Last data update: Jan 27, 2025. (Total: 48650 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 75 Records) |
Query Trace: Messenger S[original query] |
---|
An influenza mRNA vaccine protects ferrets from lethal infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus
Hatta M , Hatta Y , Choi A , Hossain J , Feng C , Keller MW , Ritter JM , Huang Y , Fang E , Pusch EA , Rowe T , De La Cruz JA , Johnson MC , Liddell J , Jiang N , Stadlbauer D , Liu L , Bhattacharjee AK , Rouse JR , Currier M , Wang L , Levine MZ , Kirby MK , Steel J , Di H , Barnes JR , Henry C , Davis CT , Nachbagauer R , Wentworth DE , Zhou B . Sci Transl Med 2024 16 (778) eads1273 ![]() The global spread of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) virus poses a serious pandemic threat, necessitating the swift development of effective vaccines. The success of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology in the COVID-19 pandemic, marked by its rapid development and scalability, demonstrates its potential for addressing other infectious threats, such as HPAI A(H5N1). We therefore evaluated mRNA vaccine candidates targeting panzootic influenza A(H5) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses, which have been shown to infect a range of mammalian species, including most recently being detected in dairy cattle. Ferrets were immunized with mRNA vaccines encoding either hemagglutinin alone or hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, derived from a 2.3.4.4b prototype vaccine virus recommended by the World Health Organization. Kinetics of the immune responses, as well as protection against a lethal challenge dose of A(H5N1) virus, were assessed. Two doses of mRNA vaccination elicited robust neutralizing antibody titers against a 2022 avian isolate and a 2024 human isolate. Further, mRNA vaccination conferred protection from lethal challenge, whereas all unvaccinated ferrets succumbed to infection. It also reduced viral titers in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of infected ferrets. These results underscore the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against HPAI A(H5N1), showcasing their potential as a vaccine platform for future influenza pandemics. |
Safety of simultaneous vs sequential mRNA COVID-19 and inactivated influenza vaccines: A randomized clinical trial
Walter EB , Schlaudecker EP , Talaat KR , Rountree W , Broder KR , Duffy J , Grohskopf LA , Poniewierski MS , Spreng RL , Staat MA , Tekalign R , Museru O , Goel A , Davis GN , Schmader KE . JAMA Netw Open 2024 7 (11) e2443166 IMPORTANCE: Limited randomized clinical trial data exist on the safety of simultaneous administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reactogenicity, safety, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after simultaneous vs sequential receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted between October 8, 2021, and June 14, 2023, at 3 US sites. Participants were nonpregnant persons aged 5 years or older with the intention of receiving both influenza and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. INTERVENTIONS: Intramuscular administration in opposite arms of either IIV4 or saline placebo simultaneously with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at visit 1. Those who received placebo at visit 1 received IIV4 and those who received IIV4 at visit 1 received placebo 1 to 2 weeks later at visit 2. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary composite reactogenicity outcome was the proportion of participants with fever, chills, myalgia, and/or arthralgia of moderate or greater severity within 7 days after vaccination visits 1 and/or 2, using a 10% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes were solicited reactogenicity events and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) for 7 days after each visit separately and HRQOL after visit 1, assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index. Serious AEs (SAEs) and AEs of special interest (AESIs) were assessed for 121 days. Outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 335 persons (mean [SD] age, 33.4 [15.1] years) were randomized (169 to the simultaneous group and 166 to the sequential group); 211 (63.0%) were female, and 255 (76.1%) received bivalent BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The proportion with the primary composite reactogenicity outcome in the simultaneous group (25.6% [n = 43]) was noninferior to the proportion in the sequential group (31.3% [n = 52]) (site-adjusted difference, -5.6 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -15.2 to 4.0 pp). Respective proportions in each group were similar after each visit separately (visit 1, 40 [23.8%] vs 47 [28.3%]; visit 2, 5 [3.0%] vs 9 [5.4%]). No significant group differences in participants with AEs (21 [12.4%] vs 16 [9.6%]), SAEs (1 [0.6%] vs 1 [0.6%]), and AESIs (19 [11.2%] vs 9 [5.4%]) were observed in the simultaneous vs sequential groups, respectively. Among participants with severe reactogenicity, the mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L Index score decreased from 0.92 (0.08) to 0.92 (0.09) prevaccination to 0.81 (0.09) to 0.82 (0.12) postvaccination. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial assessing simultaneous vs sequential administration of mRNA COVID-19 and IIV4 vaccines, reactogenicity was comparable in both groups. These findings support the option of simultaneous administration of these vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05028361. |
Notes from the field: First locally acquired Dengue virus infections - Pasadena, California, October-December 2023
Feaster M , Patrick R , Oshiro M , Kuan M , Goh YY , Carmona M , Tartof SY , Farned J , Hallum T , Lund AJ , Preas C , Messenger S , Kramer V , Danforth M , Sheridan C . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024 73 (42) 955-956 |
Human Orthohantavirus disease prevalence and genotype distribution in the U.S., 2008–2020: a retrospective observational study
Whitmer SLM , Whitesell A , Mobley M , Talundzic E , Shedroff E , Cossaboom CM , Messenger S , Deldari M , Bhatnagar J , Estetter L , Zufan S , Cannon D , Chiang CF , Gibbons A , Krapiunaya I , Morales-Betoulle M , Choi M , Knust B , Amman B , Montgomery JM , Shoemaker T , Klena JD . Lancet Reg Health - Am 2024 37 ![]() ![]() Background: In the United States (U.S.), hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) and non-HPS hantavirus infection are nationally notifiable diseases. Criteria for identifying human cases are based on clinical symptoms (HPS or non-HPS) and acute diagnostic results (IgM+, rising IgG+ titers, RT-PCR+, or immunohistochemistry (IHC)+). Here we provide an overview of diagnostic testing and summarize human Hantavirus disease occurrence and genotype distribution in the U.S. from 2008 to 2020. Methods: Epidemiological data from the national hantavirus registry was merged with laboratory diagnostic testing results performed at the CDC. Residual hantavirus-positive specimens were sequenced, and the available epidemiological and genetic data sets were linked to conduct a genomic epidemiological study of hantavirus disease in the U.S. Findings: From 1993 to 2020, 833 human hantavirus cases have been identified, and from 2008 to 2020, 335 human cases have occurred. Among New World (NW) hantavirus cases detected at the CDC diagnostic laboratory (representing 29.2% of total cases), most (85.0%) were detected during acute disease, however, some convalescent cases were detected in states not traditionally associated with hantavirus infections (Connecticut, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Vermont). From 1993 to 2020, 94.9% (745/785) of U.S. hantaviruses cases were detected west of the Mississippi with 45.7% (359/785) in the Four Corners region of the U.S. From 2008 to 2020, 67.7% of NW hantavirus cases were detected between the months of March and August. Sequencing of RT-PCR-positive cases demonstrates a geographic separation of Orthohantavirus sinnombreense species [Sin Nombre virus (SNV), New York virus, and Monongahela virus]; however, there is a large gap in viral sequence data from the Northwestern and Central U.S. Finally, these data indicate that commercial IgM assays are not concordant with CDC-developed assays, and that “concordant positive” (i.e., commercial IgM+ and CDC IgM+ results) specimens exhibit clinical characteristics of hantavirus disease. Interpretation: Hantaviral disease is broadly distributed in the contiguous U.S, viral variants are localised to specific geographic regions, and hantaviral disease infrequently detected in most Southeastern states. Discordant results between two diagnostic detection methods highlight the need for an improved standardised testing plan in the U.S. Hantavirus surveillance and detection will continue to improve with clearly defined, systematic reporting methods, as well as explicit guidelines for clinical characterization and diagnostic criteria. Funding: This work was funded by core funds provided to the Viral Special Pathogens Branch at CDC. © 2024 |
