Last data update: Dec 09, 2024. (Total: 48320 publications since 2009)
Records 1-19 (of 19 Records) |
Query Trace: Krow-Lucal E[original query] |
---|
Surveillance to track progress toward polio eradication - Worldwide, 2022-2023
Kishore N , Krow-Lucal E , Diop OM , Jorba J , Avagnan T , Grabovac V , Kfutwah AKW , Johnson T , Joshi S , Sangal L , Sharif S , Wahdan A , Tallis GF , Kovacs SD . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024 73 (13) 278-285 The reliable and timely detection of poliovirus cases through surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), supplemented by environmental surveillance of sewage samples, is a critical component of the polio eradication program. Since 1988, the number of polio cases caused by wild poliovirus (WPV) has declined by >99.9%, and eradication of WPV serotypes 2 and 3 has been certified; only serotype 1 (WPV1) continues to circulate, and transmission remains endemic in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This surveillance update evaluated indicators from AFP surveillance, environmental surveillance for polioviruses, and Global Polio Laboratory Network performance data provided by 28 priority countries for the program during 2022-2023. No WPV1 cases have been detected outside of Afghanistan and Pakistan since August 2022, when an importation into Malawi and Mozambique resulted in an outbreak during 2021-2022. During 2022-2023, among 28 priority countries, 20 (71.4%) met national AFP surveillance indicator targets, and the number of environmental surveillance sites increased. However, low national rates of reported AFP cases in priority countries in 2023 might have resulted from surveillance reporting lags; substantial national and subnational AFP surveillance gaps persist. Maintaining high-quality surveillance is critical to achieving the goal of global polio eradication. Monitoring surveillance indicators is important to identifying gaps and guiding surveillance-strengthening activities, particularly in countries at high risk for poliovirus circulation. |
Measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (PRIORIX): Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2022
Krow-Lucal E , Marin M , Shepersky L , Bahta L , Loehr J , Dooling K . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 71 (46) 1465-1470 Vaccination is the main means for preventing measles, mumps, and rubella virus infections and their related complications (1,2). Achieving and maintaining high 2-dose measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination coverage in the United States has led to elimination of endemic measles in 2000, rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in 2004, and a sharp decrease in mumps cases. However, measles and rubella remain endemic in many countries, leading to importations of cases and occasional local transmission within the United States (3). Reported U.S. mumps cases declined >99% from the prevaccine period (4); however, mumps is endemic worldwide, and since 2006, the number of mumps cases and mumps outbreaks has increased in the United States, with wider geographic spread since 2016 (4). Given the risk for importation of measles and rubella and the resurgence of mumps, maintaining high measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage is important. Since 1978, only one MMR vaccine, M-M-R II (Merck and Co., Inc.), has been available in the United States. On June 6, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration approved a second MMR vaccine, PRIORIX (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals), for the prevention of measles, mumps, and rubella in persons aged ≥12 months. The three live attenuated viruses contained in PRIORIX are genetically similar or identical to the corresponding components in M-M-R II (Table) (5-7). On June 23, 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) unanimously recommended PRIORIX as an option to prevent measles, mumps, and rubella according to the existing recommended schedules and for off-label uses (i.e., indications not included in the package insert)* (1,2). ACIP considered PRIORIX to be safe, immunogenic, and noninferior to M-M-R II. Both PRIORIX and M-M-R II are fully interchangeable for all indications for which MMR vaccination is recommended. This report contains ACIP recommendations specific to PRIORIX and supplements the existing ACIP recommendations for MMR use (1,2). |
Progress towards the elimination of hepatitis B in children in Colombia: a novel two-phase study approach
Ríos-Hincapié CY , Murad-Rivera R , Tohme RA , Ropero AM , Gómez B , Cardona DL , Forest BN , Cuellar D , Cardenas I , Krow-Lucal E , Wannemuehler K , de la Hoz Restrepo F , Sánchez-Molano SM , Delgado CE , Rivillas-Garcia JC , Wasley A . J Viral Hepat 2022 29 (9) 737-747 The World Health Organization (WHO) has established a target to eliminate mother-to-child-transmission (EMTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV), defined as a prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) of ≤0.1% among children, by 2030. Using nationally representative serosurveys to verify achievement of this target requires large sample sizes and significant resources. We assessed the feasibility of a potentially more efficient two-phase method to verify EMTCT of HBV in Colombia. In the first phase, we conducted a risk assessment to identify municipalities at the highest risk of ongoing HBV transmission. We ranked the 1,122 municipalities of Colombia based on reports of HBV infection in pregnant women per 1,000 population. Municipalities with ≥0.3 reports per 1,000 persons (equating to the top quartile) were further assessed based on health facility birth rates, coverage with three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB3), and seroprevalence data. Hepatitis B risk was considered to be further increased for municipalities with HepB3 coverage or health facility birth rate <90%. In the second phase, we conducted a multistage household serosurvey of children aged 5-10 years in 36 municipalities with the highest assessed HBV risk. HBsAg was not detected in any of 3,203 children tested, yielding a 90% upper confidence bound of <0.1% prevalence. Coverage with HepB3 and hepatitis B birth dose was high at 97.5% and 95.6%, respectively. These results support the conclusion that Colombia has likely achieved EMTCT of HBV. |
Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Activities and the Spread of COVID-19 Among Residential University Communities - Arkansas, August 21-September 5, 2020.
Vang KE , Krow-Lucal ER , James AE , Cima MJ , Kothari A , Zohoori N , Porter A , Campbell EM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (1) 20-23 Preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in colleges and universities requires mitigation strategies that address on- and off-campus congregate living settings as well as extracurricular activities and other social gatherings (1-4). At the start of the academic year, sorority and fraternity organizations host a series of recruitment activities known as rush week; rush week culminates with bid day, when selections are announced. At university A in Arkansas, sorority rush week (for women) was held during August 17-22, 2020, and consisted of on- and off-campus social gatherings, including an outdoor bid day event on August 22. Fraternity rush week (for men) occurred during August 27-31, with bid day scheduled for September 5. During August 22-September 5, university A-associated COVID-19 cases were reported to the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH). A total of 965 confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases associated with university A were identified, with symptom onset occurring during August 20-September 5, 2020; 31% of the patients with these cases reported involvement in any fraternity or sorority activity. Network analysis identified 54 gatherings among all linkages of cases to places of residence and cases to events, 49 (91%) were linked by participation in fraternity and sorority activities accounting for 42 (72%) links among gatherings. On September 4, university A banned gatherings of ≥10 persons, and fraternity bid day was held virtually. The rapid increase in COVID-19 cases was likely facilitated by on- and off-campus congregate living settings and activities, and health departments should work together with student organizations and university leadership to ensure compliance with mitigation measures. |
Multidisciplinary Community-Based Investigation of a COVID-19 Outbreak Among Marshallese and Hispanic/Latino Communities - Benton and Washington Counties, Arkansas, March-June 2020.
Center KE , Da Silva J , Hernandez AL , Vang K , Martin DW , Mazurek J , Lilo EA , Zimmerman NK , Krow-Lucal E , Campbell EM , Cowins JV , Walker C , Dominguez KL , Gallo B , Gunn JKL , McCormick D , Cochran C , Smith MR , Dillaha JA , James AE . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 69 (48) 1807-1811 By June 2020, Marshallese and Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) persons in Benton and Washington counties of Arkansas had received a disproportionately high number of diagnoses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite representing approximately 19% of these counties' populations (1), Marshallese and Hispanic persons accounted for 64% of COVID-19 cases and 57% of COVID-19-associated deaths. Analyses of surveillance data, focus group discussions, and key-informant interviews were conducted to identify challenges and propose strategies for interrupting transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Challenges included limited native-language health messaging, high household occupancy, high employment rate in the poultry processing industry, mistrust of the medical system, and changing COVID-19 guidance. Reducing the COVID-19 incidence among communities that suffer disproportionately from COVID-19 requires strengthening the coordination of public health, health care, and community stakeholders to provide culturally and linguistically tailored public health education, community-based prevention activities, case management, care navigation, and service linkage. |
Immune response at 12-23months following a single dose of Vero cell culture-derived Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine in adults previously vaccinated with mouse brain-derived JE vaccine
Krow-Lucal ER , Laven J , Perry L , Biggerstaff BJ , Johnson BW , Hollis E , Fischer M , Woolpert T , Hills SL . Vaccine 2020 38 (44) 6899-6903 BACKGROUND: Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is an important cause of neurological disease in Asia. JE vaccine is recommended for travelers with higher JE risk itineraries. Inactivated Vero cell culture-derived JE vaccine (JE-VC) is the only JE vaccine currently available in the United States. An inactivated mouse brain-derived JE vaccine (JE-MB) previously was available but production was discontinued. One JE-VC dose administered to adults previously vaccinated with ≥3 doses of JE-MB provides good short-term protection for at least one month, but data on longer-term protection are limited. We evaluated non-inferiority of the JE virus neutralizing antibody response at 12-23 months in JE-MB-vaccinated adults administered one JE-VC dose compared with JE vaccine-naïve adults administered a JE-VC two-dose primary series. METHODS: We obtained archived sera from U.S. military personnel and performed a 50% plaque reduction neutralization test for anti-JE virus neutralizing antibodies. We compared the geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroprotection rate at 12-23 months after one JE-VC dose in previously JE-MB-vaccinated personnel and after the second JE-VC dose in previously JE vaccine-naïve personnel. Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the GMT ratio in previously vaccinated to vaccine-naïve personnel was >1/1.5. RESULTS: The GMT in previously JE-MB-vaccinated persons was 75 (95% CI 63-90) and in previously JE vaccine-naïve persons was 12 (95% CI 11-14), and seroprotection rates were 94% (235/250) and 54% (135/250), respectively. The ratio of GMTs was 6.3 (95% CI: 5.0-7.7), satisfying the criterion for non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: One JE-VC dose in previously JE-MB-vaccinated military personnel provides good protection for at least 1-2 years. The benefits of administration of a single JE-VC dose in previously JE-MB-vaccinated adults include a shorter time to completion of re-vaccination before travel, a decrease in the risk of adverse events, and reduced costs. |
Assessment of immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ratios to identify West Nile Virus and St. Louis Encephalitis virus infections during concurrent outbreaks of West Nile Virus and St. Louis encephalitis virus diseases, Arizona 2015
Curren EJ , Venkat H , Sunenshine R , Fitzpatrick K , Kosoy O , Krow-Lucal E , Zabel K , Adams L , Kretschmer M , Fischer M , Hills SL . Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2020 20 (8) 619-623 West Nile virus (WNV) and St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) are closely related mosquito-borne flaviviruses that cause clinical disease ranging from febrile illness to encephalitis. The standard for serological diagnosis is immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing followed by confirmatory plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to differentiate the infecting virus. However, the PRNT is time-consuming and requires manipulation of live virus. During concurrent WNV and SLEV outbreaks in Arizona in 2015, we assessed use of a diagnostic algorithm to simplify testing. It incorporated WNV and SLEV ratios based on positive-to-negative (P/N) values derived from the IgM antibody-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We compared each sample's ratio-based result with the confirmed WNV or SLEV sample result indicated by PRNT or PCR testing. We analyzed data from 70 patients with 77 serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples, including 53 patients with confirmed WNV infection and 17 patients with confirmed SLEV infection. Both WNV and SLEV ratios had specificity >/=95%, indicating a high likelihood that each ratio was correctly identifying the infecting virus. The SLEV ratio sensitivity of 30% was much lower than the WNV ratio sensitivity of 91%, likely because of higher cross-reactivity of SLEV antibodies and generation of lower P/N values. The standard for serological diagnosis of WNV and SLEV infections remains IgM testing followed by PRNT. However, these results suggest the ratios could potentially be used as part of a diagnostic algorithm in outbreaks to substantially reduce the need for PRNTs. |
Comparison of characteristics of patients with West Nile virus or St. Louis encephalitis virus neuroinvasive disease during concurrent outbreaks, Maricopa County, Arizona, 2015
Venkat H , Krow-Lucal E , Kretschmer M , Sylvester T , Levy C , Adams L , Fitzpatrick K , Laven J , Kosoy O , Sunenshine R , Smith K , Townsend J , Chevinsky J , Hennessey M , Jones J , Komatsu K , Fischer M , Hills S . Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2020 20 (8) 624-629 West Nile virus (WNV) and St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) are closely related mosquito-borne flaviviruses that can cause neuroinvasive disease. No concurrent WNV and SLEV disease outbreaks have previously been identified. When concurrent outbreaks occurred in 2015 in Maricopa County, Arizona, we collected data to describe the epidemiology, and to compare features of patients with WNV and SLEV neuroinvasive disease. We performed enhanced case finding, and gathered information from medical records and patient interviews. A case was defined as a clinically compatible illness and laboratory evidence of WNV, SLEV, or unspecified flavivirus infection in a person residing in Maricopa County in 2015. We compared demographic and clinical features of WNV and SLEV neuroinvasive cases; for this analysis, a case was defined as physician-documented encephalitis or meningitis and a white blood cell count >5 cells/mm(3) in cerebrospinal fluid. In total, we identified 82 cases, including 39 WNV, 21 SLEV, and 22 unspecified flavivirus cases. The comparative analysis included 21 WNV and 14 SLEV neuroinvasive cases. Among neuroinvasive cases, the median age of patients with SLEV (63 years) was higher than WNV (52 years). Patients had similar symptoms; rash was identified more frequently in WNV (33%) neuroinvasive cases than in SLEV (7%) cases, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). In summary, during the first known concurrent WNV and SLEV disease outbreaks, no specific clinical features were identified that could differentiate between WNV and SLEV neuroinvasive cases. Health care providers should consider both infections in patients with aseptic meningitis or encephalitis. |
Persistence of yellow fever virus-specific neutralizing antibodies after vaccination among U.S. travelers
Lindsey NP , Horiuchi KA , Corey Fulton D , Panella AJ , Kosoy OI , Velez JO , Krow-Lucal ER , Fischer M , Staples JE . J Travel Med 2018 25 (1) Background: Few studies have assessed the duration of humoral immunity following yellow fever (YF) vaccination in a non-endemic population. We evaluated seropositivity among U.S. resident travelers based on time post-vaccination. Methods: We identified serum samples from U.S. travelers with YF virus-specific plaque reduction neutralization testing (PRNT) performed at CDC from 1988-2016. Analyses were conducted to assess the effect of time since vaccination on neutralizing antibody titer counts. Results: Among 234 travelers who had neutralizing antibody testing performed on a specimen obtained >/=1 month after vaccination, 13 received multiple YF vaccinations and 221 had one dose of YF vaccine reported. All 13 who received more than one dose of YF vaccine had a positive PRNT regardless of the amount time since most recent vaccination. Among the 221 travelers with one reported dose of YF vaccine, 155 (70%) were vaccinated within 10 years (range 1 month-9 years) and 66 (30%) were vaccinated >/=10 years (range 10-53 years) prior to serum collection. Among the 155 individuals