Last data update: Jan 13, 2025. (Total: 48570 publications since 2009)
Records 1-2 (of 2 Records) |
Query Trace: Jackson WL[original query] |
---|
Notes from the field: Acute sulfuryl fluoride poisoning in a family - Florida, August 2015
Mulay PR , Clark G , Jackson WL , Calvert GM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016 65 (27) 698-9 On August 19, 2015, the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) was notified by the Florida Poison Information Center Network and a local hospital of possible sulfuryl fluoride poisonings affecting a family in Martin County, in southeastern Florida. Sulfuryl fluoride is a highly toxic (toxicity category I) gas fumigant used for termite control of homes and buildings. FDOH personnel in Martin County commenced an investigation and identified a family of five (a grandmother, mother, father, son, and daughter) exposed to sulfuryl fluoride after their house was fumigated. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Criminal Investigation Division also conducted an investigation after being notified by FDOH. Medical records were reviewed, and the father was interviewed by FDOH. |
Comparison of 3 infrared thermal detection systems and self-report for mass fever screening
Nguyen AV , Cohen NJ , Lipman H , Brown CM , Molinari NA , Jackson WL , Kirking H , Szymanowski P , Wilson TW , Salhi BA , Roberts RR , Stryker DW , Fishbein DB . Emerg Infect Dis 2010 16 (11) 1710-7 Despite limited evidence regarding their utility, infrared thermal detection systems (ITDS) are increasingly being used for mass fever detection. We compared temperature measurements for 3 ITDS (FLIR ThermoVision A20M [FLIR Systems Inc., Boston, MA, USA], OptoTherm Thermoscreen [OptoTherm Thermal Imaging Systems and Infrared Cameras Inc., Sewickley, PA, USA], and Wahl Fever Alert Imager HSI2000S [Wahl Instruments Inc., Asheville, NC, USA]) with oral temperatures (≥ 100 degrees F = confirmed fever) and self-reported fever. Of 2,873 patients enrolled, 476 (16.6%) reported a fever, and 64 (2.2%) had a confirmed fever. Self-reported fever had a sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity 84.7%, and positive predictive value 10.1%. At optimal cutoff values for detecting fever, temperature measurements by OptoTherm and FLIR had greater sensitivity (91.0% and 90.0%, respectively) and specificity (86.0% and 80.0%, respectively) than did self-reports. Correlations between ITDS and oral temperatures were similar for OptoTherm (rho = 0.43) and FLIR (rho = 0.42) but significantly lower for Wahl (rho = 0.14; p < 0.001). When compared with oral temperatures, 2 systems (OptoTherm and FLIR) were reasonably accurate for detecting fever and predicted fever better than self-reports. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Jan 13, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure