Little cigars are similar to cigarettes, with respect to dimensions, filters, and overall appearance. Some smokers also use little cigars as substitutes for cigarettes. Comparison of little cigars with cigarettes is relevant to understanding their respective public health impact. To understand their relative toxicities, mainstream smoke yields of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), a human carcinogen, were measured for 60 commercial little cigars. The little cigars were smoked on a linear smoking machine using the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) nonintense and Canadian Intense (CI) smoking regimens followed by analysis with a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. The average analytical quantitative variability of the measured little cigar constituents was lower compared to previously tested commercial cigarettes (%RSD 9.6 vs 14.5, respectively). B[a]P yields ranged from 14.5-44.0 ng/cigar (ISO) and 24.0-65.7 ng/cigar (CI). The mean ISO yield is 25.5 ng/cigar versus the CI yield of 42.2 ng/cigar, which are 2.5- and 2-fold greater, respectively, than the corresponding mean cigarette yields. When normalized to tobacco weight, B[a]P yields of the little cigars are 1.5- (ISO) and 1.3- (CI) fold greater than cigarette yields. B[a]P smoke yields are known to correlate with tobacco weight. The little cigar B[a]P yield correlations to tobacco weight (CI R(2) = 0.35; ISO R(2) = 0.24) are similar to cigarette yield correlations (CI R(2) = 0.31; ISO R(2) = 0.21). Other physical properties (i.e., filter length, filter ventilation, and packing density) that may impact B[a]P smoke yields for the little cigars had very weak correlations. Except for cigarette packing density, cigars and cigarettes have similar correlations between B[a]P yields and physical design parameters. In summary, the little cigars, although physically similar to cigarettes, differ in smoke chemistry by generating higher B[a]P yields, even when normalized to tobacco weight.

One expectation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) is participant access to study results. However, reporting experimental data produced by studies involving biological measurements in the absence of clinical relevance can be challenging to scientists and participants. We applied best practices in data sharing to report the results of a study designed to explore polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons absorption, metabolism, and excretion following consumption of traditionally smoked salmon by members of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR). A dietary exposure study was developed, in which nine Tribal members consumed 50 g of traditionally smoked salmon and provided repeated urine samples over 24 hours. During recruitment, participants requested access to their data following analysis. Disclosing data is an important element of CBPR and must be treated with the same rigor as that given to the data analysis. The field of data disclosure is relatively new, but when handled correctly can improve education within the community, reduce distrust, and enhance environmental health literacy. Using the results from this study, we suggest mechanisms for sharing data with a Tribal community.