Aedes aegypti (L.), the primary mosquito vector of arboviruses such as dengue and Zika, has a global distribution that includes the southern United States. Control of this peridomestic mosquito is challenging. Ultra-low volume (ULV) pyrethroid sprays are commonly used against adult mosquitoes to break transmission during a disease outbreak, although efficacy data are limited. This study examined the impacts of ULV sprays on Ae. aegypti vectorial capacity as measured by vector abundance and age structure in two cities in Maricopa County, AZ with robust Ae. aegypti populations and a well-developed vector management program. We assessed impacts of routine ULV applications conducted by Maricopa Vector Control Division during the summer rainy seasons of 2017 to 2019 to determine whether existing practices mainly targeting Culex spp. also suppressed Ae. aegypti. The insecticide formulations applied for Culex spp. control (Duet and Permanone 30-30) did not affect Ae. aegypti abundance, but Duet applications slightly reduced female mosquito age. Deltagard, the insecticide product used specifically against Ae. aegypti, was only applied three times in 2018 over small areas, so efficacy assessment was difficult. Deltagard was associated with a small decline in Ae. aegypti abundance. CDC bottle bioassays of Ae. aegypti collected in the study area showed resistance to permethrin and deltamethrin. Overall, the lack of significant mosquito population suppression or age structure changes after insecticide applications suggest that current tools used by Maricopa Vector Control Division are unlikely to effectively control Ae. aegypti populations in the event of a disease outbreak.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are key to preventing opioid overdose. Despite the high risk of opioid overdose among recently incarcerated people who use drugs, missed opportunities for engagement in MOUD treatment persist in this population. We examined the association between unmet need for MOUD and non-fatal opioid overdose among recently incarcerated people who inject drugs (PWID) and assessed prevalence of non-fatal opioid overdose by selected characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed 2022 data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) system among PWID from 20 large U.S. cities. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated to examine the association between unmet need for MOUD and non-fatal opioid overdose. RESULTS: Among 1648 recently incarcerated PWID, 28 % reported an unmet need for MOUD and 39 % reported a non-fatal opioid-involved overdose in the past 12 months. Experiencing homelessness in the last 12 months (aPR=1.43, 95 % CI=1.27-1.61) and living in the Midwest region of the U.S. (aPR=1.18, 95 % CI=1.01-1.38) were significantly associated with reporting a non-fatal opioid overdose. Recently incarcerated PWID with an unmet need for MOUD were 1.4 times as likely to report a non-fatal opioid overdose in the past 12 months (50 %; aPR=1.42, 95 % CI=1.29-1.56) compared with recently incarcerated PWID without an unmet need for MOUD (35 %). CONCLUSIONS: Unmet need for MOUD was significantly associated with non-fatal opioid overdose among PWID who were incarcerated in the past 12 months, suggesting the need to investigate specific strategies to improve to MOUD treatment among recently incarcerated PWID.

CONTEXT: In response to the first reported mpox cases in May 2022, the US government implemented plans to bring testing, treatment, and vaccines to communities disproportionately affected by mpox-including the population of men who have sex with men (MSM) and Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino men, 2 subpopulations experiencing vaccination disparities. We describe the development and implementation of the US Mpox Vaccine Equity Pilot Program (MVEPP), characteristics of completed vaccination projects, and challenges that occurred. We also discuss opportunities for reducing vaccination disparities in future outbreaks. PROGRAM: To address reported vaccination disparities, the US government launched MVEPP in 2 phases. Phase 1 centered around public events attended by large numbers of gay, bisexual, and other MSM, such as Pride festivals. Phase 2 asked health departments to propose mpox vaccination projects specifically aimed at reducing or eliminating racial/ethnic and other demographic disparities in mpox vaccination. IMPLEMENTATION: MVEPP received 35 vaccination project proposals. We analyzed data from 22 completed projects that resulted in 25 675 doses of JYNNEOS administered. We note 3 innovative strategies that were implemented in several projects: direct collaboration with organizations providing services to MSM and transgender women; implementation of MVEPP projects in unique nonclinical community settings and at venues frequented by MSM and transgender women; and offering an array of services as part of mpox vaccination projects, rather than offering only mpox vaccination. EVALUATION: MVEPP highlighted the importance of recognizing and working to eliminate racial/ethnic and other disparities in access to medical countermeasures during a public health emergency. Jurisdictions developed and implemented innovative strategies to bring mpox vaccination and related services to communities disproportionately affected by mpox-including MSM and the subpopulations of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino MSM. Lessons learned from MVEPP may inform efforts to reduce disparities during future public health responses.

Observational studies demonstrated 30-40% effectiveness of OMV meningococcal serogroup-B vaccines against gonorrhea. To explore whether healthy vaccinee bias influenced such findings, we examined effectiveness of MenB-FHbp, a non-OMV vaccine that is not protective against gonorrhea. MenB-FHbp was ineffective against gonorrhea. Healthy vaccinee bias likely did not confound earlier studies of OMV vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Declining antimicrobial susceptibility to current gonorrhoea antibiotic treatment and inadequate treatment options have raised the possibility of untreatable gonorrhoea. New prevention approaches, such as vaccination, are needed. Outer membrane vesicle meningococcal serogroup B vaccines might be protective against gonorrhoea. We evaluated the effectiveness of a serogroup B meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine (MenB-4C) against gonorrhoea in individuals aged 16-23 years in two US cities. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed gonorrhoea and chlamydia infections among individuals aged 16-23 years from sexually transmitted infection surveillance records in New York City and Philadelphia from 2016 to 2018. We linked gonorrhoea and chlamydia case records to immunisation registry records to determine MenB-4C vaccination status at infection, defined as complete vaccination (two MenB-4C doses administered 30-180 days apart), partial vaccination (single MenB-4C vaccine dose), or no vaccination (serogroup B meningococcal vaccine naive). Using log-binomial regression with generalised estimating equations to account for correlations between multiple infections per patient, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) and 95% CIs to determine if vaccination was protective against gonorrhoea. We used individual-level data for descriptive analyses and infection-level data for regression analyses. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2016, and Dec 31, 2018, we identified 167 706 infections (18 099 gonococcal infections, 124 876 chlamydial infections, and 24 731 gonococcal and chlamydial co-infections) among 109 737 individuals linked to the immunisation registries. 7692 individuals were vaccinated, of whom 4032 (52·4%) had received one dose, 3596 (46·7%) two doses, and 64 (<1·0%) at least three doses. Compared with no vaccination, complete vaccination series (APR 0·60, 95% CI 0·47-0·77; p<0·0001) and partial vaccination series (0·74, 0·63-0·88; p=0·0012) were protective against gonorrhoea. Complete MenB-4C vaccination series was 40% (95% CI 23-53) effective against gonorrhoea and partial MenB-4C vaccination series was 26% (12-37) effective. INTERPRETATION: MenB-4C vaccination was associated with a reduced gonorrhoea prevalence. MenB-4C could offer cross-protection against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Development of an effective gonococcal vaccine might be feasible with implications for gonorrhoea prevention and control. FUNDING: None.

BACKGROUND: HIV co-infection among persons diagnosed with gonorrhea is not well characterized. Trends in HIV prevalence among persons diagnosed with gonorrhea may have significant implications for HIV prevention interventions, especially for MSM. MSM are increasing and disproportionately represented among incident gonorrhea cases reported in a multi-state sentinel surveillance network. Using data from this network, we estimated HIV prevalence among MSM by self-report and explored trends in co-infection by key demographics. DESIGN: Observational study using enhanced surveillance data. METHODS: Six geographically diverse jurisdictions in the STD Surveillance Network (SSuN) 2010 - 2019 randomly sampled laboratory-confirmed gonorrhea cases. Enhanced investigations on sampled cases included patient interviews eliciting demographic, behavioral and HIV testing history. These data were weighted to adjust for study design and non-response to estimate trends in HIV prevalence. RESULTS: Of 653,522 reported cases, 28,979 were sampled and investigated. The proportion of cases reporting living with diagnosed HIV at the time of their gonorrhea diagnosis increased 61% across the study period from 6.6% in 2010 to 10.8% in 2019. The observed increase in HIV prevalence is concurrent with an increase in the proportion of gonorrhea cases attributable to MSM. HIV prevalence among MSM decreased in two jurisdictions and increasing trends were observed among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic MSM. HIV prevalence decreased among non-Hispanic White MSM, MSM under 20 and those 40 years of age or older. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis with gonorrhea, especially among MSM, should be a sentinel event triggering screening for HIV, referral to high-impact HIV prevention interventions or to HIV primary care.

BACKGROUND: Neurosyphilis, a complication of syphilis, can occur at any stage of infection. Measuring the prevalence of neurosyphilis is challenging and there are limited data on the prevalence of neurologic or ocular symptoms among patients with syphilis. We sought to describe the prevalence of neurologic and/or ocular symptoms among early syphilis (ES) cases and the clinical management of symptomatic cases enrolled in the STD Surveillance Network (SSuN) Neuro/Ocular Syphilis Surveillance project. METHODS: Persons diagnosed with ES were selected for interviews based on current health department protocols in five participating SSuN jurisdictions from November 2016-October 2017. All interviewed ES cases were screened for self-reported neurologic and/or ocular symptoms. Additional clinical information on diagnostic testing and treatment for cases concerning for neurosyphilis/ocular syphilis was obtained from providers. RESULTS: Among 9,123 patients with ES who were interviewed, 151 (1.7%, 95% CI: 1.4-1.9) reported >/=1 neurologic or ocular symptom. Of the 53 (35%) who underwent lumbar puncture (LP), 22 (42%) had documented abnormal cerebrospinal fluid, of which 21 (95%) were treated for neurosyphilis/ocular syphilis. Among the remaining 98 symptomatic patients with no documented LP (65%), 12 (12%) were treated for and/or clinically diagnosed with neurosyphilis/ocular syphilis. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a low prevalence of self-reported neurologic and/or ocular symptoms in interviewed ES cases. Approximately one-third of ES cases who self-reported symptoms underwent further recommended diagnostic evaluation. Understanding barriers to appropriate clinical evaluation is important to ensuring appropriate management of patients with possible neurologic and/or ocular manifestations of syphilis.

BACKGROUND: Lacking information on men who have sex with men (MSM) for most reported cases, sexually transmitted disease (STD) programs in the United States have used crude measures such as male-to-female case ratios (MFCR) as a rule of thumb to gauge MSM involvement at the local level, primarily with respect to syphilis cases in the past. Suitability of this measure for gonorrhea incidence has not previously been investigated. METHODS: A random sample of gonorrhea cases reported from January 2010 through June 2013 were interviewed in selected counties participating in the STD Surveillance Network to obtain gender of sex partners and history of transactional sex. Weighted estimates of proportion of cases among MSM and proportion reporting transactional sex were developed; correlation between MFCR and proportion MSM was assessed. RESULTS: Male-to-female case ratio ranged from 0.66 to 8.7, and the proportion of cases occurring among MSM varied from 2.5% to 62.3%. The MFCR was strongly correlated with proportion of cases among MSM after controlling for transactional sex (Pearson partial r = 0.754, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Male-to-female case ratio for gonorrhea at the county level is a reliable proxy measure indicating MSM involvement in gonorrhea case incidence and should be used by STD programs to tailor their programmatic mix to include MSM-specific interventions.