Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with a weekly oral regimen of antiretroviral drugs could be a suitable preventative option for individuals who struggle with daily PrEP or prefer not to use long-acting injectables. We assessed in macaques the efficacy of weekly oral tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) at doses of 13.7 or 27.4 mg/kg. Macaques received weekly oral TAF for six weeks and were exposed twice-weekly to SHIV vaginally or rectally on day 3 and 6 after each dose. Median TFV-DP levels in PBMCs following the 13.7 mg/kg dose were 3110 and 1137 fmols/10(6) cells on day 3 and 6, respectively. With the 27.4 mg/kg dose, TFV-DP levels were increased (~2-fold) on day 3 and 6 (6095 and 3290 fmols/10(6) cells, respectively). Both TAF doses (13.7 and 27.4 mg/kg) conferred high efficacy (94.1% and 93.9%, respectively) against vaginal SHIV infection. Efficacy of the 27.4 mg/kg dose against rectal SHIV infection was 80.7%. We estimate that macaque doses of 13.7 and 27.4 mg/kg are equivalent to approximately 230 and 450 mg of TAF in humans, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a weekly oral PrEP regimen and suggest that a clinically achievable oral TAF dose could be a promising option for non-daily PrEP.

BACKGROUND: Vaginal products for HIV prevention that can be used on-demand before or after sex may be a preferable option for women with low frequency or unplanned sexual activity or who prefer not to use daily or long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We performed dose ranging pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy studies of a vaginally applied insert containing tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and elvitegravir (EVG) in macaques under PrEP or post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) modalities. METHODS: PK studies were performed in 3 groups of pigtailed macaques receiving inserts with different fixed-dose combinations of TAF and EVG (10/8, 20/16 and 40/24 mg). PrEP and PEP efficacy of a selected insert was investigated in a repeat exposure vaginal SHIV transmission model. Inserts were administered 4 h before (n = 6) or after (n = 6) repeated weekly SHIV exposures. Infection outcome was compared with macaques receiving placebo inserts (n = 12). FINDINGS: Dose ranging studies showed rapid and sustained high drug concentrations in vaginal fluids and tissues across insert formulations with minimal dose proportionality. TAF/EVG (20/16 mg) inserts were selected for efficacy evaluation. Five of the 6 animals receiving these inserts 4 h before and 6/6 animals receiving inserts 4 h after SHIV exposure were protected after 13 challenges (p = 0.0088 and 0.0077 compared to placebo, respectively). The calculated PrEP and PEP efficacy was 91.0% (95% CI = 32.2%-98.8%) and 100% (95% CI = undefined), respectively. INTERPRETATION: Inserts containing TAF/EVG provided high protection against vaginal SHIV infection when administered within a 4 h window before or after SHIV exposure. Our results support the clinical development of TAF/EVG inserts for on-demand PrEP and PEP in women. FUNDING: Funded by CDC intramural funds, an interagency agreement between CDC and USAID (USAID/CDC IAA AID-GH-T-15-00002), and by the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) under a Cooperative Agreement (AID-OAA-A-14-00010) with CONRAD/Eastern Virginia Medical School.

OBJECTIVES: To advance the initiative of ending the global epidemic, long-lasting HIV protection is needed through sustained release of antiretroviral drugs for months to years. We investigated in macaques the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polycaprolactone implants releasing tenofovir alafenamide for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). METHODS: Implants were administered subcutaneously in the arm using a contraceptive trocar. Efficacy against vaginal simian-HIV (SHIV) infection was investigated in six pigtailed macaques that received two tenofovir alafenamide implants (0.35 mg/day), one in each arm, for a total release rate of tenofovir alafenamide at 0.7 mg/day. Macaques were exposed to SHIV twice weekly for 6 weeks. Statistical analyses were used to compare outcome with eight untreated controls. Histological assessments were performed on skin biopsies collected near implantation sites. RESULTS: Median (range) tenofovir diphosphate level in PBMCs was 1519 (1068-1898) fmol/106 cells. All macaques with tenofovir alafenamide implants were protected against vaginal SHIV infection. In contrast, 7/8 controls were infected after a median of 4 SHIV exposures (P = 0.0047). Histological assessment of tissues near tenofovir alafenamide implant sites showed inflammation and necrosis in 5/6 animals, which were not evident by visual inspection. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated complete protection against vaginal SHIV infection with two implants releasing a total of 0.7 mg of tenofovir alafenamide per day. We also identified tenofovir diphosphate concentrations in PBMCs associated with complete vaginal protection. Consistent with previous findings, we observed adverse local toxicity and necrosis near the tenofovir alafenamide implant site. Improved tenofovir alafenamide implants that are safe and maintain high efficacy have the potential to provide long-lasting protection against vaginal HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a detailed pharmacokinetic assessment in macaques treated with vaginal gels formulated with HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) to better understand drug distribution and identify INSTI concentrations associated with previously demonstrated in vivo protection against vaginal simian HIV challenge. METHODS: Six macaques received vaginal gel containing 1% raltegravir (30 mg) once-weekly over 6 weeks. Following a washout period, five macaques received once-weekly gel containing 0.23% L-870,812 (7 mg). Drug concentrations were measured in plasma, mucosal fluids and vaginal tissues at baseline and 2, 5 and 24 h post-dosing. RESULTS: The median maximum concentration (Cmax) for raltegravir and L-870,812 in plasma was below the limit of quantification and 41.1 ng/mL, respectively. The Cmax in vaginal fluids (1441 and 1250 μg/mL) and tissues (266.7 and 368.4 μg/g) was achieved 2-5 h after dosing, respectively. A similar half-life was observed for raltegravir and L-870,812 in vaginal fluids (8-10 h) and remained 3-4 orders of magnitude above the protein-adjusted IC95 (0.016 and 0.106 μg/mL, respectively) at 24 h. Drug concentrations in vaginal fluids correlated well with those in vaginal tissues (Pearson r ≥ 0.788). Both drugs were consistently detected in rectal fluids 2 h after vaginal dosing, albeit at much lower levels (31-92-fold) than those in vaginal fluids. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first data on INSTI levels in vaginal tissues associated with in vivo protection and demonstrates rectal drug distribution of INSTIs after vaginal dosing. These findings may inform dose selection for topical products with INSTIs for HIV prevention.

Prevention of HIV infection and unintended pregnancies are public health priorities. In sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV prevalence is highest, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is widely used as contraception. Therefore, understanding potential interactions between DMPA and antiretrovirals is critical. Here, we use a macaque model to investigate the effect of DMPA on the pharmacology of the antiretroviral tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Female rhesus macaques received 30 mg of DMPA (n=9) or were untreated (n=9). Macaques received a human equivalent dose of TAF (1.5 mg/kg) orally by gavage. Tenofovir (TFV) and TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) were measured in blood, secretions, and tissues over 72 hours. The median area under the curve (AUC(0-72h)) values for TFV-DP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were similar in DMPA-treated (6,991 fmol*h/10(6) cells) and untreated controls (5,256 fmol*h/10(6) cells) (P=0.174). Rectal tissue TFV-DP concentrations from DMPA+ animals [median: 20.23 fmol/mg of tissue (range: 4.94-107.95)] were higher than the DMPA-group [median: below the limit of quantification (BLOQ-11.92)], (P=0.019). TFV-DP was not detectable in vaginal tissue from either group. A high-dose DMPA treatment in macaques was associated with increased rectal TFV-DP levels, indicating a potential tissue-specific drug-drug interaction. The lack of detectable TFV-DP in the vaginal tissue warrants further investigation of PrEP efficacy with single-agent TAF products. DMPA did not affect systemic TAF metabolism, with similar PBMC TFV-DP in both groups, suggesting that DMPA use should not alter the antiviral activity of TAF.

We used a novel penile simian HIV (SHIV) transmission model to investigate if cabotegravir long-acting (CAB LA) prevents penile SHIV acquisition in macaques. Twenty-two macaques were exposed to SHIV via the foreskin and urethra once-weekly for 12 weeks. Of these, six received human-equivalent doses of CAB LA, six received oral FTC/TDF, and 10 were untreated. The efficacy of CAB LA was high (94.4% [95%CI=58.2%-99.3%]) and similar to that seen with oral FTC/TDF (94.0% [95%CI=55.1%-99.2%]). The high efficacy of CAB LA in the penile transmission model supports extending the clinical advancement of CAB LA PrEP to heterosexual men.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimens are being evaluated for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We used a macaque model of repeated exposures to SHIV to investigate if TAF alone or the combination of TAF and emtricitabine (FTC) can prevent vaginal infection. METHODS: Pigtail macaques were exposed vaginally to SHIV162p3 once a week for up to 15 weeks. Animals received clinical doses of FTC/TAF (n=6) or TAF (n=9) orally 24h before and 2h after each weekly virus exposure. Infection was compared with 21 untreated controls. RESULTS: Five of the 6 animals in the FTC/TAF and 4 of the 9 animals in the TAF alone group were protected against infection (p=0.001 and p=0.049, respectively). The calculated efficacy of FTC/TAF and TAF was 91% (95% CI=[34.9%, 98.8%]) and 57.8% [-8.7%, 83.6%]), respectively. Infection in FTC/TAF but not TAF-treated macaques was delayed relative to controls (p=0.005 and p=0.114). Median tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels in PBMCs were similar among infected and uninfected macaques receiving TAF PrEP (351 and 143 fmols/106 cells, respectively; p=0.921). CONCLUSIONS: FTC/TAF provided a level of protection against vaginal challenge similar to FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate combination in the macaque model. Our results support the clinical evaluation of FTC/TAF for PrEP in women.

The ferret transmission model is extensively used to assess the pandemic potential of emerging influenza viruses, yet experimental conditions and reported results vary among laboratories. Such variation can be a critical consideration when contextualizing results from independent risk-assessment studies of novel and emerging influenza viruses. To streamline interpretation of data generated in different laboratories, we provide a consensus on experimental parameters that define risk-assessment experiments of influenza virus transmissibility, including disclosure of variables known or suspected to contribute to experimental variability in this model, and advocate adoption of more standardized practices. We also discuss current limitations of the ferret transmission model and highlight continued refinements and advances to this model ongoing in laboratories. Understanding, disclosing, and standardizing the critical parameters of ferret transmission studies will improve the comparability and reproducibility of pandemic influenza risk assessment and increase the statistical power and, perhaps, accuracy of this model.

INTRODUCTION: While influenza A and B viruses can be transmitted via respiratory droplets, the importance of small droplet nuclei "aerosols" in transmission is controversial. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In Hong Kong and Bangkok, in 2008-11, subjects were recruited from outpatient clinics if they had recent onset of acute respiratory illness and none of their household contacts were ill. Following a positive rapid influenza diagnostic test result, subjects were randomly allocated to one of three household-based interventions: hand hygiene, hand hygiene plus face masks, and a control group. Index cases plus their household contacts were followed for 7-10 days to identify secondary infections by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing of respiratory specimens. Index cases with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza B were included in the present analyses. We used a mathematical model to make inferences on the modes of transmission, facilitated by apparent differences in clinical presentation of secondary infections resulting from aerosol transmission. We estimated that approximately 37% and 26% of influenza B virus transmission was via the aerosol mode in households in Hong Kong and Bangkok, respectively. In the fitted model, influenza B virus infections were associated with a 56%-72% risk of fever plus cough if infected via aerosol route, and a 23%-31% risk of fever plus cough if infected via the other two modes of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosol transmission may be an important mode of spread of influenza B virus. The point estimates of aerosol transmission were slightly lower for influenza B virus compared to previously published estimates for influenza A virus in both Hong Kong and Bangkok. Caution should be taken in interpreting these findings because of the multiple assumptions inherent in the model, including that there is limited biological evidence to date supporting a difference in the clinical features of influenza B virus infection by different modes.

Evaluation of: Nishiura H, Yen H-L, Cowling BJ. Sample size considerations for one-to-one animal transmission studies of the influenza A viruses. PLoS ONE 8(1), e55358 (2013). There is an urgent need to model in a laboratory setting the capacity of wild-type influenza viruses to transmit between mammals, to determine the molecular determinants and identify biological properties that confer influenza virus transmissibility, and to explore both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical methods to inhibit virus transmission. Owing to its close physiologic match to humans, researchers typically utilize the ferret to measure influenza virus transmissibility. Nishiura et al. highlight the dilemma facing researchers utilizing the ferret transmission model: how to provide high-quality data to guide public health efforts, while ensuring the ethical use of animals in limited-size, individual, one-to-one transmission experiments. However, the responsible interpretation of data generated using this model can overcome this potential limitation. A closer examination of previously published studies utilizing this model as it is currently employed reveals that the 'sample size' of these studies is not always as small as it may appear.