vaccinated <10 years prior to serum collection, 146 (94%) had a positive PRNT compared to 82% (54/66) of individuals vaccinated >/=10 years prior to serum collection (p = 0.01). Post-vaccination PRNT titers showed a time-dependent decrease. Individuals with immunocompromising conditions were less likely to have a positive PRNT (77%) compared to those who were not immunocompromised (92%; p = 0.04). Conclusion: Although the percentage of vaccinees with a positive PRNT and antibody titers decreased over time, a single dose of YF vaccine provided long-lasting protection in the majority of U.S. travelers. A booster dose could be considered for certain travelers who are planning travel to a high risk area based on immune competence and time since vaccination. |
Powassan virus disease in the United States, 2006-2016
Krow-Lucal ER , Lindsey NP , Fischer M , Hills SL . Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2018 18 (6) 286-290 BACKGROUND: Powassan virus (POWV) is a tick-borne flavivirus that causes rare, but often severe, disease in humans. POWV neuroinvasive disease was added to the U.S. nationally notifiable disease list in 2001 and nonneuroinvasive disease was added in 2004. The only previous review of the epidemiology of POWV disease in the United States based on cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) covered the period from 1999 through 2005. METHODS: We describe the epidemiology and clinical features of laboratory-confirmed POWV disease cases reported to CDC from 2006 through 2016. RESULTS: There were 99 cases of POWV disease reported during the 11-year period, including 89 neuroinvasive and 10 nonneuroinvasive disease cases. There was a median of seven cases per year (range: 1-22), with the highest numbers of cases reported in 2011 (n = 16), 2013 (n = 15), and 2016 (n = 22). Cases occurred throughout the year, but peaked in May and June. Cases were reported primarily from northeastern and north-central states. Overall, 72 (73%) cases were in males and the median age was 62 years (range: 3 months-87 years). Of the 11 (11%) cases who died, all were aged >50 years. The average annual incidence of neuroinvasive POWV disease was 0.0025 cases per 100,000 persons. CONCLUSIONS: POWV disease can be a severe disease and has been diagnosed with increased frequency in recent years. However, this might reflect increased disease awareness, improved test availability, and enhanced surveillance efforts. Clinicians should consider POWV disease in patients presenting with acute encephalitis or aseptic meningitis who are resident in, or have traveled to, an appropriate geographic region. |
Association and birth prevalence of microcephaly attributable to Zika virus infection among infants in Paraiba, Brazil, in 2015-16: a case-control study
Krow-Lucal ER , de Andrade MR , Cananea JNA , Moore CA , Leite PL , Biggerstaff BJ , Cabral CM , Itoh M , Percio J , Wada MY , Powers AM , Barbosa A , Abath RB , Staples JE , Coelho GE . Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018 2 (3) 205-213 Background: In 2015, the number of infants born with microcephaly increased in Paraiba, Brazil, after a suspected Zika virus outbreak. We did a retrospective case-control investigation to assess the association of microcephaly and Zika virus. Methods: We enrolled cases reported to the national database for microcephaly and born between Aug 1, 2015, and Feb 1, 2016, on the basis of their birth head circumference and total body length. We identified controls from the national birth registry and matched them to cases by location, aiming to enrol a minimum of two controls per case. Mothers of both cases and controls were asked about demographics, exposures, and illnesses and infants were measured at a follow-up visit 1-7 months after birth. We took blood samples from mothers and infants and classified those containing Zika virus IgM and neutralising antibodies as evidence of recent infection. We calculated prevalence of microcephaly and odds ratios (ORs) using a conditional logistic regression model with maximum penalised conditional likelihood, and combined these ORs with exposure probability estimates to determine the attributable risk. Findings: We enrolled 164 of 706 infants with complete information reported with microcephaly at birth, of whom we classified 91 (55%) as having microcephaly on the basis of their birth measurements, 36 (22%) as small, 21 (13%) as disproportionate, and 16 (10%) as not having microcephaly. 