OBJECTIVE: Using published, nationally representative estimates, we calculated the total number of perinatally HIV-exposed and -infected infants born during 1978-2010, the number of perinatal HIV cases prevented by interventions designed for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), and the number of infants exposed to antiretroviral drugs during the prenatal and intrapartum periods. DESIGN: We calculated the number of infants exposed to antiretroviral drugs since 1994, and the number of cases of mother-to-child HIV transmission prevented from 1994-2010 using published data. We generated confidence limits for our estimates by performing a simulation study. METHODS: Data were obtained from published, nationally-representative estimates from CDC. Model parameters included the annual numbers of HIV-infected pregnant women, the annual numbers of perinatally-infected infants, the annual proportions of infants exposed to antiretroviral drugs during the prenatal and intrapartum period, and the estimated mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate in the absence of preventive interventions. For the simulation study, model parameters were assigned distributions and we performed 1,000,000 repetitions. RESULTS: Between 1978 and 2010, an estimated 186,157 (95% CI: 185,312-187,003) HIV-exposed infants and approximately 21,003 (95% CI: 20.179-21,288) infected infants were born in the United States. Between 1994 and 2010, an estimated 124,342 (95% CI: 123,651-125,034) HIV-exposed infants were born in the U.S., and approximately 6,083 (95% CI: 5,931-6,236) infants were perinatally infected with HIV. During this same period about 100,207 (95% CI: 99,374-101,028) infants were prenatally exposed to antiretroviral drugs. As a result of PMTCT interventions, an estimated 21,956 (95% CI: 20,191-23,759) MTCT HIV cases have been prevented in the US since 1994. CONCLUSION: Though continued vigilance is needed to eliminate mother-to-child HIV transmission, PMTCT interventions have prevented nearly 22,000 cases of perinatal HIV transmission in the United States since 1994.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) infects approximately 120 million people worldwide. As many as 40 million have symptoms of LF disease, including lymphedema, elephantiasis, and hydrocele. India constitutes approximately 45% of the world's burden of LF. The Indian NGO Church's Auxiliary for Social Action (CASA) has been conducting a community-based lymphedema management program in Orissa State since 2007 that aims to reduce the morbidity associated with lymphedema and elephantiasis. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate the effects of this program on lymphedema patients' perceived disability. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For this prospective cohort study, 370 patients ≥14 years of age, who reported lymphedema lasting more than three months in one or both legs, were recruited from villages in the Bolagarh sub-district, Khurda District, Orissa, India. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II was administered to participants at baseline (July, 2009), and then at regular intervals through 24 months (July, 2011), to assess patients' perceived disability. Disability scores decreased significantly (p<0.0001) from baseline to 24 months. Multivariable analysis using mixed effects modeling found that employment and time in the program were significantly associated with lower disability scores after two years of program involvement. Older age, female gender, the presence of other chronic health conditions, moderate (Stage 3) or advanced (Stage 4-7) lymphedema, reporting an adenolymphangitis (ADL) episode during the previous 30 days, and the presence of inter-digital lesions were associated with higher disability scores. Patients with moderate or advanced lymphedema experienced greater improvements in perceived disability over time. Patients participating in the program for at least 12 months also reported losing 2.5 fewer work days per month (p<0.001) due to their lymphedema, compared to baseline. SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that community-based lymphedema management programs can reduce disability and prevent days of work lost. These effects were sustained over a 24 month period.

BACKGROUND: Child-to-Breastfeeding-Woman Transmission (CBWT) of HIV occurs when an HIV-infected infant transmits the virus to an HIV-uninfected woman through breastfeeding. Transmission likely occurs as a result of breastfeeding contact during a period of epithelial disruption, such as maternal skin fissures and/or infant stomatitis. Despite extensive epidemiologic and phylogenetic evidence, however, CBWT of HIV continues to be overlooked. OBJECTIVE: This paper summarizes the available evidence for CBWT from nosocomial outbreaks, during which nosocomially HIV-infected infants transmitted the virus to their mothers through breastfeeding. This paper also explores the CBWT risk associated with HIV-infected orphans and their female caretakers, and the lack of guidance regarding CBWT prevention in infant feeding recommendations. METHODS: We searched online databases including PubMed and ScienceDirect for English language articles published from January 1975 to January 2011 using the search terms "HIV", "perinatal", "child-to-mother", and "breastfeeding". The citations from all selected articles were reviewed for additional studies. RESULTS: We identified five studies documenting cases of CBWT. Two studies contained data on the number of HIV-infected women, as well as the proportion breastfeeding. Rates of CBWT ranged from 40 - 60% among women reporting breastfeeding after their infants were infected. CONCLUSIONS: Poor infection control practices, especially in areas of high HIV prevalence, have resulted in pediatric HIV infections and put breastfeeding women at risk for CBWT. Current infant feeding guidelines and HIV prevention messages do not address CBWT, and fail to provide strategies to help women reduce their risk of acquiring HIV during breastfeeding.

While breastfeeding remains a significant source of mother-to-child HIV transmission (MTCT) globally, it is the recommended infant feeding option for HIV-infected women in resource-limited settings. However, HIV-infected women in the USA-where breast milk alternatives are acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable, and safe-have been counseled to avoid all breastfeeding since 1985. A number of studies have found that despite such recommendations against breastfeeding by HIV-infected women, a very small proportion of HIV-infected women in the USA continue to breastfeed their infants for various reasons. Many of these women received late or no prenatal care, inadequate antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis, or were not diagnosed with HIV until at or after labor and delivery. While breastfeeding has never been a major source of perinatal HIV infections in the USA, studies have identified the practice as a risk factor for MTCT in the USA. Complete avoidance remains the only sure way to prevent late postnatal HIV transmission through breastfeeding. (2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.)