Last data update: Dec 02, 2024. (Total: 48272 publications since 2009)
Records 1-14 (of 14 Records) |
Query Trace: Foust A[original query] |
---|
Changes in influenza and other respiratory virus activity during the COVID-19 pandemic-United States, 2020-2021.
Olsen SJ , Winn AK , Budd AP , Prill MM , Steel J , Midgley CM , Kniss K , Burns E , Rowe T , Foust A , Jasso G , Merced-Morales A , Davis CT , Jang Y , Jones J , Daly P , Gubareva L , Barnes J , Kondor R , Sessions W , Smith C , Wentworth DE , Garg S , Havers FP , Fry AM , Hall AJ , Brammer L , Silk BJ . Am J Transplant 2021 21 (10) 3481-3486 The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent implementation of nonpharmaceutical interventions (e.g., cessation of global travel, mask use, physical distancing, and staying home) reduced the transmission of some viral respiratory pathogens.1 In the United States, influenza activity decreased in March 2020, was historically low through the summer of 2020,2 and remained low during October 2020–May 2021 (<0.4% of respiratory specimens with positive test results for each week of the season). Circulation of other respiratory pathogens, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), common human coronaviruses (HCoVs) types OC43, NL63, 229E, and HKU1, and parainfluenza viruses (PIVs) types 1–4 also decreased in early 2020 and did not increase until spring 2021. Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) circulation decreased in March 2020 and remained low through May 2021. Respiratory adenovirus (RAdV) circulated at lower levels throughout 2020 and as of early May 2021. Rhinovirus and enterovirus (RV/EV) circulation decreased in March 2020, remained low until May 2020, and then increased to near prepandemic seasonal levels. Circulation of respiratory viruses could resume at prepandemic levels after COVID-19 mitigation practices become less stringent. Clinicians should be aware of increases in some respiratory virus activity and remain vigilant for off-season increases. In addition to the use of everyday preventive actions, fall influenza vaccination campaigns are an important component of prevention as COVID-19 mitigation measures are relaxed and schools and workplaces resume in-person activities. |
Changes in Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, 2020-2021.
Olsen SJ , Winn AK , Budd AP , Prill MM , Steel J , Midgley CM , Kniss K , Burns E , Rowe T , Foust A , Jasso G , Merced-Morales A , Davis CT , Jang Y , Jones J , Daly P , Gubareva L , Barnes J , Kondor R , Sessions W , Smith C , Wentworth DE , Garg S , Havers FP , Fry AM , Hall AJ , Brammer L , Silk BJ . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (29) 1013-1019 The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent implementation of nonpharmaceutical interventions (e.g., cessation of global travel, mask use, physical distancing, and staying home) reduced transmission of some viral respiratory pathogens (1). In the United States, influenza activity decreased in March 2020, was historically low through the summer of 2020 (2), and remained low during October 2020-May 2021 (<0.4% of respiratory specimens with positive test results for each week of the season). Circulation of other respiratory pathogens, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), common human coronaviruses (HCoVs) types OC43, NL63, 229E, and HKU1, and parainfluenza viruses (PIVs) types 1-4 also decreased in early 2020 and did not increase until spring 2021. Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) circulation decreased in March 2020 and remained low through May 2021. Respiratory adenovirus (RAdV) circulated at lower levels throughout 2020 and as of early May 2021. Rhinovirus and enterovirus (RV/EV) circulation decreased in March 2020, remained low until May 2020, and then increased to near prepandemic seasonal levels. Circulation of respiratory viruses could resume at prepandemic levels after COVID-19 mitigation practices become less stringent. Clinicians should be aware of increases in some respiratory virus activity and remain vigilant for off-season increases. In addition to the use of everyday preventive actions, fall influenza vaccination campaigns are an important component of prevention as COVID-19 mitigation measures are relaxed and schools and workplaces resume in-person activities. |
Interim estimates of 2019-20 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, February 2020
Dawood FS , Chung JR , Kim SS , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Monto AS , Martin ET , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Gaglani M , Dunnigan K , Foust A , Sessions W , DaSilva J , Le S , Stark T , Kondor RJ , Barnes JR , Wentworth DE , Brammer L , Fry AM , Patel MM , Flannery B . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 69 (7) 177-182 During the 2019-20 influenza season, influenza-like illness (ILI)* activity first exceeded the national baseline during the week ending November 9, 2019, signaling the earliest start to the influenza season since the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. Activity remains elevated as of mid-February 2020. In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all persons aged >/=6 months (1). During each influenza season, CDC estimates seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with medically attended acute respiratory illness (ARI). This interim report used data from 4,112 children and adults enrolled in the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (U.S. Flu VE Network) during October 23, 2019-January 25, 2020. Overall, vaccine effectiveness (VE) against any influenza virus associated with medically attended ARI was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 36%-53%). VE was estimated to be 50% (95% CI = 39%-59%) against influenza B/Victoria viruses and 37% (95% CI = 19%-52%) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, indicating that vaccine has significantly reduced medical visits associated with influenza so far this season. Notably, vaccination provided substantial protection (VE = 55%; 95% CI = 42%-65%) among children and adolescents aged 6 months-17 years. Interim VE estimates are consistent with those from previous seasons, ranging from 40%-60% when influenza vaccines were antigenically matched to circulating viruses. CDC recommends that health care providers continue to administer influenza vaccine to persons aged >/=6 months because influenza activity is ongoing, and the vaccine can still prevent illness, hospitalization, and death associated with currently circulating influenza viruses as well as other influenza viruses that might circulate later in the season. |
HIV outbreak control with effective access to care and harm reduction in North Carolina, 2017-2018
Samoff E , Mobley V , Hudgins M , Cope AB , Adams ND , Caputo CR , Dennis AM , Billock RM , Crowley CA , Clymore JM , Foust E . Am J Public Health 2020 110 (3) e1-e7 Objectives. To assess and control a potential outbreak of HIV among people who inject drugs in Western North Carolina.Methods. Disease intervention specialists offered testing for hepatitis B and hepatitis C, harm reduction materials, and linkage to care to 7 linked people recently diagnosed with HIV who also injected drugs. Contacts were offered the same services and HIV testing. HIV genotype analysis was used to characterize HIV spread. We assessed testing and care outcomes by using state surveillance information.Results. Disease intervention specialists contacted 6 of 7 linked group members and received information on 177 contacts; among 96 prioritized contacts, 42 of 96 (44%) were exposed to or diagnosed with hepatitis C, 4 of 96 (4%) had hepatitis B, and 14 of 96 (15%) had HIV (2 newly diagnosed during the investigation). HIV genotype analysis suggested recent transmission to linked group members and 1 contact. Eleven of 14 with HIV were virally suppressed following the outbreak response.Conclusions. North Carolina identified and rapidly responded to an HIV outbreak among people reporting injecting drugs. Effective HIV care, the availability of syringe exchange services, and the rapid response likely contributed to controlling this outbreak. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print January 16, 2020: e1-e7. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305490). |
Interim estimates of 2018-19 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, February 2019
Doyle JD , Chung JR , Kim SS , Gaglani M , Raiyani C , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Monto AS , Martin ET , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Foust A , Sessions W , Berman L , Garten RJ , Barnes JR , Wentworth DE , Fry AM , Patel MM , Flannery B . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019 68 (6) 135-139 In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all persons aged >/=6 months (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/whoshouldvax.htm). Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine varies by season. During each influenza season since 2004-05, CDC has estimated the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with medically attended acute respiratory illness (ARI). This interim report uses data from 3,254 children and adults enrolled in the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (U.S. Flu VE Network) during November 23, 2018-February 2, 2019. During this period, overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness against all influenza virus infection associated with medically attended ARI was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 34%-57%). For children aged 6 months-17 years, overall vaccine effectiveness was 61% (44%-73%). Seventy-four percent of influenza A infections for which subtype information was available were caused by A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be 46% (30%-58%) against illness caused by influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. CDC recommends that health care providers continue to administer influenza vaccine because influenza activity is ongoing and the vaccine can still prevent illness, hospitalization, and death associated with currently circulating influenza viruses, or other influenza viruses that might circulate later in the season. During the 2017-18 influenza season, in which influenza A(H3N2) predominated, vaccination was estimated to prevent 7.1 million illnesses, 3.7 million medical visits, 109,000 hospitalizations, and 8,000 deaths (1). Vaccination can also reduce the severity of influenza-associated illness (2). Persons aged >/=6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season should be vaccinated. |