43 (26%) of the 164 infants had microcephaly at follow-up for an estimated prevalence of 5.9 per 1000 livebirths. We enrolled 114 control infants matched to the 43 infants classified as having microcephaly at follow-up. Infants with microcephaly at follow-up were more likely than control infants to be younger (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.7), have recent Zika virus infection (21.9, 7.0-109.3), or a mother with Zika-like symptoms in the first trimester (6.2, 2.8-15.4). Once Zika virus infection and infant age were controlled for, we found no significant association between microcephaly and maternal demographics, medications, toxins, or other infections. Based on the presence of Zika virus antibodies in infants, we concluded that 35-87% of microcephaly occurring during the time of our investigation in northeast Brazil was attributable to Zika virus. We estimate 2-5 infants per 1000 livebirths in Paraiba had microcephaly attributable to Zika virus. Interpretation: Time of exposure to Zika virus and evidence of infection in the infants were the only risk factors associated with microcephaly. This investigation has improved understanding of the outbreak of microcephaly in northeast Brazil and highlights the need to obtain multiple measurements after birth to establish if an infant has microcephaly and the need for further research to optimise testing criteria for congenital Zika virus infection. Funding: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. |
St. Louis encephalitis virus possibly transmitted through blood transfusion - Arizona, 2015
Venkat H , Adams L , Sunenshine R , Krow-Lucal E , Levy C , Kafenbaum T , Sylvester T , Smith K , Townsend J , Dosmann M , Kamel H , Patron R , Kuehnert M , Annambhotla P , Basavaraju SV , Rabe IB . Transfusion 2017 57 (12) 2987-2994 BACKGROUND: St. Louis encephalitis virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that infrequently causes epidemic central nervous system infections. In the United States, blood donors are not screened for St. Louis encephalitis virus infection, and transmission through blood transfusion has not been reported. During September 2015, St. Louis encephalitis virus infection was confirmed in an Arizona kidney transplant recipient. An investigation was initiated to determine the infection source. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The patient was interviewed, and medical records were reviewed. To determine the likelihood of mosquito-borne infection, mosquito surveillance data collected at patient and blood donor residences in timeframes consistent with their possible exposure periods were reviewed. To investigate other routes of exposure, organ and blood donor and recipient specimens were obtained and tested for evidence of St. Louis encephalitis virus infection. RESULTS: The patient presented with symptoms of central nervous system infection. Recent St. Louis encephalitis virus infection was serologically confirmed. The organ donor and three other organ recipients showed no laboratory or clinical evidence of St. Louis encephalitis virus infection. Among four donors of blood products received by the patient via transfusion, one donor had a serologically confirmed, recent St. Louis encephalitis virus infection. Exposure to an infected mosquito was unlikely based on the patient's minimal outdoor exposure. In addition, no St. Louis encephalitis virus-infected mosquito pools were identified around the patient's residence. CONCLUSION: This investigation provides evidence of the first reported possible case of St. Louis encephalitis virus transmission through blood product transfusion. Health care providers and public health professionals should maintain heightened awareness for St. Louis encephalitis virus transmission through blood transfusion in settings where outbreaks are identified. |
Increased rates of Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with Zika virus outbreak in the Salvador metropolitan area, Brazil
Styczynski AR , Malta JMAS , Krow-Lucal ER , Percio J , Nobrega ME , Vargas A , Lanzieri TM , Leite PL , Staples JE , Fischer MX , Powers AM , Chang GJ , Burns PL , Borland EM , Ledermann JP , Mossel EC , Schonberger LB , Belay EB , Salinas JL , Badaro RD , Sejvar JJ , Coelho GE . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017 11 (8) e0005869 In mid-2015, Salvador, Brazil, reported an outbreak of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), coinciding with the introduction and spread of Zika virus (ZIKV). We found that GBS incidence during April-July 2015 among those ≥12 years of age was 5.6 cases/100,000 population/year and increased markedly with increasing age to 14.7 among those ≥60 years of age. We conducted interviews with 41 case-patients and 85 neighborhood controls and found no differences in demographics or exposures prior to GBS-symptom onset. A higher proportion of case-patients (83%) compared to controls (21%) reported an antecedent illness (OR 18.1, CI 6.9-47.5), most commonly characterized by rash, headache, fever, and myalgias, within a median of 8 days prior to GBS onset. Our investigation confirmed an outbreak of GBS, particularly in older adults, that was strongly associated with Zika-like illness and geo-temporally associated with ZIKV transmission, suggesting that ZIKV may result in severe neurologic complications. |
Zika Virus Infection in Patient with No Known Risk Factors, Utah, USA, 2016
Krow-Lucal ER , Novosad SA , Dunn AC , Brent CR , Savage HM , Faraji A , Peterson D , Dibbs A , Vietor B , Christensen K , Laven JJ , Godsey MS Jr , Christensen B , Beyer B , Cortese MM , Johnson NC , Panella AJ , Biggerstaff BJ , Rubin M , Fridkin SK , Staples JE , Nakashima AK . Emerg Infect Dis 2017 23 (8) 1260-1267 In 2016, Zika virus disease developed in a man (patient A) who had no known risk factors beyond caring for a relative who died of this disease (index patient). We investigated the source of infection for patient A by surveying other family contacts, healthcare personnel, and community members, and testing samples for Zika virus. We identified 19 family contacts who had similar exposures to the index patient; 86 healthcare personnel had contact with the index patient, including 57 (66%) who had contact with body fluids. Of 218 community members interviewed, 28 (13%) reported signs/symptoms and 132 (61%) provided a sample. Except for patient A, no other persons tested had laboratory evidence of recent Zika virus infection. Of 5,875 mosquitoes collected, none were known vectors of Zika virus and all were negative for Zika virus. The mechanism of transmission to patient A remains unknown but was likely person-to-person contact with the index patient. |
Estimated incubation period for Zika virus disease
Krow-Lucal ER , Biggerstaff BJ , Staples JE . Emerg Infect Dis 2017 23 (5) 841-845 Information about the Zika virus disease incubation period can help identify risk periods and local virus transmission. In 2015-2016, data from 197 symptomatic travelers with recent Zika virus infection indicated an estimated incubation period of 3-14 days. For symptomatic persons with symptoms >2 weeks after travel, transmission might be not travel associated. |
West Nile Virus and other nationally notifiable arboviral diseases - United States, 2015
Krow-Lucal E , Lindsey NP , Lehman J , Fischer M , Staples JE . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017 66 (2) 51-55 Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) are transmitted to humans primarily through the bites of infected mosquitoes and ticks. The leading cause of domestically acquired arboviral disease in the United States is West Nile virus (WNV) (1). Other arboviruses, including La Crosse, St. Louis encephalitis, Jamestown Canyon, Powassan, and eastern equine encephalitis viruses, also cause sporadic cases and outbreaks. This report summarizes surveillance data reported to CDC in 2015 for nationally notifiable arboviruses. It excludes dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses, which are primarily nondomestic viruses typically acquired through travel (and are addressed in other CDC reports). In 2015, 45 states and the District of Columbia (DC) reported 2,282 cases of domestic arboviral disease. Among these cases, 2,175 (95%) were WNV disease and 1,455 (67%) of those were classified as neuroinvasive disease (meningitis, encephalitis, or acute flaccid paralysis). The national incidence of WNV neuroinvasive disease was 0.45 cases per 100,000 population. Because arboviral diseases continue to cause serious illness, maintaining surveillance is important to direct prevention activities such as reduction of vector populations and screening of blood donors. |
Zika virus disease cases - 50 states and the District of Columbia, January 1-July 31, 2016
Walker WL , Lindsey NP , Lehman JA , Krow-Lucal ER , Rabe IB , Hills SL , Martin SW , Fischer M , Staples JE . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016 65 (36) 983-986 Zika virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus primarily transmitted to humans by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Zika virus infections have also been documented through intrauterine transmission resulting in congenital infection; intrapartum transmission from a viremic mother to her newborn; sexual transmission; blood transfusion; and laboratory exposure. Most Zika virus infections are asymptomatic. Clinical illness, when it occurs, is generally mild and characterized by acute onset of fever, maculopapular rash, arthralgia, or nonpurulent conjunctivitis. However, Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause adverse outcomes such as fetal loss, and microcephaly and other serious brain anomalies. Guillain-Barre syndrome, a rare autoimmune condition affecting the peripheral nervous system, also has been associated with Zika virus infection. Following the identification of local transmission of Zika virus in Brazil in May 2015, the virus has continued to spread throughout the Region of the Americas, and travel-associated cases have increased. In 2016, Zika virus disease and congenital infections became nationally notifiable conditions in the United States (8). As of September 3, 2016, a total of 2,382 confirmed and probable cases of Zika virus disease with symptom onset during January 1-July 31, 2016, had been reported from 48 of 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. Most cases (2,354; 99%) were travel-associated, with either direct travel or an epidemiologic link to a traveler to a Zika virus-affected area. Twenty-eight (1%) cases were reported as locally acquired, including 26 associated with mosquito-borne transmission, one acquired in a laboratory, and one with an unknown mode of transmission. Zika virus disease should be considered in patients with compatible clinical signs or symptoms who traveled to or reside in areas with ongoing Zika virus transmission or who had unprotected sex with someone who traveled to those areas. Health care providers should continue to educate patients, especially pregnant women, about the importance of avoiding infection with Zika virus, and all pregnant women should be assessed for possible Zika virus exposure at each prenatal visit. |
Preliminary findings from an investigation of Zika virus infection in a patient with no known risk factors - Utah, 2016
Brent C , Dunn A , Savage H , Faraji A , Rubin M , Risk I , Garcia W , Cortese M , Novosad S , Krow-Lucal ER , Crain J , Hill M , Atkinson A , Peterson D , Christensen K , Dimond M , Staples JE , Nakashima A . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016 65 (36) 981-982 On July 12, 2016, the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) was notified by a clinician caring for an adult (patient A) who was evaluated for fever, rash, and conjunctivitis that began on July 1. Patient A had not traveled to an area with ongoing Zika virus transmission; had not had sexual contact with a person who recently traveled; and had not received a blood transfusion, organ transplant, or mosquito bites. Patient A provided care over several days to an elderly male family contact (the index patient) who contracted Zika virus abroad. The index patient developed septic shock with multiple organ failure and died in the hospital on June 25, 2016. The index patient's blood specimen obtained 2 days before his death had a level of viremia approximately 100,000 times higher than the average level reported in persons infected with Zika virus. Zika virus infection was diagnosed in patient A by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing on a urine specimen collected 7 days after symptom onset. In addition, a serum specimen collected 11 days after symptom onset, after patient A's symptoms had resolved, was positive for antibodies to Zika virus by Zika immunoglobulin M (IgM) capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and had neutralizing antibodies detected by plaque-reduction neutralization testing (PRNT). Working with Salt Lake and Davis County Health Departments, UDOH requested assistance from CDC with an investigation to determine patient A's exposures and determine a probable source of infection. |
Concurrent outbreaks of St. Louis encephalitis virus and West Nile virus disease - Arizona, 2015
Venkat H , Krow-Lucal E , Hennessey M , Jones J , Adams L , Fischer M , Sylvester T , Levy C , Smith K , Plante L , Komatsu K , Staples JE , Hills S . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015 64 (48) 1349-50 St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) are closely related mosquito-borne flaviviruses that can cause outbreaks of acute febrile illness and neurologic disease. Both viruses are endemic throughout much of the United States and have the same Culex species mosquito vectors and avian hosts; however, since WNV was first identified in the United States in 1999, SLEV disease incidence has been substantially lower than WNV disease incidence, and no outbreaks involving the two viruses circulating in the same location at the same time have been identified. Currently, there is a commercially available laboratory test for diagnosis of acute WNV infection, but there is no commercially available SLEV test, and all SLEV testing must be performed at public health laboratories. In addition, because antibodies against SLEV and WNV can cross-react on standard diagnostic tests, confirmatory neutralizing antibody testing at public health laboratories is usually required to determine the flavivirus species. This report describes the first known concurrent outbreaks of SLEV and WNV disease in the United States. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Dec 09, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure