Last data update: Apr 29, 2024. (Total: 46658 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 37 Records) |
Query Trace: Kabbani S [original query] |
---|
Description of antibiotic use variability among US nursing homes using electronic health record data
Kabbani S , Wang SW , Ditz LL , Gouin KA , Palms D , Rowe TA , Hyun DY , Chi NW , Stone ND , Hicks LA . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 12/28/2021 1 (1) e58 BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are frequently prescribed in nursing homes; national data describing facility-level antibiotic use are lacking. The objective of this analysis was to describe variability in antibiotic use in nursing homes across the United States using electronic health record orders. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of antibiotic orders for 309,884 residents in 1,664 US nursing homes in 2016 were included in the analysis. Antibiotic use rates were calculated as antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 resident days and were compared by type of stay (short stay ≤100 days vs long stay >100 days). Prescribing indications and the duration of nursing home-initiated antibiotic orders were described. Facility-level correlations of antibiotic use, adjusting for resident health and facility characteristics, were assessed using multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: In 2016, 54% of residents received at least 1 systemic antibiotic. The overall rate of antibiotic use was 88 DOT per 1,000 resident days. The 3 most common antibiotic classes prescribed were fluoroquinolones (18%), cephalosporins (18%), and urinary anti-infectives (9%). Antibiotics were most frequently prescribed for urinary tract infections, and the median duration of an antibiotic course was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-10). Higher facility antibiotic use rates correlated positively with higher proportions of short-stay residents, for-profit ownership, residents with low cognitive performance, and having at least 1 resident on a ventilator. Available facility-level characteristics only predicted a small proportion of variability observed (Model R(2) version 0.24 software). CONCLUSIONS: Using electronic health record orders, variability was found among US nursing-home antibiotic prescribing practices, highlighting potential opportunities for targeted improvement of prescribing practices. |
Outpatient visits and antibiotic use due to higher valency pneumococcal vaccine serotypes
King LM , Andrejko KL , Kabbani S , Tartof SY , Hicks LA , Cohen AL , Kobayashi M , Lewnard JA . J Infect Dis 2024 BACKGROUND: In 2022-2023, 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15/PCV20) were recommended for infants. We aimed to estimate the incidence of outpatient visits and antibiotic prescriptions in U.S. children (≤17 years) from 2016-2019 for acute otitis media, pneumonia, and sinusitis associated with PCV15- and PCV20-additional (non-PCV13) serotypes to quantify PCV15/20 potential impacts. METHODS: We estimated the incidence of PCV15/20-additional serotype-attributable visits and antibiotic prescriptions as the product of all-cause incidence rates, derived from national healthcare surveys and MarketScan databases, and PCV15/20-additional serotype-attributable fractions. We estimated serotype-specific attributable fractions using modified vaccine-probe approaches incorporating incidence changes post-PCV13 and ratios of PCV13 versus PCV15/20 serotype frequencies, estimated through meta-analyses. RESULTS: Per 1000 children annually, PCV15-additional serotypes accounted for an estimated 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.8-3.9) visits and 2.4 (1.6-3.4) antibiotic prescriptions. PCV20-additional serotypes resulted in 15.0 (11.2-20.4) visits and 13.2 (9.9-18.0) antibiotic prescriptions annually per 1,000 children. PCV15/20-additional serotypes account for 0.4% (0.2-0.6%) and 2.1% (1.5-3.0%) of pediatric outpatient antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PCV15-additional serotypes, PCV20-additional serotypes account for >5 times the burden of visits and antibiotic prescriptions. Higher-valency PCVs, especially PCV20, may contribute to preventing pediatric pneumococcal respiratory infections and antibiotic use. |
Length of antibiotic therapy among adults hospitalized with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia, 2013-2020
McCarthy NL , Baggs J , Wolford H , Kazakova SV , Kabbani S , Attell BK , Neuhauser MM , Walker L , Yi SH , Hatfield KM , Reddy S , Hicks LA . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2024 1-7 OBJECTIVE: The 2014 US National Strategy for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (CARB) aimed to reduce inappropriate inpatient antibiotic use by 20% for monitored conditions, such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), by 2020. We evaluated annual trends in length of therapy (LOT) in adults hospitalized with uncomplicated CAP from 2013 through 2020. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among adults with a primary diagnosis of bacterial or unspecified pneumonia using International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Revision codes in MarketScan and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services databases. We included patients with length of stay (LOS) of 2-10 days, discharged home with self-care, and not rehospitalized in the 3 days following discharge. We estimated inpatient LOT based on LOS from the PINC AI Healthcare Database. The total LOT was calculated by summing estimated inpatient LOT and actual postdischarge LOT. We examined trends from 2013 to 2020 in patients with total LOT >7 days, which was considered an indicator of likely excessive LOT. RESULTS: There were 44,976 and 400,928 uncomplicated CAP hospitalizations among patients aged 18-64 years and ≥65 years, respectively. From 2013 to 2020, the proportion of patients with total LOT >7 days decreased by 25% (68% to 51%) among patients aged 18-64 years and by 27% (68%-50%) among patients aged ≥65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although likely excessive LOT for uncomplicated CAP patients decreased since 2013, the proportion of patients treated with LOT >7 days still exceeded 50% in 2020. Antibiotic stewardship programs should continue to pursue interventions to reduce likely excessive LOT for common infections. |
Antibiotic use among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States, March 2020-June 2022
Kim C , Wolford H , Baggs J , Reddy S , Hicks LA , Neuhauser MM , Kabbani S . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (11) ofad503 We conducted a retrospective study to describe antibiotic use among US adults hospitalized with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Despite a decrease in overall antibiotic use, most patients hospitalized with COVID-19 received antibiotics on admission (88.1%) regardless of critical care status, highlighting that more efforts are needed to optimize antibiotic therapy. |
Antibiotic stewardship in outpatient telemedicine: Adapting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention core elements to optimize antibiotic use
Sanchez GV , Kabbani S , Tsay SV , Bizune D , Hersh AL , Luciano A , Hicks LA . Telemed J E Health 2023 The rapid expansion of telemedicine has highlighted challenges and opportunities to improve antibiotic use and effectively adapt antibiotic stewardship best practices to outpatient telemedicine settings. Antibiotic stewardship integration into telemedicine is essential to optimize antibiotic prescribing for patients and ensure health care quality. We performed a narrative review of published literature on antibiotic prescribing and stewardship in outpatient telemedicine to inform the adaptation of the Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship framework to outpatient telemedicine settings. Our narrative review suggests that in-person antibiotic stewardship interventions can be adapted to outpatient telemedicine settings. We present considerations for applying the Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship to outpatient telemedicine which builds upon growing evidence describing care delivery and quality improvement in this setting. Additional applied implementation research is necessary to inform the application of effective, sustainable, and equitable antibiotic stewardship interventions across the spectrum of outpatient telemedicine. |
Health equity and antibiotic prescribing in the United States: A systematic scoping review
Kim C , Kabbani S , Dube WC , Neuhauser M , Tsay S , Hersh A , Marcelin JR , Hicks LA . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (9) ofad440 We performed a scoping review of articles published from 1 January 2000 to 4 January 2022 to characterize inequities in antibiotic prescribing and use across healthcare settings in the United States to inform antibiotic stewardship interventions and research. We included 34 observational studies, 21 cross-sectional survey studies, 4 intervention studies, and 2 systematic reviews. Most studies (55 of 61 [90%]) described the outpatient setting, 3 articles were from dentistry, 2 were from long-term care, and 1 was from acute care. Differences in antibiotic prescribing were found by patient's race and ethnicity, sex, age, socioeconomic factors, geography, clinician's age and specialty, and healthcare setting, with an emphasis on outpatient settings. Few studies assessed stewardship interventions. Clinicians, antibiotic stewardship experts, and health systems should be aware that prescribing behavior varies according to both clinician- and patient-level markers. Prescribing differences likely represent structural inequities; however, no studies reported underlying drivers of inequities in antibiotic prescribing. |
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient antibiotic use in the United States, January 2019 through July 2022
O'Leary EN , Neuhauser MM , Srinivasan A , Dubendris H , Webb AK , Soe MM , Hicks LA , Wu H , Kabbani S , Edwards JR . Clin Infect Dis 2023 Antimicrobial use (AU) data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network's Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Module between January 2019 and July 2022 were analyzed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient antimicrobial use. |
Characteristics of patients associated with any outpatient antibiotic prescribing among Medicare Part D enrollees, 2007-2018
Kim CY , Gouin KA , Hicks LA , Kabbani S . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2023 3 (1) e113 The 2007-2018 National Health Interview Survey data linked with Medicare claims were used to examine older adults' characteristics and assess their associations with receiving an antibiotic prescription. This analysis shows variation in antibiotic prescribing among adults enrolled in Medicare Part D by race and ethnicity, sex, geography, and health status. © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, 2023. |
Intravenous antimicrobial starts among hemodialysis patients in the National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Component, 2016-2020
Wilson WW , Gouin KA , Fike L , Apata IW , Bell JM , Edwards JR , Novosad S , Kabbani S . Kidney360 2023 4 (7) 971-975 NHSN total IV antimicrobial start rates for patients on hemodialysis decreased from 2016-2020, | but rates unsupported by NHSN surveillance documentation did not. | 80% of reporting hemodialysis facilities had ≥1 unsupported IV antimicrobial start and the | fraction of facilities with unsupported starts increased yearly. | Accurate reporting and timely review of antimicrobial data is critical to understanding | prescribing trends and practices in hemodialysis facilities. |
The perfect storm: respiratory viral surges and anti-infective shortages
Gross AE , Kabbani S , Blumenthal J . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2023 3 (1) e89 In late 2022, ∼40% of US households had a family member with influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and/or severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 1 Increased incidence of influenza and RSV infection occurred much earlier than in the typical respiratory virus season, with the peak occurring in November. 2–4 Furthermore, RSV and influenza-related hospitalization rates were higher than in the past 5 years. This RSV peak coincided with a SARS-CoV-2 peak in early December 2022. 2 The overlap in respiratory viral disease burden in the United States contributed to significant healthcare resource utilization in outpatient and inpatient settings for patients with respiratory infection syndromes, especially in pediatric populations, contributing to shortages in anti-infectives and antipyretics. |
Comparison of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions among older adults in IQVIA Xponent and publicly available Medicare Part D data, 2018
Beshearse EM , Gouin KA , Fleming-Dutra KE , Tsay S , Hicks LA , Kabbani S . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2023 3 (1) e32 The distributions of antibiotic prescriptions by geography, antibiotic class, and prescriber specialty are similar in the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D Prescriber Public Use Files and IQVIA Xponent dataset. Public health organizations and healthcare systems can use these data to track antibiotic use and guide antibiotic stewardship interventions for older adults. |
Evaluation of antifungal use in long-term care facilities using pharmacy dispensing data in the USA, 2019
Dickinson DT , Gouin KA , Neuhauser MM , Benedict K , Cincotta S , Kabbani S . J Antimicrob Chemother 2022 78 (1) 309-311 Antimicrobials are one of the most commonly prescribed medications in long-term care (LTC) settings.1–3 Cross-sectional surveys have estimated that antifungals account for 0.1%–5% of antimicrobials administered to LTC residents.2,3 However, these prevalence surveys did not capture use over time or characterize the prescribing of specific agents. Dispensing data from LTC pharmacies can be leveraged to track and report LTC antimicrobial use.4 Due to the risk of adverse events and drug interactions among older adults, characterizing antifungal use and describing variability in antifungal prescribing can inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts to ensure resident safety.5–7 |
Urgent-care antibiotic prescribing: An exploratory analysis to evaluate health inequities
Seibert AM , Hersh AL , Patel PK , Matheu M , Stanfield V , Fino N , Hicks LA , Tsay SV , Kabbani S , Stenehjem E . Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2022 2 (1) e184 Healthcare disparities and inequities exist in a variety of environments and manifest in diagnostic and therapeutic measures. In this commentary, we highlight our experience examining our organization's urgent care respiratory encounter antibiotic prescribing practices. We identified differences in prescribing based on several individual characteristics including patient age, race, ethnicity, preferred language, and patient and/or clinician gender. Our approach can serve as an electronic health record (EHR)-based methodology for disparity and inequity audits in other systems and for other conditions. |
Antibiotic Prescriptions Associated With COVID-19 Outpatient Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries, April 2020 to April 2021.
Tsay SV , Bartoces M , Gouin K , Kabbani S , Hicks LA . JAMA 2022 327 (20) 2018-2019 This study of Medicare claims data examines the prescribing of antibiotics to older US patients who had outpatient visits for COVID-19 in an effort to address unnecessary antibiotic use for viral infections. |
Identifying higher-volume antibiotic outpatient prescribers using publicly available Medicare Part D data - United States, 2019
Gouin KA , Fleming-Dutra KE , Tsay S , Bizune D , Hicks LA , Kabbani S . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 71 (6) 202-205 Antibiotic prescribing can lead to adverse drug events and antibiotic resistance, which pose ongoing urgent public health threats (1). Adults aged ≥65 years (older adults) are recipients of the highest rates of outpatient antibiotic prescribing and are at increased risk for antibiotic-related adverse events, including Clostridioides difficile and antibiotic-resistant infections and related deaths (1). Variation in antibiotic prescribing quality is primarily driven by prescribing patterns of individual health care providers, independent of patients' underlying comorbidities and diagnoses (2). Engaging higher-volume prescribers (the top 10% of prescribers by antibiotic volume) in antibiotic stewardship interventions, such as peer comparison audit and feedback in which health care providers receive data on their prescribing performance compared with that of other health care providers, has been effective in reducing antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings and can be implemented on a large scale (3-5). This study analyzed data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D Prescriber Public Use Files (PUFs)* to describe higher-volume antibiotic prescribers in outpatient settings compared with lower-volume prescribers (the lower 90% of prescribers by antibiotic volume). Among the 59.4 million antibiotic prescriptions during 2019, 41% (24.4 million) were prescribed by the top 10% of prescribers (69,835). The antibiotic prescribing rate of these higher-volume prescribers (680 prescriptions per 1,000 beneficiaries) was 60% higher than that of lower-volume prescribers (426 prescriptions per 1,000 beneficiaries). Identifying health care providers responsible for a higher volume of antibiotic prescribing could provide a basis for additional assessment of appropriateness and outreach. Public health organizations and health care systems can use publicly available data to guide focused interventions to optimize antibiotic prescribing to limit the emergence of antibiotic resistance and improve patient outcomes. |
Using machine learning to examine drivers of inappropriate outpatient antibiotic prescribing in acute respiratory illnesses.
King LM , Kusnetsov M , Filippoupolitis A , Arik D , Bartoces M , Roberts RM , Tsay SV , Kabbani S , Bizune D , Rathore AS , Valkova S , Eleftherohorinou H , Hicks LA . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022 44 (5) 1-5 Using a machine-learning model, we examined drivers of antibiotic prescribing for antibiotic-inappropriate acute respiratory illnesses in a large US claims data set. Antibiotics were prescribed in 11% of the 42 million visits in our sample. The model identified outpatient setting type, patient age mix, and state as top drivers of prescribing. |
Feasibility of a nursing home antibiotic stewardship intervention
Baier RR , Jump RLP , Zhang T , Kabbani S , Gifford DR , Gravenstein S . J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021 23 (6) 1025-1030 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a bundled electronic intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in US nursing homes. DESIGN: Prospective mixed-methods quality improvement intervention. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nursing staff and residents in 13 nursing homes, and residents in 8 matched-control facilities (n = 21 facilities total, from 2 corporations). METHODS: This study involved a 2-month design period (n = 5 facilities) focused on the acceptability and feasibility of a bundled electronic intervention consisting of 3 tools, followed by a 15-month implementation period (n = 8 facilities) during which we used rapid-cycle quality improvement methods to refine and add to the bundle. We used mixed-methods data from providers, intervention tools, and health records to assess feasibility and conduct a difference-in-difference analysis among the 8 intervention sites and 8 pair-matched controls. RESULTS: Nurses at 5 pilot sites reported that initial versions of the electronic tools were acceptable and feasible, but barriers emerged when 8 different facilities began implementing the tools, prompting iterative revisions to the training and bundle. The final bundle consisted of 3 electronic tools and training that standardized digital documentation to document and track a change in resident condition, infections, antibiotic prescribing, and antibiotic follow-up. By the end of the implementation phase, all 8 facilities were using at least 1 of the 3 tools. Early antibiotic discontinuation increased 10.5% among intervention sites, but decreased 10.8% among control sites. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The 3 tools in our bundled electronic intervention capture clinical and prescribing data necessary to assess changes in antibiotic use and were feasible for nurses to adopt. Achieving this required modifying the tools and training before the intervention reached its final form. Comparisons of rates of antibiotic use at intervention and control facilities showed promising improvement in antibiotic discontinuation, demonstrating that the intervention could be evaluated using secondary electronic health record data. |
Advancing diagnostic stewardship for healthcare associated infections, antibiotic resistance, and sepsis
Curren EJ , Lutgring JD , Kabbani S , Diekema DJ , Gitterman S , Lautenbach E , Morgan DJ , Rock C , Salerno RM , McDonald LC . Clin Infect Dis 2021 74 (4) 723-728 Diagnostic stewardship means ordering the right tests, for the right patient at the right time to inform optimal clinical care. Diagnostic stewardship is an integral part of antibiotic stewardship efforts to optimize antibiotic use and improve patient outcomes, including reductions in antibiotic resistance, and treatment of sepsis. CDC's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP) hosted a meeting on improving patient safety through diagnostic stewardship with a focus on the use of the laboratory. The meeting identified emerging issues in the field of diagnostic stewardship, raised awareness of these issues among stakeholders, and discussed strategies and interventions to address the issues-all with an emphasis on improved outcomes and patient safety. This white paper summarizes the key takeaways of the meeting including needs for diagnostic stewardship implementation, promising future avenues for diagnostic stewardship implementation, and areas of needed research. |
White Paper On Antimicrobial Stewardship In Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
So M , Hand J , Forrest G , Pouch SM , Te H , Ardura MI , Bartash RM , Dadhania D , Edelman J , Ince D , Jorgenson MR , Kabbani S , Lease ED , Levine D , Ohler L , Patel G , Pisano J , Spinner ML , Abbo L , Verna EC , Husain S . Am J Transplant 2021 22 (1) 96-112 Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have made immense strides in optimizing antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral use in clinical settings. However, while ASPs are required institutionally by regulatory agencies in the United States and Canada, they are not mandated for transplant centers or programs specifically. Despite the fact that solid-organ transplant recipients in particular are at increased risk of infections from multi-drug resistant organisms, due to host and donor factors and immunosuppressive therapy - there currently are little rigorous data regarding stewardship practices in solid organ transplant populations, and thus no transplant-specific requirements currently exist. Further complicating matters, transplant patients have a wide range of variability regarding their susceptibility to infection, as factors such as surgery of transplant, intensity of immunosuppression, and presence of drains or catheters in-situ, may modify the risk of infection. As such, it is not feasible to have a 'one-size-fits-all' style of stewardship for this patient population. The objective of this whitepaper is to identify opportunities, risk factors and ASP strategies that should be assessed with SOT recipients to optimize antimicrobial use, while producing an overall improvement in patient outcomes. We hope it may serve as a springboard for development of future guidance, and identification of research opportunities. |
Trends in Antibiotic Use in United States Hospitals During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
Rose AN , Baggs J , Wolford H , Neuhauser MM , Srinivasan A , Gundlapalli AV , Reddy S , Kompaniyets L , Pennington AF , Grigg C , Kabbani S . Open Forum Infect Dis 2021 8 (6) ofab236 We described antibiotic use among inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Most COVID-19 inpatients received antibiotic therapy. We also described hospital-wide antibiotic use during 2020 compared with 2019, stratified by hospital COVID-19 burden. Although total antibiotic use decreased between years, certain antibiotic use increased with higher COVID-19 burden. |
Implementation of core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes-National Healthcare Safety Network, 2016-2018
Gouin KA , Kabbani S , Anttila A , Mak J , Mungai E , McCray TT , Bell J , Hicks LA , Stone ND . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021 43 (6) 1-5 OBJECTIVE: To assess the national uptake of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes from 2016 to 2018 and the effect of infection prevention and control (IPC) hours on the implementation of the core elements. DESIGN: Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: US nursing homes. METHODS: We used the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Long-Term Care Facility Component annual surveys from 2016 to 2018 to assess nursing home characteristics and percent implementation of the core elements. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the association between weekly IPC hours and the implementation of all 7 core elements while controlling for confounding by facility characteristics. RESULTS: We included 7,506 surveys from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported implementation of all 7 core elements, a 28% increase from 2016. The greatest increases in implementation from 2016 to 2018 were in education (19%), reporting (18%), and drug expertise (15%). In 2018, 71% of nursing homes reported pharmacist involvement in improving antibiotic use, an increase of 27% since 2016. Nursing homes that reported at least 20 hours of IPC activity per week were 14% (95% confidence interval, 7%-20%) more likely to implement all 7 core elements when controlling for facility ownership and affiliation. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing homes reported substantial progress in antibiotic stewardship implementation from 2016 to 2018. Improvements in access to drug expertise, education, and reporting antibiotic use may reflect increased stewardship awareness and resource use among nursing home providers under new regulatory requirements. Nursing home stewardship programs may benefit from increased IPC staff hours. |
Urinary tract infection treatment practices in nursing homes reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2017
Kabbani S , Palms D , Bell JM , Hicks LA , Stone ND . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021 43 (2) 1-3 We describe differences between urinary tract infection treatment and events reported by nursing homes enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network. In 2017, almost 4 times as many antibiotic starts as infection events were reported, suggesting that opportunities exist for antibiotic stewardship and improvement of urinary tract infection reporting. |
Trends in Prescribing of Antibiotics and Drugs Investigated for COVID-19 Treatment in U.S. Nursing Home Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Gouin KA , Creasy S , Beckerson M , Wdowicki M , Hicks LA , Lind JN , Geller AI , Budnitz DS , Kabbani S . Clin Infect Dis 2021 74 (1) 74-82 BACKGROUND: Trends in prescribing for nursing home (NH) residents, which may have been influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic, have not been characterized. METHODS: Long-term care pharmacy data from 1,944 U.S. NHs were used to evaluate trends in prescribing of antibiotics and drugs that were investigated for COVID-19 treatment, including hydroxychloroquine, famotidine, and dexamethasone. To account for seasonal variability in antibiotic prescribing and decreased NH occupancy during the pandemic, monthly prevalence of residents with a prescription dispensed per 1,000 residents serviced was calculated from January - October and compared as relative percent change from 2019 to 2020. RESULTS: In April 2020, prescribing was significantly higher in NHs for drugs investigated for COVID-19 treatment than 2019; including hydroxychloroquine (+563%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.87, 7.48) and azithromycin (+150%, 95% CI 2.37, 2.63). Ceftriaxone prescribing also increased (+43%, 95% CI 1.34, 1.54). Prescribing of dexamethasone was 36% lower in April (95% CI 0.55, 0.73) and 303% higher in July (95% CI 3.66, 4.45). Although azithromycin and ceftriaxone prescribing increased, total antibiotic prescribing among residents was lower from May (-5%, 95% CI 0.94, 0.97) through October (-4%, 95% CI 0.94, 0.97) in 2020 compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, large numbers of residents were prescribed drugs investigated for COVID-19 treatment, and an increase in prescribing of antibiotics commonly used for respiratory infections was observed. Prescribing of these drugs may increase the risk of adverse events, without providing clear benefits. Surveillance of NH prescribing practices is critical to evaluate concordance with guideline-recommended therapy and improve resident safety. |
Trends in U.S. outpatient antibiotic prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
King LM , Lovegrove MC , Shehab N , Tsay S , Budnitz DS , Geller AI , Lind JN , Roberts R , Hicks LA , Kabbani S . Clin Infect Dis 2020 73 (3) e652-e660 BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to describe trends in U.S. outpatient antibiotic prescriptions from January through May 2020 and compare with trends in previous years (2017-2019). METHODS: We used data from the IQVIA Total Patient Tracker to estimate the monthly number of patients dispensed antibiotic prescriptions from retail pharmacies in January 2017-May 2020. We averaged estimates from 2017-2019 and defined expected seasonal change as the average percent change from January to May 2017-2019. We calculated percentage point and volume changes in the number of patients dispensed antibiotics from January to May 2020 exceeding expected seasonal changes. We also calculated average percent change in number of patients dispensed antibiotics per month in 2017- 2019 versus 2020. Data were analyzed overall and by agent, class, patient age, state, and prescriber specialty. RESULTS: From January to May 2020, the number of patients dispensed antibiotic prescriptions decreased from 20.3 to 9.9 million, exceeding seasonally expected decreases by 33 percentage points and 6.6 million patients. The largest changes in 2017-2019 versus 2020 were observed in April (-39%) and May (-42%). The number of patients dispensed azithromycin increased from February to March 2020 then decreased. Overall, beyond-expected decreases were greatest among children (≤19 years) and agents used for respiratory infections, dentistry, and surgical prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: From January 2020 to May 2020, the number of outpatients with antibiotic prescriptions decreased substantially more than would be expected due to seasonal trends alone, possibly related to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated mitigation measures. |
Opportunities to improve antibiotic prescribing in outpatient hemodialysis facilities
Apata IW , Kabbani S , Neu AM , Kear TM , D'Agata EMC , Levenson DJ , Kliger AS , Hicks LA , Patel PR . Am J Kidney Dis 2020 77 (5) 757-768 Antibiotic use is necessary in the outpatient hemodialysis setting, as patients on hemodialysis are at increased risk for infections and sepsis. However, inappropriate antibiotic use can lead to adverse drug events, including adverse drug reactions and infections with Clostridioides difficile and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Optimizing antibiotic use can decrease adverse events and improve infection cure rates and patient outcomes. The American Society of Nephrology (ASN) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) created the Antibiotic Stewardship in Hemodialysis White Paper Writing Group, comprising experts in antibiotic stewardship, infectious diseases, nephrology, and public health, to highlight strategies that can improve antibiotic prescribing for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Based on existing evidence and the unique patient and clinical setting characteristics, the following strategies for improving antibiotic use are reviewed: expanding infection and sepsis prevention activities, standardizing blood culture collection processes, treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections with β-lactams, optimizing communication between nurses and prescribing providers, and improving data sharing across transitions of care. Collaboration between CDC, ASN, other professional societies such as infectious diseases, hospital medicine and vascular surgery societies, and dialysis provider organizations can improve antibiotic use and the quality of care for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. |
Prioritizing prevention to combat multidrug resistance in nursing homes: A call to action
Jacobs Slifka KM , Kabbani S , Stone ND . J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020 21 (1) 5-7 Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) do not discriminate—they spread in all health care settings. From our unique vantage point at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we are witnessing the emergence of novel MDROs across the country, which are causing life-threatening infections, with limited to no available treatments.1 Public health efforts to detect and contain these pathogens have revealed the significant role nursing homes, especially those caring for a medically complex, higher-acuity resident population, are playing in the regional spread of these dangerous pathogens. Although all health care facilities must be prepared to prevent transmission of MDROs, nursing homes face unique challenges in caring for colonized residents. However, these are challenges that can be overcome with a renewed focus on and investment in infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship to protect the older Americans receiving care in these facilities. |
Update: Interim guidance for health care providers for managing patients with suspected e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury - United States, November 2019
Jatlaoui TC , Wiltz JL , Kabbani S , Siegel DA , Koppaka R , Montandon M , Adkins SH , Weissman DN , Koumans EH , O'Hegarty M , O'Sullivan MC , Ritchey MD , Chatham-Stephens K , Kiernan EA , Layer M , Reagan-Steiner S , Legha JK , Shealy K , King BA , Jones CM , Baldwin GT , Rose DA , Delaney LJ , Briss P , Evans ME . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019 68 (46) 1081-1086 CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), state and local health departments, and public health and clinical stakeholders are investigating a nationwide outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) (1). CDC has published recommendations for health care providers regarding EVALI (2-4). Recently, researchers from Utah and New York published proposed diagnosis and treatment algorithms for EVALI (5,6). EVALI remains a diagnosis of exclusion because, at present, no specific test or marker exists for its diagnosis, and evaluation should be guided by clinical judgment. Because patients with EVALI can experience symptoms similar to those associated with influenza or other respiratory infections (e.g., fever, cough, headache, myalgias, or fatigue), it might be difficult to differentiate EVALI from influenza or community-acquired pneumonia on initial assessment; EVALI might also co-occur with respiratory infections. This report summarizes recommendations for health care providers managing patients with suspected or known EVALI when respiratory infections such as influenza are more prevalent in the community than they have been in recent months (7). Recommendations include 1) asking patients with respiratory, gastrointestinal, or constitutional symptoms about the use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products; 2) evaluating those suspected to have EVALI with pulse oximetry and obtaining chest imaging, as clinically indicated; 3) considering outpatient management for clinically stable EVALI patients who meet certain criteria; 4) testing patients for influenza, particularly during influenza season, and administering antimicrobials, including antivirals, in accordance with established guidelines; 5) using caution when considering prescribing corticosteroids for outpatients, because this treatment modality has not been well studied among outpatients, and corticosteroids could worsen respiratory infections; 6) recommending evidence-based treatment strategies, including behavioral counseling, to help patients discontinue using e-cigarette, or vaping, products; and 7) emphasizing the importance of annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged >/=6 months, including patients who use e-cigarette, or vaping products. |
Characteristics of hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients in a nationwide outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury - United States, November 2019
Chatham-Stephens K , Roguski K , Jang Y , Cho P , Jatlaoui TC , Kabbani S , Glidden E , Ussery EN , Trivers KF , Evans ME , King BA , Rose DA , Jones CM , Baldwin G , Delaney LJ , Briss P , Ritchey MD . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019 68 (46) 1076-1080 CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), state and local health departments, and public health and clinical stakeholders are investigating a nationwide outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) (1). As of November 13, 2019, 49 states, the District of Columbia, and two U.S. territories (Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands) have reported 2,172 EVALI cases to CDC, including 42 (1.9%) EVALI-associated deaths. To inform EVALI surveillance, including during the 2019-20 influenza season, case report information supplied by states for hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients with EVALI were analyzed using data collected as of November 5, 2019. Among 2,016 EVALI patients with available data on hospitalization status, 1,906 (95%) were hospitalized, and 110 (5%) were not hospitalized. Demographic characteristics of hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients were similar; most were male (68% of hospitalized versus 65% of nonhospitalized patients), and most were aged <35 years (78% of hospitalized versus 74% of nonhospitalized patients). These patients also reported similar use of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing products (83% of hospitalized versus 84% of nonhospitalized patients). Given the similarity between hospitalized and nonhospitalized EVALI patients, the potential for large numbers of respiratory infections during the emerging 2019-20 influenza season, and the potential difficulty in distinguishing EVALI from respiratory infections, CDC will no longer collect national data on nonhospitalized EVALI patients. Further collection of data on nonhospitalized patients will be at the discretion of individual state, local, and territorial health departments. Candidates for outpatient management of EVALI should have normal oxygen saturation (>/=95% while breathing room air), no respiratory distress, no comorbidities that might compromise pulmonary reserve, reliable access to care, strong social support systems, and should be able to ensure follow-up within 24-48 hours of initial evaluation and to seek medical care promptly if respiratory symptoms worsen. Health care providers should emphasize the importance of annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged >/=6 months, including persons who use e-cigarette, or vaping, products (2,3). |
Potential utility of pharmacy data to measure antibiotic use in nursing homes
Kabbani S , Palms DL , Bartoces M , Marek J , Stone ND , Hicks LA , Jump RLP . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019 40 (7) 1-2 Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed medications in nursing homes,Reference Gurwitz, Field, Judge, Rochon, Harrold and Cadoret1 and they are frequently prescribed inappropriately.Reference Lim, Kong and Stuart2, Reference Nicolle, Bentley, Garibaldi, Neuhaus and Smith3 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires that all nursing homes have an antibiotic stewardship program and a system for monitoring antibiotic use.4 Antibiotic use can be monitored using different measures to identify potential targets for practice improvement and to track the impact of antibiotic stewardship interventions.Reference Mylotte5 The 2 most commonly used antibiotic use measures in nursing homes are antibiotic days of therapy and antibiotic starts.Reference Mylotte5, 6 |
Implementation of the core elements of antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network
Palms DL , Kabbani S , Bell JM , Anttila A , Hicks LA , Stone ND . Clin Infect Dis 2019 69 (7) 1235-1238 In 2016, 42% of nursing homes enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network reported meeting all 7 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship. Bivariate analyses suggested that implementation of all core elements differed by ownership type and amount of infection prevention staff hours. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 29, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure