Last data update: Jun 03, 2024. (Total: 46935 publications since 2009)
Records 1-6 (of 6 Records) |
Query Trace: Jungerman R [original query] |
---|
Use of US Public Health Travel Restrictions during COVID-19 Outbreak on Diamond Princess Ship, Japan, February-April 2020.
Medley AM , Marston BJ , Toda M , Kobayashi M , Weinberg M , Moriarty LF , Jungerman MR , Surpris ACA , Knust B , Acosta AM , Shockey CE , Daigle D , Schneider ZD , Charles J , Ishizumi A , Stewart A , Vonnahme LA , Brown C , White S , Cohen NJ , Cetron M . Emerg Infect Dis 2021 27 (3) 710-718 Public health travel restrictions (PHTR) are crucial measures during communicable disease outbreaks to prevent transmission during commercial airline travel and mitigate cross-border importation and spread. We evaluated PHTR implementation for US citizens on the Diamond Princess during its coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Japan in February 2020 to explore how PHTR reduced importation of COVID-19 to the United States during the early phase of disease containment. Using PHTR required substantial collaboration among the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, other US government agencies, the cruise line, and public health authorities in Japan. Original US PHTR removal criteria were modified to reflect international testing protocols and enable removal of PHTR for persons who recovered from illness. The impact of PHTR on epidemic trajectory depends on the risk for transmission during travel and geographic spread of disease. Lessons learned from the Diamond Princess outbreak provide critical information for future PHTR use. |
US federal travel restrictions for persons with higher-risk exposures to communicable diseases of public health concern
Vonnahme LA , Jungerman MR , Gulati RK , Illig P , Alvarado-Ramy F . Emerg Infect Dis 2017 23 (13) S108-13 Published guidance recommends controlled movement for persons with higher-risk exposures (HREs) to communicable diseases of public health concern; US federal public health travel restrictions (PHTRs) might be implemented to enforce these measures. We describe persons eligible for and placed on PHTRs because of HREs during 2014-2016. There were 160 persons placed on PHTRs: 142 (89%) involved exposure to Ebola virus, 16 (10%) to Lassa fever virus, and 2 (1%) to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Most (90%) HREs were related to an epidemic. No persons attempted to travel; all persons had PHTRs lifted after completion of a maximum disease-specific incubation period or a revised exposure risk classification. PHTR enforced controlled movement and removed risk for disease transmission among travelers who had contacts who refused to comply with public health recommendations. PHTRs are mechanisms to mitigate spread of communicable diseases and might be critical in enhancing health security during epidemics. |
Conveyance contact investigation for imported Middle East Respiratory Syndrome cases, United States, May 2014
Lippold SA , Objio T , Vonnahme L , Washburn F , Cohen NJ , Chen TH , Edelson PJ , Gulati R , Hale C , Harcourt J , Haynes L , Jewett A , Jungerman R , Kohl KS , Miao C , Pesik N , Regan JJ , Roland E , Schembri C , Schneider E , Tamin A , Tatti K , Alvarado-Ramy F . Emerg Infect Dis 2017 23 (9) 1585-1589 In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted conveyance contact investigations for 2 Middle East respiratory syndrome cases imported into the United States, comprising all passengers and crew on 4 international and domestic flights and 1 bus. Of 655 contacts, 78% were interviewed; 33% had serologic testing. No secondary cases were identified. |
Federal travel restrictions to prevent disease transmission in the United States: An analysis of requested travel restrictions
Robynne Jungerman M , Vonnahme LA , Washburn F , Alvarado-Ramy F . Travel Med Infect Dis 2017 18 30-35 BACKGROUND: Individuals with certain communicable diseases may pose risks to the health of the traveling public; there has been documented transmission on commercial aircraft of tuberculosis (TB), measles, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Federal public health travel restrictions (PHTR) prevent commercial air or international travel of persons with communicable diseases that pose a public health threat. METHODS: We described demographics and clinical characteristics of all cases considered for PHTR because of suspected or confirmed communicable disease from May 22, 2007, to December 31, 2015. RESULTS: We reviewed 682 requests for PHTR; 414 (61%) actions were completed to place 396 individuals on PHTR. The majority (>99%) had suspected (n = 27) or confirmed (n = 367) infectious pulmonary TB; 58 (16%) had multidrug-resistant-TB. There were 128 (85%) interceptions that prevented the initiation or continuation of travel. PHTR were removed for 310 (78%) individuals after attaining noninfectious status and 86 (22%) remained on PHTR at the end of the analysis period. CONCLUSIONS: PHTR effectively prevent exposure during commercial air travel to persons with potentially infectious diseases. In addition, they are effective tools available to public health agencies to prevent commercial travel of individuals with certain communicable diseases and possibly reconnect them with public health authorities. |
Tracing airline travelers for a public health investigation: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection in the United States, 2014
Regan JJ , Robynne Jungerman M , Lippold SA , Washburn F , Roland E , Objio T , Schembri C , Gulati R , Edelson PJ , Alvarado-Ramy F , Pesik N , Cohen NJ . Public Health Rep 2016 131 (4) 552-559 Objective. CDC routinely conducts contact investigations involving travelers on commercial conveyances, such as aircrafts, cargo vessels, and cruise ships. Methods. The agency used established systems of communication and partnerships with other federal agencies to quickly provide accurate traveler contact information to states and jurisdictions to alert contacts of potential exposure to two travelers with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) who had entered the United States on commercial flights in April and May 2014. Results. Applying the same process used to trace and notify travelers during routine investigations, such as those for tuberculosis or measles, CDC was able to notify most travelers of their potential exposure to MERS-CoV during the first few days of each investigation. Conclusion. To prevent the introduction and spread of newly emerging infectious diseases, travelers need to be located and contacted quickly. © 2016, Association of Schools of Public Health. All rights reserved. |
Public health response to commercial airline travel of a person with Ebola virus infection - United States, 2014
Regan JJ , Jungerman R , Montiel SH , Newsome K , Objio T , Washburn F , Roland E , Petersen E , Twentyman E , Olaiya O , Naughton M , Alvarado-Ramy F , Lippold SA , Tabony L , McCarty CL , Kinsey CB , Barnes M , Black S , Azzam I , Stanek D , Sweitzer J , Valiani A , Kohl KS , Brown C , Pesik N . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015 64 (3) 63-6 Before the current Ebola epidemic in West Africa, there were few documented cases of symptomatic Ebola patients traveling by commercial airline, and no evidence of transmission to passengers or crew members during airline travel. In July 2014 two persons with confirmed Ebola virus infection who were infected early in the Nigeria outbreak traveled by commercial airline while symptomatic, involving a total of four flights (two international flights and two Nigeria domestic flights). It is not clear what symptoms either of these two passengers experienced during flight; however, one collapsed in the airport shortly after landing, and the other was documented to have fever, vomiting, and diarrhea on the day the flight arrived. Neither infected passenger transmitted Ebola to other passengers or crew on these flights. In October 2014, another airline passenger, a U.S. health care worker who had traveled domestically on two commercial flights, was confirmed to have Ebola virus infection. Given that the time of onset of symptoms was uncertain, an Ebola airline contact investigation in the United States was conducted. In total, follow-up was conducted for 268 contacts in nine states, including all 247 passengers from both flights, 12 flight crew members, eight cleaning crew members, and one federal airport worker (81 of these contacts were documented in a report published previously). All contacts were accounted for by state and local jurisdictions and followed until completion of their 21-day incubation periods. No secondary cases of Ebola were identified in this investigation, confirming that transmission of Ebola during commercial air travel did not occur. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Jun 03, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure