Last data update: Sep 30, 2024. (Total: 47785 publications since 2009)
Records 1-7 (of 7 Records) |
Query Trace: Malec D[original query] |
---|
JYNNEOS™ effectiveness as post-exposure prophylaxis against Mpox: Challenges using real-world outbreak data
Rosen JB , Arciuolo RJ , Pathela P , Boyer CB , Baumgartner J , Latash J , Malec L , Lee EH , Reddy V , King R , Edward Real J , Lipsitch M , Zucker JR . Vaccine 2024 BACKGROUND: JYNNEOS(TM) vaccine has been used as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) during a mpox outbreak in New York City (NYC). Data on effectiveness are limited. METHODS: Effectiveness of a single dose of JYNNEOS(TM) vaccine administered subcutaneously ≤ 14 days as PEP for preventing mpox disease was assessed among individuals exposed to case-patients from May 22, 2022-August 24, 2022. Individuals were evaluated for mpox through 21 days post-exposure. An observational study was conducted emulating a sequence of nested "target" randomized trials starting each day after exposure. Results were adjusted for exposure risk and race/ethnicity. Analyses were conducted separately based on last (PEP(L)) and first (PEP(F)) exposure date. We evaluated the potential to overestimate PEP effectiveness when using conventional analytic methods due to exposed individuals developing illness before they can obtain PEP (immortal time bias) compared to the target trial. RESULTS: Median time from last exposure to symptom onset (incubation period) among cases that did not receive PEP(L) was 7 days (range 1-16). Time to PEP(L) receipt was 7 days (range 0-14). Among 549 individuals, adjusted PEP(L) and PEP(F) effectiveness was 19 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], -54 % to 57 %) and -7% (95 % CI, -144 % to 53 %) using the target trial emulation, respectively, and 78 % (95 % CI, 50 % to 91 %) and 73 % (95 % CI, 31 % to 91 %) using conventional analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Determining PEP effectiveness using real-world data during an outbreak is challenging. Time to PEP in NYC coupled with the observed incubation period resulted in overestimated PEP effectiveness using a conventional method. The target trial emulation, while yielding wide confidence intervals due to small sample size, avoided immortal time bias. While results from these evaluations cannot be used as reliable estimates of PEP effectiveness, we present important methodologic considerations for future evaluations. |
Evaluation of public health contact tracing for mpox among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men-10 US jurisdictions, May 17-July 31, 2022
Cope AB , Kirkcaldy RD , Weidle PJ , Jackson DA , Laramee N , Weber R , Rowse J , Mangla A , Fox B , Saunders KE , Taniguchi K , Usagawa L , Cahill ME , Harrington P , Ricketts EK , Harbi K , Malec L , Templin TG , Drociuk D , Hannibal T , Klos R , Bernstein KT . Am J Public Health 2023 113 (7) e1-e4 Objectives. To examine the potential impact of contact tracing to identify contacts and prevent mpox transmission among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) as the outbreak expanded. Methods. We assessed contact tracing outcomes from 10 US jurisdictions before and after access to the mpox vaccine was expanded from postexposure prophylaxis for persons with known exposure to include persons at high risk for acquisition (May 17-June 30, 2022, and July 1-31, 2022, respectively). Results. Overall, 1986 mpox cases were reported in MSM from included jurisdictions (240 before expanded vaccine access; 1746 after expanded vaccine access). Most MSM with mpox were interviewed (95.0% before vaccine expansion and 97.0% after vaccine expansion); the proportion who named at least 1 contact decreased during the 2 time periods (74.6% to 38.9%). Conclusions. During the period when mpox cases among MSM increased and vaccine access expanded, contact tracing became less efficient at identifying exposed contacts. Public Health Implications. Contact tracing was more effective at identifying persons exposed to mpox in MSM sexual and social networks when case numbers were low, and it could be used to facilitate vaccine access. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 4, 2023:e1-e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307301). |
National Center for Health Statistics Data presentation standards for proportions
Parker JD , Talih M , Malec DJ , Beresovsky V , Carroll M , Gonzalez JF , Hamilton BE , Ingram DD , Kochanek K , McCarty F , Moriarity C , Shimizu I , Strashny A , Ward BW . Vital Health Stat 2 2017 (175) 1-22 The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) disseminates information on a broad range of health topics through diverse publications. These publications must rely on clear and transparent presentation standards that can be broadly and efficiently applied. Standards are particularly important for large, cross-cutting reports where estimates cannot be individually evaluated and indicators of precision cannot be included alongside the estimates. This report describes the NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions. The multistep NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions are based on a minimum denominator sample size and on the absolute and relative widths of a confidence interval calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Proportions (usually multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages) are the most commonly reported estimates in NCHS reports. |
Longitudinal analysis of electronic health information to identify possible COVID-19 sequelae
Click ES , Malec D , Chevinsky J , Tao G , Melgar M , Giovanni J , Gundlapalli A , Datta D , Wong KK . Emerg Infect Dis 2023 29 (2) 389-392 Ongoing symptoms might follow acute COVID-19. Using electronic health information, we compared pre‒ and post‒COVID-19 diagnostic codes to identify symptoms that had higher encounter incidence in the post‒COVID-19 period as sequelae. This method can be used for hypothesis generation and ongoing monitoring of sequelae of COVID-19 and future emerging diseases. |
Multistate Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes Infections Linked to Fresh, Soft Hispanic-Style Cheese - United States, 2021.
