OBJECTIVE: To compare the sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital related factors associated with discharge of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) survivors to inpatient rehabilitation (IRF) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) rehabilitation services. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study from the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP) participating hospitals during 2016 to 2019. SETTING: 9 Participating hospitals from PCNASP in United States PARTICIPANTS: 130,988 patients with AIS from 569 hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Discharge to IRF and SNF RESULTS: Patients discharged to a SNF had longer length of hospital stay, more comorbidities, and higher modified Rankin scores compared to patients discharged to an IRF. Nine characteristics were associated with being less likely to be discharged to an IRF than an SNF: older age (85+ years old, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.20 [confidence interval [CI]=0.18- 0.21]), identifying as non-Hispanic Black (AOR=0.85 [CI=0.81-0.89]), identifying as Hispanic (AOR=0.80 [CI=0.74-0.87]), having Medicaid/Medicare (AOR=0.73 [CI=0.70-0.77]), being able to ambulate with assistance from another person (AOR=0.93 [CI=0.89-0.97]), being unable to ambulate (AOR =0.73 [CI=0.62-0.87]) and having comorbidities, prior stroke (AOR=0.69 [CI=0.66-0.73]), diabetes (AOR=0.85 [CI=0.82-0.88]), and myocardial infraction/coronary artery disease (AOR=0.94 [CI=0.90-0.97]). Four characteristics were associated with being more likely to be discharged to an IRF than an SNF: being a man (AOR=1.20 [CI=1.16-1.24]), and having a slight disability (Rankin Score 2) (AOR=1.41 [CI=1.29-1.54]), being at larger hospitals (200-399 beds: AOR=1.31 [CI=1.23-1.40]; 400+ beds: AOR=1.29 [CI=1.20-1.38]), and being at a hospital with stroke unit (AOR=1.12 [CI=1.07-1.17]). CONCLUSION: This study found differences in demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics of AIS patients discharged for rehabilitation to an IRF versus SNF. The characteristics of patients receiving rehabilitation services may be helpful for researchers and hospitals making policies related to stroke discharge and practices that optimize patient outcomes. Populations experiencing inequities in access to rehabilitation services should be identified, and those who qualify for rehabilitation in IRF should receive this care in preference to rehabilitation in SNF.

INTRODUCTION: Studies documented significant reductions in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for acute stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic. A limited number of studies assessed the adherence to stroke performance measures during the pandemic. We examined rates of stroke hospitalization and adherence to stroke quality-of-care measures before and during the early phase of pandemic. METHODS: We identified hospitalizations with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke or transient ischemic attack among 406 hospitals who contributed data to the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program. We used 10 performance measures to examine the effect of the pandemic on stroke quality of care. We compared data from 2 periods: pre-COVID-19 (week 11-24 in 2019) and COVID-19 (week 11-24 in 2020). We used χ(2) tests for differences in categorical variables and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. RESULTS: We identified 64,461 hospitalizations. We observed a 20.2% reduction in stroke hospitalizations (from 35,851 to 28,610) from the pre-COVID-19 period to the COVID-19 period. Hospitalizations among patients aged 85 or older, women, and non-Hispanic White patients declined the most. A greater percentage of patients aged 18 to 64 were hospitalized with ischemic stroke during COVID-19 than during pre-COVID-19 (34.4% vs 32.5%, P < .001). Stroke severity was higher during COVID-19 than during pre-COVID-19 for both hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke, and in-hospital death among patients with ischemic stroke increased from 4.3% to 5.0% (P = .003) during the study period. We found no differences in rates of receiving care across stroke type during the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite a significant reduction in stroke hospitalizations, more severe stroke among hospitalized patients, and an increase in in-hospital death during the pandemic period, we found no differences in adherence to quality of stroke care measures.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve stroke quality of care and patient outcomes, quality of care metrics are monitored to assess utilization of evidence-based stroke care processes as part of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP). We aimed to assess temporal trends in defect free care (DFC) received by stroke patients in the PCNASP between 2008 and 2018. METHODS: Quality of care data for ten performance measures were available for 849,793 patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to a participating hospital with a clinical diagnosis of stroke between 2008 and 2018. A patient who receives care according to all performance measures for which they are eligible, receives "defect-free care" (DFC) (e.g. appropriate medications, assessments and education). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the factors associated with receipt of DFC. RESULTS: DFC among ischemic stroke patients increased from 38.0% in 2008 to 80.8% in 2018 (p<0.0001), with the largest improvement seen in receipt of stroke education (relative percent change, RPC=64%). Similarly, DFC for hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients increased from 46.7% to 82.6% (RPC=76.9%) and 39.9% to 85.0% (RPC=113.0%) (p<0.001), respectively. Among ischemic stroke patients, the adjusted odds for receiving DFC were lower for women, patients aged 18-54 years, Medicaid or Medicare participants, and patients with atrial fibrillation (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: From 2008-2018, receipt of DFC by ischemic stroke patients significantly increased in the PCNASP; however certain subgroups were less likely to receive this level of care. Targeted quality improvement initiatives could result in even further improvements among all stroke patients and help reduce disparities in care.