INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, state and national programs and policies aimed to increase access to postpartum contraception; however, recent data on population-based estimates of postpartum contraception is limited. METHODS: Using Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 20 sites, we conducted multivariable-adjusted weighted multinomial regression to assess variation in method use by insurance status and geographic setting (urban/rural) among people with a recent live birth in 2018. We analyzed trends in contraceptive method use from 2015 to 2018 overall and within subgroups using weighted multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: In 2018, those without insurance had lower odds of using permanent methods (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.98), long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (AOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.89), and short-acting reversible contraception (SARC) (AOR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81) than those with private insurance. There were no significant differences in these method categories between public and private insurance. Rural respondents had greater odds than urban respondents of using all method categories: permanent (AOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.67-2.77), LARC (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.65), SARC (AOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15-1.76), and less effective methods (AOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.72). From 2015 to 2018, there was an increase in LARC use (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05) and use of no method (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07) and a decrease in SARC use (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). LARC use increased among those with private insurance (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08) and in urban settings (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), but not in other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that those without insurance had lower odds of using effective contraception and that LARC use increased among those who had private insurance and lived in urban areas. Strategies to increase access to contraception, including increasing insurance coverage and investigating whether effectiveness of existing initiatives varies by geographic setting, may increase postpartum contraceptive use and address these differences.

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality rates in the United States appear to be increasing. One potential reason may be increased identification of maternal deaths after the addition of a pregnancy checkbox to the death certificate. In 2016, four state health departments (Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio) implemented a pregnancy checkbox quality assurance pilot, with technical assistance provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The pilot aimed to improve accuracy of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates and resultant state maternal mortality estimates. OBJECTIVE(S): To estimate the validity of the pregnancy checkbox on the death certificate and describe characteristics associated with errors using 2016 data from a four state quality assurance pilot. STUDY DESIGN: Potential pregnancy-associated deaths were identified by linking death certificates with birth or fetal death certificates from within a year preceding death or by pregnancy checkbox status. Death certificates which indicated the decedent was pregnant within a year of death via the pregnancy checkbox, but that did not link to a birth or fetal death certificate, were referred for active follow-up to confirm pregnancy status by either death certifier confirmation or medical record review. Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals were used to examine the distributions of demographic characteristics by pregnancy confirmation category (i.e., confirmed pregnant, confirmed not pregnant, and unable to confirm). We compared the proportion confirmed pregnant and confirmed not pregnant within age, race/ethnicity, pregnancy checkbox category, and certifier type categories using a Wald test of proportions. Binomial and Poisson regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios for having an incorrect pregnancy checkbox (false positive, false negative) by age group, race/ethnicity, pregnancy checkbox category, and certifier type. RESULTS: Among 467 potential pregnancy-associated deaths, 335 (72%) were confirmed pregnant either via linkage to a birth or fetal death certificate, certifier confirmation, or review of medical records. Ninety-seven (21%) women were confirmed not pregnant (false positives) and 35 (7%) were unable to be confirmed. Women confirmed pregnant were significantly younger than women confirmed not pregnant (p<.001). Deaths certified by coroners and medical examiners were more likely to be confirmed pregnant than confirmed not pregnant (p=0.04). The association between decedent age category and false positive status followed a dose-response relationship (p<0.001), with increasing prevalence ratios for each increase in age category. Death certificates of non-Hispanic black women were more likely to be false positives, compared with non-Hispanic white women [prevalence ratio (PR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 1.96]. The sensitivity of the pregnancy checkbox among these four states in 2016 was 62% and the positive predictive value was 68%. CONCLUSION(S): We provide a multi-state analysis of the validity of the pregnancy checkbox and highlight a need for more accurate reporting of pregnancy status on death certificates. States and other jurisdictions may increase the accuracy of their data used to calculate maternal mortality rates by implementing quality assurance processes.

Rates of short interval pregnancies resulting in unintended pregnancies remain high in the United States and contribute to adverse reproductive health outcomes. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods have annual failure rates of less than 1% compared with 9% for oral contraceptive pills, and are an effective strategy to reduce unintended pregnancies. To increase access to LARCs in the immediate postpartum period, several State Medicaid programs, including those in Iowa (IA) and Louisiana (LA), recently established reimbursement policies to remove the barriers to reimbursement of immediate postpartum LARC insertion. We used a mixed-methods approach, to analyze 2013-2015 linked Medicaid and vital records data from both IA and LA, to describe trends in immediate postpartum LARC provision one year prior to and following the Medicaid reimbursement policy change. We also used data from key informant interviews with State program staff to understand how provider champions affected policy uptake. We found that the monthly average for the number of insertions in IA increased from 4.6 per month prior to the policy to 6.6 per month post policy, and in LA, the average increased from 2.6 per month prior to the policy to 45.2 per month. In both states, the majority of insertions occurred at one academic/teaching hospital. In LA, the additional increase may be due to the engagement of a provider champion who worked at both the state and facility level. Recruiting, training, engaging, and supporting provider champions, as facilitators, with influence at state and facility levels, is an important component of a multipart strategy for increasing successful implementation of State-level Medicaid payment reform policies that allow reimbursement for immediate postpartum LARC insertions.

Common features of successful, local-level, Fetal Infant Mortality Review (FIMR) Programs are identified by the National Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (NFIMR) Program, including medical records abstraction and home interviews, case reviews by a case review team (CRT), and community systems action recommendations implemented by a community action team (CAT). This paper presents Louisiana's FIMR program, an adaptation of NFIMR recommendations. In 2001, the Louisiana Maternal and Child Health Program began a statewide FIMR Network (LaFIMR) based on the NFIMR model. Geographic areas of focus, case identification, staffing, data collection methods, and CRT and CAT membership and activities include modifications of the NFIMR recommendations unique to LaFIMR implementation. Adaptations made to the NFIMR model were advantageous to LaFIMR's success. Specifically, LaFIMR geographic areas of interest cover multiple natural communities. Compared with independent FIMR programs elsewhere, LaFIMR represents a Title V Program-based coordinated network of regional LaFIMR teams offering opportunities for expanded partnerships. Primary sources for LaFIMR case identification include obituaries and hospital logs, with secondary identification available through vital records. Improvements in vital records data systems are expected to enhance future LaFIMR case identification. LaFIMR-identified records that are linked with vital event certificates provide enhanced contextual findings for reviews and support continuous quality improvement processes. These differences in the LaFIMR implementation reinforce the NFIMR-supported uniqueness of FIMR programs across the United States, and may encourage other FIMR programs to consider how adaptations to NFIMR recommendations could benefit their programs.