A suspected outbreak of influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 at a long-term care facility in Los Angeles County was months later, determined to not involve influenza. To prevent inadvertent transmission of infections, facilities should use highly specific influenza diagnostics and follow CDC guidelines that specifically address infection control challenges.

Following increases in reported cases of hepatitis A, we assessed the impact of hepatitis A vaccine in Alaska Native persons. During 1996-2018, only 6 cases of hepatitis A were identified, all in unvaccinated adults. Populations can be protected against hepatitis A by achieving sufficient vaccination coverage over time.

BACKGROUND: In Alaska, while introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine led to declines in invasive pneumococcal disease, carriage prevalence remained stable because of replacement with non-vaccine serotypes. We assessed antibiotic non-susceptibility of carried pneumococci during serotype redistribution, determined the contributions of within-serotype shifts, and assessed factors that could explain changes in non-susceptibility. METHODS: Each year from 2008 to 2015, at multiple sites in Alaska, we collected nasopharyngeal swabs and completed surveys for a convenience sample of participants. Pneumococcal serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility testing for penicillin and erythromycin were performed. We described changes in non-susceptibility of isolates from 2008-2011 to 2012-2015, and assessed the contributions of serotype redistribution and within-serotype changes in non-susceptibility by comparing observed data to modeled data removing either factor. We used weighted logistic regression to assess whether reported risk factors could explain changes over time in non-susceptibility within serotypes. RESULTS: From 2008-2011 to 2012-2015, the overall proportion of isolates non-susceptible to penicillin or erythromycin increased by 3%, from 23% (n = 1,183) to 26% (n = 1,589; P < 0.05). However, a decrease of 3% would be expected if serotype redistribution occurred without within-serotype changes in non-susceptibility. Standardization by either factor produced hypothetical data significantly different to observed data. Within serotypes, the average annual increase in odds of non-susceptibility to penicillin or erythromycin was 1.08 (95% CI 1.05-1.11). Recent antibiotic exposure, urban residence and increased household size of participants predicted isolate non-susceptibility but did not explain the increase over time. DISCUSSION: An overall increase in non-susceptibility of carried pneumococcal isolates to penicillin or erythromycin resulted from increases in non-susceptibility within serotypes, which outweighed a protective effect of serotype redistribution. Characterization of emerging resistant clones within carried non-vaccine serotypes, including risk factors for colonization and disease, would support disease prevention efforts and inform vaccine strategies.

We summarised available hepatitis C virus (HCV) surveillance data for 2012-14 from Arctic/sub-Arctic countries/regions. We sent a HCV data collection template by email to public health authorities in all jurisdictions. Population statistics obtained from census sources for each country were used to estimate rates of reported acute and chronic/undifferentiated HCV cases. Seven countries with Arctic regions (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Norway, Sweden and the United States, represented by the state of Alaska), including three Canadian territories and one province, as well as 11 Russian subnational Arctic regions, completed the data collection template. Data on acute HCV infection during 2014 was available from three Arctic countries and all Russian Arctic regions (rate range 0/100,000 population in Greenland, as well as Nenets and Chukotka Automous Okrugs (Russian subnational Arctic regions) to 3.7/100,000 in the Russian Republic of Komi). The rate of people with chronic/undifferentiated HCV infection in 2014 ranged from 0/100,000 in Greenland to 171.2/100,000 in Alaska. In most countries/regions, the majority of HCV-infected people were male and aged 19-64 years. Differences in surveillance methods preclude direct comparisons of HCV surveillance data between Arctic countries/regions. Our data can inform future efforts to develop standardised approaches to HCV surveillance in the Arctic countries/regions by identifying similarities/differences between the surveillance data collected.

OBJECTIVES: Burden of pneumococcal disease depends on the prevalence and invasive disease potential of serotypes. We aimed to estimate the invasive disease potential of serotypes in children under 5 years of age by combining data from different settings with routine immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, supplemented by unpublished data, to identify data on the frequency of pneumococcal serotypes in carriage and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). We estimated the invasive disease potential of serotypes as the ratio of IPD in relation to carriage (odds ratio and 95%CI) compared with 19A (reference serotype) by meta-analysis. We report results based on a random effects model for children aged 0-23, 24-29, and 0-59 months and by invasive clinical syndromes. RESULTS: In comparison with 19A, serotypes 1, 7F, and 12F had a significantly higher invasive disease potential in children aged 0-23 and 0-59 months for all IPD and clinical syndromes (OR>5). Several non-vaccine types (NVTs) (6C, 15A, 15BC, 16F, 23B, in these two age groups) had a lower invasive disease potential than 19A (OR 0*1-0*3). NVTs 8, 12F, 24F, and 33F were at the upper end of the invasiveness spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation among pneumococcal serotypes in their potential to cause IPD and disease presentation, which is influenced by age and time after PCV introduction. Surveillance of IPD and carriage is critical to understand the expected effectiveness of current PCVs (in the longer term) and guide the development of future vaccines.

BACKGROUND: The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) was introduced in 2001. Widespread PCV use nearly eradicated pneumococcal colonization by vaccine serotypes. Since 2008, however, colonization by PCV-serotype 19F has increased in Alaska residents. We describe the epidemiology of re-emerging serotype 19F colonization. METHODS: We conducted annual cross-sectional colonization surveys from 2008 to 2013. We recruited children aged <5years at 2 urban clinics and participants of all ages from Region-A (2 villages), Region-B (4 villages), and Region-C (2 villages). We interviewed participants and reviewed their medical records to obtain demographic information and determine PCV status. We obtained nasopharyngeal swab specimens from participants to identify pneumococci and to determine the pneumococcal serotype, antimicrobial resistance, and multilocus sequence type. We used the Cochran-Armitage test to assess for significant trends in colonization across time periods. RESULTS: Among participants aged <5years, pneumococcal serotype 19F colonization remained unchanged from 2008-2009 (0.7%) to 2012-2013 (0.5%; P-value [P]=.54). Serotype 19F colonization increased from 2008-2009 to 2012-2013 among participants aged 5-11years (0.3% to 3.2%; P<.01), participants 12-17years (0.0% to 2.0%; P<.01), and participants aged >/=18years (0.1% to 0.5%; P<.01). During 2012-2013, 85 (93%) of 91 pneumococcal serotype 19F isolates were identified among participants from Region B; the majority of serotype 19F isolates belonged to an antimicrobial nonsusceptibility pattern corresponding to a novel multilocus sequence type 9074. CONCLUSIONS: PCV continues to protect against serotype 19F colonization in vaccinated children aged <5years. The direct PCV impact on serotype 19F colonization in persons aged 5-11years and indirect impact in persons aged >/=12years is waning, possibly because of a newly introduced genotype in Region-B.

OBJECTIVE: Reports about infectious disease (ID) hospitalization rates among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons have been constrained by data limited to the tribal health care system and by comparisons with the general US population. We used a merged state database to determine ID hospitalization rates in Alaska. METHODS: We combined 2010 and 2011 hospital discharge data from the Indian Health Service and the Alaska State Inpatient Database. We used the merged data set to calculate average annual age-adjusted and age-specific ID hospitalization rates for AI/AN and non-AI/AN persons in Alaska. We stratified the ID hospitalization rates by sex, age, and ID diagnosis. RESULTS: ID diagnoses accounted for 19% (6501 of 34 160) of AI/AN hospitalizations, compared with 12% (7397 of 62 059) of non-AI/AN hospitalizations. The average annual age-adjusted hospitalization rate was >3 times higher for AI/AN persons (2697 per 100 000 population) than for non-AI/AN persons (730 per 100 000 population; rate ratio = 3.7, P < .001). Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), which occurred in 38% (2486 of 6501) of AI/AN persons, was the most common reason for ID hospitalization. AI/AN persons were significantly more likely than non-AI/AN persons to be hospitalized for LRTI (rate ratio = 5.2, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial disparity in ID hospitalization rates exists between AI/AN and non-AI/AN persons, and the most common reason for ID hospitalization among AI/AN persons was LRTI. Public health programs and policies that address the risk factors for LRTI are likely to benefit AI/AN persons.

Sirs, We appreciate the interest in our study from Professors Chen and Liaw and the opportunity to provide additional information.1 As we acknowledged in our paper, the wide confidence intervals for our risk estimates resulting from the relatively small number of case- and control-patients developing HCC were an important limitation to our study.2 Thus, it is possible that we failed to detect a real reduction in HCC risk because of insufficient statistical power. As requested, we recalculated the risk for developing HCC after excluding the 2 case-patients who received antiviral treatment before HBsAg seroclearance and the 32 control-patients who had received antiviral treatment. After adjusting for age at cohort entry and initial anti-hepatitis B e antibody status, we did not detect a difference in HCC risk among case-compared with control-patients after excluding patients who had received antiviral treatment (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.7; 95% confidence interval: 0.2–2.7). The effect of age at HBsAg seroclearance on risk for HCC is complex and could be partly related to the specific HBV genotypes represented in a population. It has been demonstrated that the duration of hepatitis B e antigen persistence and the risk for HCC is substantially higher for persons with HBV genotype C compared with other genotypes.3,4 The majority of patients in the study indicating an increased risk for HCC among persons aged ≥50 years at the time of HBsAg seroclearance were infected with HBV genotype C.5,6 In contrast, the majority of patients in our study population were infected with HBV genotype D. Therefore, the risk for HCC associated with a later age of HBsAg seroclearance among Alaska Native persons compared with other geographic regions is unclear because of differences in the prevalence of HBV genotypes. Furthermore, the age at HBsAg seroclearance should not affect our interpretation of the relative risk for HCC between case- and control-patients because the majority of participants acquired HBV infection in early childhood and our analysis adjusted for case-patients’ HBsAg duration prior to seroclearance. We also speculated in our paper that ongoing low-level HBV DNA replication with continued integration into the host hepatocyte could have contributed to persistent HCC risk after HBsAg seroclearance. Further study is necessary to determine the relative importance of HBV viremia early in the course of disease versus persistence of viremia after HBsAg clearance in the development of HCC.

Objective: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Prevention Quality Indicators comprise acute and chronic conditions for which hospitalization can be potentially prevented by high-quality ambulatory care. The Healthy Alaska 2020 initiative (HA2020) targeted reducing potentially preventable hospitalizations (PPH) for acute and chronic conditions among its health indicators. We estimated the PPH rate for adults aged ≥ 18 years in Alaska during 2010-2012. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of state-wide hospital discharge data obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and the Indian Health Service. We calculated average annual PPH rates/1000 persons for acute/chronic conditions. Age-adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) were used for evaluating PPH rate disparities between Alaska Native (AN) and non-AN adults. Results: Among 127,371 total hospitalizations, 4911 and 6721 were for acute and chronic PPH conditions, respectively. The overall crude PPH rate was 7.3 (3.1 for acute and 4.2 for chronic conditions). AN adults had a higher rate than non-AN adults for acute (aRR: 4.7; . p < 0.001) and chronic (aRR: 2.6; p < 0.001) PPH conditions. Adults aged ≥ 85. years had the highest PPH rate for acute (43.5) and chronic (31.6) conditions. Acute conditions with the highest PPH rate were bacterial pneumonia (1.8) and urinary tract infections (0.8). Chronic conditions with the highest PPH rate were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 1.6) and congestive heart failure (CHF; 1.3). Conclusion: Efforts to reduce PPHs caused by COPD, CHF, and bacterial pneumonia, especially among AN people and older adults, should yield the greatest benefit in achieving the HA2020 goal.

BACKGROUND: The aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and a fibrosis index calculated using platelets (FIB-4) have been proposed as noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis. GOALS: To determine APRI/FIB-4 accuracy for predicting histologic liver fibrosis and evaluate whether incorporating change in index improves test accuracy in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected Alaska Native persons. STUDY: Using liver histology as the gold standard, we determined the test characteristics of APRI to predict Metavir ≥F2 fibrosis and FIB-4 to predict Metavir ≥F3 fibrosis. Index discrimination was measured as the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve. We fit a logistic regression model to determine whether incorporating change in APRI/FIB-4 over time improved index discrimination. RESULTS: Among 283 participants, 46% were female, 48% had a body mass index >30, 11% had diabetes mellitus, 8% reported current heavy alcohol use. Participants were infected with HCV genotypes 1 (68%), 2 (17%), or 3 (15%). On liver histology, 30% of study participants had ≥F2 fibrosis and 15% had ≥F3 fibrosis. The positive predictive value of an APRI>1.5/FIB-4>3.25 for identifying fibrosis was 77%/78%. The negative predictive value of an APRI<0.5/FIB-4<1.45 was 91%/87%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of an APRI/FIB-4 for identifying fibrosis was 0.82/0.84. Incorporating change in APRI/FIB-4 did not improve index discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of APRI/FIB-4 for identifying liver fibrosis in HCV-infected Alaska Native persons is similar to that reported in other populations and could help prioritize patients for treatment living in areas without access to liver biopsy. Change in APRI/FIB-4 was not predictive of degree of fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in Alaska Native children and young adults with hepatitis B virus (HBV). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a population-based cohort of Alaska Native persons with HBV followed during 1982-2012. All individuals with HBV were offered HCC screening regardless of age using alpha-fetoprotein every 6 months; persons with an elevated alpha-fetoprotein or persons at high-risk for HCC, such as cirrhosis, family history of HCC, were offered ultrasound. We calculated the HCC incidence/1000 person-years from date of cohort entry until death, diagnosis of HCC, or attaining the age of 40 years (males) or 50 years (females). RESULTS: We followed 1083 subjects with HBV (56% male) comprising 5 genotypes (A2 [12.5%], B6 [1.7%], C [5.3%], D [49.7%], F1 [18.6%], unknown [12.4%]) for a median of 23.4 years/person. We observed 22 HCC cases (incidence/1000 person-years follow-up: 1.0); 19 HCC cases among persons with genotype F1. There was no significant difference in HCC incidence between males (1.4) and females (0.6). The HCC incidence was significantly higher for persons with genotype F1 (4.4) compared with genotype A2 (0.4) and D (0.2) and remained higher among persons with HBV genotype F1 excluding persons with HCC family history/cirrhosis (1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Alaska Native children and young adults with HBV genotype F1 are at high risk for HCC and should receive HCC surveillance. For males <40 years of age and females <50 years of age with HBV in regions of the world with a high genotype F prevalence, testing/confirming genotype F can identify persons who could benefit from HCC surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP-->US). DESIGN: A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983-2012. We assumed that compared with AFP-->US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate. RESULTS: The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP-->US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP-->US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP-->US and $41,000 per extra YLG. CONCLUSIONS: Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP-->US, the reduced costs of the AFP-->US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk after resolving chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is unclear. AIM: To compare HCC risk between Alaska Native (AN) patients with and without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. METHODS: We selected persons with (case-patients) and without (control-patients) HBsAg seroclearance from a cohort of 1346 chronically HBV-infected AN patients followed during 1982-2013. We attempted to match two control-patients/case-patient on sex, HBV genotype, and age. Person-years of follow-up for case-patients began on the date of HBsAg resolution and for control-patients began on the date equivalent to the cohort entry date plus the years of HBsAg duration for their corresponding case-patient. We compared HCC risk using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 238 case-patients (4 with HCC) and 435 control-patients (9 with HCC) were similar in age [P-value (P) = 0.30], sex (P = 0.53) and HBV genotype (P = 0.99). Case-patients had longer person-years of follow-up than control-patients (11.7 vs. 10.1 years; P = 0.04). The HCC rate/100 000 persons was similar between case- (132) and control-patients (178; P = 0.65). The adjusted hazard ratio comparing case- and control-patients was similar for HCC [0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-2.4], increased for each 1-year increment for age (1.1; CI: 1.0-1.1; P < 0.01), and was greater if the initial HBeAg was positive (3.5; CI: 1.1-11.0; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance was not associated with reduced HCC risk; the HCC risk estimates are limited by wide 95% confidence intervals. Persons meeting HCC surveillance indications prior to HBsAg seroclearance could benefit from continued surveillance after seroclearance.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most regions of the world have <3 co-circulating hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes, which limits direct comparisons of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk among HBV-infected persons by genotype. We evaluated HCC incidence by HBV genotype in a cohort of Alaska Native (AN) persons where 5 HBV genotypes (A, B, C, D, F) have been identified. METHODS: Our cohort comprised AN persons with chronic HBV infection identified during 1983-2012 who consented to participate in the study. Cohort persons were offered annual hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) testing and semiannual HCC screening. We developed a logistic regression model to compare HCC risk by genotype, adjusting for age, sex, region, and HBeAg status. RESULTS: Among the 1,235 consenting study participants, 711 (57.6%) were male, 510 (41.3%) were HBeAg positive at cohort entry, and 43 (3.5%) developed HCC. The HBV genotype was known for 1,142 (92.5%) persons (13.5% A, 3.9% B, 6.7% C, 56.9% D, 19.0% F). The HCC incidence/1,000 person-years of follow-up for genotypes A, B, C, D, and F was 1.3, 0, 5.5, 0.4, and 4.2, respectively. Compared with persons with HBV genotype B/D infection, the HCC risk was higher for persons with genotypes A (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.14-13.74), C (aOR: 16.3, 95% CI: 5.20-51.11), and F (aOR: 13.9, 95% CI: 5.30-36.69). CONCLUSION: HBV genotype is independently associated with HCC risk. AN persons with genotypes A, C, and F are at higher risk compared with genotypes B or D.

BACKGROUND: We describe the relative impact of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7, introduced 2001) and antibiotic use on colonization by antibiotic resistant pneumococci in urban Alaskan children during 2000-2010. METHODS: We obtained nasopharyngeal swab specimens from a convenience sample of children aged <5 years at clinics annually during 2000-2004 and 2008-2010. PCV7 status and antibiotic use < 90 days before enrollment was determined by interview/medical records review. Pneumococci were characterized by serotype and susceptibility to penicillin (PCN). Isolates with full PCN resistance (PCN-R) or intermediate PCN resistance (PCN-I) were classified as PCN-NS. RESULTS: We recruited 3,496 children (median: 452/year). During 2000-2010, a range of 18-29%/year of children used PCN/amoxicillin (p-value for trend [p] = 0.09); the proportion age-appropriately vaccinated with PCV7 increased (0%-90%; p <0.01). Among pneumococcal isolates, the PCV7-serotype proportion decreased (53%-<1%; p <0.01) and non-PCV7-serotype proportion increased (43%-95%; p <0.01). PCN-R pneumococcal colonizationprevalence decreased (23%-9%, p <0.01) and PCN-I pneumococcal colonization prevalence increased (13%-24%, p <0.01); overall PCN-NS pneumococcalcolonizationprevalence was unchanged. PCN-NS among colonizing PCV7-type and non-PCV7-type pneumococci remained unchanged; a mean of 31%/year of PCV7-type and 10%/year of non-PCV7-type isolates were PCN-R, and 10%/year of PCV7 and 20%/year of non-PCV7-type isolates were PCN-I. CONCLUSIONS: Overall PCN-NS pneumococcal colonization remained unchanged during 2000-2010 because increased colonization by predominantly PCN-I non-PCV7 serotypes offset decreased colonization by predominantly PCN-R PCV7 serotypes. Proportion PCN-NS did not increase within colonizing pneumococcal serotype-groups (PCV7 versus non-PCV7) despite stable penicillin use in our population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the North American Arctic during 2000-2010. METHODS: Surveillance data were obtained from the International Circumpolar Surveillance network. We defined a case of bacterial meningitis caused by H. influenzae, N. meningitidis, or S. pneumoniae as a culture-positive isolate obtained from a normally sterile site in a resident with a meningitis diagnosis. RESULTS: The annual incidence/100,000 persons for meningitis caused by H. influenzae, N. meningitidis, and S. pneumoniae among all North American Arctic residents was: 0.6, 0.5, and 1.5, respectively; the meningitis incidence among indigenous persons in Alaska and Canada (indigenous status not recorded in Greenland) for those three bacteria was: 2.1, 0.8, and 2.4, respectively. The percentage of pneumococcal isolates belonging to a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine serotype declined from 2000-2004 to 2005-2010 (31% to 2%, p-value <0.01). During 2005-2010, serotype a caused 55% of H. influenzae meningitis and serogroup B caused 86% of meningococcal meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with all North American Arctic residents, indigenous people suffer disproportionately from bacterial meningitis. Arctic residents could benefit from the development of a H. influenzae serotype a vaccine and implementation of a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Patients with prior positive tuberculin skin test (TST) results may benefit from prophylaxis after repeat exposure to infectious tuberculosis (TB). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with active TB disease among persons with prior positive TST results named as contacts of persons with infectious TB. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2,933 contacts with prior positive TST results recently exposed to infectious TB identified in New York City's TB registry during the period from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2003. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Contacts developing active TB disease ≤ 4 years after exposure were identified and compared with those who did not, using Poisson regression analysis. Genotyping was performed on selected Mycobacterium tuberculosis-positive isolates. KEY RESULTS: Among contacts with prior positive TST results, 39 (1.3 %) developed active TB disease ≤ 4 years after exposure (≤2 years: 34). Risk factors for contacts that were independently associated with TB were age < 5 years (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 19.48; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 7.15-53.09), household exposure (aPR = 2.60;CI = 1.30-5.21), exposure to infectious patients (i.e., cavities on chest radiograph, acid-fast bacilli on sputum smear; aPR = 1.9 3;CI = 1.01-3.71), and exposure to a U.S.-born index patient (aPR = 4.04; CI = 1.95-8.38). Receipt of more than1 month of treatment for latent TB infection following the current contact investigation was found to be protective (aPR = 0.27; CI = 0.08-0.93). Genotype results were concordant with the index patients among 14 of 15 contacts who developed active TB disease and had genotyping results available. CONCLUSIONS: Concordant genotype results and a high proportion of contacts developing active TB disease within 2 years of exposure indicate that those with prior positive TST results likely developed active TB disease from recent rather than remote infection. Healthcare providers should consider prophylaxis for contacts with prior TB infection, especially young children and close contacts of TB patients (e.g., those with household exposure).

BACKGROUND: In 2010, a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) replaced a 7-valent vaccine (PCV7) that contained all PCV7 serotypes plus 6 additional serotypes (PCV6+). We conducted annual surveys from 2008 to 2012 to determine the effect of PCV13 on colonization by pneumococcal serotypes. METHODS: We obtained nasopharyngeal swabs for pneumococcal identification and serotyping from residents of all ages at 8 rural villages and children age <60 months at 2 urban clinics. We conducted interviews/medical records review for all participants. RESULTS: A total of 18 207 nasopharyngeal swabs (rural = 16 098; urban = 2109) were collected. From 2008 to 2012, 84% of rural and 90% of urban children age <5 years were age-appropriately vaccinated with a PCV. Overall pneumococcal colonization prevalence remained stable among rural (66%) and urban (35%) children age <5 years, and adults age ≥18 years (14%). Colonization by PCV6+ serotypes declined significantly among rural children age <5 years, urban children age <5, and adults age ≥18 over the course of the study (25%-5%, 22%-9%, 22%-6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PCV13 was rapidly introduced into the Alaska childhood immunization schedule and reduced colonization by PCV6+ serotypes among children. Unvaccinated adults also experienced comparable reductions in vaccine serotype colonization indicating substantial indirect protection from PCV13.

We read with interest and appreciated the immense effort by Otsuka et al1 in evaluating risk factors for nasopharyngeal colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenza among children followed from birth to 36 months of age. The authors concluded that recent exposure to antimicrobials increased the overall risk of colonization by S. pneumoniae/H. influenzae but did not increase the risk of antimicrobial-resistant colonization. The evidence provided by the authors does not support these conclusions. | The authors’ assert that reduced antimicrobial use could lower the risk of colonization based on a univariate analysis that indicated increased colonization among children receiving antimicrobials in the preceding 3 months. That analysis failed to account for well-established confounding factors such as the child’s age and receipt of the7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7).2 After the authors adjusted for several potential confounding variables in Table 2, they did not find an association between colonization and the number of antimicrobial prescriptions children received (odds ratio: 1.1, P = 0.2). Their multivariable model results are consistent with other studies conducted before introduction of PCV7 that demonstrated colonization did not increase among children with recent antimicrobial use.2