Objectives This report describes the development and operations of the 2016 National Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services Survey for Office-based Physicians (National CLAS Physician Survey). The survey was developed to understand awareness, adoption, and implementation of the National CLAS Standards in health and health care among office-based physicians. Methods Survey development included a literature review of survey and assessment instruments that evaluated cultural and linguistic appropriateness in health care. Survey questions were pretested during a cognitive interview study of 20 office-based physicians in the District of Columbia metropolitan area. The cognitive interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. The final survey was administered via web, mail, and computer-assisted telephone interview to 2, 400 sampled physicians between August 2016 and December 2016. A nonresponse bias assessment was conducted. Results The literature review identified five survey and assessment instruments. Collectively, survey content included: cultural competency training, cultural awareness, and adoption of the National CLAS Standards. Cognitive interviews showed respondent difficulty in question interpretation and survey completion of some items. Survey revisions addressed these issues. The final overall weighted survey response rate was 33.8%. Final weights produced a lower standardized bias than base weights. Conclusions The National CLAS Physician Survey is the first nationally representative survey to describe the use and implementation of culturally and linguistically appropriate services by office-based physicians. Data can serve as a baseline for future studies and as a benchmark for meeting the key objectives of the National CLAS Standards. © 2025, null. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVES: Adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs; >/=2 chronic conditions) account for a substantial number of visits to health care providers. The complexity of a patient's care, including the number of chronic conditions, may differ by physician specialty. The objectives of this study were to (1) examine differences in physician office visits among adults with MCCs by physician specialty and (2) identify the types of MCC dyads (combinations of 2 chronic conditions) most common among visits to office-based physicians. METHODS: We used data from the 2014-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (unweighted analytic sample, n = 61 682), a nationally representative survey of physician office-based ambulatory visits, to examine differences in physician office visits among adults with MCCs by physician specialty. We also identified the most commonly observed MCC dyads among these visits. RESULTS: During 2014-2015, 40.0% of physician office visits were made by adults with MCCs. Compared with visits for all specialties combined (40.0%), a significantly higher percentage of physician office visits among adults with MCCs were to specialists in cardiovascular disease (74.7%) and internal medicine (57.6%). For all physician specialties except psychiatry, the MCC dyads of hyperlipidemia and hypertension and diabetes and hypertension were among the most commonly observed MCC dyads among visits made by adults with MCCs. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of these findings may help specialists improve care for adults with MCCs. The recognition among physicians of common MCC dyads is relevant to the care management of persons with MCCs.