases. METHODS: Sputum samples were collected from a nationally representative sample of new and previously treated sputum smear-positive TB patients registered at TB diagnostic centers during December 2009 to February 2011 using a weighted cluster sampling method. Culture and drug susceptibility testing was performed at the national TB reference laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 1537 patients (1397 new and 140 previously treated) were enrolled in the survey from 44 health facilities. HIV test result and complete drug susceptibility testing (DST) results were available for 1524 (96.8%) and 1325 (85.9%) patients, respectively. Of the 1209 isolates from new cases, resistance to any anti-TB drug was 10.3%, 5% were resistant to isoniazid, 1.9% to rifampicin, and 1.4% were multi drug resistant. Among the 116 isolates from previously treated cases, the prevalence of resistance was 25.9%, 23.3%, 12.1% and 12.1% respectively. Of the 1524 patients who had HIV testing 469 (30.7%) tested positive. There was no association between anti-TB drug resistance (including MDR) and HIV infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anti-TB drug resistance among new patients in Uganda is low relative to WHO estimates. The higher levels of MDR-TB (12.1%) and resistance to any drug (25.3%) among previously treated patients raises concerns about the quality of directly observed therapy (DOT) and adherence to treatment. This calls for strengthening existing TB control measures, especially DOT, routine DST among the previously treated TB patients or periodic drug resistance surveys, to prevent and monitor development and transmission of drug resistant TB.