A Comparison of syphilis partner notification outcomes by reported use of internet-based apps to meet sex partners in North Carolina, 2013-2016
Mobley V , Cope A , Dzialowy N , Maxwell J , Foust E , Samoff E . Sex Transm Dis 2018 45 (12) 823-828 BACKGROUND: Partner notification services (PNS) remain the backbone of syphilis control. The popularity of internet-based apps to meet sex partners among early syphilis (ES) patients may hinder the success of PNS if partners cannot be located. METHODS: We compared demographic and clinical characteristics between male ES patients indicating sex with men (MSM) and reported in North Carolina between 2013 and 2016 by reported use of an internet-based app to meet sex partners (app user). We used multivariable log-binomial regression to assess the association between app usage and ES exposure notification of >/=1 sex partner. RESULTS: Among 3,414 MSM ES patients, 58.6% were app users. App users were more frequently white (33.2% vs. 27.3%; p=0.003), younger (median: 28 vs. 30 years; p=0.0002) and less frequently HIV co-infected (54.1% vs. 58.2%; p=0.02) compared to non-app users. Overall, 94.9% of app users and 89.6% of non-app users reported >/=1 sex partner. App users reported 2.5-times more locatable and 2.7-times more unlocatable sex partners than non-app users. Similar proportions of app (23.6%) and non-app users (25.0%) reported only unlocatable partners (p=0.4). App usage was not associated with ES exposure notification of >/=1 sex partner (adjusted risk ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.87-1.13). CONCLUSION: We observed no difference in the proportion of locatable partners or likelihood of notifying >/=1 sex partner of exposure among MSM ES patients, by reported use of internet-based apps to meet sex partners. PNS continues to be an important mechanism to locate and assure treatment for sex partners in this population. |
Interim estimates of 2017-18 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, February 2018
Flannery B , Chung JR , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Gaglani M , Murthy K , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Monto AS , Martin ET , Foust A , Sessions W , Berman L , Barnes JR , Spencer S , Fry AM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018 67 (6) 180-185 In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all persons aged >/=6 months (1). During each influenza season since 2004-05, CDC has estimated the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with medically attended acute respiratory illness (ARI). This report uses data from 4,562 children and adults enrolled in the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (U.S. Flu VE Network) during November 2, 2017-February 3, 2018. During this period, overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) against influenza A and influenza B virus infection associated with medically attended ARI was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 27%-44%). Most (69%) influenza infections were caused by A(H3N2) viruses. VE was estimated to be 25% (CI = 13% to 36%) against illness caused by influenza A(H3N2) virus, 67% (CI = 54%-76%) against A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, and 42% (CI = 25%-56%) against influenza B viruses. These early VE estimates underscore the need for ongoing influenza prevention and treatment measures. CDC continues to recommend influenza vaccination because the vaccine can still prevent some infections with currently circulating influenza viruses, which are expected to continue circulating for several weeks. Even with current vaccine effectiveness estimates, vaccination will still prevent influenza illness, including thousands of hospitalizations and deaths. Persons aged >/=6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season should be vaccinated. |
Interim estimates of 2016-17 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, February 2017
