Since the initial publication of A Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals in 2008, the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has continued to be a national priority. Progress in healthcare epidemiology, infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, and implementation science research has led to improvements in our understanding of effective strategies for HAI prevention. Despite these advances, HAIs continue to affect ∼1 of every 31 hospitalized patients, leading to substantial morbidity, mortality, and excess healthcare expenditures, and persistent gaps remain between what is recommended and what is practiced.The widespread impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on HAI outcomes in acute-care hospitals has further highlighted the essential role of infection prevention programs and the critical importance of prioritizing efforts that can be sustained even in the face of resource requirements from COVID-19 and future infectious diseases crises.The Compendium: 2022 Updates document provides acute-care hospitals with up-to-date, practical expert guidance to assist in prioritizing and implementing HAI prevention efforts. It is the product of a highly collaborative effort led by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of organizations and societies with content expertise, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (PIDS), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), the Society for Hospital Medicine (SHM), the Surgical Infection Society (SIS), and others.

Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) | Essential practices | Infrastructure and resources | 1 Perform a CAUTI risk assessment and implement an organization-wide program to identify and remove catheters that are no longer necessary using 1 or | more methods documented to be effective. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Provide appropriate infrastructure for preventing CAUTI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Provide and implement evidence-based protocols to address multiple steps of the urinary catheter life cycle: catheter appropriateness (step 0), insertion | technique (step 1), maintenance care (step 2), and prompt removal (step 3) when no longer appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Ensure that only trained healthcare personnel (HCP) insert urinary catheters and that competency is assessed regularly. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Ensure that supplies necessary for aseptic technique for catheter insertion are available and conveniently located. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Implement a system for documenting the following in the patient record: physician order for catheter placement, indications for catheter insertion, date | and time of catheter insertion, name of individual who inserted catheter, nursing documentation of placement, daily presence of a catheter and | maintenance care tasks, and date and time of catheter removal. Record criteria for removal and justification for continued use. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 7 Ensure that sufficiently trained HCP and technology resources are available to support surveillance for catheter use and outcomes. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 8 Perform surveillance for CAUTI if indicated based on facility risk assessment or regulatory requirements. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 9 Standardize urine culturing by adapting an institutional protocol for appropriate indications for urine cultures in patients with and without indwelling | catheters. Consider incorporating these indications into the electronic medical record, and review indications for ordering urine cultures in the CAUTI | risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Education and training | 1 Educate HCP involved in the insertion, care, and maintenance of urinary catheters about CAUTI prevention, including alternatives to indwelling | catheters, and procedures for catheter insertion, management, and removal. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Assess healthcare professional competency in catheter use, catheter care, and maintenance. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Educate HCP about the importance of urine-culture stewardship and provide indications for urine cultures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Provide training on appropriate collection of urine. Specimens should be collected and should arrive at the microbiology laboratory as soon as possible, | preferably within an hour. If delay in transport to the laboratory is expected, samples should be refrigerated (no more than 24 hours) or collected in | preservative urine transport tubes. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Train clinicians to consider other methods for bladder management, such as intermittent catheterization or external male or female collection devices, | when appropriate, before placing an indwelling urethral catheter. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Share data in a timely fashion and report to appropriate stakeholders. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Insertion of indwelling catheters | 1 Insert urinary catheters only when necessary for patient care and leave in place only as long as indications remain. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Consider other methods for bladder management such as intermittent catheterization, or external male or female collection devices, when appropriate. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Use appropriate technique for catheter insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE). | 4 Consider working in pairs to help perform patient positioning and monitor for potential contamination during placement. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Practice hand hygiene (based on CDC or WHO guidelines) immediately before insertion of the catheter and before and after any manipulation of the | catheter site or apparatus. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Insert catheters following aseptic technique and using sterile equipment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Use sterile gloves, drape, and sponges, a sterile antiseptic solution for cleaning the urethral meatus, and a sterile single-use packet of lubricant jelly for | insertion. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Use a catheter with the smallest feasible diameter consistent with proper drainage to minimize urethral trauma but consider other catheter types and | sizes when warranted for patients with anticipated difficult catheterization to reduce the likelihood that a patient will experience multiple, sometimes | traumatic, catheterization attempts. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Management of indwelling catheters | 1 Properly secure indwelling catheters after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Maintain a sterile, continuously closed drainage system. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Replace the catheter and the collecting system using aseptic technique when breaks in aseptic technique, disconnection, or leakage occur. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | 4 For examination of fresh urine, collect a small sample by aspirating urine from the needleless sampling port with a sterile syringe/cannula adaptor after | cleansing the port with disinfectant. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | 2 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) | (Continued ) | 5 Facilitate timely transport of urine samples to laboratory. If timely transport is not feasible, consider refrigerating urine samples or using samplecollection cups with preservatives. Obtain larger volumes of urine for special analyses (eg, 24-hour urine) aseptically from the drainage bag. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | 6 Maintain unobstructed urine flow. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Employ routine hygiene. Cleaning the meatal area with antiseptic solutions is an unresolved issue, though emerging literature supports chlorhexidine | use prior to catheter insertion. Alcohol-based products should be avoided given concerns about the alcohol causing drying of the mucosal tissues. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Develop a protocol for standardizing diagnosis and management of postoperative urinary retention, including nurse-directed use of intermittent | catheterization and use of bladder scanners when appropriate as alternatives to indwelling urethral catheterization. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Establish a system for analyzing and reporting data on catheter use and adverse events from catheter use. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Establish a system for defining, analyzing, and reporting data on non–catheter-associated UTIs, particularly UTIs associated with the use of devices | being used as alternatives to indwelling urethral catheters. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Essential practices | Before insertion | 1 Provide easy access to an evidence-based list of indications for CVC use to minimize unnecessary CVC placement. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Require education and competency assessment of healthcare personnel (HCP) involved in insertion, care and maintenance of CVCs about CLABSI | prevention. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Bathe ICU patients aged >2 months with a chlorhexidine preparation on a daily basis. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | At insertion | 1 In ICU and non-ICU settings, a facility should have a process in place, such as a checklist, to ensure adherence to infection prevention practices at the | time of CVC insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Perform hand hygiene prior to catheter insertion or manipulation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 The subclavian site is preferred to reduce infectious complications when the catheter is placed in the ICU setting. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Use an all-inclusive catheter cart or kit. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Use ultrasound guidance for catheter insertion. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Use maximum sterile barrier precautions during CVC insertion. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | After insertion | 1 Ensure appropriate nurse-to-patient ratio and limit use of float nurses in ICUs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Use chlorhexidine-containing dressings for CVCs in patients aged >2 months. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 For nontunneled CVCs in adults and children, change transparent dressings and perform site care with a chlorhexidine-based antiseptic at least every 7 | days or immediately if the dressing is soiled, loose, or damp. Change gauze dressings every 2 days or earlier if the dressing is soiled, loose, or damp. | (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Disinfect catheter hubs, needleless connectors, and injection ports before accessing the catheter. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Remove nonessential catheters. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Routine replacement of administration sets not used for blood, blood products, or lipid formulations can be performed at intervals up to 7 days. | (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 Perform surveillance for CLABSI in ICU and non-ICU settings. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Additional approaches | 1 Use antiseptic or antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH in adult patients; MODERATE in pediatric patients) | 2 Use antimicrobial lock therapy for long-term CVCs. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Use recombinant tissue plasminogen activating factor (rt-PA) once weekly after hemodialysis in patients undergoing hemodialysis through a CVC. | (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Utilize infusion or vascular access teams for reducing CLABSI rates. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Use antimicrobial ointments for hemodialysis catheter-insertion sites. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Use an antiseptic-containing hub, connector cap, or port protector to cover connectors. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 3 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) | Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and infection | Essential practices | 1 Encourage appropriate use of antimicrobials through implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Implement diagnostic stewardship practices for ensuring appropriate use and interpretation of C. difficile testing. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Use contact precautions for infected patients, single-patient room preferred. (Quality of evidence: LOW for hand hygiene; MODERATE for gloves; LOW | for gowns; LOW for single-patient room) | 4 Adequately clean and disinfect equipment and the environment of patients with CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW for equipment; LOW for environment) | 5 Assess the adequacy of room cleaning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Implement a laboratory-based alert system to provide immediate notification to infection preventionists and clinical personnel about newly diagnosed | patients with CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Conduct CDI surveillance and analyze and report CDI data. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Educate healthcare personnel (HCP), environmental service personnel, and hospital administration about CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 9 Educate patients and their families about CDI as appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 10 Measure compliance with CDC or WHO hand hygiene and contact precaution recommendations. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Intensify the assessment of compliance with process measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Perform hand hygiene with soap and water as the preferred method following care of or interacting with the healthcare environment of a patient with | CDI. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Place patients with diarrhea on contact precautions while C. difficile testing is pending. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Prolong the duration of contact precautions after the patient becomes asymptomatic until hospital discharge. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Use an EPA-approved sporicidal disinfectant, such as diluted (1:10) sodium hypochlorite, for environmental cleaning and disinfection. Implement a | system to coordinate with environmental services if it is determined that sodium hypochlorite is needed for environmental disinfection. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | Essential practices | 1 Implement an MRSA monitoring program. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Conduct an MRSA risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Promote compliance with CDC or World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene recommendations. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Use contact precautions for MRSA-colonized and MRSA-infected patients. A facility that chooses or has already chosen to modify the use of contact | precautions for some or all of these patients should conduct an MRSA-specific risk assessment to evaluate the facility for transmission risks and to | assess the effectiveness of other MRSA risk mitigation strategies (eg, hand hygiene, cleaning and disinfection of the environment, single occupancy | patient rooms) and should establish a process for ongoing monitoring, oversight, and risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Ensure cleaning and disinfection of equipment and the environment. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Implement a laboratory-based alert system that notifies healthcare personnel (HCP) of new MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients in a timely | manner. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 7 Implement an alert system that identifies readmitted or transferred MRSA-colonized or MRSA-infected patients. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 8 Provide MRSA data and outcome measures to key stakeholders, including senior leadership, physicians, nursing staff, and others. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 9 Educate healthcare personnel about MRSA. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 10 Educate patients and families about MRSA. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 11 Implement an antimicrobial stewardship program. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Active surveillance testing (AST) | 1 Implement an MRSA AST program for select patient populations as part of a multifaceted strategy to control and prevent MRSA. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) Note: specific populations may have different evidence ratings. | 2 Active surveillance for MRSA in conjunction with decolonization can be performed in targeted populations prior to surgery to prevent postsurgical | MRSA infection. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | (Continued) | 4 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent surgical-site infections (SSIs) | (Continued ) | 3 Active surveillance with contact precautions is inferior to universal decolonization for reduction of MRSA clinical isolates in adult ICUs. (Quality of | evidence: HIGH) | 4 Hospital-wide active surveillance for MRSA can be used in conjunction with contact precautions to reduce the incidence of MRSA infection. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Active surveillance can be performed in the setting of an MRSA outbreak or evidence of ongoing transmission of MRSA within a unit as part of a | multifaceted strategy to halt transmission. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Screen healthcare personnel for MRSA infection or colonization | 1 Screen HCP for MRSA infection or colonization if they are epidemiologically linked to a cluster of MRSA infections. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | MRSA decolonization therapy | 1 Use universal decolonization (ie, daily CHG bathing plus 5 days of nasal decolonization) for all patients in adult ICUs to reduce endemic MRSA clinical | cultures. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Perform preoperative nares screening with targeted use of CHG and nasal decolonization in MRSA carriers to reduce MRSA SSI from surgical | procedures involving implantation of hardware. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Screen for MRSA and provide targeted decolonization with CHG bathing and nasal decolonization to MRSA carriers in surgical units to reduce | postoperative MRSA inpatient infections. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Provide CHG bathing plus nasal decolonization to known MRSA carriers outside the ICU with medical devices, specifically central lines, midline | catheters, and lumbar drains to reduce MRSA clinical cultures. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 5 Consider postdischarge decolonization of MRSA carriers to reduce postdischarge MRSA infections and readmissions. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Neonatal ICUs should consider targeted or universal decolonization during times of above-average MRSA infection rates or targeted decolonization for | patients at high risk of MRSA infection (eg, low birth weight, indwelling devices, or prior to high-risk surgeries). (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 7 Burn units should consider targeted or universal decolonization during times of above-average MRSA infection rates. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 8 Consider targeted or universal decolonization of hemodialysis patients. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 9 Decolonization should be strongly considered as part of a multimodal approach to control MRSA outbreaks. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Universal use of gowns and gloves | 1 Use gowns and gloves when providing care to or entering the room of any adult ICU patient, regardless of MRSA colonization status. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | 1 Administer antimicrobial prophylaxis according to evidence-based standards and guidelines. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Use a combination of parenteral and oral antimicrobial prophylaxis prior to elective colorectal surgery to reduce the risk of SSI. (Quality of evidence: | HIGH) | 3 Decolonize surgical patients with an anti-staphylococcal agent in the preoperative setting for orthopedic and cardiothoracic procedures. (Quality of | evidence: HIGH) | Decolonize surgical patients in other procedures at high risk of staphylococcal SSI, such as those involving prosthetic material. (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 4 Use antiseptic-containing preoperative vaginal preparation agents for patients undergoing cesarean delivery or hysterectomy. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) | 5 Do not remove hair at the operative site unless the presence of hair will interfere with the surgical procedure. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Use alcohol-containing preoperative skin preparatory agents in combination with an antiseptic. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 For procedures not requiring hypothermia, maintain normothermia (temperature >35.5 °C) during the perioperative period. (Quality of evidence: HIGH). | 8 Use impervious plastic wound protectors for gastrointestinal and biliary tract surgery. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 9 Perform intraoperative antiseptic wound lavage. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 10 Control blood glucose level during the immediate postoperative period for all patients. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 11 Use a checklist and/or bundle to ensure compliance with best practices to improve surgical patient safety. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 12 Perform surveillance for SSI. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 13 Increase the efficiency of surveillance by utilizing automated data. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 14 Provide ongoing SSI rate feedback to surgical and perioperative personnel and leadership. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 15 Measure and provide feedback to healthcare personnel (HCP) regarding rates of compliance with process measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 5 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and ventilator-associated events (VAEs) | Adult patients | (Continued ) | 16 Educate surgeons and perioperative personnel about SSI prevention measures. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 17 Educate patients and their families about SSI prevention as appropriate. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 18 Implement policies and practices to reduce the risk of SSI for patients that align with applicable evidence-based standards, rules and regulations, and | medical device manufacturer instructions for use. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 19 Observe and review operating room personnel and the environment of care in the operating room and in central sterile reprocessing. (Quality of | evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | 1 Perform an SSI risk assessment. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Consider use of negative-pressure dressings in patients who may benefit. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Observe and review practices in the preoperative clinic, post-anesthesia care unit, surgical intensive care unit, and/or surgical ward. (Quality of | evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Use antiseptic-impregnated sutures as a strategy to prevent SSI. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | Interventions with little risk of harm and that are associated with decreases in duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, mortality, antibiotic utilization, | and/or costs | Avoid intubation and prevent reintubation if possible. | 1 Use high flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as appropriate, whenever safe and feasible. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Minimize sedation. | 1 Minimize sedation of ventilated patients whenever possible. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Preferentially use multimodal strategies and medications other than benzodiazepines to manage agitation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Utilize a protocol to minimize sedation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 4 Implement a ventilator liberation protocol. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Maintain and improve physical conditioning. | 1 Provide early exercise and mobilization. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Elevate the head of the bed to 30°–45°. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Provide oral care with toothbrushing but without chlorhexidine. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Provide early enteral rather than parenteral nutrition. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Maintain ventilator circuits. | 1 Change the ventilator circuit only if visibly soiled or malfunctioning (or per manufacturers’ instructions) (Quality of evidence: HIGH). | Additional approaches | May decrease duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and/or mortality in some populations but not in others, and they may confer some risk of harm | in some populations. | 1 Consider using selective decontamination of the oropharynx and digestive tract to decrease microbial burden in ICUs with low prevalence of antibiotic | resistant organisms. Antimicrobial decontamination is not recommended in countries, regions, or ICUs with high prevalence of antibiotic-resistant | organisms. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Additional approaches | May lower VAP rates, but current data are insufficient to determine their impact on duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and mortality. | 1 Consider using endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage ports to minimize pooling of secretions above the endotracheal cuff in patients | likely to require >48–72 hours of intubation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Consider early tracheostomy. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 3 Consider postpyloric feeding tube placement in patients with gastric feeding intolerance at high risk for aspiration. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 6 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Preterm neonatal patients | Pediatric patients | Essential practices | Confer minimal risk of harm and may lower VAP and/or PedVAE rates. | Avoid intubation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Minimize duration of mechanical ventilation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Manage patients without sedation whenever possible. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Use caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity within 72 hours after birth to facilitate extubation. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Assess readiness to extubate daily. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Take steps to minimize unplanned extubation and reintubation. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 5 Provide regular oral care with sterile water (extrapolated from practice in infants and children, no data in preterm neonates). (Quality of evidence: | LOW) | 6 Change the ventilator circuit only if visibly soiled or malfunctioning or according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use (extrapolated from studies in | adults and children, no data in preterm neonates). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Minimal risks of harm, but impact on VAP and VAE rates is unknown. | 1 Lateral recumbent positioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Reverse Trendelenberg positioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Closed or in-line suctioning. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Oral care with maternal colostrum. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Essential practices | Confer minimal risk of harm and some data suggest that they may lower VAP rates, PedVAE rates, and/or duration of mechanical ventilation. | Avoid intubation. | 1 Use noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula whenever safe and feasible. (Quality of evidence: | MODERATE) | Minimize duration of mechanical ventilation. | 1 Assess readiness to extubate daily using spontaneous breathing trials in patients without contraindications. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Take steps to minimize unplanned extubations and reintubations. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Avoid fluid overload. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Provide regular oral care (ie, toothbrushing or gauze if no teeth). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Elevate the head of the bed unless medically contraindicated. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Maintain ventilator circuits. | 1 Change ventilator circuits only when visibly soiled or malfunctioning (or per manufacturer’s instructions). (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Remove condensate from the ventilator circuit frequently and avoid draining the condensate toward the patient. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Endotracheal tube selection and management | 1 Use cuffed endotracheal tubes. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 Maintain cuff pressure and volume at the minimal occlusive settings to prevent clinically significant air leaks around the endotracheal tube, typically | 20-25cm H2O. This “minimal leak” approach is associated with lower rates of post-extubation stridor. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Suction oral secretions before each position change. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Additional approaches | Minimal risks of harm and some evidence of benefit in adult patients but data in pediatric populations are limited. | 1 Minimize sedation. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 2 Use endotracheal tubes with subglottic secretion drainage ports for patients ≥10 years of age. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 Consider early tracheostomy. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 7 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Strategies to prevent nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) | Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene | Essential practices | Promote the maintenance of healthy hand skin and nails. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Promote the preferential use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS) in most clinical situations. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Perform hand hygiene as indicated by CDC or the WHO Five Moments. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Include fingernail care in facility-specific policies related to hand hygiene. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | a) Healthcare personnel (HCP) should maintain short, natural fingernails. | b) Nails should not extend past the fingertip. | c) HCP who provide direct or indirect care in high-risk areas | (eg, ICU or perioperative) should not wear artificial fingernail extenders. | d) Prohibitions against fingernail polish (standard or gel shellac) are at the discretion of the infection prevention program, except among scrubbed | individuals who interact with the sterile field during surgical procedures; these individuals should not wear fingernail polish or gel shellac. | 4 Engage all HCP in primary prevention of occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Provide cotton glove liners for HCP with hand irritation and educate these HCP on their use. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Select appropriate products. | 1 For routine hand hygiene, choose liquid, gel, or foam ABHS with at least 60% alcohol. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 Involve HCP in selection of products. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Obtain and consider manufacturers’ product-specific data if seeking ABHS with ingredients that may enhance efficacy against organisms anticipated to | be less susceptible to biocides. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | 4 Confirm that the volume of ABHS dispensed is consistent with the volume shown to be efficacious. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Educate HCP about an appropriate volume of ABHS and the time required to obtain effectiveness. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 6 Provide facility-approved hand moisturizer that is compatible with antiseptics and gloves. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 For surgical antisepsis, use an FDA-approved surgical hand scrub or waterless surgical hand rub. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Ensure the accessibility of hand hygiene supplies. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 1 Ensure ABHS dispensers are unambiguous, visible, and accessible within the workflow of HCP. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 2 In private rooms, consider 2 ABHS dispensers the minimum threshold for adequate numbers of dispensers: 1 dispenser in the hallway, and 1 in the | patient room. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 In semiprivate rooms, suites, bays, and other multipatient bed configurations, consider 1 dispenser per 2 beds the minimum threshold for adequate | numbers of dispensers. Place ABHS dispensers in the workflow of HCP. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 4 Ensure that the placement of hand hygiene supplies (eg, individual pocket-sized dispensers, bed mounted ABHS dispenser, single use pump bottles) is | easily accessible for HCP in all areas where patients receive care. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 5 Evaluate for the risk of intentional consumption. Utilize dispensers that mitigate this risk, such as wall-mounted dispensers that allow limited numbers | of activations within short periods (eg, 5 seconds). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 6 Have surgical hand rub and scrub available in perioperative areas. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 7 Consider providing ABHS hand rubs or handwash with FDA-approved antiseptics for use in procedural areas and prior to high-risk bedside procedures | (eg, central-line insertion). (Quality of evidence: LOW) | (Continued) | Practices supported by interventional studies suggesting lower | NV-HAP rates | 1 Provide regular oral care. | 2 Diagnose and manage dysphagia. | 3 Provide early mobilization. | 4 Implement multimodal interventions to prevent viral infections. | 5 Use prevention bundles. | 8 Deborah S. Yokoe et al | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Implementing strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections | Standard approach to implementation | Examples of implementation frameworks | (Continued ) | Ensure appropriate glove use to reduce hand and environmental contamination. (Quality of Evidence: HIGH) | 1 Use gloves for all contact with the patient and environment as indicated by standard and contact precautions during the care of individuals with | organisms confirmed to be less susceptible to biocides (e.g., C. difficile or norovirus) | 2 Educate HCP about the potential for self-contamination and environmental contamination when gloves are worn. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | 3 Educate and confirm the ability of HCP to doff gloves in a manner that avoids contamination. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Take steps to reduce environmental contamination associated with sinks and sink drains. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Monitor adherence to hand hygiene. (Quality of evidence: HIGH) | Provide timely and meaningful feedback to enhance a culture of safety. (Quality of evidence: MODERATE) | Additional approaches during outbreaks | 1 Consider educating HCP using a structured approach (eg, WHO Steps) for handwashing or hand sanitizing. Evaluate HCP adherence to technique. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 2 For waterborne pathogens of premise plumbing, consider disinfection of sink drains using an EPA-registered disinfectant with claims against biofilms. | Consult with state or local public health for assistance in determining appropriate protocols for use and other actions needed to ensure safe supply. | (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 3 For C. difficile and norovirus, in addition to contact precautions, encourage hand washing with soap and water after the care of patients with known or | suspected infections. (Quality of evidence: LOW) | 1 Assess determinants of change and | classify as follows: | • Facilitators: promote practice or | change, or | • Barriers: hinder practice or change | Individual level: healthcare personnel, leaders, patients, and visitors’ preferences, needs, attitudes, and | knowledge. | Facility level: team composition, communication, culture, capacity, policies, resources. | Partners: degree of support and buy-in. | 2 Choose measures Measurement methods must be appropriate for the question(s) they seek to answer and adhere to the | methods’ data collection and analysis rules: | • Outcome measure: ultimate goal (eg, HAI reduction). | • Process measure: action reliability (eg, bundle adherence). | • Balancing measure: undesired outcome of change (eg, staff absences due to required vaccine side effects). | 3 Select framework(s) See below and “Implementing Strategies to Prevent Infections in Acute Care Settings” (Table 3) | 32 | Framework Published Experience Resources | 4Es Settings | • Healthcare facilities | • Large-scale projects including multiple | sites | Infection prevention and control | • HAI prevention (including mortality | reduction and cost savings) | • 4Es Framework11 | • HAI reduction12–14 | • Mortality reduction15 | • Cost savings16 | Behavior Change Wheel Settings | • Community-based practice | • Healthcare facilities | Healthy behaviors | • Smoking cessation | • Obesity prevention | • Increased physical activity | Infection prevention and control | • Hand hygiene adherence | • Antibiotic prescribing17 | • Behavior Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions18 | • Stand More at Work (SMArT Work)19 | (Continued) | Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 9 | https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.138 Published online by Cambridge University Press | Acknowledgments. The Compendium Partners thank the authors for their | dedication to this work, including maintaining adherence to the rigorous | process for the development of the Compendium: 2022 Updates, involving but | not limited to screening of thousands of articles; achieving multilevel consensus; | and consideration of, response to, and incorporation of many organizations’ | feedback and comments. We acknowledge these efforts especially because they | occurred as the authors handled the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. The | authors thank Valerie Deloney, MBA, for her organizational expertise in the | development of this manuscript and Janet Waters, MLS, BSN, RN, for her | expertise in developing the strategies used for the literature searches that | informed this manuscript. The authors thank the many individuals and | organizations who gave their time and expertise to review and provide | (Continued ) | Comprehensive Unit-based | Safety Program (CUSP) | Settings | • Intensive care units | • Ambulatory centers | Improvements | • Antibiotic prescribing | • CLABSI prevention | • CAUTI prevention | • CUSP Implementation Toolkit20 | • AHA/HRET: Eliminating CAUTI (Stop CAUTI)21 | • AHRQ Toolkit to Improve Safety in Ambulatory Surgery Centers22 | European Mixed Methods Settings | • European institutions of varied | healthcare systems and cultures | Improvements: | • CLABSI prevention | • Hand hygiene | • PROHIBIT: Description and Materials23 | Getting to Outcomes (GTO)® Settings | • Community programs and services | Improvements | • Sexual health promotion | • Dual-disorder treatment program in | veterans | • Community emergency preparedness | • RAND Guide for Emergency Preparedness24 (illustrated overview of GTO® methodology) | Model for Improvement Settings | • Healthcare (inpatient, perioperative, | ambulatory) | • Public health | Interventions | • PPE use | • HAI prevention | • Public health process evaluation | • Institute for Healthcare Improvement25 | • The Improvement Guide26 | • Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge27 | Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, | Implementation, Maintenance | (RE-AIM) | Settings | • Healthcare | • Public health | • Community programs | • Sexual health | Evaluations | • Antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU | • Clinical practice guidelines for STIs | • Promotion of vaccination | • Implementation of contact tracing | • RE-AIM.org28 | • Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and | resources29 | Replicating Effective Practices | (REP) | Settings | • Healthcare | • Public health | • HIV prevention | Interventions that have produced | positive results are reframed for local | relevance | CDC Compendium of HIV Prevention Interventions with Evidence of | Effectiveness30 (see Section C, Intervention Checklist) | Theoretical Domains Settings | • Healthcare (inpatient, perioperative, | ambulatory) | • Community (individual and communitybased behaviors) | Health maintenance | • Diabetes management in primary care | • Pregnancy weight management | HCP practice | • ICU blood transfusion | • Selective GI tract decontamination | • Preoperative testing | • Spine imaging | • Hand hygiene

The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical-site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The National ALS Registry launched surveillance projects to understand the distribution of ALS in targeted geographic cohorts. Objective: To describe the demographics, incidence, and survival of persons with ALS (PALS) identified in the Chicago and Detroit area population-based cohort. Methods: Neurologists in the catchment area provided case reports for eligible ALS cases diagnosed and/or cared for from 1 January 2009 through 31 December 2011. Crude incidence rates were calculated for 2009-2011 and stratified by race and ethnicity. Using data from the National Death Index through 2018, we modeled the effect of patient covariates on mortality using the Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: Of the 574 cases, 372 (64.8%) were diagnosed from 2009 to 2011. The combined crude incidence rates for 2009, 2010, and 2011 were 1.44, 1.53, and 1.73 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Of the 486 subjects with complete survival data, 81% were deceased at the end of follow-up. Median survival time was 2.2 years, with 30% and 9% of subjects surviving past 5 and 10 years after diagnosis, respectively. Additionally, female PALS and PALS with longer time between symptom onset and diagnosis experienced longer survival. Nonwhites also experienced longer survival than Whites, except for those cases diagnosed in the younger age categories. Conclusion: Understanding the survival of ALS patients can aid in understanding variable prognostic factors, which can potentially extend survival and improve disease management.

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Registry is the first national registry for a chronic neurologic disease in the USA and uses a combination of case-finding methods including administrative healthcare data and patient self-registration. METHODS: We applied capture-recapture methodology to estimate the completeness of the Registry for ascertaining patients with ALS for the first full year and the fourth year of the Registry (2011, 2014). The Registry uses the combination of two national administrative claims databases (Medicare and Veterans Affairs) with a self-register option at the registry portal. We conducted descriptive analyses of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the ALS cases identified by each of the sources and estimated the completeness of case ascertainment for each of the three ALS Registry sources individually, pairwise, and in all combinations. RESULTS: Case-finding completeness was 54% in 2011 and improved to 56% in 2014. A smaller proportion of ALS patients under age 65 were ascertained than those 65 or older, and ascertainment was also lower for nonwhite than white patients. The uncorrected ALS prevalence was 4.3/100,000 in 2011 (in 2014, 5.0/100,000), but after correction for underascertainment, annual prevalence in 2011 was 7.9/100,000 (95% CI: 7.6-8.2) (in 2014 was 8.9/100,000 [95% CI: 8.7-9.2]). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that administrative healthcare databases are a very efficient method for identifying the majority of ALS prevalent cases in the National ALS Registry and that the inclusion of a web registry portal for patients to self-register is important to ensure a more representative population for estimating ALS prevalence. Nonetheless, more than 40% of ALS cases were not ascertained by the Registry, with individuals younger than age 65 and people of color underrepresented. Recommendations are provided for additional methods that can be considered to improve the completeness of case ascertainment.

Objective:To estimate the prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the United States for 2017 using data from the National ALS Registry (Registry) as well as capture-recapture methodology to account for under-ascertainment. Established in 2010, the Registry collects and examines data on ALS patients in the US to better describe the epidemiology of ALS (i.e. risk factor exposures, demographics).Methods: The Registry compiled data from national administrative databases (from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Veterans Health Administration, and the Veterans Benefits Administration) and a voluntary enrollment data through a web portal (www.cdc.gov/als). To estimate the number of missing cases, capture-recapture methodology was utilized.Results: The Registry conservatively identified 17,800 adult persons (lower-bound estimate) who met the Registry definition of ALS for an age-adjusted prevalence of 5.5 per 100,000 US population. Using capture-recapture methodology, we obtained a "mean case count" of 24,821 ALS cases (prevalence of 7.7 per 100,000 U.S. population) and estimated the upper-bound estimate to be 31,843 cases (prevalence of 9.9 per 100,000 U.S. population). The pattern of patient characteristics (e.g. age, sex, and race/ethnicity) remained unchanged from previous Registry reports. Overall, ALS was most common among whites, males, and persons aged 60-69 years. The age groups with the lowest number of cases were persons aged 18-39 years. Males had a higher prevalence than females overall and across all data sources.Conclusions: Existing Registry methodology, along with capture-recapture methodology, are being used to better describe the epidemiology and demographics of ALS in the US.

Concurrent outbreaks of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus serotypes 1 and 2 (cVDPV1, cVDPV2) were confirmed in the Republic of the Philippines in September 2019 and were subsequently confirmed in Malaysia by early 2020. There is continuous population subgroup movement in specific geographies between the two countries. Outbreak response efforts focused on sequential supplemental immunization activities with monovalent Sabin strain oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (mOPV2) and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (bOPV, containing Sabin strain types 1 and 3) as well as activities to enhance poliovirus surveillance sensitivity to detect virus circulation. A total of six cVDPV1 cases, 13 cVDPV2 cases, and one immunodeficiency-associated vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 case were detected, and there were 35 cVDPV1 and 31 cVDPV2 isolates from environmental surveillance sewage collection sites. No further cVDPV1 or cVDPV2 have been detected in either country since March 2020. Response efforts in both countries encountered challenges, particularly those caused by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Important lessons were identified and could be useful for other countries that experience outbreaks of concurrent cVDPV serotypes.

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the United States for 2016 using data from the National ALS Registry (Registry). Established in 2009, the Registry collects data on ALS patients in the U.S. to better describe the epidemiology of ALS, examine risk factors such as environmental and occupational exposures, and characterize the demographics of those living with the disease. Methods: To identify adult prevalent cases of ALS, the Registry compiles data from three national administrative databases (maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Veterans Health Administration, and the Veterans Benefits Administration). To ascertain cases not necessarily included in these databases and to better understand risk-factors associated with ALS and disease progression, the Registry also includes data collected from patients who voluntarily enroll via a web portal to complete online surveys. Results: In 2016, the Registry conservatively identified 16,424 adult persons who met the Registry definition of ALS for an age-adjusted prevalence rate of 5.2 per 100,000 U.S. population. The pattern of patient characteristics (e.g., age, sex, and race/ethnicity) has not changed from previous Registry reports. Overall, ALS was more common among whites, males, and persons aged 60-69 years. The age groups with the lowest number of ALS cases were persons aged 18-39 years. Males had a higher prevalence rate of ALS than females overall and across all data sources. Conclusions: Data collected by the National ALS Registry are being used to better describe the epidemiology and demographics of ALS in the U.S.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurological condition affecting upper and lower motor neurons. The National ALS Biorepository (referred to as the Biorepository) was initiated in 2015, with biospecimen collection beginning in 2017, as a repository for biospecimens for future ALS research. To help ensure the usefulness of the Biorepository, a biospecimen demand analysis is conducted on an annual basis, as well as an analysis of the utilization of the Biorepository. To determine the types of biospecimens to be collected for the Biorepository, an in-depth initial examination occurred followed by ongoing biospecimen demand and utilization analyses. The initial examination included input from an expert panel, discussions with ALS research experts, review of other ALS biorepositories, assessment of biospecimen demand, and analysis of the biospecimen types historically used in ALS research. Of all biospecimen types reported in the literature, the most frequently used were DNA, postmortem spinal cord, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid; while the frequently reported types of biospecimens used in ALS-related grants were induced pluripotent stem cells, brain, blood, and spinal cord. Continuous analysis of potential sample demand and tissues collected, based on an analysis of the literature and funded grants, and actual sample requests can assist the Biorepository in ensuring that the appropriate samples are available for researchers when they are needed.

Objective: The majority of cases of the fatal neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are of unknown etiology. A proportion of these cases are likely to be attributable to contaminant exposures, although the specific environmental etiology of ALS remains largely a mystery. Certain forms of the neurotoxic metal mercury readily cross into the central nervous system. Fish is a dietary source of methylmercury, but also of beneficial components, such as omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Prior work using clinic-based studies of toenails and hair as keratinous biomarkers of exposure suggest elevated mercury levels in ALS patients compared with controls. We sought to validate this relationship in a U.S. case-control comparison of mercury levels in nail clippings. Methods: We performed trace element analysis using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) on the nail clippings of n = 70 female, geographically representative ALS patients from the National ALS Biorepository and compared them to n = 210 age-matched controls from a set of n = 1216 nationally distributed controls from the Sister and Two Sister Studies. Results: Compared to the lowest quartile of nail mercury, moderate levels were associated with decreased risk of ALS (P = 4.18e-6). However, the odds of having nail mercury levels above the 90th percentile were 2.3-fold higher among ALS patients compared with controls (odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.10-4.58, adjusted for age and smoking status). Conclusion: This finding suggests that excessive mercury exposure may be associated with the neurodegenerative health of aging populations.

Objective: To conduct educational and promotional outreach activities to general neurologists and to increase self-enrollment of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the National ALS Registry (Registry). Methods: A multicomponent project to educate neurologists and increase Registry self-enrollment was delivered. Project components consisted of phone calls, mailings, train-the-trainer presentations, and key informant interviews. Project-specific metrics, continuing education enrollment, and Registry self-enrollment data were analyzed to measure project efficacy. Results: Mailings were sent to 1561 neurologists in 6 states during 2015 to 2016. Sixty-five percent of responding neurologists remembered the mailing 3 months after receipt. Of providers who saw patients with ALS in the 3-month period, 60% read the provider guide, 22% distributed a patient guide, and 15% advised a patient to self-enroll. No changes in self-enrollment rates were observed. Conclusion: Targeted mailings to providers can be used to educate them about the Registry; however, most providers did not distribute materials to patients with ALS. Increases in providers receiving Registry material did not lead to increases in patient self-enrollment. Practice Implications: General neurologists have competing priorities, and they see patients with ALS infrequently. Neurologists could be the appropriate channel to distribute Registry information to patients, but they are not the appropriate resource to assist patients with self-enrollment. Engaging the support staff of busy specialists can help increase research response rates and information distribution. The lessons learned from this project can be applied to other rare conditions and disease specialists.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, rare, and hard to diagnose neurological disease with unknown etiology. Objective: To understand the incidence, prevalence, and survival characteristics of ALS cases in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Methods: Neurologists in Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, and Gwinnett counties provided case reports for ALS patients under their care from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011. Incidence and prevalence rates were calculated for 2009, 2010, and 2011 by sex, race, and ethnicity. Using data from the National Death Index, survival time was calculated for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and El Escorial criteria. Results: There were 281 unique ALS cases reported, which is approximately 104% of the expected cases. The majority of the 281 cases were white, non-Hispanic, male, and in the 50-59 age category. The overall average incidence rate for 2009 to 2011 was 1.54 per 100,000 person-years, with higher annual incidence rates for whites, males, and non-Hispanics. The prevalence rates for 2009, 2010, and 2011 were 5.05, 5.44, and 5.56 per 100,000, respectively. Median survival time was highest for the 18-39 age group, Asians, non-Hispanics, and males. Additionally, the log-rank tests for homogeneity across strata indicate a statistical significance between strata for the age category for survival time. Conclusion: The findings for Atlanta are similar to other population-based studies in the United States. Although the Atlanta metropolitan area was selected to over-represent the minority population, the strongest predictor of survival time was age at diagnosis.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease; the majority of ALS patients die within 2-5 years of receiving a diagnosis (1). Familial ALS, a hereditary form of the disease, accounts for 5%-10% of cases, whereas the remaining cases have no clearly defined etiology (1). ALS affects persons of all races and ethnicities; however, whites, males, non-Hispanics, persons aged >/=60 years, and those with a family history of ALS are more likely to develop the disease (2). No cure for ALS has yet been identified, and the lack of proven and effective therapeutic interventions is an ongoing challenge. Treatments currently available, Edaravone and Riluzole, do not cure ALS, but slow disease progression in certain patients (3,4). This report presents National ALS Registry findings regarding ALS prevalence in the United States for the period January 1-December 31, 2015. In 2015, the estimated prevalence of ALS cases was 5.2 per 100,000 population with a total of 16,583 cases identified. Overall, these findings are similar to the 2014 ALS prevalence and case count (5.0 per 100,000; 15,927 cases) (2). Prevalence rates by patient characteristics (most common in whites, males, and persons aged >/=60 years) and U.S. Census regions are consistent with ALS demographics and have not changed from 2014 to 2015 calendar years. The algorithm used to identify cases from national administrative databases was updated from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) to the ICD-10 codes for claims starting on October 1, 2015, with no apparent effect on case ascertainment. Data collected by the National ALS Registry are being used to better describe the epidemiology of ALS in the United States and to facilitate research on the genetics, potential biomarkers, environmental pollutants, and etiology for ALS.

BACKGROUND: National administrative healthcare data may be used as a case-finding method for prevalence studies of chronic disease in the United States, but the completeness of ascertainment likely varies depending on the disease under study. METHODS: We used 3 case-finding sources (Medicare, Medicaid, and Veterans Administration data) to estimate the prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the United States for 2002-2004, and applied the capture-recapture methodology to estimate the degree of under-ascertainment when relying solely on these sources for case identification. RESULTS: Case-finding completeness was 76% overall and did not vary by race, but was lower for males (77%) than for females (88%), and lower for patients under age 65 (66%) than patients over age 65 (79%). The uncorrected ALS prevalence ratio was 2.8/100,000 in 2002, 3.3/100,000 in 2003, and 3.7/100,000 in 2004. After correcting for under-ascertainment, the annual prevalence increased by approximately 1 per 100,000 to 3.7/100,000 in 2002 (95% CI 3.66-3.80), 4.4/100,000 in 2003 (95% CI 4.34-4.50), and 4.8/100,000 in 2004 (95% CI 4.76-4.91). CONCLUSIONS: Federal healthcare claims databases ascertained are a very efficient method for identifying the majority of ALS-prevalent cases in the National ALS Registry, and may be enhanced by having patients self-register through the registry web portal.

BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) did not include a code specific for Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) until 2017. Instead, code G12.2 included both ALS and other motor neuron diseases (MND). Our objective was to determine US mortality rates for ALS exclusively by excluding other MND and progressive supranuclear palsy. METHODS: All mortality data coded as G12.2 under the pre-2017 rubric were obtained for 2011-2014. Deaths without ALS listed in one of the un-coded cause-of-death fields were excluded. ALS death rates per 100,000 persons were age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using the direct method. RESULTS: The proportion of excluded records coded G12.2 but not ALS was 0.21, resulting in 24,328 ALS deaths. The overall age-adjusted mortality rate was 1.70 (95% CI 1.68-1.72). The rate among males was 2.09 (95% CI 2.05-2.12) and females was 1.37 (95% CI 1.35-1.40). The overall rate among whites was 1.84, blacks 1.03, and other races 0.70. For both sexes and all races, the rate increased with age and peaked among 75-79 year-olds. Rates tended to be greater in states at higher latitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Previous reports of ALS mortality in the United States showed similar age, sex, and race distributions but with greater age-adjusted mortality rates due to the inclusion of other diseases in the case definition. When using ICD-10 data collected prior to 2017, additional review of multiple-cause of death data is required for the accurate estimation of ALS deaths.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease; the majority of ALS patients die within 2-5 years of receiving a diagnosis (1). Familial ALS, a hereditary form of the disease, accounts for 5%-10% of cases, whereas the remaining sporadic cases have no clearly defined etiology (1). ALS affects persons of all races and ethnicities; however, whites, males, non-Hispanics, persons aged >60 years, and those with a family history of ALS are more likely to develop the disease (1-3). No cure for ALS has yet been identified, and the lack of proven and effective therapeutic interventions is an ongoing challenge. Current treatments available do not cure ALS but have been shown to slow disease progression. Until recently, only one drug (riluzole) was approved to treat ALS; however, in 2017, the Food and Drug Administration approved a second drug, edaravone (4).

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease that typically results in death within 2-5 years of initial symptom onset. Multidisciplinary ALS clinics (MDCs) have been established to provide specialty care to people living with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proximity of ALS prevalence cases to the nearest MDC in the US to help evaluate one aspect of access to care. METHODS: Using 2013 prevalence data from the National ALS Registry, cases were geocoded by city using geographic information system (GIS) software, along with the locations of all MDCs in operation during 2013. Case-to-MDC proximity was calculated and analyzed by sex, race, and age group. RESULTS: During 2013, there were 72 MDCs in operation in 30 different states. A total of 15,633 ALS cases were geocoded and were distributed throughout all 50 states. Of these, 62.6% were male, 77.9% were white, and 76.2% were 50-79 years old. For overall case-to-MDC proximity, nearly half (44.9%) of all geocoded cases in the US lived >50 miles from an MDC, including approximately a quarter who lived >100 miles from an MDC. There was a statistically significant difference between distance to MDC by race and age group. CONCLUSIONS: The high percentage of those living more than 50 miles from the nearest specialized clinic underscores one of the many challenges of ALS. Having better access to care, whether at MDCs or through other modalities, is likely key to increasing survivability and obtaining appropriate end-of-life treatment and support for people with ALS.

Our objective was to evaluate the completeness of the United States National ALS Registry (Registry). We compared persons with ALS who were passively identified by the Registry with those actively identified in the State and Metropolitan Area ALS Surveillance project. Cases in the two projects were matched using a combination of identifiers, including, partial social security number, name, date of birth, and sex. The distributions of cases from the two projects that matched/did not match were compared and Chi-square tests conducted to determine statistical significance. There were 5883 ALS cases identified by the surveillance project. Of these, 1116 died before the Registry started, leaving 4767 cases. We matched 2720 cases from the surveillance project to those in the Registry. The cases identified by the surveillance project that did not match cases in the Registry were more likely to be non-white, Hispanic, less than 65 years of age, and from western states. The methods used by the Registry to identify ALS cases, i.e. national administrative data and self-registration, worked well but missed cases. These findings suggest that developing strategies to identify and promote the Registry to those who were more likely to be missing, e.g. non-white and Hispanic, could be beneficial to improving the completeness of the Registry.

As part of our continuing effort to highlight innovative approaches to improving the health and environment of communities, the Journal is pleased to publish a bimonthly column from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). ATSDR is a federal public health agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and shares a common office of the Director with the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). ATSDR serves the public by using the best science, taking responsive public health actions, and providing trusted health information to prevent harmful exposures and diseases related to toxic substances. The purpose of this column is to inform readers of ATSDR's activities and initiatives to better understand the relationship between exposure to hazardous substances in the environment and their impact on human health and how to protect public health. We believe that the column will provide a valuable resource to our readership by helping to make known the considerable resources and expertise that ATSDR has available to assist communities, states, and others to assure good environmental health practice for all is served. The conclusions of this column are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of ATSDR, CDC, or HHS. Kevin Horton is chief of the Environmental Health Surveillance Branch within the Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences at ATSDR. Wendy Kaye is a senior epidemiologist at McKing Consulting Corporation. Laurie Wagner is a research associate at McKing Consulting Corporation.

A standardized method to reduce analytic variables for the collection of human tissue is essential for investigators seeking to advance findings from basic disease research to new therapies for patients. When designing experiments involving human tissue samples, researchers must define specific donor criteria and preservation requirements useful for their analysis. Access to tissue from donors who fit specific criteria can be problematic if the donor profile or disease is not widespread. The biggest challenge facing human tissue research is identifying a significant number of donors who match specific eligibility criteria to add value to studies seeking cures or treatments for devastating diseases. Both diseased and nondiseased tissues are needed for comparison to understand the mechanisms of dysfunction, to seek potential biomarkers, or to evaluate potential therapies for disorders. The key to mitigating the challenge facing human tissue research is establishing a wide donor screening and recovery network to maximize donation opportunities that meet donor eligibility requirements and tissue collection parameters. The National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI) has developed several novel approaches to serve these specific scientific needs. To support uniform human tissue collection programs, NDRI has become accredited by the College of American Pathologists as a biorepository to enhance the reproducibility of our recovery network. | One method that NDRI uses to capture these very important human biospecimens is partnerships with organ procurement organizations (OPOs) for the screening and recovery of donors throughout the United States. The landscape of organ and tissue donation for transplant has changed significantly in the past 35 years, which has led to great opportunities for human tissue research efforts. Following the National Organ and Transplant Act passed by Congress in 1984, the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network was established to manage the organ matching process at 58 OPOs throughout the country. Currently, about 1.4 million deaths that occur in acute clinical care settings in the United States are referred to these OPOs for consideration for transplant. As not all organs and tissues from these donors are eligible for transplant, there are opportunities for donation of tissue for research through the same mechanism. The NDRI, a 501(c)3 not-for-profit, uses the extensive screening and authorization in place at the OPOs to provide high-quality, highly annotated, nondiseased, and diseased tissues for research.

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease for which no cure or viable treatment has been identified. ALS, like most noncommunicable diseases, is not a nationally notifiable disease in the United States. The prevalence of ALS in the United States during 2010-2011 was estimated to be 3.9 cases per 100,000 persons in the general population. Updated prevalence estimates are needed to help monitor disease status, better understand etiology, and identify risk factors for ALS. PERIOD COVERED: 2012-2013. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: The National ALS Registry, established in 2009, collects data on ALS patients in the United States to better describe the incidence and prevalence of ALS, examine risk factors such as environmental and occupational exposures, and characterize the demographics of those living with ALS. To identify prevalent cases of ALS, data are compiled from four national administrative databases (maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Veterans Health Administration, and the Veterans Benefits Administration). To identify cases not included in these databases and to better understand risk-factors associated with ALS and disease progression, the Registry also includes data that are collected from patients who voluntarily enroll and complete online surveys. RESULTS: During 2012 and 2013, the Registry identified 14,713 and 15,908 persons, respectively, who met the surveillance case definition of ALS. The estimated ALS prevalence rate was 4.7 cases per 100,000 U.S. population for 2012 and 5.0 per 100,000 for 2013. Due to revisions to the algorithm and use of death data from the National Death Index, an updated prevalence estimate has been calculated retrospectively for October 19, 2010-December 31, 2011. This updated estimate showed a prevalence rate of 4.3 per 100,000 population and a total of 13,282 cases. Since the inception of the Registry, the pattern of characteristics (e.g., age, sex, and race/ethnicity) among persons with ALS have remained unchanged. Overall, ALS was more common among whites, males, and persons aged 60-69 years. The age groups with the lowest number of ALS cases were persons aged 18-39 years and those aged ≥80 years. Males had a higher prevalence rate of ALS than females overall and across all data sources. These findings remained consistent during October 2010-December 2013. INTERPRETATION: The Registry is the only available data source that can be used to estimate the national prevalence for ALS in the United States. Use of both administrative national databases and self-report from patients enables a comprehensive approach to estimate ALS prevalence. The overall increase in the prevalence rate from 4.3 per 100,000 persons (revised) during 2010-2011 to 4.7 and 5.0 per 100,000 persons, respectively, during 2012-2013 likely is not an actual increase in the number of ALS cases. Rather, this increase might be attributed to improved case ascertainment due to the refinement of the algorithm used to identify definite ALS cases, along with an increased public awareness of the Registry. Registry estimates of ALS prevalence are consistent with findings from long-established ALS registries in Europe and from smaller-scale epidemiologic studies previously conducted in the United States. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS: Data collected by the National ALS Registry are being used to better describe the epidemiology of ALS in the United States and to help facilitate research. The combined approach of using national administrative databases and a self-enrollment web portal to collect data is novel and potentially could be used for other non-notifiable diseases such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis. Increased public awareness of the Registry might lead to more ALS cases being identified from the secure web portal (https://www.cdc.gov/als), which can ascertain cases apart from the national administrative databases. For example, in 2014, the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, a social media-centered campaign, received extensive public visibility and created increased awareness of ALS. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) works closely with ALS advocacy and support groups, researchers, health care professionals, and others to promote the National ALS Registry and to identify all cases of ALS in the United States. In addition to estimating the prevalence of ALS, the Registry is being used to collect specimens from patient enrollees through a new biorepository, connect patient enrollees with new clinical trials and epidemiologic studies, and fund studies to help learn more about the etiology of ALS. Additional information about the National ALS Registry is available at http://www.cdc.gov/als or by calling toll-free at 1-877-442-9719.

Newborn screening (NBS) is intended to identify congenital conditions prior to the onset of symptoms in order to provide early intervention that leads to improved outcomes. NBS is a public health success, providing reduction in mortality and improved developmental outcomes for screened conditions. However, it is less clear to what extent newborn screening achieves the long-term goals relating to improved health, growth, development and function. We propose a framework for assessing outcomes for the health and well-being of children identified through NBS programs. The framework proposed here, and this manuscript, were approved for publication by the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC). This framework can be applied to each screened condition within the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), recognizing that the data elements and measures will vary by condition. As an example, we applied the framework to sickle cell disease and phenylketonuria (PKU), two diverse conditions with different outcome measures and potential sources of data. Widespread and consistent application of this framework across state NBS and child health systems is envisioned as useful to standardize approaches to assessment of outcomes and for continuous improvement of the NBS and child health systems. SIGNIFICANCE: Successful interventions for newborn screening conditions have been a driving force for public health newborn screening for over fifty years. Organizing interventions and outcome measures into a standard framework to systematically assess outcomes has not yet come into practice. This paper presents a customizable outcomes framework for organizing measures for newborn screening condition-specific health outcomes, and an approach to identifying sources and challenges to populating those measures.

BACKGROUND: The National ALS Registry is made up of two components to capture amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases: national administrative databases (Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Health Administration and Veterans Benefits Administration) and self-identified cases captured by the Registry's web portal. This study describes self-reported characteristics of U.S. adults with ALS using the data collected by the National ALS Registry web portal risk factor surveys only from October 19, 2010 through December 31, 2013. OBJECTIVE: To describe findings from the National ALS Registry's web portal risk factor surveys. MEASUREMENTS: The prevalence of select risk factors among adults with ALS was determined by calculating the frequencies of select risk factors-smoking and alcohol (non, current and former) histories, military service and occupational history, and family history of neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS, Alzheimer's and/or Parkinson's. RESULTS: Nearly half of survey respondents were ever smokers compared with nearly 41% of adults nationally. Most respondents were ever drinkers which is comparable to national estimates. The majority were light drinkers. Nearly one-quarter of survey respondents were veterans compared with roughly 9% of US adults nationally. Most respondents were retired or disabled. The industries in which respondents were employed for the longest time were Professional and Scientific and Technical Services. When family history of neurodegenerative diseases in first degree relatives was evaluated against our comparison group, the rates of ALS were similar, but were higher for Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and any neurodegenerative diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The National ALS Registry web portal, to our knowledge, is the largest, most geographically diverse collection of risk factor data about adults living with ALS. Various characteristics were consistent with other published studies on ALS risk factors and will allow researchers to generate hypotheses for future research.

Our objective was to develop state and metropolitan area-based surveillance projects to describe the characteristics of those with ALS and to assist with evaluating the completeness of the National ALS Registry. Because the literature suggested that ethnic/racial minorities have lower incidence of ALS, three state and eight metropolitan areas were selected to over-represent ethnic/racial minorities to have a sufficient number of minority patients. Project activities relied on reports from medical providers and medical records abstraction. The project areas represented approximately 27% of the U.S. POPULATION: The combined racial and ethnic distribution of these areas is 64.4% white, 16.0% African-American, 6.7% Asian, and 28.3% Hispanic. Most neurologists did not diagnose or provide care for ALS patients. The number of unique patients reported was close to expected (5883 vs. 6673). Age and gender distribution of patients was similar to the literature. The crude average annual incidence rate was 1.52 per 100,000 person-years, CI 1.44-1.61, and the 2009 prevalence rate was 3.84 per 100,000 population, CI 3.70-3.97. In conclusion, this study represents the largest number of clinically diagnosed ALS patients reported by neurologists in the U.S. Comparison of these data with those in the National ALS Registry will help evaluate the completeness of administrative databases.

Our objective was to describe racial and ethnic differences of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in distinct geographic locations around the United States (U.S.). ALS cases for the period 2009-2011 were identified using active case surveillance in three states and eight metropolitan areas. Of the 5883 unique ALS cases identified, 74.8% were white, 9.3% were African-American/black, 3.6% were Asian, 12.0% were an unknown race, and 0.3% were marked as some other race. For ethnicity, 77.5% were defined as non-Hispanic, 10.8% Hispanic, and 11.7% were of unknown ethnicity. The overall crude average annual incidence rate was 1.52 per 100,000 person-years and the rate differed by race and ethnicity. The overall age-adjusted average annual incidence rate was 1.44 per 100,000 person-years and the age-adjusted average incidence rates also differed by race and ethnicity. Racial differences were also found in payer type, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, reported El Escorial criteria, and age at diagnosis. In conclusion, calculated incidence rates demonstrate that ALS occurs less frequently in African-American/blacks and Asians compared to whites, and less frequently in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanics in the U.S. A more precise understanding of racial and ethnic variations in ALS may help to reveal candidates for further studies of disease etiology and disease progression.

We assessed for vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) precursor organisms in southeastern Michigan, an area known to have VRSA. The prevalence was 2.5% (pSK41-positive methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 2009-2011) and 1.5% (Inc18-positive vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, 2006-2013); Inc18 prevalence significantly decreased after 2009 (3.7% to 0.82%). Risk factors for pSK41 included intravenous vancomycin exposure.

Uncertainty about the incidence and prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), as well as the role of the environment in the etiology of ALS, supports the need for a surveillance system/registry for this disease. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of using existing administrative data to identify cases of ALS. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) funded four pilot projects at tertiary care facilities for ALS, HMOs, and state based organizations. Data from Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Health Administration, and Veterans Benefits Administration were matched to data available from site-specific administrative and clinical databases for a five-year time-period (1 January 2001-31 December 2005). Review of information in the medical records by a neurologist was considered the gold standard for determining an ALS case. We developed an algorithm using variables from the administrative data that identified true cases of ALS (verified by a neurologist). Individuals could be categorized into ALS, possible ALS, and not ALS. The best algorithm had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 85%. We concluded that administrative data can be used to develop a surveillance system/registry for ALS. These methods can be explored for creating surveillance systems for other neurodegenerative diseases.

Since the publication of "A Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals" in 2008, prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has become a national priority. Despite improvements, preventable HAIs continue to occur. The 2014 updates to the Compendium were created to provide acute care hospitals with up-to-date, practical, expert guidance to assist in prioritizing and implementing their HAI prevention efforts. They are the product of a highly collaborative effort led by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Hospital Association (AHA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), the Society for Hospital Medicine (SHM), and the Surgical Infection Society (SIS).

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease for which no cure has been identified. Although ALS has no known definitive cause, familial ALS (a hereditary form) occurs in 5%-10% of cases. Many hypotheses have been formulated about what causes ALS, including chemical exposures, occupational exposure, military service, infectious agents, nutritional intake, physical activity, and trauma. Worldwide, ALS affects white males aged >60 years more often than any other group. In the United States, ALS surveillance is necessary to estimate the incidence and prevalence of ALS and collect data on risk factors. ALS is not a nationally notifiable condition in the United States (i.e., it is not a reportable condition in all jurisdictions), and individual state reporting requirements differ, with Massachusetts being the only state that mandates reporting. PERIOD COVERED: October 19, 2010-December 31, 2011. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: In 2009, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) implemented the National ALS Registry to collect and analyze data regarding persons with ALS in the United States. The main goals of the Registry, as defined by the 2008 ALS Registry Act, are to describe the incidence and prevalence of ALS better, examine risk factors such as environmental and occupational exposures, and characterize the demographics of those living with ALS. The Registry uses a two-pronged approach to identify all cases of ALS. The first approach uses four existing national administrative databases (maintained by Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Health Administration, and the Veterans Benefits Administration) to identify prevalence of ALS. The second approach uses a secure web portal (http://www.cdc.gov/als) that was launched to the public on October 19, 2010, to identify cases not included in the four national administrative databases and to collect risk-factor data on known ALS cases. ALS patients who have registered via the web portal can complete brief risk-factor surveys online that are intended to attain a better understanding of ALS (e.g., genetics and environmental and occupational exposures) and help determine disease progression. RESULTS: During October 19, 2010-December 31, 2011, a total of 12,187 persons meeting the surveillance case definition of definite ALS were identified by the Registry, for a prevalence of 3.9 cases of ALS per 100,000 persons in the U.S. general population. Incidence cannot be measured because the date of diagnosis was not noted in all patient records. Overall, ALS was more common among white males, non-Hispanics, and persons aged 60-69 years. The age groups with the lowest number of persons with ALS were age 18-39 years and age >80 years. Males had a higher prevalence rate of ALS than females overall and across all data sources. INTERPRETATION: This is the first (and to date the only) effort to estimate the national prevalence of ALS in the United States. Using the combined approach of the national databases and the web-based portal enables researchers to estimate ALS prevalence more accurately. Registry findings for the prevalence of ALS are consistent with findings from long-established ALS registries in Europe and from smaller-scale epidemiologic studies conducted previously in the United States. Although incidence cannot be measured with Registry data at this time, incidence is being measured in smaller geographic areas that have participated in ATSDR's State and Metropolitan Area ALS surveillance projects. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS: Data collected by the National ALS Registry are being used to better describe the prevalence of ALS in the United States and to help facilitate research. The combined approach of using national administrative databases and a self-enrollment web portal to collect data is novel and potentially could be used for other non-notifiable diseases such as Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis. ATSDR is working closely with ALS advocacy and support groups, researchers, health-care professionals, and others to promote the National ALS Registry in order to capture all cases of ALS. To further enhance and strengthen the Registry, ATSDR is 1) adding new modules to the portal to examine other potential risk factors, 2) launching a feasibility study for a novel ALS biorepository (available at http://wwwn.cdc.gov/als/ALSBioRegistry.aspx) linked to the Registry that would potentially provide biologic specimens from patient enrollees to help researchers learn more about disease etiology, 3) engaging in surveillance activities in selected states and large metropolitan areas to help test the completeness of the Registry as well as calculating incidence in these areas, and 4) using the Registry to recruit patient enrollees for new clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. Additional information about the National ALS Registry is available at http://www.cdc.gov/als or by calling toll-free at 1-877-442-9719.

Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates "Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals," published in 2008. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Hospital Association (AHA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise. The list of endorsing and supporting organizations is presented in the introduction to the 2014 updates.