COVID-19 vaccination in the first trimester and major structural birth defects among live births
Kharbanda EO , DeSilva MB , Lipkind HS , Romitti PA , Zhu J , Vesco KK , Boyce TG , Daley MF , Fuller CC , Getahun D , Jackson LA , Williams JTB , Zerbo O , Weintraub ES , Vazquez-Benitez G . JAMA Pediatr 2024 IMPORTANCE: COVID-19 vaccination is recommended throughout pregnancy to prevent pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes associated with COVID-19 disease. To date, data on birth defects after first-trimester vaccination are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associated risks for selected major structural birth defects among live-born infants after first-trimester receipt of a messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with estimated last menstrual period (LMP) between September 13, 2020, and April 3, 2021, and ending in live birth from March 5, 2021, to January 25, 2022. Included were data from 8 health systems in California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Minnesota, and Wisconsin in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. EXPOSURES: Receipt of 1 or 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses in the first trimester, as part of the primary series. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Selected major structural birth defects among live-born infants, identified from electronic health data using validated algorithms, with neural tube defects confirmed via medical record review. RESULTS: Among 42 156 eligible pregnancies (mean [SD] maternal age, 30.9 [5.0] years) 7632 (18.1%) received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester. Of 34 524 pregnancies without a first-trimester COVID-19 vaccination, 2045 (5.9%) were vaccinated before pregnancy, 13 494 (39.1%) during the second or third trimester, and 18 985 (55.0%) were unvaccinated before or during pregnancy. Compared with pregnant people unvaccinated in the first trimester, those vaccinated in the first trimester were older (mean [SD] age, 32.3 [4.5] years vs 30.6 [5.1] years) and differed by LMP date. After applying stabilized inverse probability weighting, differences in baseline characteristics between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant persons in the first trimester were negligible (standardized mean difference <0.20). Selected major structural birth defects occurred in 113 infants (1.48%) after first-trimester mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and in 488 infants (1.41%) without first-trimester vaccine exposure; the adjusted prevalence ratio was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.78-1.33). In secondary analyses, with major structural birth defect outcomes grouped by organ system, no significant differences between infants vaccinated or unvaccinated in the first trimester were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this multisite cohort study, among live-born infants, first-trimester mRNA COVID-19 vaccine exposure was not associated with an increased risk for selected major structural birth defects. |
Obstetric complications and birth outcomes after antenatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination
Vesco KK , Denoble AE , Lipkind HS , Kharbanda EO , DeSilva MB , Daley MF , Getahun D , Zerbo O , Naleway AL , Jackson L , Williams JTB , Boyce TG , Fuller CC , Weintraub ES , Vazquez-Benitez G . Obstet Gynecol 2024 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between antenatal messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton pregnancies with live deliveries between June 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022, with data available from eight integrated health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Vaccine exposure was defined as receipt of one or two mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses (primary series) during pregnancy. Outcomes were preterm birth (PTB) before 37 weeks of gestation, small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia-eclampsia-HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome. Outcomes in individuals vaccinated were compared with those in propensity-matched individuals with unexposed pregnancies. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs were estimated for PTB and SGA using a time-dependent covariate Cox model, and adjusted relative risks (aRRs) were estimated for GDM, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia-eclampsia-HELLP syndrome using Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS: Among 55,591 individuals eligible for inclusion, 23,517 (42.3%) received one or two mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses during pregnancy. Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination varied by maternal age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, and history of COVID-19. Compared with no vaccination, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a decreased risk of PTB (rate: 6.4 [vaccinated] vs 7.7 [unvaccinated] per 100, aHR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94). Messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with SGA (8.3 vs 7.4 per 100; aHR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.99-1.13), GDM (11.9 vs 10.6 per 100; aRR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.90-1.10), gestational hypertension (10.8 vs 9.9 per 100; aRR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.96-1.22), or preeclampsia-eclampsia-HELLP syndrome (8.9 vs 8.4 per 100; aRR 1.10, 95% CI, 0.97-1.24). CONCLUSION: Receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes; this information will be helpful for patients and clinicians when considering COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. |
Effectiveness of the original monovalent coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in preventing emergency department or urgent care encounters and hospitalizations among adults with disabilities: VISION Network, June 2021-September 2022
Patel P , Schrader KE , Rice CE , Rowley E , Cree RA , DeSilva MB , Embi PJ , Gaglani M , Grannis SJ , Ong TC , Stenehjem E , Naleway AL , Ball S , Natarajan K , Klein NP , Adams K , Kharbanda A , Ray C , Link-Gelles R , Tenforde MW . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (11) ofad474 ![]() ![]() Adults with disabilities are at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Using data across 9 states during Delta- and Omicron-predominant periods (June 2021-September 2022), we evaluated the effectiveness of the original monovalent COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines among 521 206 emergency department/urgent care encounters (11 471 [2%] in patients with a documented disability) and 139 548 hospitalizations (16 569 [12%] in patients with a disability) for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 illness in adults (aged ≥18 years). Across variant periods and for the primary series or booster doses, vaccine effectiveness was similar in those with and those without a disability. These findings highlight the importance of adults with disabilities staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations. |
Effectiveness of a messenger RNA vaccine booster dose against coronavirus disease 2019 among US healthcare personnel, October 2021-July 2022
Plumb ID , Mohr NM , Hagen M , Wiegand R , Dumyati G , Harland KK , Krishnadasan A , Gist JJ , Abedi G , Fleming-Dutra KE , Chea N , Lee J , Barter D , Brackney M , Fridkin SK , Wilson LE , Lovett SA , Ocampo V , Phipps EC , Marcus TM , Smithline HA , Hou PC , Lee LC , Moran GJ , Krebs E , Steele MT , Lim SC , Schrading WA , Chinnock B , Beiser DG , Faine B , Haran JP , Nandi U , Chipman AK , LoVecchio F , Talan DA , Pilishvili T . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (10) ofad457 ![]() ![]() BACKGROUND: Protection against symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) can limit transmission and the risk of post-COVID conditions, and is particularly important among healthcare personnel. However, lower vaccine effectiveness (VE) has been reported since predominance of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant. METHODS: We evaluated the VE of a monovalent messenger RNA (mRNA) booster dose against COVID-19 from October 2021 to June 2022 among US healthcare personnel. After matching case-participants with COVID-19 to control-participants by 2-week period and site, we used conditional logistic regression to estimate the VE of a booster dose compared with completing only 2 mRNA doses >150 days previously, adjusted for multiple covariates. RESULTS: Among 3279 case-participants and 3998 control-participants who had completed 2 mRNA doses, we estimated that the VE of a booster dose against COVID-19 declined from 86% (95% confidence interval, 81%-90%) during Delta predominance to 65% (58%-70%) during Omicron predominance. During Omicron predominance, VE declined from 73% (95% confidence interval, 67%-79%) 14-60 days after the booster dose, to 32% (4%-52%) ≥120 days after a booster dose. We found that VE was similar by age group, presence of underlying health conditions, and pregnancy status on the test date, as well as among immunocompromised participants. CONCLUSIONS: A booster dose conferred substantial protection against COVID-19 among healthcare personnel. However, VE was lower during Omicron predominance, and waning effectiveness was observed 4 months after booster dose receipt during this period. Our findings support recommendations to stay up to date on recommended doses of COVID-19 vaccines for all those eligible. |
Mapping SARS-CoV-2 antigenic relationships and serological responses
Wilks SH , Mühlemann B , Shen X , Türeli S , LeGresley EB , Netzl A , Caniza MA , Chacaltana-Huarcaya JN , Corman VM , Daniell X , Datto MB , Dawood FS , Denny TN , Drosten C , Fouchier RAM , Garcia PJ , Halfmann PJ , Jassem A , Jeworowski LM , Jones TC , Kawaoka Y , Krammer F , McDanal C , Pajon R , Simon V , Stockwell MS , Tang H , van Bakel H , Veguilla V , Webby R , Montefiori DC , Smith DJ . Science 2023 382 (6666) eadj0070 ![]() During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, multiple variants escaping preexisting immunity emerged, causing reinfections of previously exposed individuals. Here, we used antigenic cartography to analyze patterns of cross-reactivity among 21 variants and 15 groups of human sera obtained after primary infection with 10 different variants or after messenger RNA (mRNA)-1273 or mRNA-1273.351 vaccination. We found antigenic differences among pre-Omicron variants caused by substitutions at spike-protein positions 417, 452, 484, and 501. Quantifying changes in response breadth over time and with additional vaccine doses, our results show the largest increase between 4 weeks and >3 months after a second dose. We found changes in immunodominance of different spike regions, depending on the variant an individual was first exposed to, with implications for variant risk assessment and vaccine-strain selection. |
Humoral immune response to messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination among children aged 5-11 years in a multisite prospective cohort study, September 2021-September 2022
Lyski ZL , Porter C , Uhrlaub JL , Ellingson KD , Jeddy Z , Gwynn L , Rivers P , Sprissler R , Hegmann KT , Coughlin M , Fowlkes A , Hollister J , LeClair L , Mak J , Beitel SC , Fuller S , Grant L , Newes-Adeyi G , Yoo YM , Olsho L , Burgess JL , Caban-Martinez A , Yoon S , Britton A , Gaglani M , Lutrick K . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (8) ofad431 ![]() BACKGROUND: The PROTECT study is a longitudinal cohort study initiated in July 2021 with weekly testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 4 states: Arizona, Florida, exas, and Utah. This study aims to examine vaccine-elicited antibody response against postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections. METHODS: Children aged 5-11 years had serum collected 14-59 days after their second dose of monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 messenger RNA vaccine. Vaccine-elicited antibodies were measured using the area under the curve (AUC) and end-point titer using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (receptor-binding domain [RBD] and S2) and surrogate neutralization assays against ancestral (WA1) and Omicron (BA.2). RESULTS: 79 vaccinated participants (33 [41.7%] female; median age, 8.8 years [standard deviation, 1.9 years]), 48 (60.8%) were from Tucson, Arizona; 64 (81.0%) were non-Hispanic white; 63 (80.8%) attended school in person; 68 (86.1%) did not have any chronic conditions; and 47 (59.5%) were infected after vaccination. Uninfected children had higher AUCs against WA1 (P = .009) and Omicron (P = .02). The geometric mean and surrogate neutralization titer above the limit of detection was 346.0 for WA1 and 39.7 for Omicron, an 8.7-fold decrease (P < .001). After adjustment of covariates in the WA1-specific model, we observed a 47% reduction in the odds of postvaccination infection for every standard deviation increase in RBD AUC (aOR, 0.53 [95% confidence interval, .29-.97) and a 69% reduction in the odds of infection for every 3-fold increase in RBD end titer (0.31 [.06-1.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Children with higher antibody levels experienced a lower incidence of postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection. |
A whole transcriptomic approach reveals novel mechanisms of organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles arabiensis from Ethiopia (preprint)
Messenger LA , Impoinvil LM , Derilus D , Yewhalaw D , Irish S , Lenhart A . bioRxiv 2021 2021.07.09.451871 The development of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors is of increasing concern in Ethiopia because of its potential implications for vector control failure. To better elucidate the specificity of resistance mechanisms and to facilitate the design of control strategies that minimize the likelihood of selecting for cross-resistance, a whole transcriptomic approach was used to explore gene expression patterns in a multi-insecticide resistant population of Anopheles arabiensis from Oromia Region, Ethiopia. This field population was resistant to the diagnostic doses of malathion (average mortality of 71.9%) and permethrin (77.4%), with pools of survivors and unexposed individuals analyzed using Illumina RNA-sequencing, alongside insecticide susceptible reference strains. This population also demonstrated deltamethrin resistance but complete susceptibility to alpha-cypermethrin, bendiocarb and propoxur, providing a phenotypic basis for detecting insecticide-specific resistance mechanisms. Transcriptomic data revealed overexpression of genes including cytochrome P450s, glutathione-s-transferases and carboxylesterases (including CYP4C36, CYP6AA1, CYP6M2, CYP6M3, CYP6P4, CYP9K1, CYP9L1, GSTD3, GSTE2, GSTE3, GSTE4, GSTE5, GSTE7 and two carboxylesterases) that were shared between malathion and permethrin survivors. We also identified nineteen highly overexpressed cuticular-associated proteins (including CYP4G16, CYP4G17 and chitinase) and eighteen salivary gland proteins (including D7r4 short form salivary protein), which may be contributing to a non-specific resistance phenotype by either enhancing the cuticular barrier or promoting binding and sequestration of insecticides, respectively. These findings provide novel insights into the molecular basis of insecticide resistance in this lesser well-characterized major malaria vector species.Importance Insecticide-resistant mosquito populations remain a significant challenge to global malaria vector control. While substantial progress has been made unraveling resistance mechanisms in major vector species, such as Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus, comparatively less is known about An. arabiensis populations. Using a whole transcriptomic approach, we investigated genes associated with resistance to insecticides used to control An. arabiensis in Ethiopia. Study findings revealed shared detoxification genes between organophosphate- and pyrethroid-resistant vectors and highly overexpressed cuticular-associated proteins and salivary gland proteins, which may play a role in enhancing insecticide resistance. The whole transcriptomic analysis detected novel resistance-associated genes, which warrant functional validation to determine their specificity to particular insecticides and their potential to confer cross-resistance between different insecticides with the same mode of action. These genes may contribute to the development of diagnostic markers to monitor insecticide resistance dynamics in the field. |
Neutralizing Antibody Response to Pseudotype SARS-CoV-2 Differs between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines and by History of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (preprint)
Tyner HL , Burgess JL , Grant L , Gaglani M , Kuntz JL , Naleway AL , Thornburg NJ , Caban-Martinez AJ , Yoon SK , Herring MK , Beitel SC , Blanton L , Nikolich-Zugich J , Thiese MS , Pleasants JF , Fowlkes AL , Lutrick K , Dunnigan K , Yoo YM , Rose S , Groom H , Meece J , Wesley MG , Schaefer-Solle N , Louzado-Feliciano P , Edwards LJ , Olsho LEW , Thompson MG . medRxiv 2021 2021.10.20.21265171 Background Data on the development of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination with messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines are limited.Methods From a prospective cohort of 3,975 adult essential and frontline workers tested weekly from August, 2020 to March, 2021 for SARS-CoV-2 infection by Reverse Transcription- Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) assay irrespective of symptoms, 497 participants had sera drawn after infection (170), vaccination (327), and after both infection and vaccination (50 from the infection population). Serum was collected after infection and each vaccine dose. Serum- neutralizing antibody titers against USA-WA1/2020-spike pseudotype virus were determined by the 50% inhibitory dilution. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and corresponding fold increases were calculated using t-tests and linear mixed effects models.Results Among 170 unvaccinated participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 158 (93%) developed neutralizing antibodies (nAb) with a GMT of 1,003 (95% CI=766-1,315). Among 139 previously uninfected participants, 138 (99%) developed nAb after mRNA vaccine dose-2 with a GMT of 3,257 (95% CI = 2,596-4,052). GMT was higher among those receiving mRNA-1273 vaccine (GMT =4,698, 95%CI= 3,186-6,926) compared to BNT162b2 vaccine (GMT=2,309, 95%CI=1,825-2,919). Among 32 participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, GMT was 21,655 (95%CI=14,766-31,756) after mRNA vaccine dose-1, without further increase after dose- 2.Conclusions A single dose of mRNA vaccine after SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in the highest observed nAb response. Two doses of mRNA vaccine in previously uninfected participants resulted in higher nAb to SARS-CoV-2 than after one dose of vaccine or SARS- CoV-2 infection alone. Neutralizing antibody response also differed by mRNA vaccine product.Main Point Summary One dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine after previous SARS-CoV-2 infection produced the highest neutralizing antibody titers; among those without history of infection, two doses of mRNA vaccine produced the most robust response.Competing Interest StatementAllison Naleway receives research funding from Pfizer and Vir Biotechnology and Jennifer Kuntz receives research funding from Pfizer, Novartis, and Vir Biotechnology for unrelated studies. All other authors: No conflicts. Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases [contracts 75D30120R68013 to Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, 75D30120C08379 to the University of Arizona, and 75D30120C08150 to Abt Associates].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study is governed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention IRB review board and gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the pres nt work are contained in the manuscript |
Prevention and Attenuation of COVID-19 by BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines (preprint)
Thompson MG , Burgess JL , Naleway AL , Tyner H , Yoon SK , Meece J , Olsho LEW , Caban-Martinez AJ , Fowlkes AL , Lutrick K , Groom HC , Dunnigan K , Odean MJ , Hegmann K , Stefanski E , Edwards LJ , Schaefer-Solle N , Grant L , Ellingson K , Kuntz JL , Zunie T , Thiese MS , Ivacic L , Wesley MG , Mayo Lamberte J , Sun X , Smith ME , Phillips AL , Groover KD , Yoo YM , Gerald J , Brown RT , Herring MK , Joseph G , Beitel S , Morrill TC , Mak J , Rivers P , Poe BP , Lynch B , Zhou Y , Zhang J , Kelleher A , Li Y , Dickerson M , Hanson E , Guenther K , Tong S , Bateman A , Reisdorf E , Barnes J , Azziz-Baumgartner E , Hunt DR , Arvay ML , Kutty P , Fry AM , Gaglani M . medRxiv 2021 2021.06.01.21257987 BACKGROUND Information is limited on messenger RNA (mRNA) BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or attenuating disease when administered in real-world conditions.METHODS Prospective cohorts of 3,975 healthcare personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers completed weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing during December 14 2020—April 10 2021. Self-collected mid-turbinate nasal swabs were tested by qualitative and quantitative reverse-transcription–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR). VE was calculated as 100%×(1−hazard ratio); adjusted VE was calculated using vaccination propensity weights and adjustments for site, occupation, and local virus circulation.RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 204 (5.1%) participants; 16 were partially (≥14 days post-dose-1 to 13 days after dose-2) or fully (≥14 days post-dose-2) vaccinated, and 156 were unvaccinated; 32 with indeterminate status (<14 days after dose-1) were excluded. Adjusted mRNA VE of full vaccination was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]=76%–97%) against symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection; VE of partial vaccination was 81% (95% CI=64%-90%). Among partially or fully vaccinated participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, mean viral RNA load (Log10 copies/mL) was 40% lower (95% CI=16%-57%), the risk of self-reported febrile COVID-19 was 58% lower (Risk Ratio=0.42, 95% CI=0.18-0.98), and 2.3 fewer days (95% CI=0.8-3.7) were spent sick in bed compared to unvaccinated infected participants.CONCLUSIONS Authorized mRNA vaccines were highly effective among working-age adults in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections when administered in real-world conditions and attenuated viral RNA load, febrile symptoms, and illness duration among those with breakthrough infection despite vaccination.Competing Interest StatementAllison L. Naleway reported funding from Pfizer for a meningococcal B vaccine study unrelated to the submitted work. Kurt T. Hegmann serves at the Editor of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine evidence-based practice guidelines. Matthew S. These reported grants and personal fees from Reed Group and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, outside the submitted work. Other authors have reported no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementFunding provided in whole or in part by federal funds from the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under contract numbers 75D30120R68013 awarded to Marshfield Clinic Research Laboratory, 75D30120C08379 to University of Arizona, and 75D30120C08150 awarded to Abt Associates, Inc.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Arizona IRB as the single IRB for this studyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSummary data will be available once all study objectives are met. |
