Last data update: Nov 11, 2024. (Total: 48109 publications since 2009)
Records 1-5 (of 5 Records) |
Query Trace: Morrissey KG[original query] |
---|
Reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among household contacts with recent vaccination and past COVID-19 infection: Results from two multi-site case-ascertained household transmission studies
Rolfes MA , Talbot HK , Morrissey KG , Stockwell MS , Maldonado Y , McLean HQ , Lutrick K , Bowman NM , Rao S , Izurieta HS , Zhu Y , Chappell J , Battan-Wraith S , Merrill LS , McClaren S , Sano E , Petrie JG , Biddle J , Johnson S , Salvatore P , Smith-Jeffcoat SE , Asturias EJ , Lin JT , Ellingson KD , Belongia EA , Olivo V , Mellis AM , Grijalva CG . Am J Epidemiol 2024 Households are a primary setting for transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We examined the role of prior SARS-CoV-2 immunity on the risk of infection in household close contacts. Households in the United States with an individual who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during September 2021-May 2023 were enrolled if the index case's illness began ≤6 days prior. Household members had daily self-collected nasal swabs tested by RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. The effects of prior SARS-CoV-2 immunity (vaccination, prior infection, or hybrid immunity) on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among household contacts were assessed by robust, clustered multivariable Poisson regression. Of 1,532 contacts (905 households), 8% had immunity from prior infection alone, 51% from vaccination alone, 29% hybrid immunity, and 11% had no prior immunity. Sixty percent of contacts tested SARS-CoV-2-positive during follow-up. The adjusted risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was lowest among contacts with vaccination and prior infection (aRR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.93, compared with contacts with no prior immunity) and was lowest when the last immunizing event occurred ≤6 months before COVID-19 affected the household (aRR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.83). In high-transmission settings like households, immunity from COVID-19 vaccination and prior infection was synergistic in protecting household contacts from SARS-CoV-2 infection. |
Symptoms, viral loads, and rebound among COVID-19 outpatients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared to propensity score matched untreated individuals
Smith-Jeffcoat SE , Biddle JE , Talbot HK , Morrissey KG , Stockwell MS , Maldonado Y , McLean HQ , Ellingson KD , Bowman NM , Asturias E , Mellis AM , Johnson S , Kirking HL , Rolfes MAR , Olivo V , Merrill L , Battan-Wraith S , Sano E , McLaren SH , Vargas CY , Goodman S , Sarnquist CC , Govindaranjan P , Petrie JG , Belongia EA , Ledezma K , Pryor K , Lutrick K , Bullock A , Yang A , Haehnel Q , Rao S , Zhu Y , Schmitz J , Hart K , Grijalva CG , Salvatore PP . Clin Infect Dis 2024 78 (5) 1175-1184 BACKGROUND: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/R) reduces severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, rebound after treatment has been reported. We compared symptom and viral dynamics in individuals with COVID-19 who completed N/R treatment and similar untreated individuals. METHODS: We identified symptomatic participants who tested severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-positive and were N/R eligible from a COVID-19 household transmission study. Index cases from ambulatory settings and their households contacts were enrolled. We collected daily symptoms, medication use, and respiratory specimens for quantitative polymerase chain reaction for 10 days during March 2022-May 2023. Participants who completed N/R treatment (treated) were propensity score matched to untreated participants. We compared symptom rebound, viral load (VL) rebound, average daily symptoms, and average daily VL by treatment status measured after N/R treatment completion or 7 days after symptom onset if untreated. RESULTS: Treated (n = 130) and untreated participants (n = 241) had similar baseline characteristics. After treatment completion, treated participants had greater occurrence of symptom rebound (32% vs 20%; P = .009) and VL rebound (27% vs 7%; P < .001). Average daily symptoms were lower among treated participants without symptom rebound (1.0 vs 1.6; P < .01) but not statistically lower with symptom rebound (3.0 vs 3.4; P = .5). Treated participants had lower average daily VLs without VL rebound (0.9 vs 2.6; P < .01) but not statistically lower with VL rebound (4.8 vs 5.1; P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who completed N/R treatment experienced fewer symptoms and lower VL but rebound occured more often compared with untreated individuals. Providers should prescribe N/R, when indicated, and communicate rebound risk to patients. |
Changes in Transmission and Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 in United States Households, April 2020-September 2022 (preprint)
Mellis AM , Lauring AS , Talbot HK , McLean HQ , Morrissey KG , Stockwell MS , Bowman NM , Maldonado Y , Ellingson KD , Rao S , Biddle JE , Johnson S , Ogokeh C , Salvatore PP , Reed C , Smith-Jeffcoat SE , Meece JK , Hanson KE , Belongia EA , Bendall EE , Gilbert J , Olivo V , Merrill LS , McLaren SH , Sano E , Vargas CY , Saiman L , Silverio Francisco RA , Bullock A , Lin J , Govindarajan P , Goodman SH , Sarnquist CC , Lutrick K , Ledezma KI , Ramadan FA , Pryor K , Miiro FN , Asturias E , Dominguez S , Olson D , Izurieta HS , Chappell J , Lindsell C , Halasa N , Hart K , Zhu Y , Schmitz J , Rolfes MA , Grijalva CG . medRxiv 2023 19 Background: The natural history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission dynamics may have changed as SARS-CoV-2 has evolved and population immunity has shifted. Method(s): Household contacts, enrolled from two multi-site case-ascertained household transmission studies (April 2020-April 2021 and September 2021-September 2022), were followed for 10-14 days after enrollment with daily collection of nasal swabs and/or saliva for SARS-CoV-2 testing and symptom diaries. SARS-CoV-2 virus lineage was determined by whole genome sequencing, with multiple imputation where sequences could not be recovered. Adjusted infection risks were estimated using modified Poisson regression. Finding(s): 858 primary cases with 1473 household contacts were examined. Among unvaccinated household contacts, the infection risk adjusted for presence of prior infection and age was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49-68%) in households currently exposed to pre-Delta lineages and 90% (95% CI: 74-100%) among those exposed to Omicron BA.5 (detected May - September 2022). The fraction of infected household contacts reporting any symptom was similarly high between pre-Delta (86%, 95% CI: 81-91%) and Omicron lineages (77%, 70-85%). Among Omicron BA.5-infected contacts, 48% (41-56%) reported fever, 63% (56-71%) cough, 22% (17-28%) shortness of breath, and 20% (15-27%) loss of/change in taste/smell. Interpretation(s): The risk of infection among household contacts exposed to SARS-CoV-2 is high and increasing with more recent SARS-CoV-2 lineages. This high infection risk highlights the importance of vaccination to prevent severe disease. Funding(s): Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
Patient navigation for colonoscopy completion: Results of an RCT
DeGroff A , Schroy PC 3rd , Morrissey KG , Slotman B , Rohan EA , Bethel J , Murillo J , Ren W , Niwa S , Leadbetter S , Joseph D . Am J Prev Med 2017 53 (3) 363-372 INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in the U.S. Although screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, screening rates among U.S. adults remain less than optimal, especially among disadvantaged populations. This study examined the efficacy of patient navigation to increase colonoscopy screening. STUDY DESIGN: RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 843 low-income adults, primarily Hispanic and non-Hispanic blacks, aged 50-75 years referred for colonoscopy at Boston Medical Center were randomized into the intervention (n=429) or control (n=427) groups. Participants were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2014, with analysis following through 2015. INTERVENTION: Two bilingual lay navigators provided individualized education and support to reduce patient barriers and facilitate colonoscopy completion. The intervention was delivered largely by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Colonoscopy completion within 6 months of study enrollment. RESULTS: Colonoscopy completion was significantly higher for navigated patients (61.1%) than control group patients receiving usual care (53.2%, p=0.021). Based on regression analysis, the odds of completing a colonoscopy for navigated patients was one and a half times greater than for controls (95% CI=1.12, 2.03, p=0.007). There were no differences between navigated and control groups in regard to adequacy of bowel preparation (95.3% vs 97.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Navigation significantly improved colonoscopy screening completion among a racially diverse, low-income population. Results contribute to mounting evidence demonstrating the efficacy of patient navigation in increasing colorectal cancer screening. Screening can be further enhanced when navigation is combined with other evidence-based practices implemented in healthcare systems and the community. |
Refining the patient navigation role in a colorectal cancer screening program: results from an intervention study
Rohan EA , Slotman B , DeGroff A , Morrissey KG , Murillo J , Schroy P . J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016 14 (11) 1371-1378 BACKGROUND: Oncology patient navigators help individuals overcome barriers to increase access to cancer screening, diagnosis, and timely treatment. This study, part of a randomized intervention trial investigating the efficacy of patient navigation in increasing colonoscopy completion, examined navigators' activities to ameliorate barriers to colonoscopy screening in a medically disadvantaged population. METHODS: This study was conducted from 2012 through 2014 at Boston Medical Center. We analyzed navigator service delivery and survey data collected on 420 participants who were navigated for colonoscopy screening after randomization to this intervention. Key variables under investigation included barriers to colonoscopy, activities navigators undertook to reduce barriers, time navigators spent on each activity and per contact, and patient satisfaction with navigation services. Descriptive analysis assessed how navigators spent their time and examined what aspects of patient navigation were most valued by patients. RESULTS: Navigators spent the most time assessing patient barriers/needs; facilitating appointment scheduling; reminding patients of appointments; educating patients about colorectal cancer, the importance of screening, and the colonoscopy preparation and procedures; and arranging transportation. Navigators spent an average of 44 minutes per patient. Patients valued the navigators, especially for providing emotional/peer support and explaining screening procedures and bowel preparation clearly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings help clarify the role of the navigator in colonoscopy screening within a medically disadvantaged community. These findings may help further refine the navigator role in cancer screening and treatment programs as facilities strive to effectively and efficiently integrate navigation into their services. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Nov 11, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure