Last data update: Aug 15, 2025. (Total: 49733 publications since 2009)
| Records 1-1 (of 1 Records) |
| Query Trace: Meza BP[original query] |
|---|
| Knowledge and barriers related to reporting of acute transfusion reactions among healthcare workers in Namibia
Basavaraju SV , Lohrke B , Pitman JP , Pathak SR , Meza BP , Shiraishi RW , Wilkinson R , Bock N , Mataranyika M , Lowrance DW . Transfus Med 2013 23 (5) 367-9 In sub-Saharan Africa, only South Africa has had a long-standing national haemovigilance system to monitor acute transfusion reactions (ATR) (Nel and Heyns, 2000). To improve monitoring, recognition and reporting of ATR more countries in the region have implemented or are considering national haemovigilance systems (Dahourou et al., 2012). In Namibia, The Blood Transfusion Service of Namibia (NAMBTS) is the only organisation authorised to collect, process and distribute blood and blood components for transfusion. Since 2006, NAMBTS has invested heavily in the development of guidelines and training for doctors and nurses in the appropriate clinical use of blood. Coupled with this focus on appropriate use, in 2008 NAMBTS launched a national haemovigilance system with a standardised reporting tool backed by clinical and laboratory investigations of all reported ATR. Under this system, healthcare workers (HCW) in Namibia who order or perform transfusions (primarily physicians and nurses) are responsible for voluntary reporting of ATR to NAMBTS by phone or via a paper-based system. Reportable ATR include allergic, acute haemolytic, febrile non-haemolytic reactions, sepsis due to bacterial contamination of the donor unit, transfusion-associated acute lung injury, transfusion-associated circulatory overload and transfusion-associated dyspnoea. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Aug 15, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure


