Background Despite recent reports of false negative results among histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) based-malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) caused by pfhrp2/3 gene deletions in different countries, there is paucity of data in Tanzania.Methods This study assessed the status of pfhrp2/3 deletions in 7,543 blood samples using laboratory multiplex antigen detection (Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase - pLDH, aldolase, and HRP2). Samples showing mRDT false negativity or aberrant relationship of HRP2 to pan-Plasmodium antigens were genotyped for pfhrp2/3genes.Results Of all samples, 2,417 (32.0%) were positive for any Plasmodium antigens while 5,126 (68.0%) were negative. About 99.8% (n=2,411) of antigen positive samples had HRP2, but 6 (0.2%) had only pLDH and/or pAldolase. Thirteen samples had atypical relationships between pan-Plasmodium antigens and HRP2, but were positive by PCR. An additional 16 samples with negative HRP2 mRDTs but positive by microscopy were also chosen; all giving 35 samples genotyped for pfhrp2/3. Of 35 samples, 4 (11.4%) failed to consistently amplify positive control genes (pfmsp1 and pfmsp2), and pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes were successfully amplified in 31 (88.6%) samples.Conclusions Lack of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes deletions in Plasmodium falciparum parasites supports continued use of HRP2-based mRDTs for routine malaria diagnosis in Tanzania.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe field component of this study was supported by The Global Fund through National Malaria Control Programme of the Tanzanian Ministry of Health. The CDC laboratory work was supported by Malaria Branch and Catherine Bakari’s MSc studies was funded by the Developing Excellence in Leadership and Genomics for Malaria Elimination (DELGEME) project with funding from the Developing Excellence in Leadership and Training (DELTAS) Africa Initiative, of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

BACKGROUND: Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are effective and widely used for the detection of wild-type Plasmodium falciparum infections. Although recent studies have reported false negative HRP2 RDT results due to pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions in different countries, there is a paucity of data on the deletions of these genes in Tanzania. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between July and November 2017 in four regions: Geita, Kigoma, Mtwara and Ruvuma. All participants had microscopy and RDT performed in the field and provided a blood sample for laboratory multiplex antigen detection (for Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase, aldolase, and P. falciparum HRP2). Samples showing RDT false negativity or aberrant relationship of HRP2 to pan-Plasmodium antigens were genotyped to detect the presence/absence of pfhrp2/3 genes. RESULTS: Of all samples screened by the multiplex antigen assay (n = 7543), 2417 (32.0%) were positive for any Plasmodium antigens while 5126 (68.0%) were negative for all antigens. The vast majority of the antigen positive samples contained HRP2 (2411, 99.8%), but 6 (0.2%) had only pLDH and/or aldolase without HRP2. Overall, 13 samples had an atypical relationship between a pan-Plasmodium antigen and HRP2, but were positive by PCR. An additional 16 samples with negative HRP2 RDT results but P. falciparum positive by microscopy were also chosen for pfhrp2/3 genotyping. The summation of false negative RDT results and laboratory antigen results provided 35 total samples with confirmed P. falciparum DNA for pfhrp2/3 genotyping. Of the 35 samples, 4 (11.4%) failed to consistently amplify positive control genes; pfmsp1 and pfmsp2 and were excluded from the analysis. The pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes were successfully amplified in the remaining 31 (88.6%) samples, confirming an absence of deletions in these genes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that P. falciparum parasites in the study area have no deletions of both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes. Although single gene deletions could have been missed by the multiplex antigen assay, the findings support the continued use of HRP2-based RDTs in Tanzania for routine malaria diagnosis. There is a need for the surveillance to monitor the status of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 deletions in the future.