Palacios A , Otto M , Flaherty E , Boyle MM , Malec L , Holloman K , Low M , Wellman A , Newhart C , Gollarza L , Weeks T , Muyombwe A , Lozinak K , Kafka E , O'Halloran D , Rozza T , Nicholas D , Ivory S , Kreil K , Huffman J , Gieraltowski L , Conrad A . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 71 (21) 709-712 Listeriosis is a serious infection usually caused by eating food contaminated with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. An estimated 1,600 persons become ill with listeriosis each year, among whom approximately 260 die. Persons at higher risk for listeriosis include pregnant persons and their newborns, adults aged ≥65 years, and persons with weakened immune systems. Persons with invasive listeriosis usually report symptoms starting 1-4 weeks after eating food contaminated with L. monocytogenes; however, some persons who become infected have reported symptoms starting as late as 70 days after exposure or as early as the same day of exposure (1). On January 29, 2021, PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping surveillance network coordinated by CDC, identified a multistate cluster of three L. monocytogenes infections: two from Maryland and one from Connecticut (2). CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and state and local partners began an investigation on February 1, 2021. A total of 13 outbreak-related cases were eventually identified from four states. All patients reported Hispanic ethnicity; 12 patients were hospitalized, and one died. Rapid food testing and record collection by regulatory agencies enabled investigators to identify a brand of queso fresco made with pasteurized milk as the likely source of the outbreak, leading to an initial product recall on February 19, 2021. Fresh, soft Hispanic-style cheeses made with pasteurized milk are a well-documented source of listeriosis outbreaks. These cheeses can be contaminated with L. monocytogenes unless stringent hygienic controls are implemented, and the processing environment is monitored for contamination (3). U.S. public health agencies should establish or improve communications, including new methods of disseminating information that also effectively reach Hispanic populations, to emphasize the risk from eating fresh, soft Hispanic-style cheeses, even those made with pasteurized milk. |
Multistate Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings, United States.
Gharpure R , Sami S , Vostok J , Johnson H , Hall N , Foreman A , Sabo RT , Schubert PL , Shephard H , Brown VR , Brumfield B , Ricaldi JN , Conley AB , Zielinski L , Malec L , Newman AP , Chang M , Finn LE , Stainken C , Mangla AT , Eteme P , Wieck M , Green A , Edmundson A , Reichbind D , Brown VJr , Quiñones L , Longenberger A , Hess E , Gumke M , Manion A , Thomas H , Barrios CA , Koczwara A , Williams TW , Pearlowitz M , Assoumou M , Senisse Pajares AF , Dishman H , Schardin C , Wang X , Stephens K , Moss NS , Singh G , Feaster C , Webb LM , Krueger A , Dickerson K , Dewart C , Barbeau B , Salmanson A , Madoff LC , Villanueva JM , Brown CM , Laney AS . Emerg Infect Dis 2022 28 (1) 35-43 During July 2021, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.617.2 variant infections, including vaccine breakthrough infections, occurred after large public gatherings in Provincetown, Massachusetts, USA, prompting a multistate investigation. Public health departments identified primary and secondary cases by using coronavirus disease surveillance data, case investigations, and contact tracing. A primary case was defined as SARS-CoV-2 detected <14 days after travel to or residence in Provincetown during July 3-17. A secondary case was defined as SARS-CoV-2 detected <14 days after close contact with a person who had a primary case but without travel to or residence in Provincetown during July 3-August 10. We identified 1,098 primary cases and 30 secondary cases associated with 26 primary cases among fully and non-fully vaccinated persons. Large gatherings can have widespread effects on SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and fully vaccinated persons should take precautions, such as masking, to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly during substantial or high transmission. |
Late conditions diagnosed 1-4 months following an initial COVID-19 encounter: a matched cohort study using inpatient and outpatient administrative data - United States, March 1-June 30, 2020.
Chevinsky JR , Tao G , Lavery AM , Kukielka EA , Click ES , Malec D , Kompaniyets L , Bruce BB , Yusuf H , Goodman AB , Dixon MG , Nakao JH , Datta SD , Mac Kenzie WR , Kadri S , Saydah S , Giovanni JE , Gundlapalli AV . Clin Infect Dis 2021 73 S5-S16 BACKGROUND: Late sequelae of COVID-19 have been reported; however, few studies have investigated the time-course or incidence of late new COVID-19-related health conditions (post-COVID conditions) after COVID-19 diagnosis. Studies distinguishing post-COVID conditions from late conditions caused by other etiologies are lacking. Using data from a large administrative all-payer database, we assessed the type, association, and timing of post-COVID conditions following COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: Using the Premier Healthcare Database Special COVID-19 Release (PHD-SR) (release date, October 20, 2020) data, during March-June 2020, 27,589 inpatients and 46,857 outpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 (case-patients) were 1:1 matched with patients without COVID-19 through the 4-month follow-up period (control-patients) by using propensity score matching. In this matched-cohort study, adjusted odds ratios were calculated to assess for late conditions that were more common in case-patients compared with control-patients. Incidence proportion was calculated for conditions that were more common in case-patients than control-patients during 31-120 days following a COVID-19 encounter. RESULTS: During 31-120 days after an initial COVID-19 inpatient hospitalization, 7.0% of adults experienced at least one of five post-COVID conditions. Among adult outpatients with COVID-19, 7.7% experienced at least one of ten post-COVID conditions. During 31-60 days after an initial outpatient encounter, adults with COVID-19 were 2.8 times as likely to experience acute pulmonary embolism as outpatient control-patients and were also more likely to experience a range of conditions affecting multiple body systems (e.g. nonspecific chest pain, fatigue, headache, and respiratory, nervous, circulatory, and gastrointestinal system symptoms) than outpatient control-patients. Children with COVID-19 were not more likely to experience late conditions than children without COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: These findings add to the evidence of late health conditions possibly related to COVID-19 in adults following COVID-19 diagnosis and can inform health care practice and resource planning for follow-up COVID-19 care. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Sep 30, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure