Last data update: Apr 18, 2025. (Total: 49119 publications since 2009)
Records 1-3 (of 3 Records) |
Query Trace: O'Connor KA[original query] |
---|
Incubation periods of enteric illnesses in foodborne outbreaks, United States, 1998-2013
Chai SJ , Gu W , O'Connor KA , Richardson LC , Tauxe RV . Epidemiol Infect 2019 147 e285 Early in a foodborne disease outbreak investigation, illness incubation periods can help focus case interviews, case definitions, clinical and environmental evaluations and predict an aetiology. Data describing incubation periods are limited. We examined foodborne disease outbreaks from laboratory-confirmed, single aetiology, enteric bacterial and viral pathogens reported to United States foodborne disease outbreak surveillance from 1998-2013. We grouped pathogens by clinical presentation and analysed the reported median incubation period among all illnesses from the implicated pathogen for each outbreak as the outbreak incubation period. Outbreaks from preformed bacterial toxins (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens) had the shortest outbreak incubation periods (4-10 h medians), distinct from that of Vibrio parahaemolyticus (17 h median). Norovirus, salmonella and shigella had longer but similar outbreak incubation periods (32-45 h medians); campylobacter and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli had the longest among bacteria (62-87 h medians); hepatitis A had the longest overall (672 h median). Our results can help guide diagnostic and investigative strategies early in an outbreak investigation to suggest or rule out specific etiologies or, when the pathogen is known, the likely timeframe for exposure. They also point to possible differences in pathogenesis among pathogens causing broadly similar syndromes. |
Rapid assessment of Ebola infection prevention and control needs - six districts, Sierra Leone, October 2014
Pathmanathan I , O'Connor KA , Adams ML , Rao CY , Kilmarx PH , Park BJ , Mermin J , Kargbo B , Wurie AH , Clarke KR . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014 63 (49) 1172-4 As of October 31, 2014, the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation had reported 3,854 laboratory-confirmed cases of Ebola virus disease (Ebola) since the outbreak began in May 2014; 199 (5.2%) of these cases were among health care workers. Ebola infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are essential to interrupt Ebola virus transmission and protect the health workforce, a population that is disproportionately affected by Ebola because of its increased risk of exposure yet is essential to patient care required for outbreak control and maintenance of the country's health system at large. To rapidly identify existing IPC resources and high priority outbreak response needs, an assessment by CDC Ebola Response Team members was conducted in six of the 14 districts in Sierra Leone, consisting of health facility observations and structured interviews with key informants in facilities and government district health management offices. Health system gaps were identified in all six districts, including shortages or absence of trained health care staff, personal protective equipment (PPE), safe patient transport, and standardized IPC protocols. Based on rapid assessment findings and key stakeholder input, priority IPC actions were recommended. Progress has since been made in developing standard operating procedures, increasing laboratory and Ebola treatment capacity and training the health workforce. However, further system strengthening is needed. In particular, a successful Ebola outbreak response in Sierra Leone will require an increase in coordinated and comprehensive district-level IPC support to prevent ongoing Ebola virus transmission. |
Risk factors early in the 2010 cholera epidemic, Haiti
O'Connor KA , Cartwright E , Loharikar A , Routh J , Gaines J , Fouche MDB , Jean-Louis R , Ayers T , Johnson D , Tappero JW , Roels TH , Archer WR , Dahourou GA , Mintz E , Quick R , Mahon BE . Emerg Infect Dis 2011 17 (11) 2136-2138 During the early weeks of the cholera outbreak that began in Haiti in October 2010, we conducted a case-control study to identify risk factors. Drinking treated water was strongly protective against illness. Our results highlight the effectiveness of safe water in cholera control. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 18, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure