BACKGROUND: Differences in nutrient intakes by urbanization level in the U.S. is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: Describe, by urbanization level: 1) intake of protein, fiber, percent of energy from added sugars (AS) and saturated fat (SF), calcium, iron, potassium, sodium, and vitamin D; 2) the percent of the population meeting nutrient recommendations. METHODS: 24-hour dietary recalls from 23,107 participants aged 2 years and over from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were analyzed. Usual intakes were estimated, and linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and whether family income met the 130% threshold examined intake differences by urbanization levels-large urban areas (LUA), small to medium metro areas (SMMA), and rural areas (RA). RESULTS: A small percentage of the population met the nutrient recommendations, except for protein (92.8%) and iron (70.5%). A higher percentage of the population met recommendations than SMMA and RA for fiber (11.8% vs. 8.1% and 5.3%, p<0.001), AS (40.2% vs. 33.4% and 31.3%, p<0.001), SF (26.8% vs. 18.2% and 20.1%, p<0.001), and potassium (31.5% vs. 25.5% and 22.0%, p<0.001). Mean protein intake were also higher in LUA than RA (80.0g vs. 77.7g, p=0.003) and fiber intake higher in LUA than SMMA (16.5g vs. 15.9g, p=0.01) and RA (16.5g vs. 15.2g, p=0.001). Additionally, contributions to energy intake were lower in LUA than SMMA for AS (11.3% v 12.0%, p<0.001) and SF (11.5% v 11.7%, p<0.001), and for LUA than RA for AS (11.3% v 12.9%, p<0.001) and SF (11.5% v 11.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rural areas had some markers of poorer diet quality-lower protein and fiber intake and higher AS intake-compared to large urban areas, and these differences persisted in adjusted regression models. These results may inform public health efforts to address health disparities by urbanization levels in the U.S.

Overweight and obesity are pressing public health problems, and development of these conditions is linked to the earliest life stages.1 These early life stages include infancy (0 through 11 months) and toddlerhood (12 through 23 months),1 collectively referred to as birth to 24 months (B-24). Systematic reviews from the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project found that risk of childhood obesity is associated with the types of foods introduced during the complementary feeding period,2,3 which begins at about age 6 months when complementary foods and beverages are first introduced and continues to age 24 months as children transition to family foods.4 There is mounting evidence that the dietary patterns established during complementary feeding are not only associated with current and future weight status2,3,5 and health outcomes6 but also associated with diet quality in later life stages. For example, intake of fruits, vegetables, and sugar-sweetened beverages during infancy are associated with fruit and vegetable7 and sugar-sweetened beverage8 intakes at age 6 years. In fact, risk for childhood obesity may begin even before solid foods are introduced, as breastfeeding is also associated with higher diet quality and reduced risk of obesity in childhood.9, 10, 11

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on added sugars consumption in US infants and toddlers. OBJECTIVES: To present national estimates of added sugars intake among US infants and toddlers by sociodemographic characteristics, to identify top sources of added sugars, and to examine trends in added sugars intake. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 1 day of 24-hour dietary recall data. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: A nationally representative sample of US infants aged 0 to 11 months and toddlers aged 12 to 23 months (n=1,211) during the period from 2011 through 2016 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Trends were assessed from 2005-2006 through 2015-2016 (n=2,795). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Among infants and toddlers, the proportion consuming any added sugars, the average amount of added sugars consumed, percent of total energy from added sugars, and top sources of added sugars intake. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t tests were used to compare differences by age, sex, race/Hispanic origin, family income level, and head of household education level. Trends were tested using orthogonal polynomials. Significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: During 2011 to 2016, 84.4% of infants and toddlers consumed added sugars on a given day. A greater proportion of toddlers (98.3%) consumed added sugars than infants (60.6%). The mean amount of added sugars toddlers consumed was also more compared with infants (5.8 vs 0.9 tsp). Non-Hispanic black toddlers (8.2 tsp) consumed more added sugars than non-Hispanic Asian (3.7 tsp), non-Hispanic white (5.3 tsp), and Hispanic (5.9 tsp) toddlers. A similar pattern was observed for percent energy from added sugars. For infants, top sources of added sugars were yogurt, baby food snacks/sweets, and sweet bakery products; top sources among toddlers were fruit drinks, sugars/sweets, and sweet bakery products. The mean amount of added sugars decreased from 2005-2006 through 2015-2016 for both age groups; however, percent energy from added sugars only decreased among infants. CONCLUSION: Added sugars intake was observed among infants/toddlers and varied by age and race and Hispanic origin. Added sugars intake, as a percent of energy, decreased only among infants from 2005 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Differences in food access, availability, affordability, and dietary intake are influenced by the food environment, which includes outlets where foods are obtained. These differences between food outlets within rural and urban food environments in the US are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to describe the contribution of foods and beverages from six outlets - grocery stores, convenience stores, full-service restaurants, quick-service restaurants, schools, and other outlets - to total energy intake and Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 scores in the US population, by urbanization level (non-metropolitan statistical areas (MSA), small to medium MSA, and large MSA). DESIGN: Data were from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018. Dietary intake from one 24-hour dietary recall was analyzed by the outlet where a food or beverage was obtained and by urbanization. Linear regression, adjusted for sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, and family income, was used to predict the contribution of each food outlet to total energy intake and HEI-2015 total and component scores by urbanization level. RESULTS: During 2013-2018, foods and beverages from grocery stores, quick-service, and full-service restaurants provided 62.1%, 15.1% and 8.5% of energy intake, respectively. The percent of energy intake from full- and quick-service restaurants increased with increasing urbanization level. HEI-2015 total scores increased with increasing urbanization level overall (48.1 non-MSAs, 49.2 small to medium MSAs, and 51.3 large MSAs), for grocery stores (46.7 non-MSAs, 48.0 small to medium MSAs, and 50.6 large MSAs), and for quick-service restaurants (35.8 non-MSAs, 36.3 small to medium MSAs, and 37.5 large MSAs). CONCLUSION: Grocery stores and restaurants were the largest contributors of energy intake in urban and rural areas. Diet quality improved with increasing urbanization overall and for grocery stores and quick-service restaurants.

BACKGROUND: High energy intake from non-nutrient dense sources correlates with poorer diet quality. OBJECTIVES: To, 1) estimate total energy intake, and energy from solid fats and added sugars, and combined (SOFAS), and identify their top food category sources for ages 2-18 years in 2015-2018, and 2) describe trends over time in 2009-2018. DESIGN: Data were from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Pairwise differences were examined using univariate t statistics (2015-2018, n=5,038), and trends by age, and over time (2009-2018, n=14,038) examined using orthogonal polynomials. RESULTS: In 2015-2018, SOFAS contributed (mean [SE], 30.0% [0.3%]) of total energy. Solid fats 16.1% [0.2%] and added sugars 13.8% [0.2%] each contributed >10%. The contribution of added sugars increased with age from 11.1% (2-3 years) to 14.4% (14-18 years), and was higher for all other race/Hispanic origins than Non-Hispanic Asians. Top five sources of energy were sweet bakery products, savory snacks, pizza, other mixed dishes, and unflavored milk, and for SOFAS also included soft drinks, other desserts, candy and snack bars. Total energy did not change between 2009-2018, but energy from SOFAS, and servings of solid fats, and added sugars declined. The contribution of unflavored milk to total energy declined for all ages and most race/Hispanic origins. Fruit drinks (all ages) and soft drinks (9-18 years) remained among top added sugars sources despite declines. The contribution of sweet bakery products to energy from SOFAS increased for most ages, and candy and snack bars to energy from added sugars. CONCLUSIONS: In 2015-2018, SOFAS contributed over 30% of total energy for ages 2-18 years, which doubled the Dietary Guidelines for Americans' recommended limit of 15%. Top five sources of total energy were similar to those of solid fats, and those of SOFAs similar to those of added sugars. These results may inform public health efforts for improving diet quality.

Complementary foods and beverages (CFB) are key components of an infant's diet in the second 6 months of life. This manuscript summarizes nutrition and feeding practices examined by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees during the CFB life stage. Breastfeeding initiation is high (84%), but exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (26%) is below the Healthy People 2030 goal (42%). Most infants (51%) are introduced to CFB sometime before 6 months. The primary mode of feeding (i.e., human milk fed [HMF]; infant formula or mixed formula and human milk fed [FMF]) at the initiation of CFB is associated with the timing of introduction and types of CFB reported. FMF infants (42%) are more likely to be introduced to CFB before 4 months compared to HMF infants (19%). Different dietary patterns, such as higher prevalence of consumption and mean amounts, were observed including fruit, grains, dairy, proteins, and solid fats. Compared to HMF infants of the same age, FMF infants consume more total energy (845 vs. 631 kcal) and protein (22 vs. 12 g) from all sources, and more energy (345 vs. 204 kcal) and protein (11 vs. 6 g) from CFB alone. HMF infants have a higher prevalence of risk of inadequate intakes of iron (77% vs. 7%), zinc (54% vs. <3%), and protein (27% vs. <3%). FMF infants are more likely to have early introduction (<12 months) to fruit juice (45% vs. 20%) and cow's milk (36% vs. 24%). Dietitians and nutritional professionals should consider tailoring their advice to caregivers on dietary and complementary feeding practices, taking into account the primary mode of milk feeding during this life stage to support infants' nutrient adequacy. National studies that address the limitations of this analysis, including small sample sizes and imputed breast milk volume, could further refine findings from this analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D is important for bone health; in 2014 it was the fifth most commonly ordered laboratory test among Medicare Part B payments. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe vitamin D status in the US population in 2011-2014 and trends from 2003 to 2014. METHODS: We used serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data from NHANES 2011-2014 (n = 16,180), and estimated the prevalence at risk of deficiency (<30 nmol/L) or prevalence at risk of inadequacy (30-49 nmol/L) by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and dietary intake of vitamin D. We also present trends between 2003 and 2014. RESULTS: In 2011-2014, the percentage aged >/=1 y at risk of vitamin D deficiency or inadequacy was 5.0% (95% CI: 4.1%, 6.2%) and 18.3% (95% CI: 16.2%, 20.6%). The prevalence of at risk of deficiency was lowest among children aged 1-5 y (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.3%, 1.1%), peaked among adults aged 20-39 y (7.6%; 95% CI: 6.0%, 9.6%), and fell to 2.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 4.0%) among adults aged >/=60 y; the prevalence of at risk of inadequacy was similar. The prevalence of at risk of deficiency was higher among non-Hispanic black (17.5%; 95% CI: 15.2%, 20.0%) than among non-Hispanic Asian (7.6%; 95% CI: 5.9%, 9.9%), non-Hispanic white (2.1%; 95% CI: 1.5%, 2.7%), and Hispanic (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.4%, 7.8%) persons; the prevalence of at risk of inadequacy was similar. Persons with higher vitamin D dietary intake or who used supplements had lower prevalences of at risk of deficiency or inadequacy. From 2003 to 2014 there was no change in the risk of vitamin D deficiency; the risk of inadequacy declined from 21.0% (95% CI: 17.9%, 24.5%) to 17.7% (95% CI: 16.0%, 19.7%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of at risk of vitamin D deficiency in the United States remained stable from 2003 to 2014; at risk of inadequacy declined. Differences in vitamin D status by race and Hispanic origin warrant additional investigation.

Background: Limited nationally representative data are available on dietary supplement (DS) use and resulting nutrient exposures among infants and toddlers. Objective: This study evaluated DS use among US infants and toddlers to characterize DS use, estimate nutrient intake from DSs, and assess trends in DS use over time. Methods: Using nationally representative data from NHANES (2007-2014) and trends over time (1999-2014), we estimated prevalence of DS use and types of products used for US infants and toddlers aged <2 y (n = 2823). We estimated median daily intakes of vitamins and minerals consumed via DSs for all participants aged <2 y, by age groups (0-11.9 mo and 12.0-23.9 mo), and by feeding practices for infants 0-5.9 mo. Results: Overall, 18.2% (95% CI: 16.2%, 20.3%) of infants and toddlers used >/=1 DS in the past 30 d. Use was lower among infants (0-5.9 mo: 14.6%; 95% CI: 11.5%, 18.1%; 6-11.9 mo: 11.6%; 95% CI: 8.8%, 15.0%) than among toddlers (12-23.9 mo: 23.3%; 95% CI: 20.4%, 26.3%). The most commonly reported DSs were vitamin D and multivitamin infant drops for those <12 mo, and chewable multivitamin products for toddlers (12-23.9 mo). The nutrients most frequently consumed from DSs were vitamins D, A, C, and E for those <2 y; for infants <6 mo, a higher percentage of those fed breast milk than those fed formula consumed these nutrients via DSs. DS use remained steady for infants (6-11.9 mo) and toddlers from 1999-2002 to 2011-2014, but increased from 7% to 20% for infants aged 0-5.9 mo. Conclusions: One in 5 infants and toddlers aged <2 y use >/=1 DS. Future studies should examine total nutrient intake from foods, beverages, and DSs to evaluate nutrient adequacy overall and by nutrient source.

Although many Americans use dietary supplements, databases of dietary supplements sold in the United States have not been widely available. The Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD), an easily accessible public-use database, was created in 2008 to provide information on dietary supplement composition for use by researchers and consumers. We describe in this article the history, key features, recent enhancements, and common applications of the DSLD. Accessing current information easily and quickly is crucial for documenting exposures to dietary supplements because they contain nutrients and other bioactive ingredients that may have beneficial or adverse effects on human health. This article details recent developments with the DSLD to achieve this goal, and provides examples of how the DSLD has been used. With periodic updates to track changes in product composition and capture new products entering the market, the DSLD currently contains >71,000 dietary supplement labels. Following usability testing with consumer and researcher user groups completed in 2016, improvements to the DSLD interface were made. As of 2018, both a desktop and mobile device version are available. Since its inception in 2008, the DSLD has been used for research, exposure monitoring, and for other purposes by users in the public and private sectors. Further refinement of the user interface and search features is planned to facilitate ease of use for stakeholders. The DSLD can be used to track changes in product composition and capture new products entering the market. With >71,000 dietary supplement labels, it is a unique resource that policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and consumers may find valuable for multiple applications.

This review summarizes the current and previous data on dietary supplement (DS) use collected from participants in the NHANES, describes the NHANES DS database used to compute nutrient intakes from DSs, discusses recent developments and future directions, and describes many examples to show the utility of these data in informing nutrition research and policy. Since 1971, NHANES has been collecting information on the use of DSs from participants. These data are critical to national nutrition surveillance and have been used to characterize usage patterns, examine trends over time, assess the percentage of the population meeting or exceeding nutrient recommendations, and help to elucidate the sources contributing nutrients to the diet of the US population. More than half of adults and approximately one-third of children in the United States currently use ≥1 DS in the course of 30 d. DSs contribute to the dietary intake of nutrients and bioactive compounds in the United States and therefore need to be assessed when monitoring nutritional status of the population and when studying diet-health associations. With the recent development and availability of the Dietary Supplement Label Database, a comprehensive DS database that will eventually contain labels for all products marketed in the United States, NHANES DS data will be more easily linked to product information to estimate nutrient intake from DSs. NHANES provides a rich source of nationally representative data on the usage of dietary supplements in the United States. Over time, NHANES has both expanded and improved collection methods. The continued understanding of sources of error in collection methods will continue to be explored and is critical to improved accuracy.

In the United States, the iodine status of populations is determined from the median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) of spot urine samples collected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Because of the critical role of iodine in fetal growth and development, pregnant women and women who may enter pregnancy are key groups for ensuring adequate iodine nutrition (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) categorizes population median UIC <150 μg/L and <100 μg/L as iodine insufficiency for pregnant and nonpregnant women, respectively (1). In NHANES 2001–2006, the median UIC was 153 μg/L [confidence interval (CI) 105–196] for pregnant women and 130 μg/L [CI 117–140] for nonpregnant women (2). In NHANES 2005–2010, these estimates were 129 μg/L [CI 101–173] and 129 μg/L [CI 119–136], respectively (3). We used NHANES 2007–2014 data to provide an update of the iodine status of pregnant and nonpregnant women, aged 15–44 years, in the United States.

We estimated iodine status (median urinary iodine concentration (mUIC (&micro;g/L))) for the US population (6 years and over; n = 4613) and women of reproductive age (WRA) (15(-)44 years; n = 901). We estimated mean intake of key iodine sources by race and Hispanic origin. We present the first national estimates of mUIC for non-Hispanic Asian persons and examine the intake of soy products, a potential source of goitrogens. One-third of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants in 2011(-)2014 provided casual urine samples; UIC was measured in these samples. We assessed dietary intake with one 24-h recall and created food groups using the USDA&rsquo;s food/beverage coding scheme. For WRA, mUIC was 110 &micro;g/L. For both non-Hispanic white (106 &micro;g/L) and non-Hispanic Asian (81 &micro;g/L) WRA mUIC was significantly lower than mUIC among Hispanic WRA (133 &micro;g/L). Non-Hispanic black WRA had a mUIC of 124 &micro;g/L. Dairy consumption was significantly higher among non-Hispanic white (162 g) compared to non-Hispanic black WRA (113 g). Soy consumption was also higher among non-Hispanic Asian WRA (18 g compared to non-Hispanic black WRA (1 g). Differences in the consumption pattern of key sources of iodine and goitrogens may put subgroups of individuals at risk of mild iodine deficiency. Continued monitoring of iodine status and variations in consumption patterns is needed.

In the United States, the American Thyroid Association recommends that women take a dietary supplement containing 150 &micro;g of iodine 3 months prior to conception and while pregnant and lactating to support fetal growth and neurological development. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011&ndash;2014 to describe the use of dietary supplements with and without iodine in the past 30 days among 2155 non-pregnant, non-lactating (NPNL) women; 122 pregnant women; and 61 lactating women. Among NPNL women, 45.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 42.0, 48.6) used any dietary supplement and 14.8% (95% CI: 12.7, 16.8) used a dietary supplement with iodine in the past 30 days. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely to use any dietary supplement as well as one with iodine, than non-Hispanic white or non-Hispanic Asian women (p < 0.05). Among pregnant women, 72.2% (95% CI: 65.8, 78.6) used any dietary supplement; however, only 17.8% (95% CI: 11.4, 24.3) used a dietary supplement with iodine. Among lactating women, 75.0% (95% CI: 63.0, 87.0) used a dietary supplement; however, only 19.0% (95% CI: 8.8, 29.2) used a dietary supplement with iodine. Among NPNL women using a supplement with iodine, median daily iodine intake was 75.0 &micro;g. Self-reported data suggests that the use of iodine containing dietary supplements among pregnant and lactating women remains low in contrast with current recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: Differences in bottled v. tap water intake may provide insights into health disparities, like risk of dental caries and inadequate hydration. We examined differences in plain, tap and bottled water consumption among US adults by sociodemographic characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. We used 24 h dietary recall data to test differences in percentage consuming the water sources and mean intake between groups using Wald tests and multiple logistic and linear regression models. SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2007-2014. SUBJECTS: A nationally representative sample of 20 676 adults aged >/=20 years. RESULTS: In 2011-2014, 81.4 (se 0.6) % of adults drank plain water (sum of tap and bottled), 55.2 (se 1.4) % drank tap water and 33.4 (se 1.4) % drank bottled water on a given day. Adjusting for covariates, non-Hispanic (NH) Black and Hispanic adults had 0.44 (95 % CI 0.37, 0.53) and 0.55 (95 % CI 0.45, 0.66) times the odds of consuming tap water, and consumed B=-330 (se 45) ml and B=-180 (se 45) ml less tap water than NH White adults, respectively. NH Black, Hispanic and adults born outside the fifty US states or Washington, DC had 2.20 (95 % CI 1.79, 2.69), 2.37 (95 % CI 1.91, 2.94) and 1.46 (95 % CI 1.19, 1.79) times the odds of consuming bottled water than their NH White and US-born counterparts. In 2007-2010, water filtration was associated with higher odds of drinking plain and tap water. CONCLUSIONS: While most US adults consumed plain water, the source (i.e. tap or bottled) and amount differed by race/Hispanic origin, nativity status and education. Water filters may increase tap water consumption.

Early dietary patterns can have long-term health consequences. This study describes food consumption patterns among US children ≤23 months. We used one 24 h dietary recall from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2014 to estimate the percentage of children ≤23 months who consumed selected food/beverage categories on any given day by age and race/Hispanic origin. Among 0 to 5 month olds, 42.9% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 37.0%, 49.1%) consumed breast milk, with non-Hispanic blacks less likely (21.2%, 95% CI: 13.2%, 32.2%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (49.0%, 95% CI: 39.0%, 59.1%) (p < 0.001). The percentage of children consuming vegetables was 57.4%, 48.2%, and 45.1% for ages 6 to 11, 12 to 18 and 19 to 23 months, respectively (p < 0.01 for trend). The percentage of children consuming sugar-sweetened beverages was 6.6%, 31.8% and 38.3% for ages 6 to 11, 12 to 18 and 19 to 23 months, respectively (p < 0.01 for trend). Among children aged ≥6 months, lower percentages of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children consumed vegetables, and higher percentages consumed sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% juice compared with non-Hispanic white children, although differences were not always statistically significant. Compared with children in the second year of life, a higher percentage of children 6 to 11 months of age consumed vegetables and a lower percentage consumed 100% juice, sugar-sweetened beverages, snacks, or sweets; with differences by race/Hispanic origin. These data may be relevant to the upcoming 2020-2025 federal dietary guidelines.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, few studies have described the usual nutrient intakes of US children aged <2 y or assessed the nutrient adequacy of their diets relative to the recommended Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). OBJECTIVE: We estimated the usual nutrient intake of US children aged 6-23 mo examined in NHANES 2009-2012 and compared them to age-specific DRIs as applicable. DESIGN: Dietary intake was assessed with two 24-h recalls for infants aged 6-11 mo (n = 381) and toddlers aged 12-23 mo (n = 516) with the use of the USDA's Automated Multiple-Pass Method. Estimates of usual nutrient intakes from food and beverages were obtained with the use of the National Cancer Institute method. The proportions of children with intakes below and above the DRI were also estimated. RESULTS: The estimated usual intakes of infants were adequate for most nutrients; however, 10% had an iron intake below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), and only 21% had a vitamin D intake that met or exceeded the recommended Adequate Intake (AI). More nutrient inadequacies were noted among toddlers; 1 in 4 had a lower-than-recommended fat intake (percentage of energy), and most had intakes that were below the EAR for vitamins E (82%) and D (74%). Few toddlers (<1%) met or exceeded the AI for fiber and potassium. In contrast, 1 in 2 had sodium intakes that exceeded the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL); ≥16% and 41% of the children had excessive intakes (greater than the ULs) of vitamin A and zinc, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated usual intakes of infants were adequate for most nutrients. Most toddlers were at risk for inadequate intakes of vitamins D and E and had diets low in fiber and potassium. The sources contributing to excessive intakes of vitamin A and zinc among infants and toddlers may need further evaluation.

In the United States, breastfeeding initiation rates have risen to 80%.1 We report secular trends of breastfeeding initiation and duration by birth weight using nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

OBJECTIVES: To describe the contribution of whole fruit, including discrete types of fruit, to total fruit consumption and to investigate differences in consumption by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed data from 3129 youth aged 2 to 19 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011 to 2012. Using the Food Patterns Equivalents Database and the What We Eat in America 150 food groups, we calculated the contribution of whole fruit, 100% fruit juices, mixed fruit dishes, and 12 discrete fruit and fruit juices to total fruit consumption. We examined differences by age, gender, race and Hispanic origin, and poverty status. RESULTS: Nearly 90% of total fruit intake came from whole fruits (53%) and 100% fruit juices (34%) among youth aged 2 to 19 years. Apples, apple juice, citrus juice, and bananas were responsible for almost half of total fruit consumption. Apples accounted for 18.9% of fruit intake. Differences by age were predominately between youth aged 2 to 5 years and 6 to 11 years. For example, apples contributed a larger percentage of total fruit intake among youth 6 to 11 years old (22.4%) than among youth 2 to 5 years old (14.6%), but apple juice contributed a smaller percentage (8.8% vs 16.8%), P < .05. There were differences by race and Hispanic origin in intake of citrus fruits, berries, melons, dried fruit, and citrus juices and other fruit juices. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insight into what fruits US youth are consuming and sociodemographic factors that may influence consumption.

We examined consumption of different types of infant formula (eg, cow's milk, soy, gentle/lactose-reduced, and specialty) and regular milk among a nationally representative sample of 1864 infants, 0 to 12 months old, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2010. Among the 81% of infants who were fed formula or regular milk, 69% consumed cow's milk formula, 12% consumed soy formula, 5% consumed gentle/ lactose-reduced formulas, 6% consumed specialty formulas, and 13% consumed regular milk products. There were differences by household education and income in the percentage of infants consuming cow's milk formula and regular milk products. The majority of infants in the United States who were fed formula or regular milk consumed cow's milk formula (69%), with lower percentages receiving soy, specialty, gentle/sensitive, or lactose-free/reduced formulas. Contrary to national recommendations, 13% of infants younger than 1 year consumed regular milk, and the percentage varied by household education and income levels.