In 2016 the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established a Nuclear/Radiological Training and Exercise Preparedness (TEP) Program to better prepare its workforce to respond to a nuclear/radiological incident. The TEP program is comprised of staff across CDC programs with a variety of specialties such as epidemiologists, clinicians, data managers, communicators, environmental health specialists, at risk population specialists and health physicists. Key TEP activities include the preparation of the CDC Nuclear/Radiological Incident Response and Recovery Annex that describes CDC's roles and responsibilities in the event of a nuclear/radiological incident; establishment of an Incident Management System (IMS) structure to reflect an agency-wide response consistent with CDC's All Hazards Plan; and completion of nuclear/radiological public health preparedness and response training and exercises. In addition to training sessions on the various radiation topics, the TEP program includes seminars on the various roles and responsibilities of the task forces defined in IMS during a response. The TEP program includes a range of discussion-based (seminars, workshops, tabletop exercises) and operations-based (drills and functional exercises) activities aimed at enhancing IMS staff capabilities and capacity to be prepared to respond to a nuclear/radiological incident. In summary, the CDC's Nuclear/Radiological TEP Program prepares knowledgeable, well-trained staff, or a radiation-savvy workforce, ready for a robust response to a nuclear/radiological emergency.

BACKGROUND: Responding effectively to outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea (ARGC) in the future will likely prove challenging. Tabletop exercises (TTXs) may assist local, state, and federal public health officials evaluate existing ARGC outbreak response plans, strengthen preparedness and response effectiveness, and identify critical gaps to address prior to an outbreak. METHODS: In 2018-2019, CDC collaborated with state partners to develop and implement TTXs to simulate a public health emergency involving an ARGC outbreak. Prior to the TTXs, two state-local health department pairs developed ARGC outbreak response plans. During each one-day exercise (in Indiana and Illinois), participants discussed roles, clinical management, public health response, and communication based on pre-developed response plans. Observers identified outbreak response strengths and gaps, and participants completed feedback forms. RESULTS: Forty-one (Illinois) and 48 people (Indiana) participated in each TTX, including: STD clinical staff, laboratorians, public health infectious disease program staff, and CDC observers. Strengths and gaps varied by jurisdiction, but identified gaps included: (1) local access to gonorrhea culture and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), (2) protocols for clinical management of suspected treatment failures, (3) communication plans, and (4) clarity regarding state and local responsibilities. CDC observers identified opportunities to provide national-level technical assistance, foster local AST, and develop further response guidance. TTX summary reports were used to guide modifications to local response plans to address gaps. CONCLUSIONS: The TTXs allowed participants to practice responding to a simulated public health emergency and may have enhanced local response capacity. CDC made TTX implementation materials publicly available.