Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality.1 EOS pathogenesis typically involves ascending infection of the fetal compartment by maternal colonizing gastrointestinal and genitourinary microbial flora or exposure during labor and delivery with subsequent neonatal colonization and infection.2 Signs of neonatal EOS can be difficult to distinguish from clinical instability associated with prematurity and from newborn physiologic transition to extrauterine life.3 EOS is defined by the isolation of pathogenic microbial species from blood or spinal fluid culture in the first 3 days after birth, although definitions vary and may extend to the first week after birth. Sensitivity of neonatal cultures is high, but concerns persist about maternal antibiotic exposures and small blood volumes affecting results.4 Limitations of EOS risk assessment and diagnosis, in addition to substantial infection-attributable morbidity and mortality, have led to high rates of antibiotic use among newborns.5,6 | Several advancements have been made over the last decades in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of neonatal EOS.7 Prevention efforts have focused on detecting maternal vaginal-rectal colonization with group B Streptococcus (GBS) and administering intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). Targeted prevention strategies do not exist for other organisms, such as Escherichia coli. Automated culture technology has improved diagnostic yield, though limitations remain for the newborn population. Treatment primarily consists of antimicrobials and supportive (often intensive) care. Increases in drug-resistant infections have led to debate about the risks and benefits of broad versus narrow empiric antibiotic regimens for suspected EOS. | Here, we review the contemporary epidemiology and microbiology of neonatal EOS in the United States and highlight differences between term and preterm newborns and across international settings. We explore 4 current controversies in neonatal EOS: (1) the pros and cons of IAP, (2) options for the current plateau in EOS prevention, (3) optimal empiric treatment regimen, and (4) ongoing disparities in EOS.

OBJECTIVE: To assess COVID-19 association with newborn critical care outcomes, including nursery level of care and ventilation, during three time periods: Pre-delta (May 2020-June 2021), Delta (July-November 2021), and Omicron (December 2021-February 2022). STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort of newborns born May 2020-February 2022 using the Premier Healthcare Database, we classified COVID-19 status and critical care using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes, laboratory data, and billing records and assessed for variation during three time periods. RESULTS: Of 1,388,712 newborns, 0.06% had COVID-19 during the birth hospitalization (Pre-delta period: 0.03%; Delta: 0.07%; Omicron: 0.21%). Among newborns with COVID-19, the risks for admission to a higher-level nursery and for invasive or non-invasive ventilation were lower in the Omicron period compared to Pre-delta and Delta periods. CONCLUSION: From May 2020-February 2022, COVID-19 in newborns was rare and cases were less severe during the period of Omicron predominance.

OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics National Registry for the Surveillance and Epidemiology of Perinatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (NPC-19) was developed to provide information on the effects of perinatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: National Registry for the Surveillance and Epidemiology of Perinatal COVID-19 participating centers entered maternal and newborn data for pregnant persons who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection between 14 days before and 10 days after delivery. Incidence of and morbidities associated with maternal and newborn SARS-CoV-2 infection were assessed. RESULTS: From April 6, 2020 to March 19, 2021, 242 centers in the United States centers reported data for 7524 pregnant persons; at the time of delivery, 78.1% of these persons were asymptomatic, 18.2% were symptomatic but not hospitalized specifically for COVID-19, 3.4% were hospitalized for COVID-19 treatment, and 18 (0.2%) died in the hospital of COVID-related complications. Among 7648 newborns, 6486 (84.8%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2, and 144 (2.2%) were positive; the highest rate of newborn infection was observed when mothers first tested positive in the immediate postpartum period (17 of 125, 13.6%). No newborn deaths were attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, 15.6% of newborns were preterm: among tested newborns, 30.1% of polymerase chain reaction-positive and 16.2% of polymerase chain reaction-negative were born preterm (P < .001). Need for mechanical ventilation did not differ by newborn SARS-CoV-2 test result, but those with positive tests were more likely to be admitted to a NICU. CONCLUSIONS: Early in the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infection was acquired by newborns at variable rates and without apparent short-term effects. During a period that preceded widespread availability of vaccines, we observed higher than expected numbers of preterm births and maternal in-hospital deaths.

OBJECTIVE: Describe 1-month outcomes among newborns of persons with perinatal COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study of pregnant persons who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 14 days before and 3 days after delivery and their newborns, from 3/2020 to 3/2021 at two urban high-risk academic hospitals. Phone interviews were conducted to determine 1-month newborn outcomes. RESULTS: Among 9748 pregnant persons, 209 (2.1%) tested positive for perinatal SARS-CoV-2. Symptomatically infected persons were more likely to have a preterm delivery due to worsening maternal condition and their newborns were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared with asymptomatic persons. Six of 191 (3.1%) infants tested were positive for SARS-CoV-2; none had attributable illness before discharge. Of 169 eligible families, 132 (78.1%) participated in post-discharge interviews; none reported their newborn tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by 1 month of age. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic perinatal COVID-19 had a substantial effect on maternal health but no apparent short-term effect on newborns.

BACKGROUND: The microbiologic etiologies, clinical manifestations, and antimicrobial treatment of neonatal infections differ substantially from infections in adult and pediatric patient populations. In 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed neonatal-specific (Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratios SAARs), a set of risk-adjusted antimicrobial use metrics that hospitals participating in the National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN's) antimicrobial use surveillance can use in their antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in collaboration with the Vermont Oxford Network, identified eligible patient care locations, defined SAAR agent categories, and implemented neonatal-specific NHSN Annual Hospital Survey questions to gather hospital-level data necessary for risk adjustment. SAAR predictive models were developed using 2018 data reported to NHSN from eligible neonatal units. RESULTS: The 2018 baseline neonatal SAAR models were developed for 7 SAAR antimicrobial agent categories using data reported from 324 neonatal units in 304 unique hospitals. Final models were used to calculate predicted antimicrobial days, the SAAR denominator, for level II neonatal special care nurseries and level II/III, III, and IV NICUs. CONCLUSIONS: NHSN's initial set of neonatal SAARs provides a way for hospital ASPs to assess whether antimicrobial agents in their facility are used at significantly higher or lower rates compared with a national baseline or whether an individual SAAR value is above or below a specific percentile on a given SAAR distribution, which can prompt investigations into prescribing practices and inform ASP interventions.