Reduced long-lasting insecticidal net efficacy and pyrethroid insecticide resistance are associated with over-expression of CYP6P4, CYP6P3 and CYP6Z1 in populations of Anopheles coluzzii from South-East Côte d’Ivoire (preprint)
Meiwald A , Clark E , Kristan M , Edi C , Jeffries CL , Pelloquin B , Irish SR , Walker T , Messenger LA . bioRxiv 2020 2020.09.24.311639 Background Resistance to major public health insecticides in Côte d’Ivoire has intensified and now threatens the long-term effectiveness of malaria vector control interventions.Methods This study evaluated the bioefficacy of conventional and next-generation long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), determined resistance profiles, and characterized molecular and metabolic mechanisms in wild Anopheles coluzzii from South-East Côte d’Ivoire in 2019.Results Phenotypic resistance was intense: more than 25% of mosquitoes survived exposure to ten times the doses of pyrethroids required to kill susceptible populations. Similarly, 24-hour mortality to deltamethrin-only LLINs was very low and not significantly different to an untreated net. Sub-lethal pyrethroid exposure did not induce significant delayed vector mortality 72 hours later. In contrast, LLINs containing the synergist piperonyl butoxide (PBO), or new insecticides, clothianidin and chlorfenapyr, were highly toxic to An. coluzzii. Pyrethroid-susceptible An. coluzzii were significantly more likely to be infected with malaria, compared to those that survived insecticidal exposure. Pyrethroid resistance was associated with significant over-expression of CYP6P4, CPY6Z1 and CYP6P3.Conclusions Study findings raise concerns regarding the operational failure of standard LLINs and support the urgent deployment of vector control interventions incorporating PBO, chlorfenapyr or clothianidin in areas of high resistance intensity in Côte d’Ivoire.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. |
An assessment of adult mosquito collection techniques for studying species abundance and diversity in Maferinyah, Guinea (preprint)
Cansado-Utrilla C , Jeffries CL , Kristan M , Brugman VA , Heard P , Camara G , Sylla M , Beavogui AH , Messenger LA , Walker T . bioRxiv 2019 772822 Background Guinea is a West African country with a high prevalence of vector-borne diseases where few entomological studies have been undertaken. Although several mosquito collection methods are routinely used for surveillance in vector control programmes, they target different behaviours causing bias in species diversity and abundance. Given the paucity of mosquito trap data in West Africa, we compared the performance of five trap-lure combinations and Human Landing Catches (HLCs) in Guinea.Methods Five mosquito traps were compared in a 5×5 Latin Square design for 15 days in three villages in Guinea between June and July 2018. CDC light traps, BG sentinel 2 traps (with BG and MB5 lures), gravid traps and Stealth traps were deployed for 24-hour intervals with mosquitoes collected every 12 hours (day and night collections). HLCs were also performed for 15 nights. A Generalised Linear Mixed Model was applied to compare the effect of the traps, sites and collection times on the mosquito abundance. Species identification was confirmed using PCR-based analysis and Sanger sequencing.Results In total, 10,610 mosquitoes were captured across all five traps. Significantly more mosquitoes (P<0.005) were collected by Stealth traps (7,096) compared to the rest of the traps. Stealth traps and BG sentinel 2 traps were the best at capturing An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes respectively. HLCs captured predominantly An. coluzzii (41%) and hybrids of An. gambiae s.s. / An. coluzzii (36%) in contrast to the five adult traps, which captured predominantly An. melas (83%). Senguelen (rural) presented the highest abundance of mosquitoes and overall diversity in comparison with Fandie (semi-rural) and Maferinyah Centre One (semi-urban). To our knowledge, four species are reported for the first time in Guinea.Conclusions Stealth traps presented the best performance overall, suggesting that this trap may play an important role for mosquito surveillance in Guinea and similar sites in West Africa. We recommend the incorporation of molecular tools in entomological studies since it has helped to reveal, together with morphological identification, the presence of 25 mosquito species in this area.BG2BG sentinel 2 trapBG2-BGBG sentinel 2 trap with BG lureBG2-MB5BG sentinel 2 trap with MB5 lureGLMMgeneralized linear mixed modelGTGravid trapHLCHuman Landing CatchLTCDC light trapSTStealth trap |
Characterizing the molecular and metabolic mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Faranah, Guinea (preprint)
Stica C , Jeffries CL , Irish SR , Barry Y , Camara D , Yansane I , Kristan M , Walker T , Messenger LA . bioRxiv 2019 610998 Background In recent years, the scale-up of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has greatly reduced malaria transmission. However, malaria remains a global public health concern with the majority of disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Insecticide resistance is a growing problem among Anopheles vector populations, with potential implications for the continued effectiveness of available control interventions. Improved understanding of current resistance levels and underlying mechanisms is essential to design appropriate management strategies and to mitigate future selection for resistance.Methods Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes were collected from three villages in Faranah Prefecture, Guinea and their levels of susceptibility to seven insecticides were measured using CDC resistance intensity bioassays. Synergist assays with piperonyl butoxide (PBO) were also undertaken to assess the role of elevated mixed-function oxidases in resistance. RNA was extracted from 563 individuals and PCR was performed on cDNA to determine vector species, presence of target site mutations (L1014F kdr, N1575Y and G119S Ace-1), Plasmodium falciparum infection, and relative expression of three metabolic genes (CYP6M2, CYP6P3 and GSTD3).Results In Faranah, resistance to permethrin and deltamethrin was observed, as well as possible resistance to bendiocarb. All assayed vector populations were fully susceptible to alpha-cypermethrin, pirimiphos-methyl, clothianidin and chlorfenapyr. Plasmodium falciparum infection was detected in 7.3% (37/508) mosquitoes tested. The L1014F kdr mutation was found in 100% of a sub-sample of 60 mosquitoes, supporting its fixation in the region. The N1575Y mutation was identified in 20% (113/561) of individuals, with ongoing selection evidenced by significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The G119S Ace-1 mutation was detected in 62.1% (18/29) of mosquitoes tested and was highly predictive of bendiocarb bioassay survival. The metabolic resistance genes, CYP6M2, CYP6P3 and GSTD3, were found to be overexpressed in wild resistant and susceptible An. gambiae s.s. populations, compared to a susceptible G3 colony. Furthermore, CYP6P3 was significantly overexpressed in bendiocarb survivors, implicating its potential role in carbamate resistance in Faranah.Conclusions Identification of intense resistance to permethrin and deltamethrin in Faranah, is of concern, as the Guinea National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) relies exclusively on the distribution of pyrethroid-treated LLINs for vector control. Study findings will be used to guide current and future control strategies in the region. |
Investigating the relationship between insecticide resistance, underlying molecular mechanisms and malaria prevalence in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Guinea (preprint)
Collins E , Vaselli NM , Sylla M , Beavogui AH , Orsborne J , Walker T , Messenger LA . bioRxiv 2018 434688 The threat of insecticide resistance across sub-Saharan Africa is anticipated to severely impact the continued effectiveness of malaria vector control. We investigated the effect of carbamate and pyrethroid resistance on Anopheles gambiae s.l age, Plasmodium falciparum infection and characterized molecular resistance mechanisms in Guinea. Pyrethroid resistance was intense, with survivors of ten times the insecticidal concentration required to kill susceptible individuals. The L1014F kdr allele was significantly associated with mosquito survival following deltamethrin or permethrin treatment (p=0.003 and p=0.04, respectively). N1575Y and I1527T mutations were identified in 13% and 10% of individuals, respectively, but neither conferred increased pyrethroid tolerance. Partial restoration of pyrethroid susceptibility following synergist pre-exposure suggest a role for mixed-function oxidases. Carbamate resistance was lower and significantly associated with the G119S Ace-1 mutation (p=0.001). Oocyst rates were 6.8% and 4.2% among resistant and susceptible mosquitoes, respectively; survivors of bendiocarb exposure were significantly more likely to be infected (p=0.03). Resistant mosquitoes had significantly lower parity rates; however, a subset of intensely pyrethroid-resistant vectors were more likely to be parous (p=0.042 and p=0.045, for survivors of five and ten times the diagnostic dose of insecticides, respectively). Our findings emphasize the need for additional studies directly assessing the influence of insecticide resistance on mosquito fitness. |
Safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination among young children in the Vaccine Safety Datalink
Goddard K , Donahue JG , Lewis N , Hanson KE , Weintraub ES , Fireman B , Klein NP . Pediatrics 2023 152 (1) ![]() We previously assessed safety of monovalent messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines using weekly surveillance monitoring known as rapid cycle analysis (RCA) among individuals aged 5 years and older, identifying an increased risk for myocarditis and pericarditis in younger males, particularly following dose 2 of the primary series.1,–3 Information regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety among children under age 5 is limited.4 Here we report RCA safety surveillance of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered in this youngest age group within the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). |
COVID-19 booster vaccination in early pregnancy and surveillance for spontaneous abortion
Kharbanda EO , Haapala J , Lipkind HS , DeSilva MB , Zhu J , Vesco KK , Daley MF , Donahue JG , Getahun D , Hambidge SJ , Irving SA , Klein NP , Nelson JC , Weintraub ES , Williams JTB , Vazquez-Benitez G . JAMA Netw Open 2023 6 (5) e2314350 IMPORTANCE: Adherence to COVID-19 booster vaccine recommendations has lagged in pregnant and nonpregnant adult populations. One barrier to booster vaccination is uncertainty regarding the safety of booster doses among pregnant people. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there is an association between COVID-19 booster vaccination during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational, case-control, surveillance study evaluated people aged 16 to 49 years with pregnancies at 6 to 19 weeks' gestation at 8 health systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink from November 1, 2021, to June 12, 2022. Spontaneous abortion cases and ongoing pregnancy controls were evaluated during consecutive surveillance periods, defined by calendar time. EXPOSURE: Primary exposure was receipt of a third messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine dose within 28 days before spontaneous abortion or index date (midpoint of surveillance period in ongoing pregnancy controls). Secondary exposures were third mRNA vaccine doses in a 42-day window or any COVID-19 booster in 28- and 42-day windows. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Spontaneous abortion cases and ongoing pregnancy controls were identified from electronic health data using a validated algorithm. Cases were assigned to a single surveillance period based on pregnancy outcome date. Eligible ongoing pregnancy time was assigned to 1 or more surveillance periods as an ongoing pregnancy-period control. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with gestational age, maternal age, antenatal visits, race and ethnicity, site, and surveillance period as covariates and robust variance estimates to account for inclusion of multiple pregnancy periods per unique pregnancy. RESULTS: Among 112 718 unique pregnancies included in the study, the mean (SD) maternal age was 30.6 (5.5) years. Pregnant individuals were Asian, non-Hispanic (15.1%); Black, non-Hispanic (7.5%); Hispanic (35.6%); White, non-Hispanic (31.2%); and of other or unknown (10.6%); and 100% were female. Across eight 28-day surveillance periods, among 270 853 ongoing pregnancy-period controls, 11 095 (4.1%) had received a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a 28-day window; among 14 226 cases, 553 (3.9%) had received a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine within 28 days of the spontaneous abortion. Receipt of a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was not associated with spontaneous abortion in a 28-day window (AOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.03). Results were consistent when using a 42-day window (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05) and for any COVID-19 booster in a 28-day (AOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.02) or 42-day (AOR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04) exposure window. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this case-control surveillance study, COVID-19 booster vaccination in pregnancy was not associated with spontaneous abortion. These findings support the safety of recommendations for COVID-19 booster vaccination, including in pregnant populations. |
Neutralizing antibody responses to messenger RNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines versus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among pregnant women and vaccine-induced antibody transfer to infants
Dawood FS , Tita A , Stockwell MS , Newes-Adeyi G , Wielgosz K , Gyamfi-Bannerman C , Battarbee A , Reichle L , Thornburg N , Ellington S , Galang RR , Vorwaller K , Vargas CY , Morrill T , Parks M , Powers E , Gibson M , Varner M . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (5) ofad204 BACKGROUND: Early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine trials excluded pregnant women, resulting in limited data about immunogenicity and maternal-fetal antibody transfer, particularly by gestational timing of vaccination. METHODS: In this multicenter observational immunogenicity study, pregnant and nonpregnant women receiving COVID-19 vaccines were prospectively enrolled. Participants had sera collected before vaccination, at 14-28 days after each vaccine dose, at delivery (umbilical cord and peripheral), and from their infants at 3 and 6 months. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ID(50) neutralizing antibody (nAb) against D614G-like viruses were compared by participant characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 23 nonpregnant and 85 pregnant participants (trimester of first vaccine dose: 10 first, 47 second, 28 third) were enrolled. Ninety-three percent (76/82 with blood samples) of pregnant participants had detectable SARS-CoV-2 nAb after 2 vaccine doses, but GMTs (95% confidence intervals) were lower in pregnant participants than nonpregnant participants (1722 [1136-2612] vs 4419 [2012-9703]; P = .04). By 3 and 6 months, 28% and 74% of infants, respectively, of vaccinated participants had no detectable nAb to D614G-like viruses. Among the 71 pregnant participants without detectable nAb before vaccination, cord blood GMTs at delivery were 5-fold higher among participants vaccinated during the third versus first trimester, and cord blood nAb titers appeared inversely correlated with weeks since first vaccine dose (R(2) = 0.06, P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Though most pregnant women develop nAb after 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, this analysis suggests that infant protection from maternal vaccination varies by gestational timing of vaccination and wanes. Additional prevention strategies such as caregiver vaccination may warrant consideration to optimize infant protection. |
Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers - Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020-March 2021.
Thompson MG , Burgess JL , Naleway AL , Tyner HL , Yoon SK , Meece J , Olsho LEW , Caban-Martinez AJ , Fowlkes A , Lutrick K , Kuntz JL , Dunnigan K , Odean MJ , Hegmann KT , Stefanski E , Edwards LJ , Schaefer-Solle N , Grant L , Ellingson K , Groom HC , Zunie T , Thiese MS , Ivacic L , Wesley MG , Lamberte JM , Sun X , Smith ME , Phillips AL , Groover KD , Yoo YM , Gerald J , Brown RT , Herring MK , Joseph G , Beitel S , Morrill TC , Mak J , Rivers P , Harris KM , Hunt DR , Arvay ML , Kutty P , Fry AM , Gaglani M . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (13) 495-500 Messenger RNA (mRNA) BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials (1,2); however, the benefits of these vaccines for preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection, particularly when administered in real-world conditions, is less well understood. Using prospective cohorts of health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers* in eight U.S. locations during December 14, 2020-March 13, 2021, CDC routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 infections every week regardless of symptom status and at the onset of symptoms consistent with COVID-19-associated illness. Among 3,950 participants with no previous laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2,479 (62.8%) received both recommended mRNA doses and 477 (12.1%) received only one dose of mRNA vaccine.(†) Among unvaccinated participants, 1.38 SARS-CoV-2 infections were confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) per 1,000 person-days.(§) In contrast, among fully immunized (≥14 days after second dose) persons, 0.04 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported, and among partially immunized (≥14 days after first dose and before second dose) persons, 0.19 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported. Estimated mRNA vaccine effectiveness for prevention of infection, adjusted for study site, was 90% for full immunization and 80% for partial immunization. These findings indicate that authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptom status, among working-age adults in real-world conditions. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons. |
Safety and effectiveness of maternal COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant people and infants
Fleming-Dutra KE , Zauche LH , Roper LE , Ellington SR , Olson CK , Sharma AJ , Woodworth KR , Tepper N , Havers F , Oliver SE , Twentyman E , Jatlaoui TC . Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2023 50 (2) 279-297 Evidence has consistently demonstrated that COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are safe when given during pregnancy. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines protect pregnant people and their infants who are too young to receive COVID-19 vaccines. Although generally protective, monovalent vaccine effectiveness was lower during SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant predominance, in part due to changes in the Omicron spike protein. Bivalent vaccines, that combine ancestral strain and Omicron variant, may improve protection against Omicron variants. Everyone, including pregnant people, should stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccines and bivalent booster, when eligible. |
Messenger RNA vaccine in mother's milk
Nelson JM , Fleming-Dutra KE , Meaney-Delman D . JAMA Pediatr 2023 177 (4) 438-439 After reading the article by Hanna et al,1 we had concerns with their conclusions that do not seem to be supported by the data. This study included a sample of 11 lactating women with trace amounts of messenger RNA (mRNA) found in the breast milk of 5 women within 45 hours of monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Based on these findings, the authors recommended caution regarding breastfeeding infants younger than 6 months within 48 hours of maternal vaccination and raised unfounded concerns about potential interference with routine infant vaccinations. |
SARS-CoV-2 infection history and antibody response to three COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses.
Herring MK , Romine JK , Wesley MG , Ellingson KD , Yoon SK , Caban-Martinez AJ , Meece J , Gaglani M , Grant L , Olsho LEW , Tyner HL , Naleway AL , Khan SM , Phillips AL , Schaefer Solle N , Rose S , Mak J , Fuller SB , Hunt A , Kuntz JL , Beitel S , Yoo YM , Zheng PQ , Arani G , Mayo Lamberte J , Edwards T , Thompson MG , Sprissler R , Thornburg NJ , Lowe AA , Pilishvili T , Uhrlaub JL , Lutrick K , Burgess JL , Fowlkes AL . Clin Infect Dis 2022 76 (10) 1822-1831 ![]() ![]() BACKGROUND: Three doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines produce robust antibody responses, but data are limited among individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. From a cohort of health care personnel (75.5%), first responders (4.6%), and other frontline workers (19.8%) in 6 US states, we longitudinally assessed antibody waning after dose-2, and response to dose-3, according to SARS-CoV-2 infection history. METHODS: Participants submitted sera every three months, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and after each COVID-19 vaccine dose. Sera were tested for antibodies and reported quantitatively as area under the serial dilution curve (AUC). Changes in the AUC values over time were compared as fold-changes using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Analysis included 388 participants who received dose-3 by November 2021. Three comparison groups: (1) vaccine only with no known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 224); (2) infection prior to dose-1 (n = 123); and (3) infection after dose 2 and before dose-3 (n = 41). The interval from dose 2 and dose 3 was approximately 8-months. After dose-3, antibody levels rose 2.5-fold (95%CI = 2.2-3.0) in group 2, and 2.9-fold (95%CI = 2.6-3.3) in group 1. Those infected within 90 days before dose-3 (and median 233 days (IQR = 213-246) after dose-2) did not increase significantly after dose-3. CONCLUSIONS: A third dose of mRNA vaccine typically elicited a robust humoral immune response among those with primary vaccination regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection >3 months prior to boosting. Those with infection < 3 months prior to boosting did not have a significant increase in antibody concentrations in response to a booster. |
A forty-year review of Rocky Mountain spotted fever cases in California shows clinical and epidemiologic changes
Kjemtrup AM , Padgett K , Paddock CD , Messenger S , Hacker JK , Feiszli T , Melgar M , Metzger ME , Hu R , Kramer VL . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022 16 (9) e0010738 Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a life-threatening tick-borne disease documented in North, Central, and South America. In California, RMSF is rare; nonetheless, recent fatal cases highlight ecological cycles of the two genera of ticks, Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus, known to transmit the disease. These ticks occur in completely different habitats (sylvatic and peridomestic, respectively) resulting in different exposure risks for humans. This study summarizes the demographic, exposure, and clinical aspects associated with the last 40 years of reported RMSF cases to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Seventy-eight RMSF cases with onsets from 1980 to 2019 were reviewed. The incidence of RMSF has risen in the last 20 years from 0.04 cases per million to 0.07 cases per million (a two-fold increase in reports), though the percentage of cases that were confirmed dropped significantly from 72% to 25% of all reported cases. Notably, Hispanic/Latino populations saw the greatest rise in incidence. Cases of RMSF in California result from autochthonous and out-of-state exposures. During the last 20 years, more cases reported exposure in Southern California or Mexico than in the previous 20 years. The driver of these epidemiologic changes is likely the establishment and expansion of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks in Southern California and on-going outbreaks of RMSF in northern Mexico. Analysis of available electronically reported clinical data from 2011 to 2019 showed that 57% of reported cases presented with serious illness requiring hospitalization with a 7% mortality. The difficulty in recognizing RMSF is due to a non-specific clinical presentation; however, querying patients on the potential of tick exposure in both sylvatic and peridomestic environments may facilitate appropriate testing and treatment. |
Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination.
Goddard K , Lewis N , Fireman B , Weintraub E , Shimabukuro T , Zerbo O , Boyce TG , Oster ME , Hanson KE , Donahue JG , Ross P , Naleway A , Nelson JC , Lewin B , Glanz JM , Williams JTB , Kharbanda EO , Katherine Yih W , Klein NP . Vaccine 2022 40 (35) 5153-5159 BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is associated with risk of myocarditis and possibly pericarditis, especially in young males. It is not clear if risk differs between mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2. We assessed if risk differs using comprehensive health records on a diverse population. METHODS: Members 18-39 years of age at eight integrated healthcare-delivery systems were monitored using data updated weekly and supplemented with medical record review of myocarditis and pericarditis cases. Incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis events that occurred among vaccine recipients 0 to 7 days after either dose 1 or 2 of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was compared with that of vaccinated concurrent comparators who, on the same calendar day, had received their most recent dose 22 to 42 days earlier. Rate ratios (RRs) were estimated by conditional Poisson regression, adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, health plan, and calendar day. Head-to-head comparison directly assessed risk following mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 during 0-7 days post-vaccination. RESULTS: From December 14, 2020 - January 15, 2022 there were 41 cases after 2,891,498 doses of BNT162b2 and 38 cases after 1,803,267 doses of mRNA-1273. Cases had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. Most were hospitalized for ≤1 day; none required intensive care. During days 0-7 after dose 2 of BNT162b2, the incidence was 14.3 (CI: 6.5-34.9) times higher than the comparison interval, amounting to 22.4 excess cases per million doses; after mRNA-1273 the incidence was 18.8 (CI: 6.7-64.9) times higher than the comparison interval, amounting to 31.2 excess cases per million doses. In head-to-head comparisons 0-7 days after either dose, risk was moderately higher after mRNA-1273 than after BNT162b2 (RR: 1.61, CI 1.02-2.54). CONCLUSIONS: Both vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in 18-39-year-olds. Risk estimates were modestly higher after mRNA-1273 than after BNT162b2. |
Estimated Number of COVID-19 Infections, Hospitalizations, and Deaths Prevented Among Vaccinated Persons in the US, December 2020 to September 2021.
Steele MK , Couture A , Reed C , Iuliano D , Whitaker M , Fast H , Hall AJ , MacNeil A , Cadwell B , Marks KJ , Silk BJ . JAMA Netw Open 2022 5 (7) e2220385 IMPORTANCE: The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and deaths prevented among vaccinated persons, independent of the effect of reduced transmission, is a key measure of vaccine impact. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and deaths prevented among vaccinated adults in the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this modeling study, a multiplier model was used to extrapolate the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-associated deaths from data on the number of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations stratified by state, month, and age group (18-49, 50-64, and ≥65 years) in the US from December 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. These estimates were combined with data on vaccine coverage and effectiveness to estimate the risks of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. Risks were applied to the US population 18 years or older to estimate the expected burden in that population without vaccination. The estimated burden in the US population 18 years or older given observed levels of vaccination was subtracted from the expected burden in the US population 18 years or older without vaccination (ie, counterfactual) to estimate the impact of vaccination among vaccinated persons. EXPOSURES: Completion of the COVID-19 vaccination course, defined as 2 doses of messenger RNA (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) vaccines or 1 dose of JNJ-78436735 vaccine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Monthly numbers and percentages of SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and deaths prevented were estimated among those who have been vaccinated in the US. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccination was estimated to prevent approximately 27 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 22 million to 34 million) infections, 1.6 million (95% UI, 1.4 million to 1.8 million) hospitalizations, and 235 000 (95% UI, 175 000-305 000) deaths in the US from December 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021, among vaccinated adults 18 years or older. From September 1 to September 30, 2021, vaccination was estimated to prevent 52% (95% UI, 45%-62%) of expected infections, 56% (95% UI, 52%-62%) of expected hospitalizations, and 58% (95% UI, 53%-63%) of expected deaths in adults 18 years or older. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings indicate that the US COVID-19 vaccination program prevented a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality through direct protection of vaccinated individuals. |
Strain characterisation for measuring bioefficacy of ITNs treated with two active ingredients (dual-AI ITNs): Developing a robust protocol by building consensus
Lees RS , Armistead JS , Azizi S , Constant E , Fornadel C , Gimnig JE , Hemingway J , Impoinvil D , Irish SR , Kisinza W , Lissenden N , Mawejje HD , Messenger LA , Moore S , Ngufor C , Oxborough R , Protopopoff N , Ranson H , Small G , Wagman J , Weetman D , Zohdy S , Spiers A . Insects 2022 13 (5) Durability monitoring of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) containing a pyrethroid in combination with a second active ingredient (AI) must be adapted so that the insecticidal bioefficacy of each AI can be monitored independently. An effective way to do this is to measure rapid knock down of a pyrethroid-susceptible strain of mosquitoes to assess the bioefficacy of the pyrethroid component and to use a pyrethroid-resistant strain to measure the bioefficacy of the second ingredient. To allow robust comparison of results across tests within and between test facilities, and over time, protocols for bioefficacy testing must include either characterisation of the resistant strain, standardisation of the mosquitoes used for bioassays, or a combination of the two. Through a series of virtual meetings, key stakeholders and practitioners explored different approaches to achieving these goals. Via an iterative process we decided on the preferred approach and produced a protocol consisting of characterising mosquitoes used for bioefficacy testing before and after a round of bioassays, for example at each time point in a durability monitoring study. We present the final protocol and justify our approach to establishing a standard methodology for durability monitoring of ITNs containing pyrethroid and a second AI. |
Effectiveness of Homologous and Heterologous Covid-19 Boosters against Omicron.
Accorsi EK , Britton A , Shang N , Fleming-Dutra KE , Link-Gelles R , Smith ZR , Derado G , Miller J , Schrag SJ , Verani JR . N Engl J Med 2022 386 (25) 2433-2435 To the Editor: For persons who received a single dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), a booster dose of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine at least 2 months after the primary dose is recommended. Recipients of Ad26.COV2.S for both the primary and booster doses may receive a second booster dose of an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine at least 4 months after the first Ad26.COV2.S booster dose.1 Immunogenicity data from a phase 1–2 clinical trial conducted before B.1.1.529 and the BA sublineages of omicron emerged showed that increases in the titers of binding and neutralizing antibodies with heterologous boosting were similar to or greater than the increases with homologous boosting.2 In a study involving U.S. veterans, data that were obtained during a period in which omicron was the predominant circulating variant also showed that among Ad26.COV2.S recipients, vaccine effectiveness against omicron infection was higher with heterologous boosting than with homologous boosting3; however, data from the general adult population and on vaccine effectiveness over time are lacking. More than 18 million doses of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine have been administered in the United States alone4; therefore, data are needed on boosting strategies that are effective over time. |
Protection with a Third Dose of mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Frontline Workers.
Yoon SK , Hegmann KT , Thiese MS , Burgess JL , Ellingson K , Lutrick K , Olsho LEW , Edwards LJ , Sokol B , Caban-Martinez AJ , Schaefer-Solle N , Jones JM , Tyner H , Hunt A , Respet K , Gaglani M , Dunnigan K , Rose S , Naleway A , Groom H , Kuntz J , Fowlkes AL , Thompson MG , Yoo YM . N Engl J Med 2022 386 (19) 1855-1857 ![]() ![]() Data are needed regarding the effectiveness of a third dose of a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine against the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that are based on scientifically rigorous, population-level surveillance. Health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers who are being evaluated in the HEROES-RECOVER cohorts at eight sites in six states across the United States underwent weekly reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) testing regardless of the presence or absence of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) symptoms.1-3 Here, we report the vaccine effectiveness of two or three doses of an mRNA vaccine against infection caused by the omicron and B.1.617.2 (delta) variants. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Jan 27, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure