HIGHLIGHTS: Comprehensive view of occupational safety research: Prioritizing topics in robotics and autonomous machines. Barriers to safety research: Logistical, intellectual property, timeline, and funding challenges. Importance of surveillance or tracking system: Documenting fatalities, injuries, and near misses/good catches. Priority safety research needs: human-machine interaction, adoption of automation in the work setting, and surveillance/tracking. Collaboration with technology developers: Overcoming barriers and exploring emerging technologies and potential safety implications. ABSTRACT: In 2022, the SAfety for Emerging Robotics and Autonomous AGriculture (SAFER AG) Workshop was held to discuss and understand emerging challenges related to safety, occupational safety research needs, workforce implications, and other issues associated with robotics and autonomous machines in agriculture. This paper presents the major findings from the occupational safety research track of the workshop. This track identified existing hurdles to conducting occupational safety research including logistical barriers, intellectual property concerns, long timelines, and lack of funding. Considerations for developing a tracking or surveillance system for adverse events as well as exposure related to these technologies were also discussed, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive system. Finally, the priority occupational safety research needs identified during the session were related to human and non-human machine interaction, adoption of automation in the work setting, and event tracking/surveillance. To overcome barriers to research, collaboration between occupational safety researchers and technology developers is crucial. Enhancements to existing surveillance systems can facilitate better understanding of captured events. Additionally, prioritizing research on worker risk from robotics and autonomous machines in agriculture is essential. The integration of robotics and autonomous machines in agriculture has revolutionized the industry but requires evidence-based safety research, outreach, and education to ensure worker safety and health.

Starting in the 1970s with robots that were physically isolated from contact with their human co-workers, robots now collaborate with human workers towards a common task goal in a shared workspace. This type of robotic device represents a new era of workplace automation. Industrial robotics is rapidly evolving due to advances in sensor technology, artificial intelligence (AI), wireless communications, mechanical engineering, and materials science. While these new robotic devices are used mainly in manufacturing and warehousing, human-robot collaboration is now seen across multiple goods-producing and service-delivery industry sectors. Assessing and controlling the risks of human-robot collaboration is a critical challenge for occupational safety and health research and practice as industrial robotics becomes a pervasive feature of the future of work. Understanding the physical, psychosocial, work organization, and cybersecurity risks associated with the increasing use of robotic technologies is critical to ensuring the safe development and implementation of industrial robotics. This commentary provides a brief review of the uses of robotic technologies across selected industry sectors; the risks of current and future industrial robotic applications for worker and employer alike; strategies for integrating human-robot collaboration into a health and safety management system; and the role of robotic safety standards in the future of work.

Workers employed in the commercial fishing, seafood processing, and aquaculture sectors face workplace hazards daily. Worldwide, a staggering 26% of commercial fishing workers reported experiencing harm at work in the past two years in a recent poll.Citation1 Moreover, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that worldwide roughly 80 commercial fishing workers lose their lives each day.Citation2 Small-scale artisanal fishers are most vulnerable due to the lack of access to basic equipment and safety training.Citation3 Astonishingly, seven in ten workers in the fishing industry report having never been trained in workplace safety.Citation1 The need to reduce occupational safety and health risks in these work settings remains a prominent concern for these workers. As the world’s population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, FAO estimates the global supply of aquatic foods would require a 22% rise just to ensure the consumption in 2050 is maintained at current levels.Citation4 Growth could put more pressure on fishers, processing, and aquaculture workers in an industry already exposed to risks of injuries and fatalities, if safety and health concerns are not addressed.

A recent article in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report1 describes the Fatalities in Oil and Gas Extraction (FOG) database—an industry-specific database created to help researchers understand patterns of deaths among US oil and gas extraction (OGE) workers. Among other strengths, the database includes detailed geographic data on fatal incidents–a feature lacking in other systems that track workplace fatalities. It is clear that the majority of OGE worker fatalities occurred in rural micropolitan and noncore counties (Figure 1). This finding may not be surprising to people in the industry. However, it does raise questions about relationships between work, health, and rurality that are rarely explored explicitly or systematically.

Introduction: A variety of factors are driving the development of robotics and automation in the agriculture industry including the nature of work, workforce shortages, and a variety of economic, climatic, technologic, political, and social factors. While some new robotics and automated machines are available commercially, most are still being developed. This provides occupational safety and health researchers an unprecedented opportunity to mitigate risks and benefits to the health and safety of agriculture workers. Method: The NIOSH Office of Agriculture Safety and Health (OASH) is working to better understand how the advancements in automation and robotics is affecting workers. OASH is coordinating with the NIOSH Center of Occupational Robotics Research (CORR) to help to increase the understanding of human/machine interactions; improve the ability to identify injuries and fatalities involving automation/ robotics; and provide guidance on working safely with automation/ robotics. OASH also joined a small team of academics and industry to organize the SAfety For Emerging Robotics and Autonomous aGriculture or (SAFER AG) Workshop to identify gaps in knowledge and research needs that connect to issues related to risks and regulations/standards, occupational safety research, and impacts on workforce and society. This workshop was sponsored by USDA NIFA. Practical Applications: Occupational safety and health experts need to engage and collaborate with developers of technology. It is also increasingly important for occupational safety and health researchers and practitioners to not only become familiar with existing manufacturing safety standards, but also the lengthy standards development process. Joining consensus standards groups to help shape new standards for emerging technologies may help to mitigate adverse worker impacts. NIOSH's Office of Agriculture Safety and Health will continue to identify research gaps, support new research projects, education, outreach efforts and the development of best practices with our partners.

Workers, particularly outdoor workers, are among the populations most disproportionately affected by climate-related hazards. However, scientific research and control actions to comprehensively address these hazards are notably absent. To assess this absence, a seven-category framework was developed in 2009 to characterize the scientific literature published from 1988 through 2008. Using this framework, a second assessment examined the literature published through 2014, and the current one examines literature from 2014 through 2021. The objectives were to present literature that updates the framework and related topics and increases awareness of the role of climate change in occupational safety and health. In general, there is substantial literature on worker hazards related to ambient temperatures, biological hazards, and extreme weather but less on air pollution, ultraviolet radiation, industrial transitions, and the built environment. There is growing literature on mental health and health equity issues related to climate change, but much more research is needed. The socioeconomic impacts of climate change also require more research. This study illustrates that workers are experiencing increased morbidity and mortality related to climate change. In all areas of climate-related worker risk, including geoengineering, research is needed on the causality and prevalence of hazards, along with surveillance to identify, and interventions for hazard prevention and control.

In recent decades, there have been considerable technological developments in the agriculture sector to automate manual processes for many factors, including increased production demand and in response to labor shortages/costs. We conducted a review of the literature to summarize the key advances from installing emerging technology and studies on robotics and automation to improve agricultural practices. The main objective of this review was to survey the scientific literature to identify the uses of these new technologies in agricultural practices focusing on new or reduced occupational safety risks affecting agriculture workers. We screened 3248 articles with the following criteria: (1) relevance of the title and abstract with occupational safety and health; (2) agriculture technologies/applications that were available in the United States; (3) written in English; and (4) published 2015-2020. We found 624 articles on crops and harvesting and 80 articles on livestock farming related to robotics and automated systems. Within livestock farming, most (78%) articles identified were related to dairy farms, and 56% of the articles indicated these farms were using robotics routinely. However, our review revealed gaps in how the technology has been evaluated to show the benefits or potential hazards to the safety and well-being of livestock owners/operators and workers.

INTRODUCTION: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry (AgFF) workers often work extremely long hours during peak production seasons, resulting in sleep deprivation and fatigue. The National Occupational Research Agenda has classified fatigue as a "significant safety issue" and area of concern for many industry sectors, including AgFF. This review explores current research and practice in AgFF and proposes next steps. METHODS: We conducted a scoping literature review to examine the extent and nature of research in this area. Article inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed journal articles written in English; published after 1989; covering AgFF workers in high-income countries; with data on working hours/schedules and sleep related to safety and health. RESULTS: Limited research has addressed long hours and sleep deprivation among AgFF workers. We identified 8350 articles for title and abstract review. Among those, 407 underwent full-text review and 96 met all inclusion criteria (67% agriculture, 25% fishing/seafood processing, 8% forestry). The literature provided some evidence fatigue contributes to fatalities, injuries, and illnesses in AgFF. Older, new, young, foreign-born, and female workers, as well as those who work in small organizations or longer hours (40+) may be at higher risk for fatigue-related injury and illness. Few studies have developed or evaluated interventions to control risks. DISCUSSION: Given that fatigue is a factor in injury and illness for this sector, future AgFF surveillance and research should increase efforts to capture fatigue and sleep data, directly investigate the role of long hours and nonstandard work schedules in the sector, and most importantly, create practical interventions to manage fatigue.