Flannery B , Chung JR , Thaker SN , Monto AS , Martin ET , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Gaglani M , Murthy K , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Foust A , Sessions W , Berman L , Spencer S , Fry AM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017 66 (6) 167-171 In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months. Each influenza season since 2004-05, CDC has estimated the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine to prevent influenza-associated, medically attended, acute respiratory illness (ARI). This report uses data, as of February 4, 2017, from 3,144 children and adults enrolled in the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (U.S. Flu VE Network) during November 28, 2016-February 4, 2017, to estimate an interim adjusted effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection associated with medically attended ARI. During this period, overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) (adjusted for study site, age group, sex, race/ethnicity, self-rated general health, and days from illness onset to enrollment) against influenza A and influenza B virus infection associated with medically attended ARI was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 37%-57%). Most influenza infections were caused by A (H3N2) viruses. VE was estimated to be 43% (CI = 29%-54%) against illness caused by influenza A (H3N2) virus and 73% (CI = 54%-84%) against influenza B virus. These interim VE estimates indicate that influenza vaccination reduced the risk for outpatient medical visits by almost half. Because influenza activity remains elevated (2), CDC and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommend that annual influenza vaccination efforts continue as long as influenza viruses are circulating. Vaccination with 2016-17 influenza vaccines will reduce the number of infections with most currently circulating influenza viruses. Persons aged ≥6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season should be vaccinated as soon as possible. |
Enhanced genetic characterization of influenza A(H3N2) viruses and vaccine effectiveness by genetic group, 2014-2015.
Flannery B , Zimmerman RK , Gubareva LV , Garten RJ , Chung JR , Nowalk MP , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Monto AS , Ohmit SE , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Gaglani M , Piedra PA , Mishin VP , Chesnokov AP , Spencer S , Thaker SN , Barnes JR , Foust A , Sessions W , Xu X , Katz J , Fry AM . J Infect Dis 2016 214 (7) 1010-9 BACKGROUND: During the 2014-15 US influenza season, expanded genetic characterization of circulating influenza A(H3N2) viruses was used to assess the impact of genetic variability of influenza A(H3N2) viruses on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE). METHODS: A novel pyrosequencing assay was used to determine genetic group based on hemagglutinin (HA) gene sequences of influenza A(H3N2) viruses from patients enrolled US Flu Vaccine Effectiveness network sites. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using a test-negative design comparing vaccination among patients infected with influenza A(H3N2) viruses and uninfected patients. RESULTS: Among 9710 enrollees, 1868 (19%) tested positive for influenza A(H3N2); genetic characterization of 1397 viruses showed 1134 (81%) belonged to one HA genetic group (3C.2a) of antigenically drifted H3N2 viruses. Effectiveness of 2014-15 influenza vaccination varied by A(H3N2) genetic group from 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], -14% to 14%) against illness caused by antigenically drifted A(H3N2) group 3C.2a viruses versus 44% (95% CI, 16% to 63%) against illness caused by vaccine-like A(H3N2) group 3C.3b viruses. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of 2014-15 influenza vaccination varied by genetic group of influenza A(H3N2) virus. Changes in hemagglutinin genes related to antigenic drift were associated with reduced vaccine effectiveness. |
Hepatitis C in North Carolina: Two epidemics with one public health response
Rhea S , Fleischauer A , Foust E , Davies M . N C Med J 2016 77 (3) 190-2 Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the most common blood-borne infection in the United States, is most | frequently transmitted through injection drug use [1]. | Although HCV infection can be acute and self-limiting, | approximately 75%–85% of infected persons will develop | chronic illness. Of the estimated 3.5 million persons in the | United States with chronic HCV infection, approximately | 75% were born during the period 1945–1965 (ie, baby | boomers) [1-3]. Chronic HCV infection has been referred | to as a silent epidemic. Approximately 50% of those | with chronic infection are unaware of their status and do | not receive recommended medical care and treatment, | increasing the possibility of progression to liver disease, | cirrhosis, liver cancer, and death [1, 2]. |
Screening yield of HIV antigen/antibody combination and pooled HIV RNA testing for acute HIV infection in a high-prevalence population
Peters PJ , Westheimer E , Cohen S , Hightow-Weidman LB , Moss N , Tsoi B , Hall L , Fann C , Daskalakis DC , Beagle S , Patel P , Radix A , Foust E , Kohn RP , Marmorino J , Pandori M , Fu J , Samandari T , Gay CL . JAMA 2016 315 (7) 682-90 IMPORTANCE: Although acute HIV infection contributes disproportionately to onward HIV transmission, HIV testing has not routinely included screening for acute HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of an HIV antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) combination assay to detect acute HIV infection compared with pooled HIV RNA testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multisite, prospective, within-individual comparison study conducted between September 2011 and October 2013 in 7 sexually transmitted infection clinics and 5 community-based programs in New York, California, and North Carolina. Participants were 12 years or older and seeking HIV testing, without known HIV infection. EXPOSURES: All participants with a negative rapid HIV test result were screened for acute HIV infection with an HIV Ag/Ab combination assay (index test) and pooled human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) RNA testing. HIV RNA testing was the reference standard, with positive reference standard result defined as detectable HIV-1 RNA on an individual RNA test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number and proportion with acute HIV infections detected. RESULTS: Among 86,836 participants with complete test results (median age, 29 years; 75.0% men; 51.8% men who have sex with men), established HIV infection was diagnosed in 1158 participants (1.33%) and acute HIV infection was diagnosed in 168 participants (0.19%). Acute HIV infection was detected in 134 participants with HIV Ag/Ab combination testing (0.15% [95% CI, 0.13%-0.18%]; sensitivity, 79.8% [95% CI, 72.9%-85.6%]; specificity, 99.9% [95% CI, 99.9%-99.9%]; positive predictive value, 59.0% [95% CI, 52.3%-65.5%]) and in 164 participants with pooled HIV RNA testing (0.19% [95% CI, 0.16%-0.22%]; sensitivity, 97.6% [95% CI, 94.0%-99.4%]; specificity, 100% [95% CI, 100%-100%]; positive predictive value, 96.5% [95% CI, 92.5%-98.7%]; sensitivity comparison, P < .001). Overall HIV Ag/Ab combination testing detected 82% of acute HIV infections detectable by pooled HIV RNA testing. Compared with rapid HIV testing alone, HIV Ag/Ab combination testing increased the relative HIV diagnostic yield (both established and acute HIV infections) by 10.4% (95% CI, 8.8%-12.2%) and pooled HIV RNA testing increased the relative HIV diagnostic yield by 12.4% (95% CI, 10.7%-14.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a high-prevalence population, HIV screening using an HIV Ag/Ab combination assay following a negative rapid test detected 82% of acute HIV infections detectable by pooled HIV RNA testing, with a positive predictive value of 59%. Further research is needed to evaluate this strategy in lower-prevalence populations and in persons using preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. |
Early estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, January 2015
Flannery B , Clippard J , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Monto AS , Petrie JG , McLean HQ , Belongia EA , Gaglani M , Berman L , Foust A , Sessions W , Thaker SN , Spencer S , Fry AM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015 64 (1) 10-15 In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months. Each season since 2004-05, CDC has estimated the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing medically attended acute respiratory illness (ARI) associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza. This season, early estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness are possible because of widespread, early circulation of influenza viruses. By January 3, 2015, 46 states were experiencing widespread flu activity, with predominance of influenza A (H3N2) viruses. This report presents an initial estimate of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness at preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection associated with medically attended ARI based on data from 2,321 children and adults enrolled in the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (Flu VE) during November 10, 2014-January 2, 2015. During this period, overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) (adjusted for study site, age, sex, race/ethnicity, self-rated health, and days from illness onset to enrollment) against laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with medically attended ARI was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%-36%). Most influenza infections were due to A (H3N2) viruses. This interim VE estimate is relatively low compared with previous seasons when circulating viruses and vaccine viruses were well-matched and likely reflects the fact that more than two-thirds of circulating A (H3N2) viruses are antigenically and genetically different (drifted) from the A (H3N2) vaccine component of 2014-15 Northern Hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccines. These early, low VE estimates underscore the need for ongoing influenza prevention and treatment measures. CDC continues to recommend influenza vaccination because the vaccine can still prevent some infections with the currently circulating A (H3N2) viruses as well as other viruses that might circulate later in the season, including influenza B viruses. Even when VE is reduced, vaccination still prevents some illness and serious influenza-related complications, including thousands of hospitalizations and deaths. Persons aged ≥6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season should be vaccinated, including persons who might already have been ill with influenza this season. |
Interim estimates of 2013-14 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States, February 2014
Flannery B , Thaker SN , Clippard J , Monto AS , Ohmit SE , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Gaglani M , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Berman L , Foust A , Sessions W , Spencer S , Fry AM . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014 63 (7) 137-42 In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months. Each season since 2004-05, CDC has estimated the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine to prevent influenza-associated, medically attended acute respiratory illness (ARI). This report uses data from 2,319 children and adults enrolled in the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (Flu VE) Network during December 2, 2013-January 23, 2014, to estimate an interim adjusted effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection associated with medically attended ARI. During this period, overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) (adjusted for study site, age, sex, race/ethnicity, self-rated health, and days from illness onset to enrollment) against influenza A and B virus infection associated with medically attended ARI was 61%. The influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 (pH1N1) virus that emerged to cause a pandemic in 2009 accounted for 98% of influenza viruses detected. VE was estimated to be 62% against pH1N1 virus infections and was similar across age groups. As of February 8, 2014, influenza activity remained elevated in the United States, the proportion of persons seeing their health-care provider for influenza-like illness was lower than in early January but remained above the national baseline, and activity still might be increasing in some parts of the country. CDC and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices routinely recommend that annual influenza vaccination efforts continue as long as influenza viruses are circulating. Persons aged ≥6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season should be vaccinated. Antiviral medications are an important second line of defense to treat influenza illness and should be used as recommended among suspected or confirmed influenza patients, regardless of patient vaccination status. Early antiviral treatment is recommended for persons with suspected influenza with severe or progressive illness (e.g., hospitalized persons) and those at high risk for complications from influenza, no matter how severe the illness. |
Receptor specificity of influenza A H3N2 viruses isolated in mammalian cells and embryonated chicken eggs
Stevens J , Chen LM , Carney PJ , Garten R , Foust A , Le J , Pokorny BA , Manojkumar R , Silverman J , Devis R , Rhea K , Xu X , Bucher DJ , Paulson J , Cox NJ , Klimov A , Donis RO . J Virol 2010 84 (16) 8287-99 Isolation of human subtype H3N2 influenza viruses in embryonated chicken eggs yields viruses with amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin (HA) that often affect binding to sialic acid receptors. We used a glycan array approach to analyze the repertoire of sialylated glycans recognized by viruses from the same clinical specimen isolated in eggs or cell cultures. The binding profiles of whole virions to 85 sialoglycans on the microarray allowed the categorization of cell isolates into 2 groups. Group 1 cell isolates displayed binding to a restricted set of alpha2-6 and alpha2-3 sialoglycans whereas Group 2 cell isolates revealed broader receptor specificity relative to their egg counterparts. Egg isolates from Group 1 showed similar binding specificity as cell isolates, whereas Group 2 egg isolates showed a significantly reduced binding to alpha2-6 and alpha2-3-type receptors but retained substantial binding to specific O- and N-linked alpha2-3 glycans, including alpha2-3GalNAc and fucosylated alpha2-3 glycans (including sialyl Lewis x), both of which may be important receptors for H3N2 virus replication in eggs. These results revealed an unexpected diversity in receptor binding specificities among recent H3N2 viruses; with distinct patterns of amino acid substitution in the HA upon isolation and/or propagation in eggs. These findings also suggest that clinical specimens containing viruses with Group 1-like receptor binding profiles would be less prone to undergoing receptor binding or antigenic changes upon isolation in eggs. Screening cell isolates for appropriate receptor binding properties might help focus efforts to isolate the most suitable viruses in eggs for production of antigenically well-matched influenza vaccines. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Dec 02, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure