Last data update: Jan 27, 2025. (Total: 48650 publications since 2009)
Records 1-4 (of 4 Records) |
Query Trace: Munsey A[original query] |
---|
Antenatal care services in Benin and Tanzania 2021/2022: an equity analysis study
Ochieng W , Munsey A , Kinyina A , Assenga M , Onikpo F , Binazon A , Adeyemi M , Alao M , Aron S , Nhiga S , Niemczura J , Buekens J , Kitojo C , Reaves E , Husseini AS , Drake M , Wolf K , Suhowatsky S , Hounto A , Lemwayi R , Gutman J . BMJ Public Health 2024 2 (1) INTRODUCTION: Antenatal care (ANC) interventions improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, access to ANC may be inequitable due to sociocultural, monetary and time factors. Examining drivers of ANC disparities may identify those amenable to policy change. METHODS: We conducted an ANC services equity analysis in selected public facilities in Geita, Tanzania, where most services are free to the end-user, and Atlantique, Benin, where every visit incurs user fees. Data on total ANC contacts, quality of care (QoC) indicators and wait times were collected from representative household surveys in the catchment of 40 clinics per country and were analysed by education and wealth. We used indices of inequality, concentration indices and Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions to determine the distribution, direction and magnitude of inequalities and their contributing factors. We assessed out-of-pocket expenses and the benefit incidence of government funding. RESULTS: ANC clients in both countries received less than the recommended minimum ANC contacts: 3.41 (95% CI 3.36 to 3.41) in Atlantique and 3.33 (95% CI 3.27 to 3.39) in Geita. Wealthier individuals had more ANC contacts than poorer ones at every education level in both countries; the wealthiest and most educated had two visits more than the poorest, least educated. In Atlantique, ANC attendees receive similar QoC regardless of socioeconomic status. In Geita, there are wide disparities in QoC received by education or wealth. In Atlantique, out-of-pocket expenses for the lowest wealth quintile are 2.7% of annual income compared with 0.8% for the highest, with user fees being the primary expense. In Geita, the values are 3.1% and 0.5%, respectively; transportation is the main expense. CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in total ANC visits favouring wealthier, more educated individuals were apparent in both countries. In Atlantique, reduction of user-fees could improve ANC access. In Geita, training and equipping healthcare staff could improve QoC. Community health services could mitigate access barriers. |
Assessing the utility of pregnant women as a sentinel surveillance population for malaria in Geita, Tanzania, 2019 - 2021
Munsey A , Kinyina A , Assenga M , Almeida A , Kitojo C , Reaves E , Simeo J , Aron S , Chacky F , Nhiga SL , Drake M , Lemwayi R , Walker P , Gutman JR . Int J Infect Dis 2023 136 57-63 OBJECTIVES: Estimates of malaria burden and intervention uptake in Africa are primarily based on household surveys. However, their expense and infrequency limit their utility. We investigated whether data collected during antenatal care (ANC) can provide relevant information for decision-makers. METHODS: Malaria test positivity rates and questionnaire data from ANC attendees at 39 health facilities were compared to questionnaire data and positivity rates among children from two cross-sectional surveys in the facilities' corresponding catchment areas. RESULTS: Trends in parasitemia among ANC attendees were predictive of trends in parasitemia among children at the council level (mean absolute error 6.0%). Primigravid ANC attendees had the lowest rates of net ownership (modeled odds ratio, OR, 0.28, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.19 - 0.40) and use (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.79). ANC attendees reported higher levels of care seeking (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48 - 2.14), malaria testing (OR 4.16, 95% CI 3.44 - 5.04), and treatment for children with fever (OR 7.66, 95% CI 4.89 - 11.98) compared to women surveyed in households, raising concerns about social desirability bias disproportionately impacting ANC surveys. CONCLUSION: ANC surveillance is an effective strategy for tracking trends in malaria burden. More work is required to elucidate the value in administering questionnaires to ANC attendees. |
Using antenatal care as a platform for malaria surveillance data collection: study protocol
Gutman JR , Mwesigwa JN , Arnett K , Kangale C , Aaron S , Babarinde D , Buekens J , Candrinho B , Debe S , Digre P , Drake M , Gansané A , Gogue C , Griffith KS , Hicks J , Kinda R , Koenker H , Lemwayi R , Munsey A , Obi E , Ogouyèmi-Hounto A , Okoko OO , Onikpo F , Onoja A , Porter T , Savaio B , Tynuv K , Uhomoibhi P , Wagman J , Wolf K , Zulliger R , Walker P , Miller JM , Robertson M . Malar J 2023 22 (1) 99 BACKGROUND: While many malaria-endemic countries have health management information systems that can measure and report malaria trends in a timely manner, these routine systems have limitations. Periodic community cross-sectional household surveys are used to estimate malaria prevalence and intervention coverage but lack geographic granularity and are resource intensive. Incorporating malaria testing for all women at their first antenatal care (ANC) visit (i.e., ANC1) could provide a more timely and granular source of data for monitoring trends in malaria burden and intervention coverage. This article describes a protocol designed to assess if ANC-based surveillance could be a pragmatic tool to monitor malaria. METHODS: This is an observational, cross-sectional study conducted in Benin, Burkina Faso, Mozambique, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Zambia. Pregnant women attending ANC1 in selected health facilities will be tested for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test and administered a brief questionnaire to capture key indicators of malaria control intervention coverage and care-seeking behaviour. In each location, contemporaneous cross-sectional household surveys will be leveraged to assess correlations between estimates obtained using each method, and the use of ANC data as a tool to track trends in malaria burden and intervention coverage will be validated. RESULTS: This study will assess malaria prevalence at ANC1 aggregated at health facility and district levels, and by gravidity relative to current pregnancy (i.e., gravida 1, gravida 2, and gravida 3 +). ANC1 malaria prevalence will be presented as monthly trends. Additionally, correlation between ANC1 and household survey-derived estimates of malaria prevalence, bed net ownership and use, and care-seeking will be assessed. CONCLUSION: ANC1-based surveillance has the potential to provide a cost-effective, localized measure of malaria prevalence that is representative of the general population and useful for tracking monthly changes in parasite prevalence, as well as providing population-representative estimates of intervention coverage and care-seeking behavior. This study will evaluate the representativeness of these measures and collect information on operational feasibility, usefulness for programmatic decision-making, and potential for scale-up of malaria ANC1 surveillance. |
Epidemiologic features of the monkeypox outbreak and the public health response - United States, May 17-October 6, 2022
Kava CM , Rohraff DM , Wallace B , Mendoza-Alonzo JL , Currie DW , Munsey AE , Roth NM , Bryant-Genevier J , Kennedy JL , Weller DL , Christie A , McQuiston JH , Hicks P , Strid P , Sims E , Negron ME , Iqbal K , Ellington S , Smith DK . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 71 (45) 1449-1456 On May 17, 2022, the Massachusetts Department of Health announced the first suspected case of monkeypox associated with the global outbreak in a U.S. resident. On May 23, 2022, CDC launched an emergency response (1,2). CDC's emergency response focused on surveillance, laboratory testing, medical countermeasures, and education. Medical countermeasures included rollout of a national JYNNEOS vaccination strategy, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issuance of an emergency use authorization to allow for intradermal administration of JYNNEOS, and use of tecovirimat for patients with, or at risk for, severe monkeypox. During May 17-October 6, 2022, a total of 26,384 probable and confirmed* U.S. monkeypox cases were reported to CDC. Daily case counts peaked during mid-to-late August. Among 25,001 of 25,569 (98%) cases in adults with information on gender identity,(†) 23,683 (95%) occurred in cisgender men. Among 13,997 cisgender men with information on recent sexual or close intimate contact,(§) 10,440 (75%) reported male-to-male sexual contact (MMSC) ≤21 days preceding symptom onset. Among 21,211 (80%) cases in persons with information on race and ethnicity,(¶) 6,879 (32%), 6,628 (31%), and 6,330 (30%) occurred in non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black), Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic), and non-Hispanic White (White) persons, respectively. Among 5,017 (20%) cases in adults with information on HIV infection status, 2,876 (57%) had HIV infection. Prevention efforts, including vaccination, should be prioritized among persons at highest risk within groups most affected by the monkeypox outbreak, including gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM); transgender, nonbinary, and gender-diverse persons; racial and ethnic minority groups; and persons who are immunocompromised, including persons with advanced HIV infection or newly diagnosed HIV infection. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Jan 27, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure