Last data update: Aug 15, 2025. (Total: 49733 publications since 2009)
| Records 1-2 (of 2 Records) |
| Query Trace: Novicki E[original query] |
|---|
| Introducing the Impact Wellbeing™ Guide: Taking Action to Improve Health Care Worker Well-being
Novicki E , Howard J , Simmons S . Workplace Health Saf 2025 73 (6) 320 |
| Using the contribution analysis approach to evaluate science impact: A case study of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Downes A , Novicki E , Howard J . Am J Eval 2019 40 (2) 177-189 Interest from Congress, executive branch leadership, and various other stakeholders for greater accountability in government continues to gain momentum today with government-wide efforts. However, measuring the impact of research programs has proven particularly difficult. Cause and effect linkages between research findings and changes to morbidity and mortality are difficult to prove. To address this challenge, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health program evaluators used a modified version of contribution analysis (CA) to evaluate two research programs. CA proved to be a useful framework for assessing research impact, and both programs received valuable, actionable feedback. Although there is room to further refine our approach, this was a promising step toward moving beyond bibiliometrics to more robust assessment of research impact. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Aug 15, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure


