BACKGROUND: In 2012, the World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) that set a target to eliminate measles and rubella in five of the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2020. Significant progress has been made toward achieving this goal through intensive efforts by countries and Measles & Rubella Initiative (M&RI) partners. Accelerating progress will require evidence-based approaches to improve implementation of the core strategies in the Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan. The M&RI Research and Innovation Working Group (R&IWG) conducted a web-based survey as part of a process to identify measles and rubella research priorities. Survey findings were used to inform discussions during a meeting of experts convened by the M&RI at the Pan American Health Organization in November 2016. METHODS: The cross-sectional web-based survey of scientific and programmatic experts included questions in four main topic areas: (1) epidemiology and economics (epidemiology); (2) new tools for surveillance, vaccine delivery, and laboratory testing (new tools); (3) immunization strategies and outbreak response (strategies); and (4) vaccine demand and communications (demand). Analyses were stratified by the six WHO regions and by global, regional, or national/sub-national level of respondents. RESULTS: The six highest priority research questions selected by survey respondents from the four topic areas were the following: (1) What are the causes of outbreaks in settings with high reported vaccination coverage? (epidemiology); (2) Can affordable diagnostic tests be developed to confirm measles and rubella cases rapidly and accurately at the point of care? (new tools); (3) What are effective strategies for increasing coverage of the routine first dose of measles vaccine administered at 9 or 12months? (strategies); (4) What are effective strategies for increasing coverage of the second dose given after the first year of life? (strategies); (5) How can communities best be engaged in planning, implementing and monitoring health services including vaccinations? (demand); (6) What capacity building is needed for health workers to be able to identify and work more effectively with community leaders? (demand). Research priorities varied by region and by global/regional/national levels for all topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: Research and innovation will be critical to make further progress toward achieving the GVAP measles and rubella elimination goals. The results of this survey can be used to inform decision-making for investments in research activities at the global, regional, and national levels.

INTRODUCTION: In 1988, an estimated 350,000 children were paralyzed by polio and 125 countries reported polio cases, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution to achieve polio eradication by 2000, and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was established as a partnership focused on eradication. Today, following eradication efforts, polio cases have decreased >99% and eradication of all three types of wild polioviruses is approaching. However, since polio resources substantially support disease surveillance and other health programs, losing polio assets could reverse progress toward achieving Global Vaccine Action Plan goals. Areas covered: As the end of polio approaches and GPEI funds and capacity decrease, we document knowledge, experience, and lessons learned from 30 years of polio eradication. Expert commentary: Transitioning polio assets to measles and rubella (MR) elimination efforts would accelerate progress toward global vaccination coverage and equity. MR elimination feasibility and benefits have long been established. Focusing efforts on MR elimination after achieving polio eradication would make a permanent impact on reducing child mortality but should be done through a 'diagonal approach' of using measles disease transmission to identify areas possibly susceptible to other vaccine-preventable diseases and to strengthen the overall immunization and health systems to achieve disease-specific goals.

When this journal last published a special supplement on polio nearly 18 years ago, we lived in a world that was still deeply entangled with this devastating virus [1]. All 3 poliovirus serotypes were still circulating on four continents. Some of the world’s largest countries remained mired in the disease, some with thousands of cases each year. Most tellingly, a number of polio-infected countries, particularly in Africa, had not even introduced core eradication strategies, such as polio national immunization days (NIDs). Both financial and human resources were stretched; worldwide, <250 people were employed full time in a program whose success would eventually require, at its peak, reaching and vaccinating >600 million children multiple times per year. | Despite these realities, optimism and enthusiasm were running high in 1997. Nelson Mandela himself had, just the previous year, launched the continent-wide Polio-Free Africa initiative accompanied by a Kick Polio Out of Africa social mobilization campaign. The massive Operation MECACAR was rapidly clearing virus from the 18 participating countries, spanning 2 continents and coordinating and collaborating through shared poliovirus surveillance, cross-border planning, and synchronized NIDs across the Middle East, Caucasus, Central Asian Republics, and Russian Federation. And in most of the world where the 4 core eradication strategies had been introduced, the number of both cases of polio-paralyzed children and polio-infected countries were falling rapidly (Figure 1). The sense that, with further program expansion, eradication might soon be inevitable was reinforced in 1999 by the eradication of the type 2 wild poliovirus serotype globally; that the last type 2 case was reported from Aligarh, India, suggested that eradication of the other serotypes would follow quickly, both in that country and globally. By 2000, 3 of the 6 regions of the World Health Organization (WHO) had seen their last indigenous poliovirus and were either already certified as polio free or soon would be. Although it was apparent that the original goal of completing wild poliovirus eradication globally by 2000 would be missed, the then Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mr Kofi Annan, convened a special Polio Eradication Summit in September of that year to ensure that the program remained on track for its secondary target of certification of global eradication in 2005. By 2001, polio had been reduced to 475 cases in 10 polio-endemic countries, compared with 350 000 cases in 125 polio-endemic countries in 1988.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, enhanced poliovirus surveillance was established in polio-endemic areas of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, India, to assess poliovirus infection in older individuals. METHODS: In Uttar Pradesh, stool specimens from asymptomatic household and neighborhood contacts of patients with laboratory-confirmed polio were tested for polioviruses. In Bihar, in community-based surveillance, children and adults from 250 randomly selected households in the Kosi River area provided stool and pharyngeal swab samples that were tested for polioviruses. A descriptive analysis of surveillance data was performed. RESULTS: In Uttar Pradesh, 89 of 1842 healthy contacts of case patients with polio (4.8%) were shedding wild poliovirus (WPV); 54 of 85 (63.5%) were ≥5 years of age. Shedding was significantly higher in index households than in neighborhood households (P < .05). In Bihar, 11 of 451 healthy persons (2.4%) were shedding WPV in their stool; 6 of 11 (54.5%) were ≥5 years of age. Mean viral titer was similar in older and younger children. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of persons ≥5 years of age were asymptomatically shedding polioviruses. These findings provide indirect evidence that older individuals could have contributed to community transmission of WPV in India. Polio vaccination campaigns generally target children <5 years of age. Expanding this target age group in polio-endemic areas could accelerate polio eradication.

Despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines, little is known about prevalence and risk factors for hepatitis A (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among Thai men who have sex with men. The prevalence of HAV and HBV infection among men who have sex with men cohort in Bangkok was assessed. Baseline blood specimens were drawn and demographic and behavioral data were collected. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for prevalent HAV and HBV infection. One thousand two hundred ninety-nine Thai men who have sex with men 18 years and older were enrolled. Among those with results, 349/1,291 (27.0%) had evidence of past or current hepatitis A infection. Of the 1,117 (86.5%) men with unambiguous HBV test results, 442 (39.6%) had serologic evidence of past/current infection, 103 (9.2%) were immune due to hepatitis B vaccination, 572 (51.2%) had no evidence of immunological exposure to HBV or vaccine. Of those with past/current HBV infection, 130 (29.4%) were HIV positive. Age >35 years was independently associated with both HAV and HBV infection. University education was protective against both HAV and HBV infection. Increased alcohol consumption, number of lifetime male sexual partners ≥10, and prevalent HIV infection were also independently associated with HBV infection. The prevalence of past/current HAV and HBV infection was high in Bangkok men who have sex with men. Age-cohorts with a higher prevalence of hepatitis B vaccine induced immunity may be expected in the future. Hepatitis A and B vaccination is recommended.

The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) made rapid progress after its launch by the World Health Assembly in 1988, reducing polio cases by more than 99% from an estimated 350 000 in 1988 to 719 cases in 2000. However, further progress toward eradicating polio stalled after 2000 in a handful of tropical endemic countries, and the international spread of the virus from these endemic areas led to recurrent outbreaks in previously polio-free countries. One factor related to the stalled progress was the well-documented lower immunogenicity and effectiveness in tropical developing countries of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) [1,  2], so attention focused on developing and licensing monovalent type 1 and type 3 vaccines to improve the effectiveness of vaccination by avoiding cross-interference between the 3 serotypes that occurs following vaccination with the traditional trivalent OPV (tOPV). This issue of the Journal contains the most recent in a series of 3 clinical trials in 2 African (Egypt, South Africa) countries and 1 Asian (India) country, demonstrating the superior type-specific immunogenicity in developing countries of monovalent oral poliovirus vaccines (mOPVs), as compared with tOPV [3–6]. In particular, the 3 trials demonstrate the superior immune responses of monovalent OPV type 1 (mOPV1) and type 3 (mOPV3) compared with tOPV, either following 1 dose of vaccine given to newborn infants (in Egypt and South Africa), or 2 doses given at birth and 1 month of age (in India).