This cross-sectional study examines reactogenicity among children of participants in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry from November 2022 to September 2023 to understand the frequency and types of reactions experienced. | eng

Objectives: To (1) determine associations between maternal risk conditions and severe adverse outcomes that may benefit from risk-appropriate care and (2) assess whether associations between risk conditions and outcomes vary by level of maternal care (LoMC). Methods: We used the 2017-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to calculate associations between maternal risk conditions and severe adverse outcomes. Risk conditions included severe preeclampsia, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) conditions, and cardiac conditions. Outcomes included disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with blood products transfusion or shock, pulmonary edema or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), stroke, acute renal failure, and a composite cardiac outcome. Then we used 2019 delivery hospitalization data from five states linked to hospital LoMC. We calculated associations between risk conditions and outcomes overall and stratified by LoMC and assessed for effect modification by LoMC. Results: We found positive measures of association between risk conditions and outcomes. Among patients with severe preeclampsia or PAS, the magnitudes of the associations with DIC with blood products transfusion or shock, pulmonary edema or ARDS, and acute renal failure were lower in Level III/IV compared with <Level III facilities. Among patients with cardiac conditions, the magnitudes of the associations with these outcomes, along with stroke, were also lower in Level III/IV compared with <Level III facilities. The proportion of patients with risk conditions that delivered in <Level III facilities was 19.8-46.8%. Conclusions: Odds of severe adverse outcomes among women with selected risk conditions were lower for births occurring at higher-level facilities, supporting the benefit of risk-appropriate care.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed and implemented the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry (C19VPR) to monitor vaccine safety. Potential participants who received a COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy or up to 30 days prior to their pregnancy-associated last menstrual period were eligible to participate in the registry, which monitored health outcomes of participants and their infants through phone interviews and review of available medical records. Data for select outcomes, including birth defects, were reviewed by clinicians. In certain cases, medical records were used to confirm and add detail to participant-reported health conditions. This paper serves as a description of CDC C19VPR protocol. We describe the development and implementation for each data collection aspect of the registry (i.e., participant phone interviews, clinical review, and medical record abstraction), data management, and strengths and limitations. We also describe the demographics and vaccinations received among eligible and enrolled participants. There were 123,609 potential participants 18-54 years of age identified from January 2021 through mid-June 2021; 23,339 were eligible and enrolled into the registry. Among these, 85.3 % consented to medical record review for themselves and/or their infants. Participants were majority non-Hispanic White (79.1 %), residents of urban areas (93.3 %), and 48.3 % were between 30 and 34 years of age. Most participants completed the primary series of vaccination by the end of pregnancy (89.7 %). Many participants were healthcare personnel (44.8 %), possibly due to the phased roll-out of the vaccination program. The registry continues to provide important information about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people, a population with higher risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19 who were not included in pre-authorization clinical trials. Lessons learned from the registry may guide development and implementation of future vaccine safety monitoring efforts for pregnant people and their infants.

Objectives: To understand college and university student knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KAB) regarding COVID-19 prevention strategies. Methods: Thirteen colleges and universities volunteered to conduct an anonymous electronic survey in April 2021 to assess students' KAB about mask use and vaccination to prevent COVID-19. Results: Three-quarters of students indicated they "Always" wore a mask correctly when in public indoor places. Of those not yet vaccinated, 55% expressed concern about unknown side effects. Over half of students were unsure or believe they do not need to continue wearing masks after vaccination and older students more likely to be vaccinated. There was a significant inverse correlation between intention of getting vaccinated and intention to attend a large indoor party without a mask. Conclusions: Colleges and universities are important to community efforts to slow the COVID-19 pandemic. The KAB findings can inform approaches to increase overall mask use and vaccination uptake among young students.

BACKGROUND: The objective of our investigation was to better understand barriers to implementation of self-administered antigen screening testing for SARS-CoV-2 at institutions of higher education (IHE). METHODS: Using the Quidel QuickVue At-Home COVID-19 Test, 1347 IHE students and staff were asked to test twice weekly for seven weeks. We assessed seroconversion using baseline and endline serum specimens. Online surveys assessed acceptability. RESULTS: Participants reported 9971 self-administered antigen test results. Among participants who were not antibody positive at baseline, the median number of tests reported was eight. Among 324 participants seronegative at baseline, with endline antibody results and ≥ 1 self-administered antigen test results, there were five COVID-19 infections; only one was detected by self-administered antigen test (sensitivity = 20%). Acceptability of self-administered antigen tests was high. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly serial self-administered antigen testing in a low prevalence period had low utility in this investigation. Issues of testing fatigue will be important to address in future testing strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Describe discrepancies between facilities' self-reported level of neonatal care and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Levels of Care Assessment Tool(SM) (CDC LOCATe(SM))-assessed level. STUDY DESIGN: CDC LOCATe(SM) data from 765 health facilities in the United States, including 17 states, one territory, one large multi-state hospital system, and one perinatal region within a state, was collected between 2016 and 2021 for this cross-sectional analysis. RESULT: Among 721 facilities that self-reported level of neonatal care, 33.1% had discrepancies between their self-reported level and their LOCATe(SM)-assessed level. Among facilities with discrepancies, 75.3% self-reported a higher level of neonatal care than their LOCATe(SM)-assessed level. The most common elements contributing to discrepancies were limited specialty and subspecialty staffing, such as neonatology or neonatal surgery. CONCLUSION: Results highlight opportunities for jurisdictions to engage with facilities, health systems, and partners about levels of neonatal care, and to collaborate to promote standardized systems of risk-appropriate care.

OBJECTIVE: Describe sources of discrepancy between self-assessed LoMC (level of maternal care) and CDC LOCATe(®)-assessed (Levels of Care Assessment Tool) LoMC. STUDY DESIGN: CDC LOCATe(®) was implemented at 480 facilities in 13 jurisdictions, including states, territories, perinatal regions, and hospital systems, in the U.S. Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to compare facilities' self-reported LoMC and LOCATe(®)-assessed LoMC. RESULT: Among 418 facilities that self-reported an LoMC, 41.4% self-reported a higher LoMC than their LOCATe(®)-assessed LoMC. Among facilities with discrepancies, the most common elements lacking to meet self-reported LoMC included availability of maternal-fetal medicine (27.7%), obstetric-specializing anesthesiologist (16.2%), and obstetric ultrasound services (12.1%). CONCLUSION: Two in five facilities self-report a LoMC higher than their LOCATe(®)-assessed LoMC, indicating discrepancies between perceived maternal care capabilities and those recommended in current LoMC guidelines. Results highlight an opportunity for states to engage with facilities, health systems, and other stakeholders about LoMC and collaborate to strengthen systems for improving maternal care delivery.

Each year approximately 700 people die in the United States from pregnancy-related complications. We describe the characteristics of pregnancy-related deaths due to mental health conditions, including substance use disorders, and identify opportunities for prevention based on recommendations from fourteen state Maternal Mortality Review Committees (MMRCs) from the period 2008-17. Among 421 pregnancy-related deaths with an MMRC-determined underlying cause of death, 11 percent were due to mental health conditions. Pregnancy-related mental health deaths were more likely than deaths from other causes to be determined by an MMRC to be preventable (100 percent versus 64 percent), to occur among non-Hispanic White people (86 percent versus 45 percent), and to occur 43-365 days postpartum (63 percent versus 18 percent). Sixty-three percent of pregnancy-related mental health deaths were by suicide. Nearly three-quarters of people with a pregnancy-related mental health cause of death had a history of depression, and more than two-thirds had past or current substance use. MMRC recommendations can be used to prioritize interventions and can inform strategies to enable screening, care coordination, and continuation of care throughout pregnancy and the year postpartum.

To prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, colleges and universities have implemented multiple strategies including testing, isolation, quarantine, contact tracing, masking, and vaccination. In April 2021, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) was notified of a large cluster of students with COVID-19 at an urban university after spring break. A total of 158 cases of COVID-19 were diagnosed among undergraduate students during March 15-May 3, 2021; the majority (114; 72.2%) lived in on-campus dormitories. CDPH evaluated the role of travel and social connections, as well as the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants, on transmission. Among 140 infected students who were interviewed, 89 (63.6%) reported recent travel outside Chicago during spring break, and 57 (40.7%) reported indoor social exposures. At the time of the outbreak, undergraduate-aged persons were largely ineligible for vaccination in Chicago; only three of the students with COVID-19 (1.9%) were fully vaccinated. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 104 specimens revealed multiple distinct SARS-CoV-2 lineages, suggesting several nearly simultaneous introductions. Most specimens (66; 63.5%) were B.1.1.222, a lineage not widely detected in Chicago before or after this outbreak. These results demonstrate the potential for COVID-19 outbreaks on university campuses after widespread student travel during breaks, at the beginning of new school terms, and when students participate in indoor social gatherings. To prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission, colleges and universities should encourage COVID-19 vaccination; discourage unvaccinated students from travel, including during university breaks; implement serial COVID-19 screening among unvaccinated persons after university breaks; encourage masking; and implement universal serial testing for students based on community transmission levels.

Angiostrongylus cantonensis, the rat lungworm, is the most common infectious cause of eosinophilic meningoencephalitis worldwide. This parasite is endemic to Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands, and its global distribution is increasing. We report A. cantonensis meningoencephalitis in a 12-month-old boy in Tennessee, USA, who had not traveled outside of southwestern Tennessee or northwestern Mississippi.