PURPOSE: We sought to assess recent trends in both sex of sex partners and sexual identity among US adolescents. One motivation for this investigation is that incidence of sexually transmitted infections is high among US adolescents, and varies along these dimensions; awareness of such trends may help to anticipate shifts in the upcoming needs for prevention and care. METHODS: We analyzed four biennial Youth Risk Behavior Survey waves (2015-2021; total n = 61,298). We used multinomial trend tests to assess changes in sex of sex partners among all respondents, and among those who had ever had sex. We then assessed trends in sexual identity, and in sex of sex partners disaggregated by sexual identity and by age. RESULTS: The proportion of female respondents reporting prior same-sex sexual contact increased significantly over time (7.4%-12.2%, p < .001), as it did for males (3.1%-3.8%, p < .02). Proportions with bisexual female, bisexual male, and lesbian identities also increased significantly, while gay male identity did not. There was no significant increase in the proportion of heterosexually-identified adolescents having same-sex contacts, but there was a significant decline in the proportion of gay male respondents having only female partners. Increases in female respondents with female partners occurred across individual ages from 14 to 17. DISCUSSION: Sexual identity and sexual contact patterns are both shifting among US adolescents. These may yield upcoming shifts in the distributions of different sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. The early age for some of these shifts are especially important to consider for sexual health education.

OBJECTIVE: Longer-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) products have potential to increase PrEP uptake and continuation. This study sought to elicit preferences for LA-PrEP product and delivery program characteristics among populations disproportionately impacted by HIV to identify factors important to adoption and anticipate potential use challenges. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, online discrete choice experiment. METHODS: We recruited 940 men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and Black heterosexual men and women (BHMW) with PrEP indications. In a series of 10 tasks, participants chose between two hypothetical LA-PrEP options composed of 5 attributes (product type, side effects, clinic type, appointment duration, cost), or neither (their current HIV prevention method). Analysis used random-parameters logit models. RESULTS: Respondents chose an LA-PrEP method over their current HIV prevention option in 96.8% of tasks. Cost was the most important determinant of LA-PrEP choice for all populations (relative importance [RI] of 10]. Side effects and product type were 1/3 to 1/2 as important as cost (RI 3.5-5.1). MSM and PWID most preferred the 12-month implant followed by semiannual dual injections and least preferred the monthly oral pill and 2-month single injection. BHMW most preferred the monthly pill and semiannual injections and least preferred the 12-month implant and 2-month injection. Clinic type and appointment duration had minimal influence (RI 0.1-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest high demand for LA-PrEP among populations with disproportionately high HIV incidence. To facilitate use, programs should offer a range of LA-PrEP products, minimize out-of-pocket costs, and counsel on side effects.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential contributions of routine opt-out testing (ROOT) in clinical settings and preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on achieving Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. (EHE) incidence reduction goals in the South. DESIGN: Simulation Study. METHODS: An agent-based epidemic projection model simulated adherence to the CDC's ROOT guidelines. Simulations were informed by literature reviews, the National Survey of Family Growth and ARTnet. Interventions included ROOT in Community Health Center (CHC) and Emergency Departments (ED) alone and in combination. PrEP was modeled as either persistent at 2019 levels or expanding consistent with historical trends. RESULTS: ROOT in CHCs and EDs averted 13.9% (95%SI: -15.5, 42.4) of infections and increased the proportion of persons with HIV (PWH) who were aware of their status from 84.8% to 94.4% (95%SI: 92.8, 95.4). In conjunction with the ongoing expansion of PrEP the proportion diagnosed increased from 84.8% at baseline to 95.1% (95% SI: 93.9, 96.4) and 23.3% (95% SI: -7.9, 50.6) of infections were averted, reducing the annual incidence rate by 42.4% compared to the baseline scenario. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, ROOT coupled with the ongoing expansion of PrEP averted almost a quarter of new infections over the 8 years from 2022 to 2030. While short of the overall EHE goal of 90%, it represents substantial potential progress for a low-cost and low-barrier intervention. ROOT also provides a method for identifying PWH who are undiagnosed both in and out of priority populations, those out of care, and individuals reluctant to seek screening.

BACKGROUND: We assessed annual out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-related services among commercially insured individuals in the U.S. before and after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated no cost-sharing in 2021. METHODS: Using data from a large commercial database, we identified persons aged ≥18 years who were prescribed PrEP from 2017-2022. Medical claims for PrEP-related services submitted within one week before each PrEP prescription were extracted using CPT codes. For each service, we calculated the annual proportion of persons incurring OOP costs and associated annual amounts, adjusted to 2022 U.S. dollars. We assessed trends in the proportion of persons with OOP costs for each service from 2019-2022. We also examined the association between OOP cost occurrence and patient demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Among 141,300 PrEP users, we observed decreasing trends in the proportion incurring OOP costs for PrEP ancillary services over the study period. In 2022, OOP costs were incurred by 65.6% for provider visits, 14.3% for HIV testing, and 32.5% for creatinine testing, with mean OOP costs of $54.18, $26.06, and $6.07, respectively. Rural users were more likely to incur costs than urban users. CONCLUSIONS: Despite ACA mandates, many persons received cost-sharing bills for PrEP services. Standardized billing and coding, along with enhanced monitoring and enforcement, could help protect access to evidence-based preventive care.

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV infections and is recommended for people without HIV who are at ongoing risk of HIV acquisition. In 2019, the U.S. launched the "Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S." initiative, which aims to reduce by 90 % the number of annual new HIV infections. To monitor progress towards this goal, several national indicators have been established, one of which is PrEP coverage. Several ways to monitor PrEP use have been developed, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. We developed a method to estimate PrEP "need" in the U.S. that could be used as a denominator to estimate PrEP coverage. The "population need for PrEP" (PPN) is estimated based on the number of people needed to treat (NNT) with PrEP to prevent an additional HIV infection in subpopulations whose annual HIV incidence is ≥ 1 %. This is done in three steps: 1) calculating NNT for each transmission group using 1 % incidence threshold and clinical trial-and cohort-generated evidence of the degree of PrEP effectiveness in each transmission group, 2) estimating the proportion of new HIV infections in subpopulations with incidence at least 1 % from epidemiologic data, 3) multiplying estimates from steps 1 and 2 with the number of new HIV infections for each transmission group from Surveillance. The estimates for each transmission group are then added together, and the number of current PrEP users is finally added to this estimate to produce PPN. This method is relatively easy to calculate and can provide public health authorities at the national, state, or local level with pragmatic estimates of PrEP "need" among different demographic or transmission groups, which can help with planning, resource allocation, and monitoring progress.

Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) for HIV is recommended when a nonoccupational (e.g., sexual, needle, or other) exposure to nonintact skin or mucous membranes that presents a substantial risk for HIV transmission has occurred, and the source has HIV without sustained viral suppression or their viral suppression information is not known. A rapid HIV test (also referred to as point-of-care) or laboratory-based antigen/antibody combination HIV test is recommended before nPEP initiation. Health care professionals should ensure the first dose of nPEP is provided as soon as possible, and ideally within 24 hours, but no later than 72 hours after exposure. The initial nPEP dose should not be delayed due to pending results of any laboratory-based testing, and the recommended length of nPEP course is 28 days. The recommendations in these guidelines update the 2016 nPEP guidelines (CDC. Updated guidelines for antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV - United States, 2016. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2017). These 2025 nPEP guidelines update recommendations and considerations for use of HIV nPEP in the United States to include newer antiretroviral (ARV) agents, updated nPEP indication considerations, and emerging nPEP implementation strategies. The guidelines also include considerations for testing and nPEP regimens for persons exposed who have received long-acting injectable ARVs in the past. Lastly, testing recommendations for persons who experienced sexual assault were updated to align with the most recent CDC sexually transmitted infection treatment guidelines. These guidelines are divided into two sections: Recommendations and CDC Guidance. The preferred regimens for most adults and adolescents are now bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or dolutegravir plus (tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) plus (emtricitabine or lamivudine). However, the regimen can be tailored to the clinical circumstances. Medical follow-up for persons prescribed nPEP also should be tailored to the clinical situation; recommended follow-up includes a visit at 24 hours (remote or in person) with a medical provider, and clinical follow-up 4-6 weeks and 12 weeks after exposure for laboratory testing. Persons initiating nPEP should be informed that pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP) can reduce their risk for acquiring HIV if they will have repeat or continuing exposure to HIV after the end of the nPEP course. Health care professionals should offer PrEP options to persons with ongoing indications for PrEP and create an nPEP-to-PrEP transition plan for persons who accept PrEP.

BACKGROUND: The 2021 update of the CDC clinical guidelines for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommended both antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) and RNA testing at PrEP initiation and routine follow-up. We assessed real-world utilization and performance of HIV tests among oral PrEP users. METHODS: An oral PrEP user cohort was constructed using the HealthVerity database that included linked diagnoses, laboratory tests, and prescriptions from December 2018 to August 2023. Data was stratified by guideline pre- (2019-2021) and post-update (2022-2023) periods. For each period, we assessed the agreement between same-day HIV Ag/Ab and RNA results and calculated the false positive rate (FPR) and positive predictive values (PPV) of HIV Ag/Ab and RNA tests compared with adjudicated HIV status. RESULTS: The HIV RNA testing rate for follow-up increased from 16 per 100 person-years (PY) to 123 per 100 PYs after the guideline update. The positivity rate of HIV RNA tests decreased from 1.39% to 0.22%. Overall agreement between Ag/Ab and RNA results remained high. The FPRs of HIV Ag/Ab and RNA testing remained similar, but the PPV of HIV RNA testing for PrEP follow-up decreased from 100% to 67%. We estimated that 8,226 to 9,900 RNA tests would be needed for one HIV diagnosis earlier than would be detected with Ag/Ab testing alone. DISCUSSION: HIV RNA testing did not provide additional value to Ag/Ab testing during routine follow-up of oral PrEP users. Considering the cost and logistical complexity of HIV RNA testing, its use as a routine test during follow-up of oral PrEP users warrants reconsideration.

Objectives. HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has increased since its US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2012. Our objective was to describe trends in PrEP use by US women. Methods. Using national pharmacy and HIV surveillance data, we calculated the PrEP-to-diagnosis ratio (PDR), a measure of PrEP prescriptions each year compared with HIV diagnoses the previous year, for women from 2017 to 2023. We also calculated PDRs in 2023 for the 20 counties with the highest numbers of diagnosed HIV infections among women and reviewed reports of public health activities conducted by recipients of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV prevention funding. Results. The PDR for women was 1.5 in 2017, and it increased to 5.8 by 2023. In the 20 counties with the highest number of diagnosed HIV infections among women, PDRs ranged from 2.2 to 16.9. Counties with the highest PDRs conducted PrEP activities designed for women. Conclusions. PrEP is a highly effective HIV prevention intervention that can empower women to protect their health, but its use has been low. Public health and clinical interventions designed for women can increase their PrEP use and support ending the US HIV epidemic. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print April 24, 2025:e1-e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308056).

Same-day pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP) is recommended to improve access to this important HIV prevention tool. A PrEP program at a community-based LGBTQ+ clinic in Seattle, Washington provided PrEP via telemedicine with a focus on converting testing-only visits to same-day 'Insta-PrEP' visits. We identified three key barriers to same-day PrEP for clients who present to clinic for testing-only visits: delays related to health insurance; longer counseling times; and disruption of clinic flow following Insta-PrEP visits. Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

INTRODUCTION: The Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. (EHE) initiative was launched by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 2019 with the goal of decreasing new HIV infections 90% by 2030. Increasing the use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is one of the EHE strategies. We assessed the impact of EHE activities on PrEP use. METHODS: Using IQVIA Real-world longitudinal prescription data and the National HIV Surveillance System data, we calculated jurisdiction-level PrEP to diagnosis ratios (PDRs) in the United States from 2016-2023. We assessed impact of EHE with a difference-in-difference (DID) analysis. RESULTS: The PDR increased from 3.0 to 14.7 in EHE Jurisdictions; from 1.2 to 7.2 in EHE states; and from 2.5 to 13.4 in non-EHE jurisdictions. On average, no additional increase in the PDR was found for EHE counties compared with matched non-EHE counties, (adjusted DID: 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.0∼1.3), or for EHE states (adjusted DID: 0.4, 95% CI: -1.6∼2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Overall PrEP use increased markedly, with some EHE jurisdictions achieving greater increases than non-EHE jurisdictions with similar PDRs in 2019. The uneven increase in PrEP use in EHE jurisdictions underscores the need for jurisdiction-specific PrEP implementation strategies designed for the needs of each community. It also underscores the need for sufficient funding to accomplish EHE goals.

BACKGROUND: People who use long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can have ambiguous HIV test results if HIV is acquired during its use. The 2021 CDC PrEP guidelines recommend both HIV antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) and RNA testing at CAB-LA initiation and follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using the HealthVerity database to evaluate the utilization of HIV testing among people who use CAB-LA PrEP. We identified and adjudicated HIV Ag/Ab and RNA tests with a positive result, and estimated the incidence of breakthrough HIV infection or long-acting early viral inhibition (LEVI) syndrome. Testing agreement, false positive test rates, and positive predictive value were explored. RESULTS: Among 384 people who use CAB-LA PrEP with both HIV Ag/Ab and RNA testing with a median follow-up time of 4.2 months, we found one discordant pair with Ag/Ab(-) and RNA(+), and one with Ag/Ab(+) and RNA(-). Among four users with a positive Ag/Ab or RNA test, we identified one who acquired HIV before CAB-LA initiation with both Ag/Ab(+) and RNA(+), one likely false RNA(+), one likely false Ag/Ab(+), and one inconclusive Ag/Ab(+) due to insufficient follow-up. We identified no persons with confirmed breakthrough HIV infection or LEVI syndrome, or with RNA testing resulting in an earlier HIV diagnosis compared with Ag/Ab testing alone. INTERPRETATION: The frequency of breakthrough HIV infection or LEVI syndrome in this real-world cohort was low during initial three to seven months of injectable PrEP use. Ongoing assessment of the added value of HIV RNA testing for monitoring during CAB-LA PrEP use is warranted.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of highly effective HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), uptake and adherence to PrEP among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) remains low, limiting its impact on the prevention of HIV infection. Strategies that incorporate an array of prevention options and provide YMSM and their providers with tailored education and support tools, including tools to support shared decision-making, are needed. OBJECTIVE: The goals of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded PrEP Choice study include the development and deployment of CDC guideline-consistent PrEP provider training and the implementation of evidence-based provider- and client-facing PrEP education and support tools. Under this initiative, the CDC funded 2 research projects, Florida State University (the Expanding PrEP in Communities of Color [EPICC] project), and Columbia University (the mChoice project). METHODS: Providers from both projects will complete the PrEP Choice online training, which was developed to educate providers on PrEP options and how to engage clients in open discussions around sexual health and PrEP options. EPICC project providers will also attend online tailored motivational interviewing (TMI) training sessions, and mChoice project providers will view a training video on cultural competency and humility in PrEP care. Following training, each project will enroll a cohort of 400 participants receiving care from study providers and follow them for 12-18 months. Participants will complete online surveys every 3 months and provide biomarkers to assess PrEP adherence. Electronic health record (EHR) data will be collected every 6 months to provide additional information on clinic attendance, PrEP prescriptions, and HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing. Each project will provide cohort participants with a unique digital health tool to support the PrEP choice and ongoing adherence. The study will assess the effectiveness of training and educational and support tools in practice and the critical factors associated with the successful uptake of and adherence to PrEP by participants. The study will also monitor patterns of PrEP use among YMSM, including types of PrEP and switching between types. RESULTS: Formative work to develop and prepare the tools for implementation was completed in 2023. The EPICC project began provider training in early 2024, and the mChoice project began in spring 2024. Cohort enrollment for both projects began after provider training began. CONCLUSIONS: Given the changing PrEP landscape, implementation of provider education and tools to maximize uptake and adherence is needed. By delivering culturally competent and interactive provider training on PrEP options, the study will help providers counsel and guide participants on the effective and safe use of PrEP. The digital health tools created will support participant adherence to help them optimize PrEP benefits. Through the cohort design, the PrEP Choice study will provide real-world data about PrEP use that will be critical for informing future guidelines and tools. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/64186.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have estimated preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among persons with commercial health insurance and Medicaid. However, data are lacking regarding PrEP use among those with Medicare. METHODS: Using a previously developed algorithm, we estimated the number of Medicare beneficiaries (MBs) with fee-for-service (FFS) claims who were prescribed PrEP from 2014 to 2021. The analysis was stratified by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. We also examined trends in PrEP prevalence by U.S. state and demographic characteristics during 2014-2021. RESULTS: The number of Medicare PrEP users increased 11-fold, from 388 in 2014 to 4,685 in 2021. MBs prescribed PrEP were predominantly younger men, White persons, residing in the South or West regions, living with a disability, and dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. The prevalence of PrEP prescriptions among MBs increased 12-fold, from 9.7 per million in 2014 to to 120.0 per million in 2021. Black/African American persons had the highest prevalence of PrEP use, followed by Hispanic/Latino and White persons in 2021. The District of Columbia had the highest prevalence of PrEP use compared with other U.S. states in 2021. Significant increasing trends in PrEP use were observed across sex, age groups, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in PrEP uptake existed across MB demographic subgroups from 2014 to 2021. Public health interventions are needed to increase PrEP access and utilization, particularly among women, younger MBs, Black persons, and Hispanic persons, including those with Medicare. Strategies and policies to expand PrEP use are essential for optimal HIV prevention in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: It is important to monitor national HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in the United States. However, PrEP use data in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system are not included in the current monitoring surveillance. To address this gap, we examined the trends in PrEP use among U.S. Veterans receiving health services in the VHA system. METHODS: We analyzed 2014-2022 VHA data to identify the annual number and prevalence of persons aged ≥18 years prescribed PrEP, stratified by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and region. We also assessed trends by calculating the estimated annual percent change and 95% confidence intervals using Poisson models. RESULTS: The number of Veterans prescribed PrEP increased from 361 in 2014 to 6050 in 2022 with an estimated annual percent change of 29.6% (95% CI: 22.6 to 37.1). Of 6050 Veterans with PrEP prescriptions in 2022, 95.2% were men, 4.8% were women, 50.4% were White, 24.5% Black or African American (Black), and 14.0% Hispanic or Latino. The prevalence of Black and Hispanic or Latino individuals prescribed PrEP increased significantly from 2014 to 2022. CONCLUSIONS: VHA data fill a gap in monitoring PrEP use in the United States. We observed an increasing trend in the number of Veterans prescribed PrEP similar to trends among persons with commercial or public health insurance.

BACKGROUND: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) has high efficacy against HIV-1 acquisition. Seventy-two prospective studies of daily oral F/TDF PrEP were conducted to evaluate HIV-1 incidence, drug resistance, adherence, and bone and renal safety in diverse settings. METHODS: HIV-1 incidence was calculated from incident HIV-1 diagnoses after PrEP initiation and within 60 days of discontinuation. Tenofovir concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS), drug resistance, and bone/renal safety indicators were evaluated in a subset of studies. RESULTS: Among 17 274 participants, there were 101 cases with new HIV-1 diagnosis (.77 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .63-.94). In 78 cases with resistance data, 18 (23%) had M184I or V, 1 (1.3%) had K65R, and 3 (3.8%) had both mutations. In 54 cases with tenofovir concentration data from DBS, 45 (83.3%), 2 (3.7%), 6 (11.1%), and 1 (1.9%) had average adherence of <2, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 doses/wk, respectively, and the corresponding incidence was 3.9 (95% CI: 2.9-5.3), .24 (.060-.95), .27 (.12-.60), and .054 (.008-.38) per 100 person-years. Adherence was low in younger participants, Hispanic/Latinx and Black participants, cisgender women, and transgender women. Bone and renal adverse event incidence rates were 0.69 and 11.8 per 100 person-years, respectively, consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging the largest pooled analysis of global PrEP studies to date, we demonstrate that F/TDF is safe and highly effective, even with less than daily dosing, in diverse clinical settings, geographies, populations, and routes of HIV-1 exposure.

This study examines the prescribing trends of 3 oral preexposure prophylaxis medications and a long-acting injectable option from 2013 to 2023. | eng

Background: Many underserved populations use Emergency Department (EDs) as primary sources of care, representing an important opportunity to provide infectious disease testing and linkage to care. We explored national ED testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Methods: We used 2010–2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data to estimate ED visit testing rates for HIV, hepatitis C, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Trends and co-testing (visit with tests for > 1 infection) patterns were analyzed by sociodemographic, hospital, and visit characteristics. Trends were evaluated as the average annual percentage change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint Regression. Results: During 2010–2019, testing events per 1000 visits (AAPCs) increased for HIV from 1.3 to 4.2 (16.3 %), hepatitis C from 0.4 to 2.2 (25.1 %), chlamydia from 9.1 to 16.0 (6.6 %), gonorrhea from 8.4 to 15.7 (7.4 %), and syphilis from 0.7 to 2.0 (12.9 %). Rate increases varied by several characteristics across infections. The largest AAPC increases were among visits by groups with lower base rate testing in 2010, including persons aged ≥ 65 years (HIV: 36.4 %), with Medicaid (HIV: 43.8 %), in the lowest income quintile (hepatitis C: 36.9 %), living in the West (syphilis: 49.4 %) and with non-emergency diagnoses (hepatitis C: 44.1 %). Co-testing increased significantly for all infections except hepatitis C. Conclusions: HIV, hepatitis C, and STI testing increased in EDs during 2010–2019; however, co-testing patterns were inconsistent. Co-testing may improve diagnosis and linkage to care, especially in areas experiencing higher rates of infection. © 2024

BACKGROUND: Male-to-male sexual transmission continues to account for the greatest proportion of new HIV diagnoses in the United States. However, calculating population-specific surveillance metrics for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections requires regularly updated estimates of the number and proportion of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, which are not collected by census surveys. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to estimate the number and percentage of MSM in the United States from population-based surveys. METHODS: We used data from 5 population-based surveys to calculate weighted estimates of the proportion of MSM in the United States and pooled these estimates using meta-analytic procedures. We estimated the proportion of MSM using sexual behavior-based questions (encompassing anal or oral sex) for 3 recall periods-past 12 months, past 5 years, and lifetime. In addition, we estimated the proportion of MSM using self-reported identity and attraction survey responses. The total number of MSM and non-MSM in the United States were calculated from estimates of the percentage of MSM who reported sex with another man in the past 12 months. RESULTS: The percentage of MSM varied by recall period: 3.3% (95% CI 1.7%-4.9%) indicated sex with another male in the past 12 months, 4.7% (95% CI 0.0%-33.8%) in the past 5 years, and 6.2% (95% CI 2.9%-9.5%) in their lifetime. There were comparable percentages of men who identified as gay or bisexual (3.4%, 95% CI 2.2%-4.6%) or who indicated that they are attracted to other men (4.9%, 95% CI 3.1%-6.7%) based on pooled estimates. Our estimate of the total number of MSM in the United States is 4,230,000 (95% CI 2,179,000-6,281,000) based on the history of recent sexual behavior (sex with another man in the past 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: We calculated the pooled percentage and number of MSM in the United States from a meta-analysis of population-based surveys collected from 2017 to 2021. These estimates update and expand upon those derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2012 by including estimates of the percentage of MSM based on sexual identity and sexual attraction. The percentage and number of MSM in the United States is an important indicator for calculating population-specific disease rates and eligibility for preventive interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: People with HIV (PWH) have higher rates of cardiovascular disease than people without HIV. However, limited information exists about hypertension prevalence and associated risk factors in PWH. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adult patients in the 2022 IQVIATM Ambulatory Electronic Medical Record - US data. HIV was identified based on ≥2 HIV diagnosis codes or a positive HIV test. Hypertension was identified by diagnosis codes, ≥2 blood pressure (BP) readings ≥130/80 mmHg, or an antihypertensive medication prescription. Among those with hypertension, control was defined as most recent BP <130/80 mmHg. Logistic models using marginal standardization method were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of hypertension and hypertension control among all patients and PWH specifically, controlling for covariates. RESULTS: Of 7,533,379 patients, 19,102 (0.3%) had HIV. PWH had higher hypertension prevalence (66% vs 54%, aPR:1.14, 95% CI: 1.13-1.15) compared with people without HIV. Among persons with hypertension, PWH were more likely to have controlled hypertension (aPR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07-1.13) compared with people without HIV. Among PWH, those from the South were more likely to have hypertension (aPR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12) than PWH from the Northeast, while Black PWH were less likely to have controlled hypertension (aPR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67-0.77) than White PWH. CONCLUSIONS: PWH were more likely to have hypertension than people without HIV. Geographic and racial disparities in hypertension prevalence and control were observed among PWH. Optimal care for PWH includes comprehensive strategies to screen for, prevent, and manage hypertension.

BACKGROUND: PrEP was approved for HIV prevention in the US in 2012; uptake has been slow. We describe relative equity with the PrEP Equity Ratio (PER), a ratio of PrEP-to-Need Ratios (PnRs). METHODS: We used commercial pharmacy data to enumerate PrEP users by race and ethnicity, sex, and US Census region from 2012 to 2021. We report annual race and ethnicity-, sex-, and region-specific rates of PrEP use and PnR, a metric of PrEP equity, to assess trends. FINDINGS: PrEP use increased for Black, Hispanic and White Americans from 2012 to 2021. By 2021, the rate of PrEP use per population was similar in Black and White populations but slightly lower among Hispanic populations. PnR increased from 2012 to 2021 for all races and ethnicities and regions; levels of PrEP use were inconsistent across regions and highly inequitable by race, ethnicity, and sex. In all regions, PnR was highest for White and lowest for Black people. Inequity in PrEP use by race and ethnicity, as measured by the PER, grew early after availability of PrEP and persisted at a level substantially below equitable PrEP use. INTERPRETATION: From 2012 to 2021, PrEP use increased among Americans, but PrEP equity for Black and Hispanic Americans decreased. The US South lagged all regions in equitable PrEP use. Improved equity in PrEP use will be not only just, but also impactful on the US HIV epidemic; persons most at-risk of acquiring HIV should have the highest levels of access to PrEP. Prevention programs should be guided by PrEP equity, not PrEP equality. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health, Gilead Sciences.

BACKGROUND: Transgender persons are disproportionately affected by HIV, but preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use has been low in this population. Clinical encounters for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) provide opportunities for HIV prevention. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number of commercially insured transgender women (TGW) and transgender men (TGM) in the United States and their use of HIV prevention services. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of secondary data. SETTING: Merative MarketScan commercial databases from 2014 to 2021. PARTICIPANTS: TGW and TGM, defined as those with transgender-related diagnoses and prescriptions for feminizing or masculinizing GAHT. MEASUREMENTS: HIV testing and PrEP use. RESULTS: A substantially increasing trend was observed in the prevalence of transgender-related diagnosis codes from 2014 to 2021 and in the proportion of persons who used GAHT. The increases were driven by persons aged 18 to 34 years. In 2021, among 10 613 TGW with a test for or a diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the previous 12 months, 61.1% had an HIV test; among those, 20.2% were prescribed PrEP. Among 4184 TGM with STI risk, 48.3% had an HIV test; among those, 10.2% were prescribed PrEP. The prevalence of TGW and TGM who had a test for or a diagnosis of an STI, had an HIV test, and were prescribed PrEP increased substantially from 2014 to 2021. LIMITATION: The findings represent only persons with commercial health insurance who sought health care services for GAHT. CONCLUSION: It is important to identify transgender persons to monitor their receipt of HIV prevention services. Encounters for GAHT provide opportunities to offer HIV prevention and other prevention services. Many HIV prevention opportunities were likely missed at clinical encounters for GAHT. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

BACKGROUND: The "Ending the HIV Epidemic" (EHE) initiative seeks to reduce new HIV infections in the U.S. by prioritizing federal resources towards highly impacted populations. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are essential for reaching EHE goals. Adolescents are often at increased risk for HIV because they may lack agency in negotiating their sexual partnerships and may not have the same access to treatment and prevention as adults. This study estimates the potential contribution of expanded PrEP coverage among adolescents ages 15-17 to achieving the EHE goals in the South. METHODS: An HIV-transmission model was built to simulate the HIV epidemic in the South. Increased ART and PrEP uptake were systematically varied with and without PrEP eligibility including individuals age<18. RESULTS: Prioritizing PrEP for adolescents had a negligible impact on incidence. At 50% uptake among eligible adolescents and 90% ART coverage, including adolescents only improved the percentage of infections averted from 80.1% to 80.3%. In 10 of 15 scenarios explored, there was no reduction in new infections when PrEP eligibility was expanded to include adolescents age<18. At 95% ART coverage at the population-level incidence among adolescents declined by over 80%, but PrEP uptake among adolescents did not contribute to additional declines in incidence among adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Prioritizing PrEP for adolescents did not significantly contribute to reaching EHE incidence reductions goal. Focusing resources to specific adolescent populations at risk, such sexual minority males in high incidence settings, will remain an important public health goal outside the context of EHE.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number of women who received human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services by race and ethnicity in seven THRIVE (Targeted Highly Effective Interventions to Reverse the HIV Epidemic)-funded jurisdictions and to estimate associations of age and syphilis and gonorrhea diagnoses with receipt of HIV PrEP services. METHODS: We analyzed data collected from 2015 to 2020 in Birmingham, Alabama; Baltimore City, Maryland; Washington, DC, New Orleans, Louisiana; Brooklyn, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Hampton Roads, Virginia. We compared Black women and women of additional racial and ethnic groups by age, HIV status at enrollment, receipt of STI testing and test positivity, and steps in the PrEP continuum (screened, eligible, referred, linked, and prescribed). We also examined the association of age, syphilis, or gonorrhea with the following steps in the PrEP continuum: screened, referred, linked, and prescribed. RESULTS: Black women made up 69.2% (8,758/12,647) of women served in THRIVE. Compared with non-Black women, Black women were more likely to have a positive test result for syphilis (3.3% vs 2.1%), gonorrhea (4.9% vs 3.5%), chlamydia (5.1% vs 1.9%), or more than one STI (1.4% vs 0.3%). Among women with negative HIV test results or unknown HIV status, Black women were more likely to be screened for PrEP eligibility (88.4% vs 64.9%). Among Black women, the proportion screened for PrEP was higher among those diagnosed with syphilis (97.3%) or gonorrhea (100%) than among those without an STI (88.1% and 87.8%, respectively). Among 219 Black women who presented with syphilis, only 10 (4.6%) were prescribed PrEP; among 407 with gonorrhea, only 11 (2.7%) were prescribed PrEP. CONCLUSION: Although most Black women seeking services received STI testing, the proportion of Black women who were eligible for PrEP and prescribed PrEP was low. To achieve national HIV-prevention goals, it is imperative that Black women have access to PrEP information and services.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is safe, effective, and was approved for adolescents in 2018. Adolescents and young adults make up 20% of HIV diagnoses in the United States. Our objective was to describe trends in adolescents prescribed PrEP during 2018 through 2021 and characteristics of these adolescents and their PrEP providers. METHODS: We identified adolescents aged 13 to 19 years with oral PrEP prescriptions during 2018 through 2021 in a national pharmacy database using a validated algorithm. We assessed trends by calculating the overall percentage change and estimated annual percentage change with 95% confidence intervals. We described characteristics of adolescents and their PrEP providers in 2021. We performed χ2 analyses to assess differences by sex and age group. RESULTS: The number of adolescents prescribed PrEP increased 76.2% from 2018 to 2021 (estimated annual percentage change: 18.0% [95% confidence interval: 16.6-19.5]), despite decreases in 2020. We observed increases among all sex and age groups, with larger increases among older adolescents aged 18 to 19 years. The majority of the 6444 adolescents prescribed PrEP in 2021 were male (82.6%) and aged 18 to 19 years (87.8%). Among 2455 physician PrEP providers, 29.6% were pediatricians, with varying specialty distributions by adolescent age group (P < .001). Among the 217 pediatricians who prescribed PrEP to adolescents aged 13 to 17 years, 67.7% were general pediatricians. CONCLUSIONS: PrEP provision for adolescents has increased, largely among older and male adolescents. The availability of PrEP provides an important opportunity for pediatric providers to take an active role in HIV prevention.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED)-based HIV testing rates are historically low, but recent testing trends surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and launch of the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative are unknown. The objective of the study is to estimate recent trends in the proportion of ED visits that included HIV testing. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), a weighted nationally representative survey of US EDs, from 2014 to 2020. Given EHE's focus on several rural Southern jurisdictions as well as populations disproportionately affected by HIV, we stratified by characteristics including US region and visit-listed race and ethnicity. RESULTS: The proportion of ED visits that included HIV testing increased from 2014 (0.6%) to 2018 (1.1%) but was lower in 2019 and 2020 (0.8%). Compared to other regions the South had the lowest rates of testing in both 2019 (0.6%) and 2020 (0.5%); testing rates in the non-metropolitan South remained ≤0.1% across all years. Testing rates for ED visits by persons who identified as Hispanic/Latino were highest in 2018 (2.2%) but were sharply lower in 2019 and 2020 (0.8%). CONCLUSION: After a small but insufficient increase in ED-based HIV testing since 2014, rates decreased between 2018 and 2019 and were stable between 2019 and 2020. Overall, very few ED visits during our entire study period included an HIV test and there were persistently low rates of HIV testing for populations prioritized in national efforts and during visits in rural jurisdictions in the South.

BACKGROUND: A study from Botswana identified an increased risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) in infants of mothers with HIV who were treated with dolutegravir around the time of conception. We aimed to examine associations of dolutegravir use with NTDs and pregnancy loss using large health-care claims databases from the USA, a country with folic acid fortification of food. METHODS: In this cohort study, we analysed health-care claims data, recorded in the Merative MarketScan commercial database (MarketScan data) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid database (Medicaid data) from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2020. We identified pregnancies with enrolment during their entire duration among women aged 15-49 years and we estimated time of conception. For each pregnancy, we determined HIV status and periconceptional exposure to dolutegravir or other antiretroviral agents. We estimated and compared the incidence rate of NTDs, stillbirths, and pregnancy loss (ie, spontaneous or induced abortions) by type of periconceptional antiretroviral exposure. We calculated adjusted risk ratios of the adverse outcomes using Poisson models adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. FINDINGS: Of 4 489 315 pregnancies in MarketScan data and 14 405 861 pregnancies in Medicaid data that had full enrolment, we identified 69 pregnancies in MarketScan data and 993 pregnancies in Medicaid data that were associated with HIV and periconceptional dolutegravir exposure. For women without HIV, the NTD rate was 4·1 per 10 000 live births (95% CI 3·9-4·3) in MarketScan and 5·7 per 10 000 live births (5·6-5·8) in Medicaid. No NTD cases were found among those with dolutegravir or non- dolutegravir antiretroviral drug exposure in the MarketScan data; only one NTD case was identified among women with dolutegravir, and three among women with non-dolutegravir antiretroviral exposure in Medicaid. After adjusting for covariates, there were no significant differences in risk ratios of NTD between groups with periconceptional dolutegravir or non-dolutegravir antiretroviral exposure and the group without HIV. However, compared with women without HIV, the risk of pregnancy loss was higher among women exposed to antiretroviral therapy: for dolutegravir exposure the adjusted risk ratio was 1·73 (95% CI 1·20-2·49) in MarketScan data and 1·41 (1·30-1·54) in Medicaid data; for non-dolutegravir antiretroviral exposure the adjusted risk ratio was 1·23 (1·10-1·37) in MarketScan data and 1·11 (1·07-1·15) in Medicaid data. INTERPRETATION: We studied the largest US cohort of women with periconceptional or early-pregnancy dolutegravir exposure. Our results do not show an increased risk of NTDs in exposed infants in the USA. Administrative databases can be used, with rigorous methodology, to study correlates of rare outcomes, such as NTDs, and to monitor for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who receive antiretrovirals. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Objective We sought to evaluate which combinations of HIV prevention and care activities would have the greatest impact towards reaching the US Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) plan goals of reducing HIV incidence at least 75% by 2025 and 90% by 2030.Design A stochastic HIV transmission model for men who have sex with men (MSM), calibrated to local surveillance estimates in the Atlanta area, a focal EHE target jurisdiction.Methods Model scenarios varied HIV screening rates relative to current levels, under different assumptions of how HIV-negative MSM would be linked to PrEP initiation, and also considered improvements to HIV care linkage and retention for those screening positive.Results A 10-fold relative increase in HIV screening rates (to approximately biannual screening for black and Hispanic MSM and quarterly for white MSM) would lead to 43% of infections averted if integrated with PrEP initiation. Improvements to HIV care retention would avert 41% of infections if retention rates were improved 10-fold. If both screening and retention were jointly improved 10-fold, up to 74% of cumulative infections would be averted. Under this scenario, it would take 4 years to meet the 75% EHE goal and 12 years to meet the 90% goal for MSM in Atlanta.Conclusions Interventions to improve HIV screening linked with PrEP for those screening negative, and HIV care retention would have a substantial impact on HIV prevention. However, additional interventions may be necessary to reach the EHE goal of a 90% reduction in incidence for Atlanta MSM by 2030.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreement number U38 PS004646 and National Institutes of Health grants R21 MH112449 and R01 AI138783.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesModel data and analysis scripts are available on our Github repository linked below. https://github.com/EpiModel/CombPrev

Background HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) could reduce the disparities in HIV incidence among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) compared to white MSM (WMSM), but this may depend on progression through the PrEP care continuum.Methods We expanded our network-based mathematical model of HIV transmission for MSM, which simulates PrEP based on CDC’s clinical practice guidelines, to include race-stratified transitions through the PrEP continuum steps of awareness, access, prescription, adherence, and retention. Continuum parameters were estimated based on published incidence cohorts and PrEP open-label studies. Counterfactuals included a no-PrEP reference scenario, and intervention scenarios in which the BMSM continuum step parameters were modified.Results Implementing PrEP according to the observed BMSM continuum was projected to result in 8.4% of all BMSM on PrEP at year 10, yielding a 23% decline in incidence (HR = 0.77). On an absolute scale, the racial disparity in incidence in this scenario was 4.95 per 100 person-years at risk (PYAR), a 19% decline from the 6.08 per 100 PYAR disparity in the reference scenario. If BMSM continuum parameters were equal to WMSM values, 17.7% of BMSM would be on PrEP, yielding a 47% decline in incidence (HR = 0.53) and a disparity of 3.30 per 100 PYAR (a 46% decline in the disparity).Conclusions PrEP could lower HIV incidence overall and reduce absolute racial disparities between BMSM and WMSM. Interventions addressing the racial gaps in the PrEP continuum will be needed to further decrease these HIV disparities.

Objectives. To describe HIV testing among clients in the Targeted Highly Effective Interventions to Reverse the HIV Epidemic (THRIVE) demonstration project and evaluate testing frequency. Methods. We identified factors associated with an average testing frequency of 180 days or less compared with more than 180 days using adjusted Poisson regression models. We performed the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare time to diagnosis by testing frequency. Results. Among 5710 clients with 2 or more tests and no preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescription, 42.4% were tested frequently. Black/African American clients were 21% less likely and Hispanic/Latino clients were 18% less likely to be tested frequently than were White clients. Among 71 Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino cisgender men who have sex with men and transgender women with HIV diagnoses, those with frequent testing had a median time to diagnosis of 137 days, with a diagnostic testing yield of 1.5% compared with those tested less frequently, with 559 days and 0.8% yield. Conclusions. HIV testing at least every 6 months resulted in earlier HIV diagnosis and was efficient. Persons in communities with high rates of HIV who are not on PrEP can benefit from frequent testing, and collaborative community approaches may help reduce disparities. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print July 6, 2023:e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307341).

INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral medication coverage remains sub-optimal in much of the United States, particularly the Sothern region, and Non-Hispanic Black or African American persons (NHB) continue to be disproportionately impacted by the HIV epidemic. The "Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S." (EHE) initiative seeks to reduce HIV incidence nationally by focusing resources towards the most highly impacted localities and populations. This study evaluates the impact of hypothetical improvements in ART and PrEP coverage to estimate the levels of coverage needed to achieve EHE goals in the South. METHODS: We developed a stochastic, agent-based network model of 500,000 individuals to simulate the HIV epidemic and hypothetical improvements in ART and PrEP coverage. RESULTS: New infections declined by 78.6% at 90%/40% ART/PrEP and 94.3% at 100%/50% ART/PrEP. Declines in annual incidence rates surpassed 75% by 2025 with 90%/40% ART/PrEP and 90% by 2030 with 100%/50% ART/PrEP coverage. Increased ART coverage among NHB MSM was associated with a linear decline in incidence among all MSM. Declines in incidence among Hispanic/Latino and White/Other MSM were similar regardless of which MSM race group increased their ART coverage, while the benefit to NHB MSM was greatest when their own ART coverage increased. The incidence rate among NHB women declined by over a third when either NHB heterosexual men or NHB MSM increased their ART use respectively. Increased use of PrEP was associated with a decline in incidence for the groups using PrEP. MSM experienced the largest absolute declines in incidence with increasing PrEP coverage, followed by NHB women. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicates that it is possible to reach EHE goals. The largest reductions in HIV incidence can be achieved by increasing ART coverage among MSM and all race groups benefit regardless of differences in ART initiation by race. Improving ART coverage to > 90% should be prioritized with a particular emphasis on reaching NHB MSM. Such a focus will reduce the largest number of incident cases, reduce racial HIV incidence disparities among both MSM and women, and reduce racial health disparities among persons with HIV. NHB women should also be prioritized for PrEP outreach.