BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend tailored reproductive health counseling for women with congenital heart defects (CHDs) beginning in adolescence, yet provider adherence to recommendations remains understudied, particularly outside specialized cardiac care settings. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study among women aged 19 to 38 with CHDs, identified from active population-based birth defects registries in three states. Participants completed surveys from 2016 to 2019, including questions about contraception, pregnancy counseling, concerns, and experiences. Multivariable Poisson regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and health characteristics, assessed associations between CHD severity, counseling, and reproductive health outcomes. RESULTS: Of 765 women, those with severe CHDs, compared with non-severe, were more likely to report receiving clinician counseling about safe contraceptive methods (44.0% and 13.7%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [2.2, 4.0]), pregnancy, (63.3% and 16.5%; aPR = 3.6; 95% CI [2.7, 4.6]), and pregnancy avoidance (32.0% and 6.4%; aPR = 4.3; 95% CI [2.9, 6.6]); be concerned about ability to have children (40.9% and 31.2%; aPR = 1.4; 95% CI [1.1, 1.8]), and delay/avoid pregnancy (26.6% and 10.7%; aPR = 2.2; 95% CI [1.5, 3.2]). No disparity was found in ever being pregnant (30.0% vs. 37.2%; aPR = 1.0; 95% CI [0.7, 1.2]). One-third of the respondents with any CHD reported concerns about their ability to have children (33.6%). CONCLUSION: We found that only a minority of women with CHDs reported receiving counseling on safe contraception and pregnancy, and about a third reported concerns about their ability to have children. These findings highlight a gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, underscoring the need for improved reproductive health discussions for women with CHDs.

Background: Guidelines recommend tailored reproductive health counseling for women with congenital heart defects (CHDs) beginning in adolescence, yet provider adherence to recommendations remains understudied, particularly outside specialized cardiac care settings. Study Design: We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study among women aged 19 to 38 with CHDs, identified from active population-based birth defects registries in three states. Participants completed surveys from 2016 to 2019, including questions about contraception, pregnancy counseling, concerns, and experiences. Multivariable Poisson regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and health characteristics, assessed associations between CHD severity, counseling, and reproductive health outcomes. Results: Of 765 women, those with severe CHDs, compared with non-severe, were more likely to report receiving clinician counseling about safe contraceptive methods (44.0% and 13.7%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [2.2, 4.0]), pregnancy, (63.3% and 16.5%; aPR = 3.6; 95% CI [2.7, 4.6]), and pregnancy avoidance (32.0% and 6.4%; aPR = 4.3; 95% CI [2.9, 6.6]); be concerned about ability to have children (40.9% and 31.2%; aPR = 1.4; 95% CI [1.1, 1.8]), and delay/avoid pregnancy (26.6% and 10.7%; aPR = 2.2; 95% CI [1.5, 3.2]). No disparity was found in ever being pregnant (30.0% vs. 37.2%; aPR = 1.0; 95% CI [0.7, 1.2]). One-third of the respondents with any CHD reported concerns about their ability to have children (33.6%). Conclusion: We found that only a minority of women with CHDs reported receiving counseling on safe contraception and pregnancy, and about a third reported concerns about their ability to have children. These findings highlight a gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, underscoring the need for improved reproductive health discussions for women with CHDs. © 2025 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, George Washington University

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to characterize the education and employment history of young adults with congenital heart defects (CHD) living in the United States. METHODS: The 2016-2019 Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG collected data from young adults (ages 19-38) with CHD identified from active birth defect in Arkansas, Arizona, and Atlanta, Georgia. Educational attainment, employment history, and special education between kindergarten and 12th grade were self-/proxy-reported. Respondent percentages were standardized to the eligible population by CHD severity, birth year, site, sex, and maternal race/ethnicity and compared by CHD severity using p values from Z-scores. Log-binomial prevalence ratios (aPRs) assessed associations between respondent characteristics and outcomes, adjusting for CHD severity, age group, sex, race/ethnicity, and site. Employment models also adjusted for education. Point estimates were compared to the 2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year general population estimates. RESULTS: Among 1438 respondents, 28.3% attained ≥ bachelor's degree and 22.1% were unemployed for ≥ 12 months. Estimates were comparable by CHD severity (aPRs ~1.0) and similar to general population estimates (in ACS, 21% attained ≥ bachelor's degree and 26% were unemployed). About 25.3% of adults with CHD received special education, more commonly adults with severe (32.9%) than nonsevere CHD (23.5%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among young adults with CHD, educational attainment and employment did not substantially differ by CHD severity or from general population rates. One in four used special education between kindergarten and 12th grade. Clinical guidelines recommend ongoing educational and vocational support to individuals with CHD as needed so this population continues to thrive.

BACKGROUND: Almost half of individuals born with Down syndrome (DS) have congenital heart defects (CHDs). Yet, little is known about the health and healthcare needs of adults with CHDs and DS. Therefore, we examined comorbidities and healthcare utilization of this population. METHODS: Data were from the 2016-2019 Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG), a survey of 19-38-year-olds with CHDs identified through birth defects registries in Arkansas, Arizona, and Atlanta. Outcome estimates were standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population. Multivariable Poisson regression generated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between DS and each outcome, adjusting for covariates, including CHD severity. RESULTS: Among 1500 respondents, 9.1% had DS. Compared to those without DS, respondents with DS were more commonly male (55.5% vs. 45.0%), < 25 years old (51.8% vs. 42.7%), non-Hispanic White (72.3% vs. 69.3%), and publicly insured (77.4% vs. 22.8%; all p < 0.05). Of adults with CHDs and DS, 5.5% had cardiac comorbidities, 19.3% had emergency room (ER) visits, 6.2% had hospital admissions, and 1.2% had cost-related delays in care in the last year; 0.1 to 0.6 times lower than adults with CHDs without DS. Additionally, 26.7% had non-cardiac comorbidities (aPR = 1.25 [0.92-1.72]), most commonly sleep apnea (13.7% vs. 3.2%, aPR = 3.67 [2.02-6.67]). Receipt of cardiology care in the last 2 years was similarly low (52.7% vs. 44.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CHDs and DS comprise a substantial percentage of adults with CHDs and have unique health and healthcare needs. Half of adults with CHDs and DS are not receiving recommended routine cardiac care.

Public space initiatives (PSIs) in African cities can significantly promote health and social well-being, yet their implementation and impact are unknown across the continent. There is a substantial gap in literature on PSIs in African countries, with most studies concentrated in wealthier cities and lacking comprehensive assessments of long-term health impacts. The objective of this study was to synthesise evidence on the typology, location, features, and outcomes of these initiatives as well as the guiding principles that underlie their design and implementation. Employing a mixed-methods model, the study systematically reviews peer-reviewed and grey literature articles, focusing on the types, settings, and outcomes of PSIs. Data is analyzed using the CASP appraisal tool and thematic analysis. We analysed 47 studies, 15 of which were mixed methods, 22 qualitative and 10 quantitative. Sports accounted for 50% of initiatives. 30 of the 47 papers originated from South Africa. Communities viewed initiatives' wellbeing impacts through social, economic, and ecological lenses, with health being but one dimension. The sustainability of initiatives was often limited by funding, historical marginalization, and competing land uses. Findings underscore the need for more comprehensive, long-term evaluations and cross-sector collaborations to sustain and enhance health-promoting public spaces in African cities.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that develops during childhood and can last into adulthood. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics Rapid Surveys System collected during October-November 2023 were used to estimate the prevalence of ADHD diagnosis and treatment among U.S. adults. In 2023, an estimated 15.5 million U.S. adults (6.0%) had a current ADHD diagnosis based on self-report; approximately one half received the diagnosis at age ≥18 years. Approximately one third of adults with ADHD took a stimulant medication to treat their ADHD in the previous year, 71.5% of whom had difficulty getting their ADHD prescription filled because it was unavailable. Approximately one half of adults with ADHD have ever used telehealth for ADHD-related services. Telehealth might have benefits for persons with ADHD, including helping them access behavioral treatment or medication prescriptions for ADHD. This report provides national estimates of the prevalence and treatment of ADHD among U.S. adults to help guide clinical care and regulatory decision-making for ADHD among U.S. adults.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment and survival, individuals with congenital heart defects (CHD) have a higher risk of heart failure (HF) compared to the general population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate comorbidities associated with HF in patients with CHD with a goal of identifying potentially modifiable risk factors that may reduce HF-associated morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Five surveillance sites in the United States linked population-based healthcare data and vital records. Individuals with an ICD-9-CM code for CHD aged 11-64 years were included and were stratified by presence of HF diagnosis code. Prevalence of death and cardiovascular risk factors based on diagnosis codes were compared by HF status using log-linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 25,343 individuals met inclusion/exclusion criteria. HF was documented for 2.2% of adolescents and 12.9% of adults with CHD. Adolescents and adults with HF had a higher mortality than those without HF. In both age groups, HF was positively associated with coronary artery disease, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and increased healthcare utilization compared to those without HF. CONCLUSIONS: Within this population-based cohort, over 1 in 50 adolescents and 1 in 8 adults with CHD had HF, which was associated with increased mortality. Modifiable cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with HF. IMPACT: Five sites in the United States linked population-based healthcare data and vital records to establish surveillance network for identifying the factors which influence congenital heart disease (CHD) outcomes. Survivors of CHD frequently develop heart failure across the lifespan. Over 1 in 50 adolescent and 1 in 8 adult survivors of CHD have heart failure which is associated with increased mortality compared to CHD survivors without heart failure. Heart failure development is associated with potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes. Controlling modifiable cardiovascular risk factors may serve to lower the risk of heart failure and mortality in survivors of congenital heart disease of all ages.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic factors may lead to a disproportionate impact on health care usage and death among individuals with congenital heart defects (CHD) by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors. How neighborhood poverty affects racial and ethnic disparities in health care usage and death among individuals with CHD across the life span is not well described. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individuals aged 1 to 64 years, with at least 1 CHD-related International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code were identified from health care encounters between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, from 4 US sites. Residence was classified into lower- or higher-poverty neighborhoods on the basis of zip code tabulation area from the 2014 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for site, sex, CHD anatomic severity, and insurance-evaluated associations between race and ethnicity, and health care usage and death, stratified by neighborhood poverty. Of 31 542 individuals, 22.2% were non-Hispanic Black and 17.0% Hispanic. In high-poverty neighborhoods, non-Hispanic Black (44.4%) and Hispanic (47.7%) individuals, respectively, were more likely to be hospitalized (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.3]; and aOR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.5]) and have emergency department visits (aOR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.5] and aOR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.0]) compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. In high poverty neighborhoods, non-Hispanic Black individuals with CHD had 1.7 times the odds of death compared with non-Hispanic White individuals in high-poverty neighborhoods (95% CI, 1.1-2.7). Racial and ethnic disparities in health care usage were similar in low-poverty neighborhoods, but disparities in death were attenuated (aOR for non-Hispanic Black, 1.2 [95% CI=0.9-1.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic disparities in health care usage were found among individuals with CHD in low- and high-poverty neighborhoods, but mortality disparities were larger in high-poverty neighborhoods. Understanding individual- and community-level social determinants of health, including access to health care, may help address racial and ethnic inequities in health care usage and death among individuals with CHD.

Children with chronic illnesses report being bullied by peers, yet little is known about bullying among children with heart conditions. Using 2018-2020 National Survey of Children's Health data, the prevalence and frequency of being bullied in the past year (never; annually or monthly; weekly or daily) were compared between children aged 6-17 years with and without heart conditions. Among children with heart conditions, associations between demographic and health characteristics and being bullied, and prevalence of diagnosed anxiety or depression by bullying status were examined. Differences were assessed with chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression using predicted marginals to produce adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Weights yielded national estimates. Of 69,428 children, 2.2% had heart conditions. Children with heart conditions, compared to those without, were more likely to be bullied (56.3% and 43.3% respectively; adjusted prevalence ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.3 [1.2, 1.4]) and bullied more frequently (weekly or daily = 11.2% and 5.3%; p < 0.001). Among children with heart conditions, characteristics associated with greater odds of weekly or daily bullying included ages 9-11 years compared to 15-17 years (3.4 [2.0, 5.7]), other genetic or inherited condition (1.7 [1.0, 3.0]), ever overweight (1.7 [1.0, 2.8]), and a functional limitation (4.8 [2.7, 8.5]). Children with heart conditions who were bullied, compared to never, more commonly had anxiety (40.1%, 25.9%, and 12.8%, respectively) and depression (18.0%, 9.3%, and 4.7%; p < 0.01 for both). Findings highlight the social and psychological needs of children with heart conditions.

INTRODUCTION: International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes recorded in administrative data are often used to identify congenital heart defects (CHD). However, these codes may inaccurately identify true positive (TP) CHD individuals. CHD surveillance could be strengthened by accurate CHD identification in administrative records using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS: To identify features relevant to accurate CHD identification, traditional ML models were applied to a validated dataset of 779 patients; encounter level data, including ICD-9-CM and CPT codes, from 2011 to 2013 at four US sites were utilized. Five-fold cross-validation determined overlapping important features that best predicted TP CHD individuals. Median values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of area under the receiver operating curve, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score were compared across four ML models: Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). RESULTS: Baseline PPV was 76.5% from expert clinician validation of ICD-9-CM CHD-related codes. Feature selection for ML decreased 7138 features to 10 that best predicted TP CHD cases. During training and testing, XGBoost performed the best in median accuracy (F1-score) and PPV, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.91) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.96), respectively. When applied to the entire dataset, XGBoost revealed a median PPV of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Applying ML algorithms improved the accuracy of identifying TP CHD cases in comparison to ICD codes alone. Use of this technique to identify CHD cases would improve generalizability of results obtained from large datasets to the CHD patient population, enhancing public health surveillance efforts.

BACKGROUND: Research on the association between neighborhood social deprivation and health among adults with congenital heart defects (CHD) is sparse. METHODS: We evaluated the associations between neighborhood social deprivation and health care utilization, disability, and comorbidities using the population-based 2016-2019 Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG) of young adults. Participants were identified from active birth defect surveillance systems in three U.S. sites and born with CHD between 1980 and 1997. We linked census tract-level 2017 American Community Survey information on median household income, percent of ≥25-year-old with greater than a high school degree, percent of ≥16-year-olds who are unemployed, and percent of families with children <18 years old living in poverty to survey data and used these variables to calculate a summary neighborhood social deprivation z-score, divided into tertiles. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) derived from a log-linear regression model with a Poisson distribution estimated the association between tertile of neighborhood social deprivation and healthcare utilization in previous year (no encounters, 1 and ≥2 emergency room [ER] visits, and hospital admission), ≥1 disability, and ≥1 comorbidities. We accounted for age, place of birth, sex at birth, presence of chromosomal anomalies, and CHD severity in all models, and, additionally educational attainment and work status in all models except disability. RESULTS: Of the 1435 adults with CHD, 43.8% were 19-24 years old, 54.4% were female, 69.8% were non-Hispanic White, and 33.7% had a severe CHD. Compared to the least deprived tertile, respondents in the most deprived tertile were more likely to have no healthcare visit (aPR: 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.1]), ≥2 ER visits (1.6 [1.1, 2.3]), or hospitalization (1.6 [1.1, 2.3]) in the previous 12 months, a disability (1.2 [1.0, 1.5]), and ≥1 cardiac comorbidities (1.8 [1.2, 2.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood social deprivation may be a useful metric to identify patients needing additional resources and referrals.

Background Administrative data permit analysis of large cohorts but rely on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes that may not reflect true congenital heart defects (CHDs). Methods and Results CHDs in 1497 cases with at least 1 encounter between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 in 2 health care systems, identified by at least 1 of 87 ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM CHD codes were validated through medical record review for the presence of CHD and CHD native anatomy. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability averaged >95%. Positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM codes for CHD was 68.1% (1020/1497) overall, 94.6% (123/130) for cases identified in both health care systems, 95.8% (249/260) for severe codes, 52.6% (370/703) for shunt codes, 75.9% (243/320) for valve codes, 73.5% (119/162) for shunt and valve codes, and 75.0% (39/52) for "other CHD" (7 ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM codes). PPV for cases with >1 unique CHD code was 85.4% (503/589) versus 56.3% (498/884) for 1 CHD code. Of cases with secundum atrial septal defect ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM codes 745.5/Q21.1 in isolation, PPV was 30.9% (123/398). Patent foramen ovale was present in 66.2% (316/477) of false positives. True positives had younger mean age at first encounter with a CHD code than false positives (22.4 versus 26.3 years; P=0.0017). Conclusions CHD ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM codes have modest PPV and may not represent true CHD cases. PPV was improved by selecting certain features, but most true cases did not have these characteristics. The development of algorithms to improve accuracy may improve accuracy of electronic health records for CHD surveillance.

Background: Administrative data permits analysis of large cohorts but relies on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD) codes that may not reflect true congenital heart defects (CHD). Method(s): 1497 cases with at least one encounter between 1/1/2010 - 12/31/2019 in two healthcare systems (one adult, one pediatric) identified by at least one of 87 ICD CHD codes were validated through chart review for the presence of CHD and CHD anatomic group. Result(s): Inter- and intra-observer reliability averaged > 95%. Positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD codes for CHD was 68.1% (1020/1497) overall, 94.6% (123/130) for cases identified in both healthcare systems, 95.8% (249/260) for severe codes, 52.6% (370/703) for shunt codes, 75.9% (243/320) for valve codes, 73.5% (119/162) for shunt and valve codes, and 75.0% (39/52) for "Other CHD" (7 ICD codes). PPV for cases with >1 unique CHD code was 85.4% (503/589) vs. 56.3% (498/884) for one CHD code. Of cases with secundum atrial septal defect ICD codes 745.5/Q21.1 in isolation, 30.9% (123/398) had a confirmed CHD. Patent foramen ovale was present in 66.2% (316/477) of false positives (FP). The median number of unique CHD-coded encounters was higher for true positives (TP) than FP (2.0; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-3.0 vs 1.0; IQR:1.0-1.0, respectively, p<0.0001). TP had younger mean age at first encounter with a CHD code than FP (22.4 years vs 26.3 years, p=0.0017). Conclusion(s): PPV of CHD ICD codes varies by characteristics for detection of CHD by ICD code and anatomic grouping. While an ICD code for severe CHD and/or the presence of a case in more than one data source, regardless of anatomic group, is associated with higher PPV for CHD, most TP cases did not have these characteristics. The development of algorithms to improve accuracy may improve administrative data for CHD surveillance. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license.

Cognitive disability is the most prevalent disability type among young adults with congenital heart defects (CHD), reported by more than a quarter of young adults with CHD in CH STRONG (Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG).1 However, the long-term outcomes of adults with CHD and cognitive disabilities are not well understood. Therefore, we compared the socioeconomic and healthcare outcomes among adults (aged 19 to 38 years) with CHD with and without cognitive disabilities in CH STRONG and described the socioeconomic characteristics associated with the receipt of disability benefits among adults with CHD and cognitive disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Limited population-based information is available on long-term survival of US individuals with congenital heart defects (CHDs). Therefore, we assessed patterns in survival from birth until young adulthood (ie, 35 years of age) and associated factors among a population-based sample of US individuals with CHDs. METHODS: Individuals born between 1980 and 1997 with CHDs identified in 3 US birth defect surveillance systems were linked to death records through 2015 to identify those deceased and the year of their death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for infant mortality (ie, death during the first year of life), and Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival after the first year of life (aHRs) were used to estimate the probability of survival and associated factors. Standardized mortality ratios compared infant mortality, >1-year mortality, >10-year mortality, and >20-year mortality among individuals with CHDs with general population estimates. RESULTS: Among 11 695 individuals with CHDs, the probability of survival to 35 years of age was 81.4% overall, 86.5% among those without co-occurring noncardiac anomalies, and 92.8% among those who survived the first year of life. Characteristics associated with both infant mortality and reduced survival after the first year of life, respectively, included severe CHDs (aRR=4.08; aHR=3.18), genetic syndromes (aRR=1.83; aHR=3.06) or other noncardiac anomalies (aRR=1.54; aHR=2.53), low birth weight (aRR=1.70; aHR=1.29), and Hispanic (aRR=1.27; aHR=1.42) or non-Hispanic Black (aRR=1.43; aHR=1.80) maternal race and ethnicity. Individuals with CHDs had higher infant mortality (standardized mortality ratio=10.17), >1-year mortality (standardized mortality ratio=3.29), and >10-year and >20-year mortality (both standardized mortality ratios ≈1.5) than the general population; however, after excluding those with noncardiac anomalies, >1-year mortality for those with nonsevere CHDs and >10-year and >20-year mortality for those with any CHD were similar to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Eight in 10 individuals with CHDs born between1980 and 1997 survived to 35 years of age, with disparities by CHD severity, noncardiac anomalies, birth weight, and maternal race and ethnicity. Among individuals without noncardiac anomalies, those with nonsevere CHDs experienced mortality between 1 and 35 years of age, similar to the general population, and those with any CHD experienced mortality between 10 and 35 years of age, similar to the general population.

Background: Women with disabilities are less likely to receive reproductive health counseling than women without disabilities. Yet, little is known about reproductive health counseling and concerns among women with congenital heart defects (CHD) and disabilities. Methods: We used population-based survey data from 778 women aged 19 to 38 years with CHD to examine contraceptive and pregnancy counseling and pregnancy concerns and experiences by disability status, based on six validated questions on vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and living independently. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to examine adjusted prevalence ratios between disability status and each outcome, adjusted for CHD severity, age, race/ethnicity, place of birth (Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia), and insurance type. Results: Women with disabilities (n = 323) were 1.4 and 2.3 times more likely than women without disabilities (n = 455) to receive clinician counseling on safe contraceptive methods and avoiding pregnancy because of their CHD. Women with CHD and disabilities, compared to those without disabilities, were more likely to be concerned about their ability to have children (aPR = 1.2) and to have delayed or avoided pregnancy (aPR = 2.2); they were less likely to have ever been pregnant (aPR = 0.7). Associations differed slightly across specific disability types. All associations remained after excluding 71 women with chromosomal anomalies. Conclusion: Among women with CHD, reproductive counseling, concerns, and experiences differ by disability status.

Many of the estimated 1.4 million adults with congenital heart defects (CHDs) in the United States are lost to follow-up (LTF) despite recommendations for ongoing cardiology care. Using 2016 to 2019 CH STRONG (Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG) data, we describe cardiac care among community-based adults with CHD, born in 1980 to 1997, identified through state birth defects registries. Our estimates of LTF were standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population and likely more generalizable to adults with CHD than clinic-based data. Half of our sample were LTF and more than 45% had not received cardiology care in over 5 years. Of those who received care, only 1 in 3 saw an adult CHD physician at their last encounter. Not knowing they needed to see a cardiologist, being told they no longer needed cardiology care, and feeling "well" were the top reasons for LTF, and only half of respondents report doctors discussing the need for cardiac follow-up.

Among children with and without heart conditions of different race/ethnicities, upstream social determinants of health, such as socio-economic status, access to care, and healthcare utilisation, may vary. Using caregiver-reported data from the 2016-19 National Survey of Children's Health, we calculated the prevalence of caregiver employment and education, child's health insurance, usual place of medical care in the past 12 months, problems paying for child's care, ≥2 emergency room visits, and unmet healthcare needs by heart condition status and race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White). For each outcome, we used multivariable logistic regression to generate adjusted prevalence ratios controlling for child's age and sex. Of 2632 children with heart conditions and 104,841 without, 65.4% and 58.0% were non-Hispanic White and 52.0% and 51.1% were male, respectively. Children with heart conditions, compared to those without, were 1.7-2.6 times more likely to have problems paying for healthcare, have ≥2 emergency room visits, and have unmet healthcare needs. Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black children with heart conditions, compared to non-Hispanic White, were 1.5-3.2 times as likely to have caregivers employed <50 weeks in the past year and caregivers with ≤ high school education, public or no health insurance, no usual place of care, and ≥2 emergency room visits. Children with heart conditions, compared to those without, may have greater healthcare needs that more commonly go unmet. Among children with heart conditions, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black children may experience lower socio-economic status and greater barriers to healthcare than non-Hispanic White children.

This report provides an overview of the unique reproductive health issues facing women with congenital heart defects (CHDs) and of the clinical care and professional guidelines on contraception, preconception care, and pregnancy for this population. It describes Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) activities related to surveillance of reproductive health issues among females with CHDs. It also describes CDC's work bringing awareness to physicians who provide care to adolescents and women with CHDs, including obstetrician/gynecologists, about the need for lifelong cardiology care for their patients with CHDs.

Having health insurance is associated with better access to healthcare and lower rates of comorbidity in the general population, but data are limited on insurance's impact on adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). The Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs and well-beinG (CH STRONG) was conducted among ACHD in three locations from 2016 to 2019. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the associations between health insurance and both access to healthcare and presence of comorbidities. We also compared health insurance and comorbidities among ACHD to similarly-aged individuals in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) as a proxy for the general population. Of 1354 CH STRONG respondents, the majority were ≤ 30 years old (83.5%), and 8.8% were uninsured versus 17.7% in the BRFSS (p < 0.01). Compared to insured ACHD, uninsured were less likely to report regular medical care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.3) and visited an emergency room more often (aOR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.3). Among all ACHD reporting disability, uninsured individuals less frequently received benefits (aOR 0.1, CI 0.0-0.3). Depression was common among uninsured ACHD (22.5%), but insured ACHD had lower rates of depression than insured in the BRFSS (13.3% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, rates of insurance were higher among ACHD compared to the general population. Nonetheless, uninsured ACHD inconsistently accessed healthcare and benefits. Further studies are needed to determine if insurance ameliorates the risk of morbidity as ACHD age.

Background We sought to characterize health care usage for adolescents with congenital heart defects (CHDs) using population-based multisite surveillance data. Methods and Results Adolescents aged 11 to 18 years with ≥1 CHD-related diagnosis code and residing in 5 US sites were identified in clinical and administrative data sources for the years 2011 to 2013. Sites linked data on all inpatient, emergency department (ED), and outpatient visits. Multivariable log-binomial regression models including age, sex, unweighted Charlson comorbidity index, CHD severity, cardiology visits, and insurance status, were used to identify associations with inpatient, ED, and outpatient visits. Of 9626 eligible adolescents, 26.4% (n=2543) had severe CHDs and 21.4% had Charlson comorbidity index >0. At least 1 inpatient, ED, or outpatient visit was reported for 21%, 25%, and 96% of cases, respectively. Cardiology visits, cardiac imaging, cardiac procedures, and vascular procedures were reported for 38%, 73%, 10%, and 5% of cases, respectively. Inpatient, ED, and outpatient visits were consistently higher for adolescents with severe CHDs compared with nonsevere CHDs. Adolescents with severe and nonsevere CHDs had higher health care usage compared with the 2011 to 2013 general adolescent US population. Adolescents with severe CHDs versus nonsevere CHDs were twice as likely to have at least 1 inpatient visit when Charlson comorbidity index was low (Charlson comorbidity index =0). Adolescents with CHDs and public insurance, compared with private insurance, were more likely to have inpatient (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.3-1.7]) and ED (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.4-1.7]) visits. Conclusions High resource usage by adolescents with CHDs indicates a substantial burden of disease, especially with public insurance, severe CHDs, and more comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between trimester of SARS-CoV-2 infection, illness severity, and risk for preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data for 6336 pregnant persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 in the United States. Risk ratios for preterm birth were calculated for illness severity, trimester of infection, and illness severity stratified by trimester of infection adjusted for age, selected underlying medical conditions, and pregnancy complications. RESULT: Pregnant persons with critical COVID-19 or asymptomatic infection, compared to mild COVID-19, in the second or third trimester were at increased risk of preterm birth. Pregnant persons with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 did not show increased risk of preterm birth in any trimester. CONCLUSION: Critical COVID-19 in the second or third trimester was associated with increased risk of preterm birth. This finding can be used to guide prevention strategies, including vaccination, and inform clinical practices for pregnant persons.

Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Surveillance of Congenital Heart Defects Across the Lifespan project uses large clinical and administrative databases at sites throughout the United States to understand population-based congenital heart defect (CHD) epidemiology and outcomes. These individual databases are also relied upon for accurate coding of CHD to estimate population prevalence. Methods and Results This validation project assessed a sample of 774 cases from 4 surveillance sites to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) for identifying a true CHD case and classifying CHD anatomic group accurately based on 57 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Chi-square tests assessed differences in PPV by CHD severity and age. Overall, PPV was 76.36% (591/774 [95% CI, 73.20-79.31]) for all sites and all CHD-related ICD-9-CM codes. Of patients with a code for complex CHD, 89.85% (177/197 [95% CI, 84.76-93.69]) had CHD; corresponding PPV estimates were 86.73% (170/196 [95% CI, 81.17-91.15]) for shunt, 82.99% (161/194 [95% CI, 76.95-87.99]) for valve, and 44.39% (83/187 [95% CI, 84.76-93.69]) for "Other" CHD anatomic group (X(2)=142.16, P<0.0001). ICD-9-CM codes had higher PPVs for having CHD in the 3 younger age groups compared with those >64 years of age, (X(2)=4.23, P<0.0001). Conclusions While CHD ICD-9-CM codes had acceptable PPV (86.54%) (508/587 [95% CI, 83.51-89.20]) for identifying whether a patient has CHD when excluding patients with ICD-9-CM codes for "Other" CHD and code 745.5, further evaluation and algorithm development may help inform and improve accurate identification of CHD in data sets across the CHD ICD-9-CM code groups.

Adults with CHD were 2× as likely as those without CHD to have early-onset dementia. | | • | Early-onset dementia was associated with CHD among males but not females. | | • | Early-onset dementia was associated with CHD in both age groups (45–54 & 55–64 yrs). | | • | Results were similar comparing those with non-severe CHD to no CHD.

Given the increased risk for severe COVID-19 illness in individuals with cardiac disease, individuals with congenital heart defects (CHDs) might have increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 as well.1 Most publications on CHD and COVID-19 illness have been restricted to patients at congenital cardiology centers, limiting generalizability, because many individuals with CHD do not receive specialized cardiology care.24 Furthermore, the studies did not include comparison groups without CHD or adjust for differences in established risk factors for critical COVID-19,4 and comparisons to general population estimates may be confounded. | | We compared the period prevalence of critical COVID-19 illness (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV], or death) among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with and without CHD. Among patients with CHD, we examined characteristics associated with critical COVID-19 illness.

Approximately 900,000 U.S. children have heart conditions, such as congenital heart disease (1). These children might be at increased risk for life-threatening infective endocarditis from oral bacteria in the bloodstream (2). Therefore, preventive dental care (i.e., check-ups, dental cleaning, radiographs, fluoride treatment, or sealant) to maintain oral health is important. Oral health status and receipt of preventive dental care were compared between children with heart conditions (2,928) and without (116,826) using population-based 2016-2019 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) data. Approximately 83% of children with and 80% without heart conditions received preventive dental care in the past year (p = 0.06). Children with heart conditions were more likely than were those without to have poor oral health (17.2% versus 13.7%; p = 0.02) and teeth in fair or poor condition (9.9% versus 5.3%; p<0.01). Among those with a heart condition, having low household income; an intellectual or developmental disability; and no well-child visit or medical home were associated with poor oral health. Receipt of preventive dental care was higher among children aged ≥6 years and those with insurance. Public health practitioners and health care providers can implement strategies (e.g., parent and patient education and collaboration between pediatricians, dentists, and cardiologists) to improve oral health and care among children with heart conditions, especially those with fewer resources and intellectual or developmental disabilities.

The emergence of birth defects programs in the United States accelerated in the 1970s and 1980s due to recognition that the use of the drug thalidomide during pregnancy resulted in fetal abnormalities (McBride, 1961; Smithells, 1962) and concerns around environmental exposures, such as Agent Orange exposure during the Vietnam War (Erickson et al., 1984). These experiences shaped the mission of many birth defect programs to focus on the surveillance of fetuses/infants affected by birth defects to monitor prevalence, identify and respond to clusters, and explore the epidemiology of birth defects as early warning systems to identify potential teratogens. This work helped identify additional risk factors for birth defects, support primary prevention opportunities, such as folic acid fortification and supplementation for neural tube defect prevention, and enabled evaluations of the success of those efforts (Harris et al., 2017).

BACKGROUND: Due to invasive treatments and stressors related to heart health, adults with congenital heart defects (CHDs) may have an increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and/or depressive disorders. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of these disorders among individuals with CHDs. METHODS: Using IBM® MarketScan® Databases, we identified adults age 18-49 years with ≥2 outpatient anxiety/depressive disorder claims on separate dates or ≥1 inpatient anxiety/depressive disorder claim in 2017. CHDs were defined as ≥2 outpatient CHD claims ≥30 days apart or ≥1 inpatient CHD claim documented in 2007-2017. We used log-binomial regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between CHDs and anxiety/depressive disorders. RESULTS: Of 13,807 adults with CHDs, 12.4% were diagnosed with an anxiety or depressive disorder. Adults with CHDs, compared to the 5,408,094 without CHDs, had higher prevalence of PTSD (0.8% vs. 0.5%; aPR: 1.5 [CI: 1.2-1.8]), anxiety disorders (9.9% vs. 7.5%; aPR: 1.3 [CI: 1.3-1.4]), and depressive disorders (6.3% vs. 4.9%; aPR: 1.3 [CI: 1.2-1.4]). Among individuals with CHDs, female sex (aPR range: 1.6-3.3) and inpatient admission (aPR range 1.1-1.9) were associated with anxiety/depressive disorders. CONCLUSION: Over 1 in 8 adults with CHDs had diagnosed PTSD and/or other anxiety/depressive disorders, 30-50% higher than adults without CHDs. PTSD was rare, but three times more common in women with CHDs than men. Screening and referral for services for these conditions in people with CHDs may be beneficial.

Background Disabilities have implications for health, well-being, and health care, yet limited information is available on the percentage of adults with congenital heart defects (CHD) living with disabilities. We evaluated the prevalence of disability and associated characteristics among the 2016-2019 CH STRONG (Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and Well-Being) population-based sample of 19- to 38-year-olds with CHD from 3 US locations. Methods and Results Prevalence of disability types (hearing, vision, cognition, mobility, self-care, living independently) were compared with similarly aged adults from the general population as estimated by the American Community Survey and standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population to reduce nonresponse bias and confounding. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scale T-scores standardized to US 18- to 34-year-olds. Separate multivariable regression models assessed associations between disability and HRQOL. Of 1478 participants, 40% reported disabilities, with cognition most prevalent (29%). Of those reporting disability, 45% ever received disability benefits and 46% were unemployed. Prevalence of disability types were 5 to 8 times higher in adults with CHD than the general population. Those with ≥1 disability had greater odds of being female, and of having non-Hispanic Black maternal race and ethnicity, severe CHD, recent cardiac care, and noncardiac congenital anomalies. On average, adults with CHD and cognition, mobility, and self-care disabilities had impaired mental HRQOL and those with any disability type had impaired physical HRQOL. Conclusions Two of 5 adults with CHD may have disabilities, which are associated with impaired HRQOL. These results may inform healthcare needs and services for this growing population.