Last data update: Jan 27, 2025. (Total: 48650 publications since 2009)
Records 1-4 (of 4 Records) |
Query Trace: Favaloro J[original query] |
---|
SARS-CoV-2 serologic surveillance among people living with HIV in Nigeria, April 2022-January 2023
Chun HM , Osawe S , Adams-Dabban S , Favaloro J , Iriemenam NC , Dirlikov E , Martin D , Milligan K , Abutu A , Okunoye O , Okoli M , Akanbi O , Akinmulero O , Okonkwo R , Oyedele O , Greby S , Abimiku A , Okoye MIJ , Shiraishi RW . Int J Infect Dis 2024 151 107309 OBJECTIVES: Evidence indicates that people living with HIV (PLHIV) are more impacted by COVID-19. The burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection among PLHIV is unknown in Nigeria. METHODS: We conducted repeated cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 serosurveys in 14 states and the Federal Capital Territory in Nigeria among PLHIV who had an HIV viral load (VL) test during April 2022 to January 2023. Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies was assessed using a multiplex bead assay to measure IgG to spike (S), receptor binding domain (RBD), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins to identify potential infection and/or vaccination status. RESULTS: Between April 2022 and January 2023, 47,614 remnant VL samples were included and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as IgG antibodies to spike and RBD591 [S+] and nucleocapsid [N+], (S+N+), ranged between 21.1% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 11.4-31.8) in Ekiti State in January 2023 to 71.4% (95% CI 71.9-81.9) in Gombe State in November 2022, with overall steady trends within and between states over time, across age and sex. CONCLUSION: High rates of SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence among PLHIV in Nigeria were observed. This underscores the need to understand the association between HIV and SARS-CoV-2 to inform strategies to reduce the threat posed by COVID-19. |
Risk factors for recent HIV infections among adults in 14 countries in Africa identified by population-based HIV impact assessment surveys, 2015-2019
Currie DW , West CA , Patel HK , Favaloro J , Asiimwe F , Ndagije F , Silver R , Mugurungi O , Shang J , Ndongmo CB , Williams DB , Dzinotyiweyi E , Waruru A , Pasipamire M , Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha H , Dlamini S , McLeod N , Kayirangwa E , Rwibasira G , Minchella PA , Auld AF , Nyirenda R , Getaneh Y , Hailemariam AH , Tondoh-Koui I , Kohemun N , Mgomella GS , Njau PF , Kirungi WL , Dalhatu I , Stafford KA , Bodika SM , Ussery F , McCracken S , Stupp P , Brown K , Duong YT , Parekh BS , Voetsch AC . Emerg Infect Dis 2023 29 (11) 2325-2334 Identifying persons who have newly acquired HIV infections is critical for characterizing the HIV epidemic direction. We analyzed pooled data from nationally representative Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys conducted across 14 countries in Africa for recent infection risk factors. We included adults 15-49 years of age who had sex during the previous year and used a recent infection testing algorithm to distinguish recent from long-term infections. We collected risk factor information via participant interviews and assessed correlates of recent infection using multinomial logistic regression, incorporating each survey's complex sampling design. Compared with HIV-negative persons, persons with higher odds of recent HIV infection were women, were divorced/separated/widowed, had multiple recent sex partners, had a recent HIV-positive sex partner or one with unknown status, and lived in communities with higher HIV viremia prevalence. Prevention programs focusing on persons at higher risk for HIV and their sexual partners will contribute to reducing HIV incidence. |
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in six districts in Zambia in July, 2020: a cross-sectional cluster sample survey.
Mulenga LB , Hines JZ , Fwoloshi S , Chirwa L , Siwingwa M , Yingst S , Wolkon A , Barradas DT , Favaloro J , Zulu JE , Banda D , Nikoi KI , Kampamba D , Banda N , Chilopa B , Hanunka B , Stevens TL Jr , Shibemba A , Mwale C , Sivile S , Zyambo KD , Makupe A , Kapina M , Mweemba A , Sinyange N , Kapata N , Zulu PM , Chanda D , Mupeta F , Chilufya C , Mukonka V , Agolory S , Malama K . Lancet Glob Health 2021 9 (6) e773-e781 BACKGROUND: Between March and December, 2020, more than 20 000 laboratory-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported in Zambia. However, the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections is likely to be higher than the confirmed case counts because many infected people have mild or no symptoms, and limitations exist with regard to testing capacity and surveillance systems in Zambia. We aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in six districts of Zambia in July, 2020, using a population-based household survey. METHODS: Between July 4 and July 27, 2020, we did a cross-sectional cluster-sample survey of households in six districts of Zambia. Within each district, 16 standardised enumeration areas were randomly selected as primary sampling units using probability proportional to size. 20 households from each standardised enumeration area were selected using simple random sampling. All members of selected households were eligible to participate. Consenting participants completed a questionnaire and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection using real-time PCR (rtPCR) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using ELISA. Prevalence estimates, adjusted for the survey design, were calculated for each diagnostic test separately, and combined. We applied the prevalence estimates to census population projections for each district to derive the estimated number of SARS-CoV-2 infections. FINDINGS: Overall, 4258 people from 1866 households participated in the study. The median age of participants was 18·2 years (IQR 7·7-31·4) and 50·6% of participants were female. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence for the combined measure was 10·6% (95% CI 7·3-13·9). The rtPCR-positive prevalence was 7·6% (4·7-10·6) and ELISA-positive prevalence was 2·1% (1·1-3·1). An estimated 454 708 SARS-CoV-2 infections (95% CI 312 705-596 713) occurred in the six districts between March and July, 2020, compared with 4917 laboratory-confirmed cases reported in official statistics from the Zambia National Public Health Institute. INTERPRETATION: The estimated number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was much higher than the number of reported cases in six districts in Zambia. The high rtPCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was consistent with observed community transmission during the study period. The low ELISA-positive SARS-CoV-2 prevalence might be associated with mitigation measures instituted after initial cases were reported in March, 2020. Zambia should monitor patterns of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and promote measures that can reduce transmission. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. |
Using mobile phone data collection tool, surveda, for noncommunicable disease surveillance in five low- and middle-income countries
Song Y , Phadnis R , Favaloro J , Lee J , Lau CQ , Moreira M , Marks L , Isaía MG , Kim J , Lea V . Online J Public Health Inform 2020 12 (2) e13 OBJECTIVES: The Noncommunicable Disease (NCD) Mobile Phone Survey, a component of the Bloomberg Philanthropies Data for Health Initiative, determines the prevalence of NCDs and their associated risk factors and demonstrates the use of mobile phone administered surveys to supplement periodic national household surveys. The NCD Mobile Phone Survey uses Surveda to administer the survey; Surveda is an open-source, multi-modal software specifically developed for the project. The objective of the paper is to describe Surveda, review data collection methods used in participating countries and discuss how Surveda and similar approaches can improve public health surveillance. METHODS: Surveda features full-service survey design and implementation through a web application and collects data via Short Messaging Service (SMS), Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and/or mobile web. Surveda's survey design process employs five steps: creating a project, creating questionnaires, designing and starting a survey, monitoring survey progress, and exporting survey results. RESULTS: The NCD Mobile Phone Survey has been successfully conducted in five countries, Zambia (2017), Philippines (2018), Morocco (2019), Malawi (2019), and Sri Lanka (2019), with a total of 23,682 interviews completed. DISCUSSION: This approach to data collection demonstrates that mobile phone surveys can supplement face-to-face data collection methods. Furthermore, Surveda offers major advantages including automated mode-switch, question randomization and comparison features. CONCLUSION: Accurate and timely survey data informs a country's abilities to make targeted policy decisions while prioritizing limited resources. The high acceptance of Surveda demonstrates that the use of mobile phones for surveillance can deliver accurate and timely data collection. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Jan 27, 2025
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure